Workflow
绿色贸易壁垒
icon
Search documents
商务部国际贸易谈判代表兼副部长李成钢出席二十国集团贸易投资部长会议
人民财讯10月11日电,10月10日,二十国集团(G20)贸易投资部长会议在南非格贝哈举行。G20成员及 嘉宾国贸易部长或代表,世贸组织、联合国贸发会议、经合组织等国际组织代表参会。商务部国际贸易 谈判代表兼副部长李成钢出席会议并发言。 本次会议主要围绕"贸易与包容性增长和应对全球挑战原则""促进绿色工业化和可持续发展的贸易投资 框架""世贸组织改革和发展维度"等议题展开讨论。会议发表《G20贸易投资部长声明》和《主席总 结》,为11月G20领导人峰会做了经贸准备。 李成钢指出,中方坚定支持多边主义,提出全球治理倡议,宣布在世贸组织当前和未来谈判中不寻求新 的特殊和差别待遇,以实际行动展现负责任发展中大国的担当。G20为全球贸易投资发展作出了重要贡 献,应当更好发挥G20贸易投资机制作用,以开放合作应对当前全球性挑战。 李成钢表示,中国在推动自身发展的同时,积极为全球经济增长贡献力量。各方应支持多边贸易体制和 自由贸易,应对单边主义和保护主义挑战,克制使用贸易限制措施,消除绿色贸易壁垒,发挥各自比较 优势共同支持发展中国家,为绿色工业化和可持续发展提供动力。 会议期间,李成钢还与多位代表团团长及世贸组织总干事 ...
“电力自由”意味什么
Jing Ji Ri Bao· 2025-09-24 22:49
电力迎峰度夏,是检验一个国家电力工业水平的"试金石"。今年夏季,我国电力负荷不断创下新高,七 八月份全国全社会用电量连续超万亿千瓦时,创历史新高,也系全球首次。面对严峻挑战,我国以充足 优质的电能供应,有效保障了经济社会高质量发展。"电力自由"正成为我国参与国际竞争的一张王牌。 谈及我国产业竞争优势,讨论比较多的是工程师红利、超大规模国内市场、完整制造业生态等,而电力 优势容易被忽略。近年来,一些发达国家因能源系统稳定性、韧性不足,导致阶段性能源短缺和能源价 格大幅波动,国民生产生活受到严重影响;一些新兴经济体囿于电力基础设施薄弱,工业化进程受阻。 而我国电力系统却以惊人的稳定性,确保了14亿多人口和庞大产业体系的用电需求。 作为国家产业体系运转的关键底座,"电力自由"给了我们什么底气? "电力自由"意味着绿色供应。在产业转型升级过程中,绿色电力的推动作用不容忽视。随着我国可再生 能源发电装机规模历史性超过火电,绿色电力在制造业中应用范围越来越广。这不仅有助于降低企业生 产成本,提高企业竞争力,还有助于减少碳排放,推动制造业向绿色化方向发展,突破国际绿色贸易壁 垒,扩大国际市场准入。随着绿电消费需求和占比越来 ...
双重驱动下企业碳管理提速 标准、数据瓶颈问题待解
Jin Rong Shi Bao· 2025-08-11 01:00
Core Viewpoint - Companies are facing dual changes in policy and market environments regarding carbon emission management, leading to increased attention from industry experts on the challenges and standards in carbon management [1] Group 1: Policy and Market Influence - The intensity of policy constraints directly affects the progress of corporate carbon management, with raw material industries like metallurgy and petrochemicals being core to national carbon market management [2] - The "1+N" dual carbon policy framework has established specific carbon peak plans for major industrial sectors, emphasizing monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) requirements [2] - Market factors, such as external pressures from green trade barriers, are driving companies, especially in the new energy sector, to enhance their carbon management capabilities [3] Group 2: Challenges in Carbon Management - Companies face fragmented systems and increasing compliance burdens due to varying carbon accounting standards across different regions and industries, complicating unified management [5][6] - The lack of economic and suitable carbon management solutions, along with high costs of third-party verification, poses significant challenges for companies [8] - Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) struggle with carbon management due to limited resources, necessitating specialized tools and shared platforms to enhance their capabilities [9] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest establishing unified national carbon management regulations and detailed implementation guidelines for specific industries to address existing challenges [7] - There is a need for improved data management and professional governance systems to ensure accurate carbon footprint tracking and effective management [8] - A shared database for carbon emissions tailored to different industries and products could help SMEs reduce management costs and improve their carbon management practices [9]
东盟能源中心达伍德:东盟能源脱碳要学习中国经验|首席气候官
Core Insights - ASEAN region has a population exceeding 600 million and a GDP of approximately $3.8 trillion, becoming one of the more stable areas for global economic growth with rising energy demands [1][2] - The ASEAN Energy Center is focusing on overcoming challenges in energy transition, including resource endowment differences, economic development levels, and energy structures among member countries [1][2][4] - The region aims for net-zero emissions targets between 2050 and 2065, with significant investment needs identified, particularly in the electricity sector, which requires about $190 billion annually by 2050 [2][4] Group 1: Energy Transition Challenges - ASEAN countries face multiple challenges in energy transition, including financing bottlenecks and insufficient technological reserves [1][4] - The energy sector's core issues include energy security, energy transition, and economic development momentum, with a goal to become the world's fourth-largest economy by 2030 [2][4] - The ASEAN Power Grid Initiative (ASEAN PGI) aims to invest up to $700 billion by 2050 to enhance energy security and facilitate renewable energy integration [6] Group 2: Investment and Policy Coordination - ASEAN member states are encouraged to align national strategies with regional goals to attract investments from Chinese renewable energy companies [2][8] - Innovative policies are being introduced to encourage foreign direct investment, particularly from China, despite external challenges such as green trade barriers [8][9] - Joint ventures are seen as the optimal model for enhancing cooperation between China and ASEAN in the renewable energy sector, facilitating resource integration and technology transfer [9][10] Group 3: Renewable Energy and Technology - Strong storage technology is identified as crucial for stabilizing energy supply from intermittent renewable sources like solar and wind [7] - The potential for green hydrogen is acknowledged, but immediate focus remains on storage solutions to ensure reliable energy supply [7] - The ASEAN Energy Center plays a pivotal role in facilitating collaboration, providing knowledge, and supporting policy development for low-carbon transitions [3][10]
面对绿色贸易壁垒高筑,我国企业如何主动重构国际竞争力?
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing green trade barriers imposed by Western countries, which pose systemic challenges to China's industries such as renewable energy and steel, under the guise of environmental protection [1][2]. Group 1: Green Trade Barriers - The green trade barriers from the US and EU are becoming systematic, standardized, and refined, with significant policies like the US Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) mandating that by 2029, 100% of electric vehicle battery components must be assembled in North America [2]. - The EU's battery regulations require foreign batteries to establish a "battery passport" by 2025, disclosing extensive information about material sources and carbon footprints, which raises compliance costs and risks of technology leakage [2]. - The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) will impose import taxes on high-carbon products starting in 2025 for the US and 2026 for the EU, increasing export costs for Chinese products, with estimated cost increases of 652 to 690 RMB per ton of steel, leading to a 15% to 20% decrease in price competitiveness [2]. Group 2: Strategic Response - Companies should adopt a proactive approach to address these barriers through a four-phase strategy: deconstructing current policies, responding to immediate challenges, resolving mid-term issues, and achieving long-term breakthroughs [3][7]. - In the short term, companies can seek new regional markets or product directions to avoid direct impacts from green trade barriers, such as establishing blockchain supply chain traceability platforms [4]. - In the mid-term, companies can invest in local production facilities in target markets to mitigate the impact of carbon tariffs, as seen with Longi Green Energy's factory in Ohio benefiting from tax credits [5]. Group 3: Long-term Strategies - In the long term, companies should focus on developing low-carbon technologies and circular processes to enhance their global competitiveness in green products [6]. - Establishing mutual recognition of environmental certifications between China and the EU can help meet carbon footprint accounting requirements [6]. - Companies should aim to lead the formulation of international green technology standards, leveraging their technological advantages in sectors like renewable energy and electric vehicles [6][7].
冲破国际市场碳足迹壁垒,要用好核算这一招
Group 1 - The global economy is integrating deeply with a focus on green transformation, creating both opportunities and challenges for companies, particularly with the rise of green trade barriers [1] - Chinese automotive companies face significant challenges in international markets due to carbon emission taxes, highlighting the urgent need for enhanced carbon footprint accounting capabilities [1][2] - The EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and Russia's carbon footprint taxation policies indicate that carbon footprint is becoming a critical international trade threshold [1] Group 2 - Many companies still prioritize traditional concerns like cost and efficiency, underestimating the strategic importance of carbon footprint accounting in overcoming green barriers and enhancing brand value [2] - The complexity and technical nature of carbon footprint accounting, along with a lack of professional talent and established technical systems, hinder companies' ability to perform accurate assessments [2] - The absence of unified domestic standards and the diverse international certification systems create confusion for companies in carbon footprint accounting [2] Group 3 - To overcome carbon footprint barriers in international markets, collaboration among companies, government, and industry is essential [3] - Companies should prioritize carbon footprint management in their development strategies and establish comprehensive carbon emission monitoring systems across the entire supply chain [3] - The government should enhance guidance and support by improving regulations and standards related to carbon footprint accounting, offering financial incentives, and creating public service platforms for data sharing and technical consultation [3]
大批黄金运回中国,提前为美债暴雷做准备?中国还防了特朗普一手
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-22 13:25
Group 1: Gold Import and Economic Strategy - China's gold imports surged to 127.5 tons, marking a nearly one-year high, despite international gold prices nearing $3,500 per ounce, reflecting a strategic move rather than a market reaction [3][5] - The increase in gold reserves is seen as a response to concerns over the financial systems of major economies, particularly with $6 trillion in U.S. debt maturing in June and uncertainty surrounding interest rate decisions [5][6] - The proportion of gold in China's foreign exchange reserves rose from less than 3% in 2020 to 5.8% in April 2023, indicating a strategy to strengthen the "gold-RMB" linkage for financial security [10][12] Group 2: Trade Relations and Regional Integration - China and ASEAN announced an upgrade to their free trade agreement to version 3.0, aiming for deeper economic integration and addressing global trade protectionism [13][15] - The new agreement is expected to cover over 90% of goods with zero tariffs, significantly reducing trade costs and optimizing China's foreign trade structure [15] - The collaboration includes establishing a "super factory" and "super market" that serves over 2 billion people, enhancing regional supply chains and market resilience [15][16] Group 3: Financial and Trade Defense Strategy - The simultaneous actions of increasing gold reserves and deepening trade ties with ASEAN are part of a broader strategy to fortify financial security and reshape trade structures [18][20] - The strategy aims to create a dual support system for financial and industrial resilience, reducing reliance on single markets and enhancing resource allocation flexibility [20][21] - The potential for increased use of RMB in ASEAN trade settlements could promote the internationalization of the currency, especially in light of upcoming financial pressures [21][23]