"国际法只有在各国都遵守时才真正有效，大国尤其要带头，否则就会退回丛林世界。""当今世界面临 多重风险挑战，国际社会需要携手应对，大国尤其要带头讲平等、讲法治、讲合作、讲诚信。""各国都 应尊重他国人民自主选择的发展道路，遵守国际法及联合国宪章宗旨和原则，大国尤应带头。" 【鸣镝】 作者：曹元龙 新年伊始，迎接世人的是一个乱象频出的"陌生"世界：委内瑞拉的惊魂一夜，格陵兰岛博弈的图穷匕 见，达沃斯论坛上的唇枪舌剑，伊朗局势的阴云密布…… 当"强者为所欲为"屡屡突破国际道义底线，当不确定性、不稳定性不断上升，人类正站在风云激荡的历 史岔路口，世界正处于破旧立新的关键临界点。此刻，作为国际体系的核心参与者、全球秩序的重要塑 造者，大国应秉持何种理念、展现何种作为、发挥何种作用，成为国际社会共同关切的问题。 日前，习近平主席在会见来华访问的外国领导人时，对大国应有的样子作了深刻阐释，彰显对人类共同 前途命运的深邃思考和责任担当—— ——变局中的中国担当，是"计利当计天下利"的务实行动，为破解全球发展困境持续注入稳定动能。 当保护主义逆流冲击世界经济复苏进程，中国坚定不移扩大高水平对外开放，持续举办进博会、消博会 等 ...

Core Viewpoint - The construction of socialist rule of law culture is essential for the comprehensive rule of law in China, with a focus on promoting socialist rule of law spirit as a key element of Xi Jinping's legal thought [1][2][4]. Group 1: Importance of Socialist Rule of Law Spirit - Socialist rule of law spirit is a significant concept in Xi Jinping's legal thought, reflecting the essence of legal culture and the values of the socialist legal system [2][5]. - The spirit of rule of law is rooted in Marxist legal theory and nourished by traditional Chinese legal culture, aiming to adapt to the new characteristics and requirements of building a socialist rule of law state [2][5][6]. Group 2: Historical and Theoretical Context - The understanding of rule of law spirit has evolved, with Xi Jinping emphasizing its importance during his tenure, particularly in promoting a culture of lawfulness and legal awareness among the populace [3][4]. - The 20th National Congress and subsequent meetings have strategically positioned the promotion of socialist rule of law spirit as a critical task for advancing the rule of law in society [1][4]. Group 3: Practical Implications - The promotion of socialist rule of law spirit is crucial for modernizing the governance system and enhancing governance capabilities, emphasizing strict law enforcement and justice [4][8]. - It is essential to integrate the spirit of rule of law into all aspects of governance, ensuring that it influences legislation, law enforcement, and public compliance [12][13]. Group 4: Cultural and Educational Aspects - Strengthening the education and promotion of socialist rule of law spirit among the public is vital for fostering a culture of lawfulness and enhancing legal confidence [13]. - Engaging key groups, such as public officials and legal professionals, is necessary to effectively disseminate the values of socialist rule of law spirit [6][13].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Human Rights Research Association organized a delegation to Indonesia and Malaysia to discuss human rights and development, emphasizing China's perspective on human rights and its ongoing national action plans [1]. Group 1: Delegation Activities - The delegation participated in international seminars on "Human Rights and Development" and "Human Rights Protection in the Digital Age" [1]. - Key discussions involved ASEAN officials and representatives from local think tanks, focusing on human rights issues [1]. Group 2: Key Themes and Discussions - The delegation highlighted Xi Jinping's important statements on respecting and safeguarding human rights, as well as the profound implications of contemporary Chinese human rights perspectives [1]. - The discussions included interpretations of the decisions made at the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China regarding the comprehensive development of human rights [1]. Group 3: International Reception - ASEAN and local representatives expressed high appreciation for China's human rights development philosophy, achievements, and the willingness to strengthen exchanges on human rights development experiences [1]. - There was a collective call to promote shared human values and address current global human rights governance challenges through collaboration [1].

Core Viewpoint - The development of a culturally influential socialist culture with Chinese characteristics is essential for national strength and the rejuvenation of the nation, as well as for building a community with a shared future for mankind [1][2][3] Group 1: Cultural Influence and National Strength - A strong international cultural influence is rooted in deep cultural heritage and must maintain cultural subjectivity while promoting universal values such as peace, development, fairness, justice, democracy, and freedom [2][4] - The current international cultural influence of China has not yet matched its economic and technological strength, indicating a need for cultural development to align with national power [2][3] Group 2: Strategies for Cultural Development - To transition from a cultural power to a cultural strong nation, four strategies must be implemented: strengthening cultural subjectivity, embracing modern transformation of Chinese culture, precise policy implementation, and gathering value consensus [4][5][6][7] - Emphasizing cultural subjectivity involves deepening the understanding and innovative development of traditional Chinese culture while promoting revolutionary culture and socialist core values [4][5] Group 3: Modern Transformation and Technological Integration - The modern transformation of Chinese culture should leverage technological advancements and diverse presentation forms, utilizing innovations like artificial intelligence and virtual reality to enhance cultural expression [5][6] - The cultural industry must be supported to create globally competitive products in film, gaming, and literature, thereby enhancing cultural influence [5][6] Group 4: International Communication and Value Consensus - Innovative media strategies are necessary to effectively communicate Chinese stories to international audiences, utilizing various platforms and channels for broader cultural dissemination [6][7] - Focusing on global issues such as climate change and public health can help articulate China's cultural values and expand value consensus on the international stage [7]

Core Viewpoint - The report emphasizes the need for a "new type of global leadership" to address the "global leadership deficit" that has led to unresolved global issues and crises, advocating for a collaborative approach among nations to foster a more just and equitable global governance system [1][2]. Group 1: Global Leadership Deficit - The "global leadership deficit" is identified as a primary cause of various global challenges, including peace, development, security, and governance deficits, which are worsening due to ineffective global governance [1]. - The report attributes the leadership deficit to the failure of certain major powers to uphold international fairness and justice, highlighting the need for proactive engagement from all countries [1]. Group 2: Constructing New Leadership - Building a "new type of global leadership" requires a fundamental restructuring of the underlying logic of international order, moving away from hegemonic practices towards a symbiotic logic characterized by mutual benefit, order, and inclusivity [2]. - The report advocates for a focus on key areas of global governance, such as development, peace, and security, proposing four global initiatives as systematic solutions to address various real-world issues [2]. Group 3: Vision for the Future - The vision for the future includes establishing a community with a shared future for humanity, aiming to unite international efforts to tackle global challenges and promote long-term stability [2][3]. - The report underscores China's commitment to standing on the right side of history and contributing to global progress alongside other nations and international organizations [3].

Core Viewpoint - The report emphasizes the need for a "new type of global leadership" to address the "global leadership deficit" that has led to unresolved global issues and crises, advocating for a collaborative approach among nations to foster a more just and equitable global governance system [1][2]. Group 1: Global Leadership Deficit - The "global leadership deficit" is identified as a primary cause of various global challenges, including peace, development, security, and governance deficits, which are worsening due to ineffective global governance [1]. - The report attributes the leadership deficit to the failure of certain major powers to uphold international fairness and justice, highlighting the need for proactive engagement from all countries [1][2]. Group 2: Principles of New Global Leadership - The construction of "new type of global leadership" requires a fundamental restructuring of the underlying logic of international order, moving away from hegemonic practices towards a symbiotic logic characterized by mutual benefit, order, and inclusivity [2]. - Emphasizing shared values such as peace, development, fairness, justice, democracy, and freedom, the report calls for a focus on common human values that transcend ideological and civilizational differences [2]. Group 3: Key Areas for Global Governance - The report suggests focusing on critical areas of global governance, including development, peace, and security, proposing systematic solutions through four global initiatives: global development, global security, global civilization, and global governance initiatives [2]. - These initiatives are framed as international public goods aimed at addressing various real-world issues and guiding the international community towards a more stable and prosperous future [2]. Group 4: Vision for the Future - The vision for the future includes building a community with a shared future for humanity, which aims to unite international efforts in addressing global challenges and moving towards long-term stability and peace [2][3].

Core Viewpoint - The report emphasizes the need for a "new type of global leadership" to address the "global leadership deficit" that has led to unresolved global issues and crises, advocating for a collaborative approach among nations to foster a more just and equitable global governance system [2][3]. Group 1: Global Leadership Deficit - The "global leadership deficit" is identified as a primary cause of various global challenges, including peace, development, security, and governance deficits, which are worsening due to ineffective global governance systems [2][3]. - The root cause of this deficit is attributed to the failure of certain major powers to uphold international fairness and justice, leading to a lack of effective leadership in addressing global crises [2][3]. Group 2: New Type of Global Leadership - The concept of "new type of global leadership" is proposed as a multilateral effort that does not stem from any single country or organization but rather from a collective international response to global issues [2][3]. - This new leadership should reject hegemonic logic characterized by "self-centered" and "zero-sum" approaches, instead promoting a symbiotic logic based on mutual benefit, order, and inclusivity [3]. Group 3: Key Areas of Focus - The report highlights the importance of focusing on critical areas of global governance, such as development, peace, and security, proposing four global initiatives as systematic solutions: global development initiative, global security initiative, global civilization initiative, and global governance initiative [3]. - These initiatives are framed as international public goods aimed at addressing various real-world problems and guiding the international community towards a more stable and prosperous future [3]. Group 4: Vision for the Future - The vision for the future includes building a community with a shared future for mankind, which aims to unite international efforts in tackling global challenges and moving towards long-term stability and peace [3][4]. - China positions itself as a proactive participant in this process, committed to supporting global governance and contributing to a brighter future for humanity [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of establishing a system of Chinese civilization symbols to enhance national cultural soft power and promote Chinese culture globally [1][2]. Group 1: Chinese Civilization Symbols - Chinese civilization symbols are expressions of the unique characteristics and cultural traits of Chinese civilization, encompassing traditional culture, revolutionary culture, and advanced socialist culture [2]. - These symbols include various forms such as thoughts, language, cultural heritage, historical artifacts, notable figures, and natural landscapes, which collectively support the global dissemination of Chinese culture [2]. Group 2: Emotional Resonance - The article highlights the need to enhance emotional resonance in the presentation of Chinese civilization symbols to overcome cultural and language barriers [3]. - It suggests integrating these symbols into international narratives to create relatable and emotionally engaging stories, as exemplified by the Beijing Winter Olympics opening ceremony [3]. Group 3: Enhancing Expressiveness - To construct a system of Chinese civilization symbols, it is essential to discover and highlight the cultural depth and significance of language, heritage, and artifacts [4]. - The article proposes using various artistic forms such as festivals, exhibitions, and performances to showcase these symbols, thereby increasing their expressiveness and international appeal [4]. - It also emphasizes the integration of technology and data analytics to enhance the effectiveness of cultural dissemination [4].

Core Viewpoint - The concept of "common values for all humanity" proposed by Xi Jinping emphasizes peace, development, fairness, justice, democracy, and freedom, which is significant in addressing global challenges and promoting a shared future for mankind [1][7]. Theoretical Logic - The common values reflect the universal needs of humanity, despite differences in history, culture, and political systems, highlighting the shared pursuit of peace, development, fairness, justice, democracy, and freedom [2][3]. Historical Logic - The emergence of common values is rooted in the historical development of human society, moving from isolation to a stage of universal interaction, where diverse value systems converge to form shared values that promote common interests [2][3]. Practical Logic - In the context of deepening economic globalization, the interdependence among nations has increased, necessitating a collective response to global challenges such as environmental pollution, terrorism, and health crises, thereby reinforcing the need for a community of shared destiny [3][4]. Specificity and Respect for Differences - Unlike the Western notion of "universal values," which often overlooks specific cultural contexts, the common values for all humanity are grounded in Marxist materialist historical perspectives, aiming to unify diverse civilizations while addressing real-world issues [4][5]. Unity of Commonality and Particularity - The common values acknowledge the diversity of value interpretations across different social systems and ideologies, striving for a balance between shared values and the unique characteristics of various civilizations [5][6]. Importance in Current Global Context - In an increasingly unstable and uncertain world, promoting and practicing common values is crucial for maintaining peace and advancing human civilization, requiring an understanding of different cultural perspectives and respecting the paths chosen by various nations [7].

Core Viewpoint - The concept of "common values for all humanity" proposed by Xi Jinping emphasizes peace, development, fairness, justice, democracy, and freedom, which is significant in addressing global challenges and promoting a shared future for mankind [1] Theoretical Logic - The common values for all humanity represent the greatest common divisor of values shared by different civilizations, countries, and nations, reflecting universal needs for survival and development [2] - Despite diverse histories, cultures, and systems, the values of peace, development, fairness, justice, democracy, and freedom accurately express the common pursuits of humanity [2] Historical Logic - The emergence of common values is rooted in the historical transition to a world history where human societies have moved away from isolation towards universal interaction [3] - The deepening of world history has led to the accumulation of value concepts that meet the needs of human interaction and promote common interests [3] Practical Logic - In the context of deepening economic globalization, the interdependence among nations has created a community of shared destiny, necessitating collective responses to global challenges such as environmental pollution and terrorism [3] - The concept of a community of shared destiny serves as both an interest community and a value community, highlighting the need for a consensus on values to effectively address global challenges [3] Specificity of Common Values - Unlike the Western notion of "universal values," which often overlooks the uniqueness of different cultures, the common values for all humanity are based on Marxist materialist historical perspectives and aim to achieve a profound innovation in value concepts [4] - The common values are derived from the specific practices of different civilizations and aim to meet the growing common interests of humanity [4] Recognition of Diversity - The common values acknowledge the diversity of value interpretations and realization methods across different social systems and ideologies, achieving a unity of commonality and individuality [5] - The existence of value differences necessitates a broader perspective to foster consensus on values, moving beyond narrow self-interests [6] Importance in Current Context - In an increasingly unstable and uncertain world, the common values for all humanity play a crucial role in maintaining world peace and promoting human civilization [7] - Promoting these values requires understanding and respecting different civilizations' interpretations of value, avoiding the imposition of one's values on others, and ensuring that these values benefit all nations [7]