信息泄露

Search documents
300分也能上“本科”?警惕社交媒体精准“钓鱼”
Zhong Guo Qing Nian Bao· 2025-08-17 21:39
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the deceptive practices of certain institutions and individuals who mislead students and parents regarding educational programs, particularly in the context of higher education enrollment and the distinction between full-time and non-full-time degrees [1][6][8]. Group 1: Misleading Enrollment Practices - Various institutions are using phrases like "full-time study for 4 years" to attract students, charging high tuition fees exceeding ten thousand yuan [1]. - The Ministry of Education has repeatedly warned about the confusion between different types of education, particularly the distinction between formal higher education and non-degree programs [1][6]. - Students are receiving misleading admission notifications for self-study programs, which do not equate to full-time degrees, leading to confusion and potential financial loss [2][4]. Group 2: Social Media and Recruitment Tactics - Social media platforms have become a significant recruitment ground for self-study programs, with targeted advertisements aimed at students with lower scores [5]. - Comments on platforms like Xiaohongshu appear to be from students but are actually designed to attract potential candidates for misleading educational programs [5]. - Institutions often use deceptive marketing tactics, such as claiming "no entrance exams" or "guaranteed job placements," to lure students into enrolling in non-traditional education programs [6][9]. Group 3: Recruitment Strategies and Ethical Concerns - Recruitment personnel are trained to use specific scripts that obscure the true nature of the programs, often blurring the lines between full-time and non-full-time education [8][10]. - There are reports of unethical practices where personal information of students and parents is bought and sold, leading to privacy concerns [11]. - The article emphasizes the need for stricter regulations and transparency in the recruitment processes of educational institutions to protect students and parents from deception [11].
共享单车“刺客”多 申诉退款费周折
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-06-23 06:45
Core Points - The shared bicycle service, initially designed to solve the "last mile" problem, has become a source of frustration for consumers due to unexpected high fees and misleading insurance charges [1][2][3] Pricing Issues - A user in Beijing reported a 50 yuan charge for a 16-minute ride, with a starting fee of 30 yuan and an additional 20 yuan for parking outside designated areas [2] - Complaints about unreasonable pricing and hidden fees have led to 2,712 reports on a consumer complaint platform regarding shared bicycle services [3] Insurance Charges - Users have reported being automatically enrolled in insurance plans after scanning shared bicycles, with initial charges as low as 0.6 yuan, which can escalate to higher amounts in subsequent months [4][5] - A case was highlighted where a user unknowingly subscribed to a critical illness insurance plan, resulting in a 99.1 yuan charge after the initial low fee [6] Customer Service Challenges - Users have faced difficulties in reaching customer service for refunds or complaints, with reports of long wait times and inadequate responses from the service providers [7] - The insurance company involved, TaiKang Online, has been noted for its quick refund process, but users still incur charges for the time the insurance was active [7] Regulatory Concerns - Legal experts have indicated that the pricing practices may constitute fraud, violating consumer rights and potentially leading to civil liability for the companies involved [4][8] - The promotion of insurance through shared bicycle platforms raises concerns about compliance with internet insurance regulations, as it may involve unauthorized third-party advertising [8]
信息差:如何逼一个小女孩离职?
Hu Xiu· 2025-06-05 06:35
Core Insights - The article emphasizes the critical issue of information distortion in management, highlighting that effective information flow is essential for transforming strategic visions into reality [2][36]. Group 1: Importance of Information - Information serves as a strategic carrier, and its effective transmission is vital for achieving organizational goals [2][36]. - Experienced managers recognize that information transmission can lead to distortion due to varying interests, resulting in wasted resources [3][36]. Group 2: Information Flow and Organizational Structure - Smaller teams (under 10 members) are more effective due to reduced information loss, while larger teams (over 200 members) face significant challenges with information distortion [5][6]. - As organizations grow, information tends to be simplified or concealed, making it difficult for management to receive accurate feedback, which impacts decision-making [6][36]. Group 3: Building Information Channels - Companies should focus on providing context rather than strict control, promoting transparency to enhance decision-making and efficiency [11][36]. - Effective information channels require categorizing all possible information, defining processing logic, and ensuring smooth information flow [15][23][36]. Group 4: Handling Negative Information - Organizations often struggle with employees being reluctant to raise issues, indicating a failure in the information channel [25][36]. - It is crucial to establish clear outlets for negative information to prevent it from being suppressed, which can lead to a toxic work environment [27][36]. Group 5: Balancing Information Transparency and Overload - Middle management must find a balance between transparency and information overload, ensuring that critical information is communicated without overwhelming team members [37][36]. - The construction of information channels should focus on managing risks and negative information, as the absence of proper outlets for such information can be detrimental [38][36].
韩国警方将就信息泄露对SK电讯展开调查
news flash· 2025-05-20 07:11
Core Viewpoint - The South Korean police will launch a comprehensive investigation into SK Telecom for failing to promptly address a user mobile card information leak incident, suggesting potential legal violations by the company's leadership [1] Group 1: Investigation Details - The investigation will begin on May 21, as announced by the South Korean police [1] - Police believe that SK Group Chairman Choi Tae-won and others were aware of the information leak but did not report it to the relevant government authorities in a timely manner [1] Group 2: Legal Implications - The actions of SK Telecom may constitute violations of the Personal Information Protection Act and the Information and Communication Network Act [1]
AI伴侣:技术的温情与隐忧
Zhong Guo Qing Nian Bao· 2025-05-18 05:04
Core Insights - The article discusses the rise of AI companions among young users, highlighting their emotional needs and the potential risks associated with virtual interactions [3][4][5] Market Overview - The market size for AI companions in China is projected to reach 38.7 billion yuan in 2024 and exceed 120 billion yuan by 2027, with a service coverage of 80 million people [3] - Approximately 65% of AI companion users are aged between 18-24, indicating that young people are the primary users of this market [3] User Motivations - Young users choose AI companions for various reasons, including alleviating loneliness, providing emotional support, and offering personalized experiences [4] - AI companions help address social anxiety and the desire for emotional connection, as many young individuals find it challenging to engage in real-life social interactions [4] Risks and Challenges - There are significant risks associated with AI companions, including data privacy concerns, the potential for creating echo chambers, and unrealistic expectations regarding human relationships [5][6] - Over-reliance on AI companions may lead to a distorted perception of real-life relationships and emotional connections [6][7] Governance and Mitigation Strategies - The article suggests implementing strict data protection measures and age verification for AI companion applications to mitigate risks [8] - It emphasizes the need for clear labeling of AI interactions as "non-real emotional relationships" to guide user expectations [9] - The development of assessment tools to evaluate dependency on AI companions and provide personalized interventions is recommended [9]