自然保护地体系

Search documents
“昆虫巨人”、伪装者、长跑健将……一起来看武夷山的神奇昆虫
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-08-24 20:05
记者从国家林草局了解到,目前,我国正在构建以国家公园为主体的自然保护地体系。在武夷山国家公园福建片区,累计发现了62个新物种。 武夷山国家公园福建科研监测中心副主任 詹丽英:武夷山这么冷的地方,也能发现海南的物种,这太奇怪了。 在这里,一片树叶、一块树皮 很可能就是一个昆虫伪装的 一起看看它们的"伪装术" ↓↓↓ 溪谷藏着"昆虫巨人" 热带物种尖峰岭彪 来认识一个"昆虫巨人"——尖峰岭彪 ,是福建省重点保护昆虫,是竹节虫的一种,它的雌性体长可达25~27厘米,再加上昆虫的足全长可轻松超过30厘米, 被誉为"华东最长昆虫"。 尖峰岭彪 若虫一般分布在热带地区,和其他竹节虫若虫不一样,它们的胫节具有斑马样花纹,触角特别短小。 武夷山有很多低海拔的溪谷,在庞大的森林的庇护下,热带的物种也能在这里繁衍生息。尖峰岭彪 生活在武夷山海拔500米以下的常绿阔叶林中。 昆虫学者 郭亮:2到3个月以后,它们可就不止这么大了,一般可以到33~34厘米,比我的脸还长,它就变成了武夷山的"昆虫巨人"了。 "长跑健将"大步甲 御敌方式很特别 武夷山大步甲,是目前只在武夷山国家公园范围内发现的昆虫,也是福建省首批重点保护昆虫,大步甲到底 ...
“大熊猫王国”改革进一步 卧龙特区地方事务管理职责完成属地移交
Si Chuan Ri Bao· 2025-07-29 00:17
Core Viewpoint - The transfer of local administrative responsibilities for the Wolong Special Administrative Region marks a significant step in the management reform of the Giant Panda National Park in Sichuan, China, enhancing ecological protection and social development in the region [1][2]. Group 1: Administrative Changes - The Sichuan Provincial Forestry and Grassland Bureau officially transferred local administrative responsibilities to Aba Prefecture and Wenchuan County, indicating a shift towards localized governance [1]. - Responsibilities for economic and social development, public services, and social management have been assigned to Wenchuan County, while road management duties have been divided between Aba Prefecture and Wenchuan County [1]. - The core ecological area’s habitat protection will be overseen by the soon-to-be-established Wolong Branch of the Giant Panda National Park [1]. Group 2: Historical Context and Significance - Established in March 1983, the Wolong Special Administrative Region has played a crucial role in ecological protection and livelihood development, covering an area of 2,000 square kilometers and housing over 5,000 residents [1][2]. - The region is recognized as the most complete habitat for wild giant pandas globally, with 149 wild pandas recorded as of last year, reflecting a significant increase since its establishment [2]. - The average annual income of rural residents in the region has increased to over 19,000 yuan, nearly doubling since 1983, showcasing the economic development alongside ecological conservation [2]. Group 3: National Park Integration - The establishment of the Giant Panda National Park in 2021 integrated the Wolong Special Administrative Region, aiming for cross-regional habitat protection and breaking down administrative barriers [2]. - The existing local administrative system was deemed inadequate for current needs, necessitating the transfer of responsibilities to local governance to streamline management processes [2].
生态环境部:正编制国家公园等生态环境保护成效评估标准
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-05-30 05:59
Core Viewpoint - The establishment of national standards for evaluating the ecological protection effectiveness of national parks and nature parks is crucial for enhancing regulatory oversight in these areas [1][2]. Group 1: National Standards and Evaluation Framework - The Ministry of Ecology and Environment is developing evaluation standards for the ecological protection effectiveness of national parks and nature parks, aiming to provide technical guidance for overall regulatory improvement [1][2]. - The draft standards, titled "Technical Specifications for Evaluating the Ecological Protection Effectiveness of National Parks" and "Technical Specifications for Evaluating the Ecological Protection Effectiveness of Nature Parks," are open for public consultation starting from the 29th [1][2]. - The overall plan for establishing the national park system emphasizes the need for evaluations of ecosystem status, environmental quality changes, and the implementation of ecological civilization systems, including the establishment of a third-party evaluation system [2]. Group 2: Evaluation Criteria and Methodology - The evaluation of national park ecological protection effectiveness will assess aspects such as ecosystem authenticity, integrity, functionality, biodiversity, water quality, major threats, violations, and monitoring status, with a recommended evaluation cycle of every five years [3]. - The evaluation for nature parks will focus on the protection status of natural ecosystems, key species, and natural relics, with specific indicators selected based on the characteristics of each nature park [3]. - The evaluation methodology will combine quantitative and qualitative assessments, covering natural ecology, environmental quality, ecological stress, violations, and monitoring status [3]. Group 3: Consequences of Evaluation Results - If significant environmental incidents caused by human factors occur, or if there are major pollution or ecological damage issues that are reported by central ecological environment protection inspections and not rectified on time, the evaluation result for the nature park will be downgraded to "poor" [4]. - For lesser incidents that are not rectified on time, the evaluation result may also be downgraded by one level [4].