《若干措施》的一大突破在于，不再停留于以往政策文件中"鼓励""支持""引导"等原则性表述，而是明 确列出民间资本可进入的重点领域，并对具备条件的项目提出量化持股比例要求，将民间投资从"可选 项"升级为"应选项"，显著增强了政策的刚性和可操作性。例如，在铁路、核电、水电、跨省跨区直流 输电通道、油气管道、液化天然气接收储运设施、供水等领域，符合条件的项目可允许民间资本持股比 例在10%以上。 民营企业作为我国经济体系中最具活力的组成部分，在促进就业、拉动增长、推动科技创新、激发市场 活力等方面发挥着不可替代的作用。数据显示，目前国家高新技术企业中，民营企业数量超过42万家， 占比达92%以上；民营企业贡献了超过80%的城镇就业岗位和65%的专利发明。这种创新与就业的双重 驱动，正在深刻重塑中国经济的质量与韧性。 因此，近日发布的《中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十五个五年规划的建议》（简称"十五 五"规划建议）再次强调坚持"两个毫不动摇"，促进各类所有制经济优势互补、共同发展。规划还明确 提出，要完善民营企业参与重大项目建设长效机制，激发民间投资活力、提高民间投资比重，增强市场 主导的有效投资增长动力。 在 ...

Core Viewpoint - The emphasis on "anti-low-price competition" is not merely about raising prices, but rather about restoring fair competition mechanisms in the market [4][5] Group 1: Anti-Low-Price Competition - Various industry associations and government departments are advocating against low-price competition, which is seen as a form of "involution" [2] - The push for price increases is being driven by government actions and self-regulatory organizations, with some viewing it as a sign of effective "anti-involution" measures [2] - Not all price competition is considered "involutionary"; only "below-cost" pricing is typically opposed [2][3] Group 2: Market Dynamics and Price Intervention - Price interventions should not be arbitrary; they must adhere to legal frameworks such as fair competition reviews and anti-monopoly laws [3] - The current economic context in China, characterized by insufficient demand, complicates the sustainability of non-market price increases [3] - For example, in the photovoltaic industry, price increases at one level of the supply chain may not be feasible if downstream consumers cannot bear the costs [3] Group 3: Long-term Solutions - The core of "anti-involution" efforts should focus on enhancing the market's ability to allocate resources effectively, addressing issues like unfair competition and unreasonable subsidies [4] - Systematic adjustments and a longer timeframe are necessary to address the deep-rooted problems that contribute to low-price competition [4][5]

Group 1 - The recent halt of low-price marketing strategies in Xi'an's ride-hailing industry reflects a broader trend across various sectors to resist low-price competition and malicious underpricing practices [1][2] - Industry associations and government bodies are increasingly advocating for price increases as part of the "anti-involution" movement, which is seen as a positive development by some commentators [1][2] - The concept of "anti-low-price competition" is becoming a priority for various industries in addressing "involution," with immediate effects expected from interventions by government and associations [1][2] Group 2 - Not all price competition is considered "involutionary," as economic theory recognizes price as a crucial dimension of market competition; only "below-cost" pricing is typically opposed [2][3] - The enforcement of "anti-low-price competition" must align with fair competition reviews, price laws, and antitrust regulations to avoid unintended consequences such as price cartels [2][3] - The current economic climate in China, characterized by insufficient demand, complicates the sustainability of non-market price increases across industries [2][3] Group 3 - The emphasis on "anti-low-price competition" aims to restore fair market competition rather than simply increase prices; enhancing market mechanisms can lead to higher prices and improved profit margins for companies [3][4] - A simplistic approach of merely raising prices may backfire, as price is a signal of market supply and demand, and improper interventions can disrupt market dynamics [3][4] - Addressing "involution" requires systemic adjustments to tackle issues like unfair competition, unreasonable government subsidies, and restrictive industry entry barriers, which necessitates time and comprehensive strategies [3][4]

Group 1 - The construction of a unified national market is essential for establishing a new development pattern and promoting high-quality development in China [2][4] - The initiative aims to eliminate local protectionism, market segmentation, and "involution" competition, as emphasized by President Xi Jinping during the National People's Congress [2][4] - The implementation of the Fair Competition Review Regulation in 2024 is expected to facilitate fair market access for various business entities [8][9] Group 2 - Local governments are taking decisive actions to dismantle barriers to market entry, such as abolishing restrictive practices like "directory lists" and exclusive agreements [3][9] - In Guangxi, the establishment of an anti-monopoly and unfair competition committee aims to prevent and resolve market monopolies and administrative monopolies [8] - In Jiangxi, a comprehensive review mechanism for fair competition has been created, leading to the assessment of 4,459 new policy measures and the modification of 615 existing ones in 2024 [8] Group 3 - The introduction of remote and cross-regional evaluation for government procurement has increased participation from external companies, with the proportion of external bidders in Beihai rising from 58% to 83% [16][22] - The remote evaluation system enhances fairness by preventing local biases and reducing costs for bidders, leading to significant savings for companies [22][18] - The implementation of remote evaluation has resulted in a 150% increase in the amount won by external companies in Beihai [22] Group 4 - The establishment of the Deep-Shan Special Cooperation Zone has provided ample development space and favorable policies for companies, leading to significant growth in production and sales [25][26] - The cooperation zone has seen a 40% year-on-year increase in GDP and a 77.3% increase in industrial output value in the first quarter of 2023 [28] - The "reverse flying land" strategy has facilitated the establishment of innovation centers that connect resources between Shenzhen and other regions, fostering cross-border industrial cooperation [30][31]