肯《商业日报》9月25日报道，肯尼亚税务局(KRA)放宽了一项新规定，该规 定要求所有进口商品必须附有原产地证书(CoO)，将于2025年10月1日生效。税 务人员还开设了一个窗口，在无CoO的特殊情况下，可以接受其他清关文件， 包括载有原产地详细信息的原产地声明、出口国主管当局签发的出口许可证或 执照、出口国的海关出口申报单或肯尼亚标准局认可的代理人签发的符合性预 验证证书。为了进一步减轻进口商的负担，KRA免除了10个产品类别（包括二 手货物）的Co0规则。这对进口商来说是一个很大的安慰，他们曾抗议对进口 二手车和其他优惠产品征收原产地税，称其重复并增加了经营成本。 （原标题：肯税务局放宽原产地规则，为进口商带来喘息之机） ...

Group 1 - The core point of the news is that the United States and the European Union have reached a framework agreement for a trade deal, which includes a 15% uniform tariff on most EU imports and the elimination of all tariffs on US industrial products by the EU [1][3][4] - The agreement outlines 19 key areas, including agricultural products, automobiles, aircraft, semiconductor chips, energy, and digital trade barriers [3][8] - The US will apply either the most-favored-nation (MFN) tariff rate or a 15% tariff rate on EU-origin goods, with specific products subject to MFN tariffs starting from September 1, 2025 [3][5] Group 2 - The EU will eliminate all tariffs on US industrial products and provide preferential market access for various US agricultural products, including nuts, dairy, and meat [7][8] - The EU plans to purchase $750 billion worth of US energy products, including liquefied natural gas and nuclear products, and at least $40 billion in US AI chips for data center construction [8][9] - Both parties agreed to negotiate rules of origin to ensure that the benefits of the agreement are shared primarily between the US and the EU [9][10]

Core Viewpoint - The United States and the European Union have reached a significant agreement on a trade framework, which includes a unified tariff structure and commitments for mutual trade benefits [2][4]. Summary by Sections Trade Agreement Framework - The trade agreement framework consists of 19 key points covering various sectors, including agricultural products, automobiles, aircraft, semiconductor chips, energy, and digital trade barriers [4]. - The U.S. will impose a 15% uniform tariff on most EU imports, while the EU will eliminate all tariffs on U.S. industrial products [2][4]. Tariff Adjustments - The U.S. will reduce tariffs on European automobiles from the current 27.5% to 15% once the EU submits the necessary legislative proposals [5][6]. - The agreement allows for potential retroactive tariff reductions for automobile manufacturers, contingent on the EU's legislative actions [6]. EU Commitments - The EU will procure $750 billion worth of U.S. liquefied natural gas, oil, and nuclear products by 2028, along with an additional $400 billion in U.S. AI chips [8]. - The EU will also provide preferential market access for various U.S. agricultural products, including nuts, dairy, and meat [8]. Investment and Cooperation - EU companies plan to invest an additional $600 billion in strategic sectors in the U.S. by 2028, highlighting a commitment to deepen cooperation in energy security and high-tech supply chains [8]. - Both parties have agreed to address unreasonable digital trade barriers and ensure that the benefits of the agreement are shared primarily between the U.S. and the EU [8]. Future Negotiations - The agreement is designed to be expandable, allowing for the inclusion of more sectors in the future to improve market access [9]. - The EU will work with member states and the European Parliament to implement the agreement and negotiate a fair and balanced trade accord with the U.S. [10].

美国官员：将在未来几周内实施原产地规则细节。 ...

墨西哥经济部长：与美国的关税争端还包括对知识产权和原产地规则的担忧。我们必须从修订《美墨加 协定》（USMCA）的角度来解决这些问题。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Indonesia's Chief Economic Minister announced discussions with the United States regarding rules of origin, including the potential for increased participation from third parties [1] Group 1 - The discussions aim to address the rules of origin, which are critical for trade agreements and tariffs [1] - Expanding third-party participation could enhance trade dynamics and compliance with international standards [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the complexities and challenges of international trade regulations, particularly in the context of U.S.-Vietnam trade relations, highlighting the interplay between tariffs and tax policies under the Trump administration [3][26]. Summary by Sections U.S.-Vietnam Trade Relations - The Trump administration's tax cuts and tariffs are interconnected, with the "Great American Trade Act" signed into law, providing flexibility in negotiations with other countries [3]. - Negotiations with the EU and Japan are more complicated due to deeper interdependencies, while talks with ASEAN countries, particularly Vietnam, are simpler due to power imbalances [3][4]. - Vietnam has proposed several concessions to the U.S., including tariff exemptions and increased purchases of U.S. goods, but the U.S. has imposed a 20% tariff on Vietnamese products and a 40% tariff on goods transiting through Vietnam [3][4]. Tariff Implementation and Regulatory Mechanisms - The U.S. has not clearly defined "transshipment goods," but existing trade regulations suggest that these goods are those exported from countries with special tariff benefits but do not meet U.S. customs origin qualifications [5]. - A collaborative regulatory mechanism is anticipated, where Vietnam will issue origin certificates, and the U.S. will use these for differential tariff policies [5][6]. Vietnam's Origin Rules - Vietnam's origin rules are categorized into preferential and non-preferential rules, with the former requiring a minimum regional value content (RVC) of 40% [7]. - The "Made in Vietnam" certification aims to strengthen origin regulation and combat foreign goods misrepresenting as local products, with a focus on key industries like electronics and textiles [8]. Compliance Risks for Industries - Industries heavily reliant on Chinese materials or simple processing may face higher compliance risks under the new U.S.-Vietnam agreement, while those with substantial local investment will be less affected [13]. - Specific industries, such as machinery, textiles, and basic metals, have LVC values below the 40% threshold, indicating potential challenges in meeting compliance standards [13]. Recommendations for Chinese Enterprises - Chinese companies must assess whether their products fall under U.S. anti-dumping and countervailing duties, as this will affect their export compliance [21]. - A thorough supply chain analysis is necessary to ensure compliance with U.S. origin requirements, moving from simple assembly to more complex manufacturing processes [22][23]. - Strengthening internal controls and traceability of data is crucial for compliance, enabling companies to provide verifiable documentation during U.S. customs inquiries [24]. - Enhancing professional capabilities to respond to U.S. origin investigations is essential for navigating regulatory challenges effectively [25]. Conclusion - The article emphasizes that trade dynamics are driven by market forces rather than rigid legal frameworks, suggesting that as long as profit opportunities exist, companies will find ways to navigate complex regulations [26][27].

Core Viewpoint - The recent trade agreement between the U.S. and Vietnam introduces a 40% tariff on transshipped goods, which may significantly impact the supply chain and trade dynamics, particularly for Chinese products passing through Vietnam [1][6]. Group 1: Understanding the 40% Transshipping Tariff - The term "transshipping" refers to goods that undergo minimal processing in Vietnam before being labeled as Vietnamese origin for export to the U.S., thus incurring a higher tariff [1][4]. - The U.S. aims to strengthen its oversight on supply chains and origin rules through this tariff, which is designed to prevent circumvention of trade regulations [1][4]. - The definition of transshipped products hinges on value addition and origin, with products needing to demonstrate sufficient local content to qualify for lower tariffs [4][5]. Group 2: Implications of Zero Tariff for U.S. Products - Vietnam's commitment to allow U.S. products to enter its market at zero tariffs could enable these products to be re-exported to other RCEP countries, potentially undermining tariff barriers [6][7]. - This arrangement may inadvertently create competitive pressure on similar Chinese products within the RCEP region, affecting market dynamics [6][7]. - The U.S. is projected to import over $136 billion worth of goods from Vietnam in 2024, highlighting the significance of this trade relationship [6]. Group 3: Changes and Industry Impact - The new tariff structure may lead to increased export costs and uncertainties for Chinese companies, prompting a reassessment of supply chain strategies [7][8]. - The higher tariffs on transshipped goods could deter companies from using Vietnam as a transit point, as the cost of goods may rise significantly due to the 40% tariff [7][8]. - The evolving trade landscape suggests that companies may need to diversify their supply chains more effectively to mitigate risks associated with these new tariffs [8].

Group 1 - The article discusses the impending deadline for trade agreements, with a total trade value of €380 billion hanging in the balance due to potential tariffs imposed by the U.S. [1][5] - The U.S. is using a strategy of divide and conquer, pressuring countries to sign agreements quickly to avoid high tariffs, which could range from 25% to 50% [5][7] - Countries like Germany, France, and Japan are feeling the pressure, with Japan reconsidering its stance on tariffs and discussing "non-core concessions" [7][39] Group 2 - The article highlights the "poison pill" clauses in trade agreements, such as the U.K.-U.S. temporary trade arrangement, which includes restrictions on re-exporting Chinese goods [9][11] - The U.S. is encouraging other nations to adopt similar restrictive measures, particularly regarding "origin rules" that would limit Chinese manufacturing [13][18] - India's negotiations show signs of concessions on key issues, raising concerns about its alignment with U.S. strategies [15][41] Group 3 - China has firmly stated its opposition to sacrificing its interests for U.S. tariff reductions, indicating a strong stance against external pressures [20][22] - The article emphasizes China's significant trade relationships, with over $800 billion in trade with the EU and a 24% trade dependency with Japan, giving it leverage in negotiations [25][27] - Recent talks between the U.S. and China have shown some progress, suggesting that both sides are cautious about escalating tensions further [27][29] Group 4 - The article discusses the internal divisions within the EU, with countries like France advocating for strong resistance against U.S. pressures, while Germany seeks stability and is more willing to compromise [33][35] - Japan's potential cooperation with the U.S. in critical resource areas could significantly impact China's interests, especially in rare earths and key minerals [39][18] - The article warns that if global supply chains are disrupted, emerging economies could see GDP growth decline by 0.7% to 1.3%, leading to significant economic losses [45]

Core Viewpoint - The India-EU free trade agreement negotiations are progressing rapidly, with nearly half of the topics reaching consensus, indicating a potential positive impact on bilateral trade and alleviating concerns for Indian farmers and the dairy processing industry [1] Group 1: Agreement Progress - India and the EU have reached consensus on approximately 8 out of 20 topic chapters in the free trade agreement negotiations [1] - Key topics include rules of origin and intellectual property rights, which are crucial for trade facilitation [1] - The agreement aims to mitigate the impact of tariffs imposed during the Trump administration on bilateral trade [1] Group 2: Sensitive Products Exclusion - Certain "sensitive" agricultural products, such as dairy, have been excluded from the agreement, providing relief to Indian farmers and the dairy processing sector [1] - This exclusion reflects the careful consideration of domestic agricultural interests in the negotiation process [1] Group 3: Timeline and Expectations - The parties involved are working towards finalizing the agreement by December of this year, with ongoing efforts to expedite the process [1] - Recent rounds of negotiations have yielded positive outcomes, suggesting a favorable trajectory for the agreement's completion [1]