美国总统特朗普2025年上任以来多次扬言要得到格陵兰岛，并声称不排除动用武力的可能性。鲁比奥在 5日举行的国会闭门简报会上称，美国政府近期就格陵兰岛问题发出威胁，目的是要从丹麦手中"购 买"该岛。 格陵兰岛位于北美洲东北部，是世界第一大岛。该岛是丹麦自治领地，有高度自治权，国防和外交事务 由丹麦政府掌管。美国目前在格陵兰岛设有一处军事基地。丹麦和美国均是北约成员国。 综合自：央视新闻 当地时间1月7日，在格陵兰岛问题上，白宫新闻秘书莱维特称，"购买"格陵兰岛的方案正在由总统及国 家安全团队积极讨论。她表示，特朗普不会提前排除任何选项，"所有选项始终在桌面上"，但强调外交 始终是总统的首选路径。 当地时间7日，欧洲理事会主席科斯塔表示，格陵兰岛属于其人民，并得到欧盟的全力支持。科斯塔警 告称，美国单边主义是通往冲突、暴力和不稳定的"快速通道"。 ...

格陵兰岛位于北美洲东北部，是世界第一大岛。该岛是丹麦自治领地，有高度自治权，国防和外交事务 由丹麦政府掌管。美国目前在格陵兰岛设有一处军事基地。丹麦和美国均是北约成员国。 美国总统特朗普2025年上任以来多次扬言要得到格陵兰岛，并声称不排除动用武力的可能性。鲁比奥在 5日举行的国会闭门简报会上称，美国政府近期就格陵兰岛问题发出威胁，目的是要从丹麦手中"购 买"该岛。（总台记者 宋亮） 当地时间7日，欧洲理事会主席科斯塔表示，格陵兰岛属于其人民，并得到欧盟的全力支持。科斯塔警 告称，美国单边主义是通往冲突、暴力和不稳定的"快速通道"。 责编：张青津、张振 ...

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the U.S. demanding a prepayment of $350 billion from South Korea, which has been denied by South Korean officials, highlighting the unsustainable nature of such a payment [2][4] - The U.S. proposal includes a profit-sharing scheme where both countries would initially split profits 50/50, but after cost recovery, the U.S. would take 90% of the profits, leaving South Korea with only 10% [4] - South Korea's current foreign reserves are approximately $410 billion, and a one-time payment of $350 billion would nearly deplete these reserves, raising concerns about a potential financial crisis similar to that of 1997 [6] Group 2 - Analysts suggest that the U.S. is exhibiting a bullying diplomatic strategy, showing more restraint with larger powers like China while exerting pressure on allies like South Korea [7] - The situation reflects a growing trend of U.S. unilateralism, disregarding the interests of allies, as seen in its policies towards Ukraine and now South Korea [8] - Observers note that South Korea may be forced to compromise due to its reliance on military security and economic ties with the U.S., potentially leading to unfavorable terms [9][10]

Core Viewpoint - Trump's tariff strategy, particularly the 50% tariff on Indian agricultural products, is causing significant distress for Indian farmers and is perceived as a threat to their livelihoods, leading to a backlash against Modi's government [2][3][10]. Group 1: Impact on India - The 50% tariff imposed by Trump is pushing Indian farmers to the brink, exacerbating their already difficult living conditions [2]. - Modi faces a dilemma: comply with U.S. agricultural demands or risk alienating a significant portion of his voter base [3][10]. Group 2: Brazil's Response - Brazilian President Lula's reaction to Trump's tariffs is one of defiance, indicating a willingness to retaliate against U.S. trade policies [6][8]. - Lula's refusal to engage with the White House and his pivot towards collaboration with India and China signifies a shift in global economic alliances [10][11]. Group 3: Global Economic Repercussions - The tariffs are catalyzing a unification among BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) against U.S. economic dominance, suggesting a potential shift towards de-dollarization [10][11]. - The current economic turbulence is not just about tariffs but represents a broader restructuring of the global economic order, challenging U.S. trade hegemony [11][13].

Group 1 - The Trump administration is facing unprecedented trade challenges, with the 125% tariffs on China not yielding the desired results, and the 90-day tariff suspension for over 70 countries approaching its deadline [1][3] - The U.S. Treasury Secretary confirmed that Trump is considering extending the tariff suspension, indicating that over 70 countries may temporarily avoid high tariff impacts [1][3] - China's strong stance in the negotiations has led to significant pressure on the U.S. from other economies, highlighting a profound shift in the global trade landscape due to China's strategic determination [1][3] Group 2 - Trump's tariff policy has undergone dramatic reversals, initially announcing equal tariffs on over 70 countries, only to suspend them shortly after while maintaining punitive tariffs on China [3][6] - The U.S. has struggled to achieve concessions from China during negotiations, with other countries, except the UK, failing to reach agreements, revealing the failure of the U.S. strategy to isolate China [3][6] - The U.S. is now likely to extend the tariff suspension for countries engaging in "good faith negotiations," although this is perceived as a unilateral demand that faces widespread resistance [6][8] Group 3 - China's rare earth exports have become a critical bargaining chip, with the U.S. heavily reliant on China for 90% of its rare earth needs, indicating potential severe impacts if exports are fully banned [6][8] - The global trade system is witnessing new trends, with China's advantages and multilateral cooperation strategies effectively countering U.S. tariff measures, leading to unprecedented challenges for U.S. unilateralism [8]