此"全日制"非彼"全日制" 正值高招接近尾声、高校开学前夕。中青报·中青网记者近日在社交媒体上发现，一些机构和个人用"全日制 在校学习4年""毕业获得本科学历"等话术吸引考生报名，并收取上万元的高额学费。 实际上，每逢这个时间段，总有一些机构或个人为谋取经济利益，利用考生和家长的急切心理，散布各种 虚假招生信息。 中青报·中青网记者梳理了教育部十多年来的招生录取预警提醒，"利用不同教育类型，故意混淆学历教育与 非学历教育"几乎年年被提及，称得上是蒙骗考生和家长的"重灾区"。"混淆学历教育与非学历教育"的形式 不断更新，话术同步迭代升级：从线下招生和电话宣传，到利用社交媒体来精准定位目标群体。 今年高考填报志愿结束后，总分276分的河南考生张嘉文（化名）意外收到了来自湖北的几所本科院校 的"入学通知书"。通知书上印着张嘉文的全名和身份证号，以及"经审核，你符合我校高等教育自学考试全 日制本科的入学条件"等字样，还用红色框重点指出"本校是教育部批准的具有高等学历招生资格的普通高 等学校"。 张嘉文感到"莫名其妙"：在填报志愿时，自己从来没报过任何一所湖北的学校，也没想过自己的分数能 上"全日制本科"。 通过社交媒 ...

Core Points - The shared bicycle service, initially designed to solve the "last mile" problem, has become a source of frustration for consumers due to unexpected high fees and misleading insurance charges [1][2][3] Pricing Issues - A user in Beijing reported a 50 yuan charge for a 16-minute ride, with a starting fee of 30 yuan and an additional 20 yuan for parking outside designated areas [2] - Complaints about unreasonable pricing and hidden fees have led to 2,712 reports on a consumer complaint platform regarding shared bicycle services [3] Insurance Charges - Users have reported being automatically enrolled in insurance plans after scanning shared bicycles, with initial charges as low as 0.6 yuan, which can escalate to higher amounts in subsequent months [4][5] - A case was highlighted where a user unknowingly subscribed to a critical illness insurance plan, resulting in a 99.1 yuan charge after the initial low fee [6] Customer Service Challenges - Users have faced difficulties in reaching customer service for refunds or complaints, with reports of long wait times and inadequate responses from the service providers [7] - The insurance company involved, TaiKang Online, has been noted for its quick refund process, but users still incur charges for the time the insurance was active [7] Regulatory Concerns - Legal experts have indicated that the pricing practices may constitute fraud, violating consumer rights and potentially leading to civil liability for the companies involved [4][8] - The promotion of insurance through shared bicycle platforms raises concerns about compliance with internet insurance regulations, as it may involve unauthorized third-party advertising [8]

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the critical issue of information distortion in management, highlighting that effective information flow is essential for transforming strategic visions into reality [2][36]. Group 1: Importance of Information - Information serves as a strategic carrier, and its effective transmission is vital for achieving organizational goals [2][36]. - Experienced managers recognize that information transmission can lead to distortion due to varying interests, resulting in wasted resources [3][36]. Group 2: Information Flow and Organizational Structure - Smaller teams (under 10 members) are more effective due to reduced information loss, while larger teams (over 200 members) face significant challenges with information distortion [5][6]. - As organizations grow, information tends to be simplified or concealed, making it difficult for management to receive accurate feedback, which impacts decision-making [6][36]. Group 3: Building Information Channels - Companies should focus on providing context rather than strict control, promoting transparency to enhance decision-making and efficiency [11][36]. - Effective information channels require categorizing all possible information, defining processing logic, and ensuring smooth information flow [15][23][36]. Group 4: Handling Negative Information - Organizations often struggle with employees being reluctant to raise issues, indicating a failure in the information channel [25][36]. - It is crucial to establish clear outlets for negative information to prevent it from being suppressed, which can lead to a toxic work environment [27][36]. Group 5: Balancing Information Transparency and Overload - Middle management must find a balance between transparency and information overload, ensuring that critical information is communicated without overwhelming team members [37][36]. - The construction of information channels should focus on managing risks and negative information, as the absence of proper outlets for such information can be detrimental [38][36].

Core Viewpoint - The South Korean police will launch a comprehensive investigation into SK Telecom for failing to promptly address a user mobile card information leak incident, suggesting potential legal violations by the company's leadership [1] Group 1: Investigation Details - The investigation will begin on May 21, as announced by the South Korean police [1] - Police believe that SK Group Chairman Choi Tae-won and others were aware of the information leak but did not report it to the relevant government authorities in a timely manner [1] Group 2: Legal Implications - The actions of SK Telecom may constitute violations of the Personal Information Protection Act and the Information and Communication Network Act [1]

Core Insights - The article discusses the rise of AI companions among young users, highlighting their emotional needs and the potential risks associated with virtual interactions [3][4][5] Market Overview - The market size for AI companions in China is projected to reach 38.7 billion yuan in 2024 and exceed 120 billion yuan by 2027, with a service coverage of 80 million people [3] - Approximately 65% of AI companion users are aged between 18-24, indicating that young people are the primary users of this market [3] User Motivations - Young users choose AI companions for various reasons, including alleviating loneliness, providing emotional support, and offering personalized experiences [4] - AI companions help address social anxiety and the desire for emotional connection, as many young individuals find it challenging to engage in real-life social interactions [4] Risks and Challenges - There are significant risks associated with AI companions, including data privacy concerns, the potential for creating echo chambers, and unrealistic expectations regarding human relationships [5][6] - Over-reliance on AI companions may lead to a distorted perception of real-life relationships and emotional connections [6][7] Governance and Mitigation Strategies - The article suggests implementing strict data protection measures and age verification for AI companion applications to mitigate risks [8] - It emphasizes the need for clear labeling of AI interactions as "non-real emotional relationships" to guide user expectations [9] - The development of assessment tools to evaluate dependency on AI companions and provide personalized interventions is recommended [9]