博雷顿无人驾驶CTO白富儒在接受《证券日报》记者采访时介绍，矿卡电动化后必然走向自动驾驶，而 且要企业自研自动驾驶技术，进而实现软硬件深度结合。最新推出的"9M145E无人驾驶专用矿卡"在零 部件、传感器、通信方式等方面有诸多行业首创，研发目的是提升车辆可靠性和出勤率。 以"9M145E无人驾驶专用矿卡"为例，车辆的运行数据、维护数据、能耗数据和异常数据都会实时进入 智慧调度系统，使运营风险、设备负荷和作业状况更容易被监测与预判。这种"数字化透明度"正在成为 矿区治理体系的新基础：它减少人为不确定性，降低管理盲区，并为矿企在对外披露安全与ESG信息时 提供可靠依据。 从前期的实践成果来看，相关技术在人工效率方面表现突出。陈方明介绍，"端到端自动驾驶的综合效 率接近人工，部分场景下甚至超过人工。同时，该技术能大幅减少矿山司机数量，目标是实现个位数人 员管理百台规模的自动驾驶车辆，显著降低矿山用工人数，大幅提升矿山整体运营效率。" 重塑行业产业链结构 自登陆资本市场以来，博雷顿科技股份公司（以下简称"博雷顿"）发展步伐明显加快。日前，公司推出 新产品"9M145E无人驾驶专用矿卡"，新产品以无人驾驶为起点重新构建 ...

这几个月其实很多小伙伴联系柱哥咨询未来的建议，有工作两三年的也有硕士甚至本科生。他们在刚接触这个领域时，往往会遇到很多问题。从模块化的量产算 法发展到端到端，再到如今的VLA。核心算法涉及BEV感知、视觉语言模型VLM、扩散模型、强化学习、世界模型等等。通过学习端到端与VLA自动驾驶，可以 掌握学术界和工业界最前沿的技术方向。据现有行业的发展来看，端到端和VLA的岗位快要饱和，留下的窗口期没多久了...... 很多同学的咨询如何快速高效的入门端到端和VLA。因此自动驾驶之心联合了 工业界 和 学术界 的大佬开展了 《端到端与VLA自动驾驶小班课》 和 《自动驾驶 VLA和大模型实战课程》 ！ 扫码报名！优惠名额仅剩6个 扫码报名！抢占课程名额 课程大纲 自动驾驶VLA与大模型实战课程 由学术界大佬带队！ 这门课程聚焦在VLA领域，从VLM作为自动驾驶解释器开始，到模块化VLA、一体化VLA，再到当前主流的推理增强VLA。三大自动驾驶 VLA领域全面梳理， 非常适合刚接触大模型、VLA的同学。 课程也配套了详细的理论基础梳理，Vision/Language/Acition三大模块、强化学习、扩散模型等等基 础， ...

点击下方 卡片 ，关注" 自动驾驶之心 "公众号 戳我-> 领取 自动驾驶近30个 方向 学习 路线 >>自动驾驶前沿信息获取 → 自动驾驶之心知识星球 编辑 | 自动驾驶之心 论文作者 | Liuhan Yin等 与自动驾驶中预测自车固定候选轨迹集的判别式方法不同，扩散模型等生成式方法能够学习未来运动的潜在分布，实现更灵活的轨迹预测。然而由于这些方法通常依 赖于对人工设计的轨迹锚点或随机噪声进行去噪处理，其性能仍有较大提升空间。 浙江大学&纽劢的团队提出一种全新的两阶段轨迹预测框架DiffRefiner ：第一阶段采用基于Transformer的proposal解码器，通过对传感器输入进行回归，利用预定义轨 迹锚点生成粗粒度轨迹预测；第二阶段引入扩散Refiner，对初始预测结果进行迭代去噪与优化。通过融合判别式轨迹proposal模块，本文为生成式精炼过程提供了强有 力的引导，显著提升了基于扩散模型的规划性能。此外，本文设计了细粒度去噪解码器以增强场景适应性，通过加强与周围环境的对齐，实现更精准的轨迹预测。实 验结果表明，DiffRefiner达到了当前最优性能：在NAVSIM v2数据集上达到87.4的 ...

作者 | 深蓝学院 来源 | 自动驾驶最新技术路线总结（分阶段、BEV、端到端、VLA） 点击下方 卡片 ，关注" 自动驾驶之心 "公众号 戳我-> 领取 自动驾驶近30个 方向 学习 路线 >>自动驾驶前沿信息获取 → 自动驾驶之心知识星球 本文只做学术分享，如有侵权，联系删文 概述 行业在解决的问题：安全且经济 corner case 技术路线之争 单车智能 vs 智能网联 传感器：视觉 vs 激光雷达 算法架构：模块化 vs 端到端 AI决策：VLM vs VLA vs WA（ 去LLM） Waymo 等主流企业采用 VLM ，让 AI 负责环境理解与推理，最终决策权交由传统模块，确保过程可控 特斯拉 、吉利、小鹏等企业探索的 VLA 则试图让 AI 直接学习所有驾驶技巧，通过海量数据训练实现 "端到端" 决策 华为： ADS 4 为代表的WEWA 架构（世界引擎 + 世界动作模型） 图片来源：https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.24044 规则系统 → 数据驱动 → 认知建模 2022年以前：感知、预测、决策（规划控制） 2022年: BEV 感知成为主流 2023年: OCC 感知 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of building a comprehensive community for autonomous driving, providing resources, networking opportunities, and guidance for both newcomers and experienced professionals in the field [6][16][19]. Group 1: Community and Networking - The "Autonomous Driving Heart Knowledge Planet" community aims to create a platform for technical exchange and collaboration among members from renowned universities and leading companies in the autonomous driving sector [16][19]. - The community has grown to over 4,000 members and aims to reach nearly 10,000 within two years, facilitating discussions on technology trends and industry developments [6][7]. - Members can freely ask questions regarding career choices and research directions, receiving insights from industry experts [89][92]. Group 2: Learning Resources - The community offers a variety of learning materials, including video tutorials, technical routes, and Q&A sessions, covering over 40 technical directions in autonomous driving [9][11][16]. - Specific learning paths are provided for newcomers, including foundational courses and advanced topics in areas such as end-to-end driving, multi-sensor fusion, and 3D target detection [11][17][36]. - The community has compiled a comprehensive list of open-source projects and datasets relevant to autonomous driving, aiding members in their research and development efforts [32][34][36]. Group 3: Career Development - The community facilitates job referrals and connections with various autonomous driving companies, enhancing members' employment opportunities [11][19]. - Regular discussions with industry leaders are organized to explore career paths, job openings, and the latest trends in the autonomous driving field [8][19][92]. - Members are encouraged to engage in research collaborations and internships, particularly for those pursuing advanced degrees in related fields [3][6][16].

Core Insights - The article discusses the development of CATG, a new trajectory generation framework based on flow matching, which addresses limitations in existing end-to-end autonomous driving systems [1][4][22] - CATG achieved a score of 51.31 in the NAVSIM V2 challenge, demonstrating its effectiveness in trajectory planning and robustness against out-of-distribution data [4][22] Background Review - End-to-end multimodal planning has become a key method in autonomous driving, significantly improving robustness and adaptability compared to single trajectory prediction methods [3] - Current multimodal methods often rely on imitation learning, leading to a lack of behavioral diversity due to insufficient strategy diversity in real trajectories [3][6] - Various alternative strategies have been proposed to capture a broader distribution of reasonable trajectories, but many still struggle with integrating safety constraints directly into the generation process [3][6] Proposed Framework - CATG completely abandons imitation learning and supports the flexible injection of explicit constraints during the generation process [4][22] - The framework integrates feasibility and safety constraints into the generation process through a progressive mechanism, utilizing prior perception anchor points [7][22] - CATG allows for controllable trade-offs between aggressive and conservative driving styles by using environmental reward signals as conditional inputs [7][13] Experimental Results - CATG was extensively evaluated in the NAVSIM V2 challenge, showcasing superior planning accuracy and robust generalization capabilities [4][14] - The model's training involved two phases: the first focused on training the flow matching process, and the second on fine-tuning the energy matching process [18][22] - The results indicated high compliance with various metrics, including 100% drivable area compliance and 98.21% no-at-fault collisions in stage one [19] Limitations - The computational cost of generating trajectories through 100-step sampling remains high, and accelerating the sampling process may compromise trajectory quality [21] Conclusion - The article concludes that CATG represents a significant advancement in end-to-end planning for autonomous driving, effectively incorporating flexible conditional signals and explicit constraints during trajectory generation [22]

Core Insights - The article discusses the rising prominence of Li Auto in the autonomous driving sector, particularly its recent advancements presented at the ICCV 2025 conference, where it introduced a new paradigm for autonomous driving that integrates world models with reinforcement learning [1][2][4]. Group 1: Company Developments - Li Auto's research and development in autonomous driving began in 2021, evolving from initial BEV solutions to more advanced systems [5]. - The company has significantly invested in AI, with nearly half of its R&D budget allocated to this area, indicating a strong commitment to integrating AI into its vehicle technology [2]. - Li Auto's recent presentation at ICCV 2025 highlighted its innovative approach, which combines synthetic data to address rare scenarios, leading to a notable improvement in human takeover mileage (MPI) [2][4]. Group 2: Industry Reception - The reception of Li Auto's advancements has been overwhelmingly positive, with many industry observers praising its research and development efforts, positioning it as a model for Chinese automotive companies [2][4]. - Articles from major Chinese AI platforms like Quantum Bit and Machine Heart have garnered significant attention, with one article achieving over 39,000 reads, reflecting the growing interest in Li Auto's developments [1][2]. Group 3: Competitive Landscape - Li Auto is recognized as a leading player in the Chinese autonomous driving space, with a notable presence in discussions surrounding AI and autonomous vehicle technology [22]. - The company aims to differentiate itself not just as an automotive manufacturer but as a competitive AI entity, aligning its goals with broader AI advancements and the five stages of AI development as defined by OpenAI [18][19].

Core Insights - The article discusses the limitations of traditional modular approaches in autonomous driving and introduces the ResAD framework, which aims to improve efficiency and safety by using an end-to-end model that focuses on learning necessary adjustments from a baseline trajectory [2][50]. Group 1: Framework Overview - ResAD framework proposes a shift from directly predicting future trajectories to learning the necessary adjustments from a physical baseline trajectory, termed "inertial reference line" [2][50]. - The model focuses on understanding the reasons for trajectory adjustments, such as obstacles and traffic rules, rather than memorizing data correlations [50]. Group 2: Methodology - The ResAD framework incorporates a "normalized residual trajectory modeling" approach, which simplifies the learning problem by defining trajectory predictions as adjustments to a reference line [11][50]. - The framework employs a "point-wise residual normalization" technique to balance the optimization weights of near and far trajectory points, ensuring that critical adjustments are not overlooked [20][50]. Group 3: Testing and Results - Real-world testing demonstrated the effectiveness of the ResAD framework, showcasing its ability to handle complex driving scenarios and respond intelligently to dynamic obstacles [6]. - In benchmark evaluations, ResAD achieved state-of-the-art performance on NAVSIM v1 and v2, with a PDMS score of 88.6 and an EPDMS score of 85.5, indicating high safety and efficiency in route completion [38][39]. Group 4: Comparative Analysis - ResAD outperformed existing models like DiffusionDrive in various metrics, including lane adherence and route completion efficiency, highlighting its superior trajectory generation capabilities [41][39]. - The article emphasizes the importance of the unique trajectory modeling strategy in ResAD, which allows for the generation of contextually relevant and diverse trajectories without relying on a static trajectory library [10][41].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the evolving landscape of autonomous driving, highlighting the shift from traditional planning and control methods to end-to-end approaches, which are increasingly favored in the industry [2][29]. Summary by Sections Course Offerings - The company has designed a specialized course on end-to-end planning and control in autonomous driving, aimed at addressing real-world challenges and enhancing employability [6][12]. - The course will cover essential algorithms and frameworks used in the industry, focusing on practical applications and integration of traditional and modern methods [6][21]. Course Structure - The course consists of six chapters, each focusing on different aspects of planning and control, including foundational algorithms, decision-making frameworks, and handling uncertainty in environments [20][24][29]. - The course will also include interview preparation, resume enhancement, and mock interviews to support participants in securing job offers [31][10]. Target Audience - The course is designed for individuals with a background in vehicle engineering, automation, computer science, and related fields, particularly those seeking to transition into autonomous driving roles [37][39]. - Participants are expected to have a basic understanding of programming and relevant mathematical concepts to fully benefit from the course [43]. Instructor Expertise - The course will be led by an experienced instructor with a strong background in autonomous driving algorithms and practical implementation, ensuring that participants receive high-quality guidance [34][10]. Additional Benefits - Participants will have access to supplementary resources, including code and development environments, to enhance their learning experience [13][15]. - The course aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the industry, equipping participants with the skills needed to tackle complex problems in autonomous driving [6][13].

Core Insights - The article discusses the advancements in autonomous driving technology, particularly focusing on the performance of Horizon's HSD system compared to Li Auto's VLA system, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of both [5][6]. Group 1: Technology Comparison - Horizon's HSD technology architecture utilizes visual information for trajectory output, with laser radar positioning as a safety redundancy, while the VLA system is criticized for its high computational and bandwidth requirements [5]. - During a test drive of the Horizon HSD engineering vehicle, the experience was reported to be significantly better than the current production version of Li Auto's VLA, particularly in terms of comfort and smoothness during traffic conditions [6]. - Feedback from the Horizon team indicated that the HSD system performs well in controlled environments but has limitations in extreme weather and complex scenarios, suggesting a need for further development [7]. Group 2: Community and Collaboration - The article mentions the establishment of nearly a hundred technical discussion groups related to various aspects of autonomous driving, with a community of around 4,000 members and over 300 companies and research institutions involved [8]. - The collaboration between Horizon and vehicle manufacturers is emphasized, with a focus on integrating user interface elements that respect manufacturer preferences, which can impact the overall driving experience [7]. Group 3: Future Outlook - The article suggests that while the HSD system shows promise, it is still in development and may not yet reach full autonomous driving capabilities, estimating it to be around 60% of the level of Li Auto's V13 system [7].