而东京，位于关东地区，长期以来在日本的历史上似乎一直处于"边缘"地位。五百年前，这里只是一个不起眼的小渔村。四百多年前，德川家族在这里建立 了江户幕府，江户才正式步入了日本历史的中央舞台。 写作是一项不容易的工作，作者每天都在辛勤写作，目的只是为了养家糊口。所以，希望大家能多一些理解和支持。为了能让大家更好地享受这篇文章，我 们加入了5秒钟的广告。只需要观看五秒钟，文章内容就可以免费解锁啦！感谢大家的支持与理解！ 文 | 张润晨 编辑 | t 如今，日本首都东京的GDP排名全球城市第二，仅次于纽约。而在亚洲，东京以其超强的经济实力稳居首位，成为名副其实的"亚洲第一城"。东京的商业用 地投资更是达到193亿美元（约2万亿日元），位居全球之首。 纽约用了两百年的时间才登上全球经济的顶峰，而东京却只用了短短八十年的时间，从一片废墟崛起，迅速成为世界第二大经济中心。那么，东京到底是凭 什么在这么短的时间内，完成这样的蜕变呢？ 日本有着两千多年的悠久历史，但东京这座城市，实际上并不算古老。日本的经济和政治中心一直以来都集中在关西地区的大都市圈，神户、京都、奈良等 城市曾是日本的文化与经济重镇。 在江户时代的前两百年，东 ...

Group 1 - The manufacturing sector's share of the US GDP has shrunk to 10%, a historical low, significantly below Japan (21%), Germany (18%), and South Korea (24%), as well as the global average of 15% [2] - The decline in manufacturing has led to severe wealth distribution imbalances, with the bottom 50% of households owning only 2.5% of national wealth, while national debt exceeds $36 trillion [3] - The core issue behind the manufacturing decline is a gap in technical capabilities and talent, with a shortage of 2.1 million skilled workers in the US manufacturing sector [3][10] Group 2 - The US manufacturing industry was once a global leader, producing ships and steel at unprecedented rates during World War II, with high worker benefits and a strong labor-innovation cycle [4] - The decline of US manufacturing began in the late 20th century due to financial liberalization policies that shifted corporate focus from technological innovation to maximizing shareholder value [5] - The financialization of manufacturing led to short-term profits but created systemic risks, culminating in the 2008 financial crisis, which severely impacted companies like General Electric [7][8] Group 3 - Current challenges for the US manufacturing sector include a significant skills gap, cost disadvantages due to aging infrastructure, and a fragmented supply chain [10][11] - Policies aimed at revitalizing manufacturing are often contradictory, such as promoting domestic production while simultaneously tightening immigration policies, which exacerbates labor shortages [11] - The historical rise and fall of US manufacturing highlight the importance of balancing technological innovation, labor rights, and capital returns, providing lessons for other countries like China [12]

Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the report. Core Viewpoints - The development of science and technology innovation bonds (Sci - tech bonds) in the US, Japan, and Europe is mainly driven by relevant industrial policies, economic fundamentals, and the improvement of the bond market. In contrast, China has established a separate Sci - tech bond sector in the bond market and clearly regulates the Sci - tech attributes of issuers and projects. - Although China's Sci - tech bond market is still in its early stage of development globally, with continuous policy support, it is expected to expand rapidly in terms of market volume and align with mature overseas markets in terms of market structure [3]. Summary by Directory 1. US Sci - tech Bond Development History - 1950s - 1960s: The US Small Business Administration (SBA) established the Small Business Investment Company (SBIC) program in 1958 to support small innovative enterprises [1][10]. - 1970s - 1980s: There was a boom in high - yield bond issuance. Start - ups in emerging industries mainly issued high - yield bonds for leveraged buyouts, with most Sci - tech enterprises in the high - yield bond market being electronic communication, computer hardware, and software start - ups [1][12]. - 1990s: The US information technology developed rapidly. The 144A rule issued by the SEC in 1990 improved the liquidity and pricing efficiency of Sci - tech bonds. The development of risk - management derivatives such as CDS promoted the large - scale and mature development of the high - yield bond market, and start - ups in Sci - tech industries such as new energy vehicles, computers, and communications rose [1][15]. - Early 2000s: After the burst of the Internet bubble, the issuance of Sci - tech bonds in the communication and semiconductor industries declined, but the biomedical field became a new growth point for Sci - tech bond issuance from 2000 - 2005 [1]. - 2008 - 2015: After the financial crisis, in a low - interest - rate environment, technology companies at various stages issued long - term low - interest bonds, and the issuance of Sci - tech bonds continued to rise [1]. - Since 2015: With the strengthening of bond market supervision in the US, the supporting systems for Sci - tech bonds have gradually improved, promoting Sci - tech enterprise bonds to become an important part of the US credit bond market [1]. 2. Japanese Sci - tech Bond Development History - Late 1970s - early 1980s: Japan's economic growth slowed down, and the government increased support for the information and electronics industries. After a series of financial liberalization measures, the Sci - tech bond market became active [1][20]. - Late 1980s: To mitigate the impact of exchange - rate fluctuations, Japan increased support for export industries such as electronics. Emerging industries turned to bond issuance for financing, but the number of issuances did not increase significantly due to the under - development of the capital market [21]. - Early 1990s: After the economic bubble burst, the Japanese government protected high - tech industries. In 1996, the corporate bond issuance market was fully liberalized, but the real - estate crisis led to a preference for high - rated bonds among investors, and the Sci - tech bond market was sluggish [22]. - Since the 21st century: In a low - interest - rate environment, Japanese technology companies prefer bank loans or issuing bonds in the international market, and the Sci - tech bond market has remained sluggish [22]. 3. European Sci - tech Bond Development History - Before the 21st century: Due to differences in fiscal policies and industrial structures among EU member states, the bond market was fragmented, and the issuance of Sci - tech bonds was limited [25]. - After the 21st century: With the acceleration of the EU bond market integration process and the implementation of the Lisbon Strategy in 2000, the bond market showed more interest in high - tech and high - growth enterprises, and the issuance of Sci - tech bonds became more active [25]. - Since 2010: The establishment of the European Private Placement Platform (ECPP) in 2015 provided a simple financing channel for start - up high - tech enterprises. The European Central Bank's Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme (PEPP) in 2020 increased the issuance of Sci - tech bonds [2][26]. 4. Comparison of Policy Trends between Overseas and Domestic Sci - tech Bonds - In the US, Japan, and Europe, there is no separate "Sci - tech bond" sector in the bond market guided by policies. The development of Sci - tech bonds is mainly driven by industrial policies, economic cycles, and bond - market improvement. In China, a separate Sci - tech bond sector has been established, with clear regulations on the Sci - tech attributes of issuers and projects [3]. - The US Sci - tech bond market has a relatively long history of development and is now an important part of the credit bond market. In Japan and Europe, the development of Sci - tech bonds started later. In recent years, the issuance of European Sci - tech bonds has been increasing, while the Japanese market has been sluggish. China's Sci - tech bond market is in the stage of continuous innovation and market upgrading [29][30][31].