11月5日，上海财经大学与东方证券联合开设的《财富管理与基金投资顾问》系列课程第五讲在中山北一路校区七教301教室如期举行。本次课程由东方证券 财富管理委员会金融产品总部总经理王峰先生带来《基金选品与组合构建》，以及金融产品总部总经理助理刘晨书洋女士主讲《私募策略介绍以及FOF组合 构建》。两场主题分享紧扣实务，内容层层递进，为现场来自上海财经大学、复旦大学、华东师范大学等多所高校的学生带来了一场系统而深入的基金投资 实战课。 在《基金选品与组合构建》课程中，王峰先生以"你是否购买过基金？"这一贴近学生的问题开场，迅速拉近了与听众的距离。他系统介绍了东方证券TPS体 系下的核心投研能力，并围绕"固收+"与主动权益两大主线，详细阐述了从宏观研判、市场应对到α能力圈刻画的全流程投资框架。他强调，深度α的挖掘不 仅依赖于定量与定性相结合的评分体系，还需结合行为数据验证，并通过完善的标签体系与严谨的绩效归因，实现策略的持续优化与投后管理的精细化。 本场课程内容扎实、逻辑清晰，既有理论高度，又具操作指导性，帮助同学们建立起从基金选品到组合构建，再到私募策略与FOF管理的完整认知链条。王 峰与刘晨书洋两位主讲人以其深厚的 ...

拆解量化私募的布局思路，可以发现其"进攻"属性明显增强。股票策略是量化私募的核心阵地，备案数量达402只，占全市场股 票策略备案总量的近一半。其中，量化多头（指数增强及量化选股）策略最为突出，共备案310只，释放出量化机构正积极通过 带风险敞口的策略，直接捕捉A股市场beta收益的明确信号。此外，作为稳健型资金的"避风港"，股票市场中性策略和量化CTA 策略也备受青睐。 【环球网消费综合报道】临近年底，A股市场虽在震荡中寻找方向，私募基金的备案却马不停蹄，掀起了一波强劲的发行热 潮。最新数据显示，11月私募证券产品备案量环比大增近三成，创下年内次高纪录。在年底发行争夺战中，量化私募再度强势 领跑，百亿级量化巨头几乎包揽了备案榜单前列，成为推动本轮备案潮的绝对主力。 11月的备案数据，不仅揭示了私募策略，更将私募行业的"马太效应"演绎得淋漓尽致。在备案数量居前的49家活跃机构中，管 理规模在100亿以上的私募机构多达30家，占比超过六成。前海钜阵资本首席投资官龙舫指出，今年百亿量化私募领跑备案榜 单，主要源于监管政策的导向、头部机构在投研和品牌上的护城河，以及其今年以来突出的业绩表现。不过，部分中小规模机 私募 ...

Group 1 - The A-share market experienced a pullback due to intertwined short-term risk factors, leading to cautious capital outflows, despite stock private equity positions reaching a nearly 112-week high [1][5] - Private equity firms are adopting varied strategies in response to the high positions, with some maintaining high exposure, others using derivatives for risk hedging, and some quietly reallocating assets for future market opportunities [1][6] Group 2 - Multiple private equity firms attribute the market adjustment to a combination of internal and external factors, with a focus on changes in external environments and liquidity expectations [3] - The tightening of overseas liquidity, particularly following the Federal Reserve's hawkish stance, has led to short-term net outflows of foreign capital, putting pressure on high-valuation technology sectors in A-shares [3][6] - Defensive behaviors from institutions cashing out profits towards year-end are expected to contribute to market volatility [3] Group 3 - As of November 14, the stock private equity position index reached 81.13%, marking a nearly 112-week high, with large private equity firms' positions nearing 90% [5] - Different private equity firms are employing distinct strategies under high positions, with some maintaining optimism about quality companies' growth despite short-term volatility [6][8] - Strategies include purchasing protective put options to hedge against market downturns and reallocating investments towards cyclical sectors while optimizing technology sector layouts [6] Group 4 - Despite short-term market pressures, leading private equity firms remain confident in the medium to long-term outlook and are actively seeking investment opportunities during the adjustment [8] - Focus areas include emerging growth sectors and cyclical industries, such as AI innovations in power construction and domestic semiconductor trends [8] - The Hang Seng Index is viewed as having reached historical low valuations, with structural opportunities in sectors like food and beverage and social services [8] Group 5 - Optimism about the market's future is reflected in the belief that major indices have returned to reasonable risk premiums after filling previous gaps, with substantial capital waiting on the sidelines [9] - The current adjustment is characterized as healthy, aiding in controlling leverage levels and optimizing trading structures [9] - Private equity firms are continuing to identify undervalued opportunities during this pullback, preparing for the next market cycle [9]

Group 1 - The A-share market has shown strong performance in 2025, with private equity securities products achieving an average return of 20.41% year-to-date, and 90.85% of the 10,135 products recorded positive returns [1] - Among stock strategy private equity products, 93.09% of the 6,473 products achieved positive returns, with an average return of 25.38%, driven by structural opportunities in the market [1] - Quantitative long strategies have outperformed subjective long strategies, with 96.24% of the 1,303 quantitative products showing positive returns and an average return of 31.84% [1][2] Group 2 - Subjective long strategies have a positive return rate of 92.68% and an average return of 25.62%, with many relying on in-depth research by fund managers to identify quality stocks [2] - Market-neutral and long-short strategies have lower performance due to their hedging nature, with positive return rates of 88.47% and 91.67%, and average returns of 8.15% and 14.53% respectively [2] - Multi-asset strategies have shown strong performance, with 89.91% of the 1,279 products achieving positive returns and an average return of 15.61% [2] Group 3 - Combination fund strategies have the highest positive return rate among the five strategies, with 95.98% of the 398 products achieving positive returns and an average return of 14.12% [3] - The commodity market has experienced wide fluctuations, negatively impacting futures and derivatives strategies, which have a positive return rate of 77.15% and an average return of 8.55% [3] - Bond strategies have benefited from a loosening monetary policy, with 92.50% of the 773 products achieving positive returns and an average return of 7.89% [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of focusing on the health of investment portfolios rather than specific investment strategies during market fluctuations, especially in a bullish market [6][14]. Market Environment Analysis - From 2019 to 2021, a liquidity-driven bull market led to significant gains for subjective long-only fund managers who concentrated on blue-chip stocks, outperforming other strategies [7]. - In 2022, external factors such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict and U.S. Federal Reserve interest rate hikes caused a market downturn, impacting subjective long strategies while benefiting CTA strategies that capitalized on commodity trends [7]. - In 2023, the market saw a recovery in small-cap valuations, with quantitative strategies performing well due to increased liquidity for small and micro enterprises [8]. - By 2024, macro strategies began to excel due to structural market changes and external economic conditions, while quantitative strategies faced challenges [8]. - In 2025, a resurgence of quantitative strategies occurred as liquidity policies favored small-cap stocks, despite macro strategies facing headwinds from geopolitical tensions [8]. Investment Strategy Recommendations - The article advocates for a diversified investment approach, suggesting that investors should not overly concentrate on a single strategy but rather build a multi-faceted portfolio to mitigate risks and balance returns [14][23]. - Diversification can be achieved through asset classes, strategies, and sub-strategies, allowing investors to capture varied sources of returns [15][19]. - The article highlights the importance of understanding the core return sources of different asset classes: equities benefit from corporate earnings growth, commodities from supply-demand imbalances, and bonds from fixed interest and declining rates [18]. Strategy Implementation - Investors are encouraged to combine low-volatility and high-volatility strategies to enhance stability and potential returns, achieving a balanced risk-reward profile [23]. - The integration of subjective and quantitative strategies can complement each other, leveraging fundamental research for long-term value and systematic approaches for short-term market inefficiencies [23]. - Cross-market strategies can reduce systemic risks and capture differentiated growth opportunities across various economic cycles [23].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance of various private equity strategies in the A-share market amid geopolitical tensions and economic downturns, highlighting the recovery of stock strategies since the "9.24" market event and the strong performance of quantitative long strategies in the first half of 2025 [1][2][4]. Group 1: Private Equity Strategy Performance - As of June 30, 2025, all private equity secondary strategies achieved positive returns in the first half of the year, with quantitative long strategies leading at an average return of 16.31%, followed by subjective long strategies at 10.55% and macro strategies at 9.19% [2][4]. - The total trading volume of the A-share market exceeded 160 trillion yuan in the first half of the year, significantly higher than over 100 trillion yuan in the same period last year, indicating a notable increase in market activity [4]. - The strong performance of quantitative long strategies is attributed to their focus on small-cap stocks, which have performed well, with the CSI 2000 index rising over 15% and the micro-cap stock sector increasing over 40% [4]. Group 2: Top Performing Private Equity Products - As of June 30, 2025, there were 345 quantitative long private equity products with performance data, with the top three products being "Fengshou No. 2," "Liangying Risheng Exclusive No. 1 A Class," and "Baolit Quantitative No. 1," achieving significant excess returns [5][6]. - The top ten quantitative long strategies included products from major firms such as Longqi Technology and Wenbo Investment, with their excess returns also being noteworthy [6][11]. Group 3: Recent Trends in Private Equity Strategies - Over the past year, the top three performing private equity secondary strategies were quantitative long, subjective long, and other derivative strategies, with average returns of 48.32%, 32.00%, and 31.52% respectively [8][10]. - In the last three years, the top three strategies shifted to subjective CTA, other derivative strategies, and bond enhancement, with average returns of 69.36%, 69.29%, and 45.18% respectively, indicating a significant change in market dynamics [12][14].

Core Insights - The average return of private equity stock strategies reached 10% in the first half of 2025, outperforming other strategies [1] - Over 80% of private equity securities products achieved positive returns, with an overall return of 8.32% [1] Summary by Category Stock Strategies - Stock strategies led with an average return of 10%, with quantitative long strategies showing impressive performance at an average return of 15.42% and a positive return ratio of 93.32% [1] - Subjective long strategies demonstrated explosive potential with a 35.68% return at the 5th percentile [1] Futures Strategies - Among futures strategies, subjective CTA outperformed quantitative CTA with an average return of 4.90% [1] Options Strategies - The options strategy exhibited a notable positive return ratio of 77.11% [1] Bond Strategies - Bond strategies showed the highest stability, with over 90% of products achieving positive returns [1] Multi-Asset Strategies - Combination funds and multi-asset strategies both exceeded a 6% return [1] Market Environment - In a volatile market environment, both quantitative and subjective strategies displayed their respective advantages [1]

Report Title - Private Equity Weekly Performance is Good, Remain Cautious about Small-cap Exposure and Basis Convergence Risk in the Future (May 26, 2025 - May 30, 2025) - Weekly Tracking Report on Private Equity Strategies of China Merchants Futures [2] Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the report Core Viewpoints - As of May 30, 2025, three types of private equity index enhancement strategies had positive returns this week. Approximately 50% of stock neutral strategy funds had positive returns, with the 75th percentile of weekly returns at 0.13%. The median return of two types of cycle-labeled dimension neutral strategies was positive, and the performance of the partial holding Alpha neutral strategy was relatively good, with a median return of 0.15%. Approximately 75% of option strategy pool funds had positive returns, and the partial selling option strategy had relatively good returns, with the 75th percentile return at 0.58%. [5] - From the perspective of the monthly performance of sub - strategies, the top three sub - strategies were CSI 1000 Index Enhancement (+4.35%), Quantitative Stock Selection (+3.65%), and CSI 500 Index Enhancement (+3.21%); the bottom three were Full Replication Neutral T (+0.23%), Partial Arbitrage (+0.40%), and 300 Neutral (+0.58%). [5] - As of May 30, 2025, most private equity index enhancement strategies rose this week. Specifically, CSI 1000 Index Enhancement rose 1.15%, Quantitative Stock Selection rose 0.68%, CSI 500 Index Enhancement rose 0.67%, and SSE 500 Index Enhancement fell 0.64%. From the perspective of the track - labeled dimension index enhancement strategies, the excess returns of the four types of index enhancement strategies were all positive, with Quantitative Stock Selection at 0.77%, CSI 1000 Index Enhancement at 0.55%, SSE 300 Index Enhancement at 0.48%, and CSI 500 Index Enhancement at 0.35%. [5] - The component stock monitoring model shows that small and micro - cap stocks had the highest investment return rate in the past three months, and one should remain cautious about the retracement risk of small and micro - cap stocks in the future. [5] Summary by Directory 01 Private Equity Review - **Private Equity Index Enhancement Fund Performance Tracking** - Three types of private equity index enhancement strategies had positive returns this week. Specifically, CSI 1000 Index Enhancement rose 1.15%, Quantitative Stock Selection rose 0.68%, CSI 500 Index Enhancement rose 0.67%, and SSE 300 Index Enhancement fell 0.64%. [12] - From the perspective of the track - labeled dimension index enhancement strategies, the excess returns of the four types of index enhancement strategies were all positive, with Quantitative Stock Selection at 0.77%, CSI 1000 Index Enhancement at 0.55%, SSE 300 Index Enhancement at 0.48%, and CSI 500 Index Enhancement at 0.35%. [19] - From the perspective of the cycle - labeled dimension index enhancement strategies, the median excess returns of the four types of cycle - labeled dimension index enhancement strategies were all positive. Specifically, the partial holding type index enhancement excess median was 0.45%, the holding type index enhancement excess median was 0.43%, the trading type index enhancement excess median was 0.31%, and the partial trading type index enhancement excess median was 0.18%. [25] - **Track - Labeled Dimension Neutral Strategy Tracking** - Approximately 50% of the stock neutral strategy funds had positive returns this week, with the 75th percentile of weekly returns at 0.13%. After deducting the basis impact, the median weekly return of the 300 neutral strategy was 0.27%, the median weekly return of the 500 neutral strategy was 0.60%, and the median weekly return of the 1000 neutral strategy was 0.23%. [28] - **Cycle - Labeled Dimension Neutral Strategy Tracking** - The median returns of two types of cycle - labeled dimension neutral strategies were positive. Specifically, the partial holding Alpha neutral median was 0.15%, the holding Alpha neutral median was 0.05%, the partial trading Alpha neutral median was -0.01%, and the trading Alpha neutral median was -0.05%. [32] - **Track - Labeled Dimension Option Strategy Tracking** - Approximately 75% of the option strategy pool funds had positive returns this week. From the 75th percentile, the fund pool's weekly return was 0.37%, and the one - year return was 13.17%. From the track - labeled dimension, the partial selling option strategy had relatively good returns, with the 75th percentile return at 0.58%. [36] 02 Performance Attribution - **Private Equity Index Enhancement Strategy Component Stock Disassembly** - The small and micro - cap exposure is large, and one should remain cautious about the retracement risk of small and micro - cap stocks in the future. [38] - The investment cost - effectiveness of CSI 1000, CSI 2000, and other (including small and micro - cap) stocks is relatively high. Specifically, the return rate of unit SSE 300 component stocks in the past three months was -1.28%, the return of unit CSI 500 component stocks was -3.22%, the return of unit CSI 1000 component stocks was -3.90%, and the return of unit other (including small and micro - cap) stocks was over 28%. [46] 03 Risk Monitoring - **Private Equity Index Enhancement Risk Monitoring - SSE 300 Index Enhancement Fund** - As of May 30, 2025, the three factors with the largest excess exposure of the SSE 300 index enhancement fund were the leverage factor, the mid - cap factor, and the growth factor, which were -1.28, 1.15, and -0.61 respectively. Generally speaking, the SSE 300 index enhancement fund has relatively large excess risk exposure in the leverage factor and the mid - cap factor. [51] - **Private Equity Index Enhancement Risk Monitoring - CSI 500 Index Enhancement Fund** - As of May 30, 2025, the three factors with the largest excess exposure of the CSI 500 index enhancement fund were the residual volatility factor, the BETA factor, and the momentum factor, which were 0.65, -0.63, and 0.55 respectively. Generally speaking, the excess risk exposure of the CSI 500 index enhancement fund is not large. [60] - **Private Equity Index Enhancement Risk Monitoring - CSI 1000 Index Enhancement Fund** - As of May 30, 2025, the three factors with the largest excess exposure of the CSI 1000 index enhancement fund were the BETA factor, the residual volatility factor, and the momentum factor, which were -0.59, 0.54, and 0.48 respectively. Generally speaking, the excess risk exposure of the CSI 1000 index enhancement fund is not large. [69]

Group 1 - The private equity industry in China is experiencing accelerated head-to-head competition, with a significant "Matthew Effect" where top firms are consolidating their advantages, leading to a market characterized by a "20/80" distribution [2][24][26] - As of February 2025, there are 7,893 private equity managers and 86,708 products in the private securities investment fund sector, with a total management scale of 5.24 trillion yuan, reflecting a decline from historical peaks due to regulatory pressures and market challenges [20][24][26] - The top 1% of private equity firms manage over 100 billion yuan, while 84.91% of managers have a scale of less than 500 million yuan, indicating a significant disparity in the industry [24][26] Group 2 - The report categorizes private equity strategies into five main types: stock strategies, bond strategies, futures and derivatives strategies, multi-asset strategies, and combination funds, with a detailed breakdown into 16 secondary strategies [36][39] - Stock strategies dominate the private equity landscape, with subjective long positions and quantitative long positions accounting for approximately 60% of the market, while bond strategies have seen a significant decline due to low interest rates [39][40] - The subjective long strategy focuses on active management through in-depth research, while quantitative long strategies utilize mathematical modeling and algorithms to construct stock portfolios, highlighting a shift towards data-driven investment approaches [44][52] Group 3 - The report outlines the performance characteristics of various strategies, noting that subjective long strategies achieved an average return of 40.2% during the 2020 bull market, while quantitative long strategies have shown a consistent annualized excess return of 13.5% over the past five years [3][50][56] - The report emphasizes the importance of strategy innovation and compliance capabilities for survival in the competitive landscape, as smaller firms face increasing challenges in fundraising and differentiation [24][26][39] - A diversified strategy configuration is proposed, offering combinations from conservative to aggressive profiles, with the conservative portfolio achieving a 6.1% annualized return and a maximum drawdown of less than 3% [5][39]