大家好，厉叔的这篇文章主要阐述了房价下降这几年，发生了什么 过去这四年，房价终于跌了，可奇怪的是，大家并没有因此就去结婚买房，反而连恋爱都懒得谈了。 打工人不再拼命求升职，连大爷大妈都开始罢工不带孙子了，这期间到底发生了什么？ 房子跌下神坛 2025年12月，有一个特别微妙的信号引起了圈内人的注意，在当月召开的重要经济会议通稿里，以往雷 打不动的房地产三个字，历史性地消失了。 但这并不让人意外，毕竟普通人在这四年里，早就用钱包做出了投票，房子这个曾经中国家庭最硬的资 产信仰，正在经历一场彻底的祛魅。 回看这房价掉头向下的四年，最直接的变化就是大家对搞事业这件事没那么上头。 根据埃森哲的一份调研数据，人们对事业的关注度从四年前的53%直接跌到了35%，不是大家不想努力 了，而是账算明白了。 以前打工人拼命加班，图的是升职加薪买房，资产增值，现在的情况是，辛辛苦苦干一年赚的工资，可 能还赶不上房子缩水的零头。 有个在2022年买房的朋友，眼看着房子市值蒸发了几十万，这种打击比老板画的大饼更能让人清醒。 于是安全感替代了进取心，数据显示，人们对财富的关注度从47%飙升到了61%，注意这里的财富指的 不是投资，而是实 ...

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the potential risks of over-reliance on AI, particularly in the context of independent thinking and cognitive abilities [1][2][3] Group 1: AI Dependency and Cognitive Impact - AI applications, while enhancing productivity, may lead to "AI brain fog," diminishing motivation and cognitive abilities over time [2][3] - Research from MIT indicates that long-term use of AI tools can reduce neural connections in the brain, affecting language and behavior [2] - Studies suggest that generative AI can weaken critical thinking skills, leading to a dependency that undermines problem-solving capabilities [2][3] Group 2: Psychological and Social Implications - The use of AI can result in a "hollowing out" of cognitive demands, where humans engage in mere mechanical execution of tasks, leading to psychological detachment and loss of motivation [3] - The increasing trust in AI stems from its specialized capabilities and user-friendly interactions, which can create a psychological dependency [4] - Lack of basic AI literacy among users contributes to a tendency to "blindly trust" AI outputs, raising concerns about the potential for misinformation and bias in critical areas like law and healthcare [4] Group 3: Future of Human-AI Interaction - The future workforce may split into "AI passengers," who rely entirely on AI, and "AI drivers," who actively manage and verify AI outputs [7] - Establishing an "AI buffer zone" is recommended, where individuals first generate their own responses before consulting AI, fostering independent thought [7] - Critical thinking should be applied to AI-generated content, questioning whether the alignment of AI responses with personal views is due to influence or training [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rise of Ani, an AI character developed by Musk's xAI, which has gained significant popularity and controversy due to its interactive features and adult-themed content [5][18][24]. Group 1: Ani's Features and Popularity - Ani is designed with a complete interaction framework that quantifies user engagement through a "likability" score ranging from -10 to +15, influencing user interactions [20][21]. - The character can remember past conversations, providing a more coherent and engaging user experience, and supports multiple languages, with varying levels of effectiveness [22][23]. - Within 24 hours of launch, Ani's platform Grok topped the iOS free charts in Japan and Hong Kong, with a 400% increase in downloads in Japan within 48 hours [23]. Group 2: Controversies Surrounding Ani - Ani's adult-themed features, including a controversial outfit change to a sheer nightgown, have sparked debates about the appropriateness of AI companions [25][27]. - The character's interactions often include suggestive content, raising concerns about the blurring lines between AI tools and emotional companionship [29][30]. - The article highlights a broader societal concern regarding the potential psychological impacts of over-reliance on AI, particularly in the context of emotional support and decision-making [30][43]. Group 3: AI Dependency and Cognitive Impact - The article references a study from MIT indicating that reliance on AI tools like ChatGPT can diminish cognitive engagement and critical thinking skills [39][41]. - The findings suggest that while AI can enhance efficiency, it may also lead to a decline in essential cognitive abilities, particularly among younger users [40][42]. - The discussion emphasizes the need for maintaining human agency and critical thinking in an increasingly AI-dependent world, questioning the balance between convenience and cognitive health [43].

Group 1 - AI is currently a productivity tool rather than an entertainment tool, even in entertainment sectors like gaming, where it enhances the experience [1] - There are signs indicating a revival of the PC desktop market [2] - Concerns about AI addiction are considered exaggerated, similar to past fears about internet addiction [2] Group 2 - The reliance on AI is not inherently alarming, as reliance on various tools is common in human life [3] - The real concern is not AI making mistakes, but rather its consistent accuracy, which can lead to fear similar to the impact of AlphaGo in the game of Go [3][4] - AI has the potential to significantly enhance efficiency, thereby increasing supply and quality, although its impact on demand remains uncertain [3][4] Group 3 - The internet excels in addressing oversupply issues but struggles with undersupply, an area where AI can provide substantial assistance [3] - AI can elevate the capabilities of already skilled individuals and slightly improve the potential of those at the lower end of the social spectrum, indicating a possible widening of the AI gap compared to the digital divide of the past [3][4] Group 4 - AI has undoubtedly raised the baseline for humanity, suggesting that a society where AI governs may be preferable to one where humans do [4] - The emotional response to AI agents differs based on their role in decision-making, highlighting the complexity of human-AI interactions [4] Group 5 - The contribution of humanities and social sciences to AI is minimal, as these fields often deal with subjective perspectives and complex ethical dilemmas that do not have standard answers [4] - Ethical dilemmas, such as the trolley problem in autonomous driving, lack clear solutions, and the market will ultimately determine which algorithms succeed based on consumer preference [4]

Core Viewpoint - The integration of AI as a tool for emotional support among teenagers is growing, with AI serving as a non-judgmental outlet for expressing feelings and managing stress, although it should not replace human interaction [1][2][3][4][5][6] Group 1: AI as Emotional Support - Teenagers are increasingly using AI as a "tree hole" for emotional expression, providing a safe space to share feelings without fear of judgment [2][3] - AI's 24/7 availability meets the need for immediate emotional support, especially when traditional avenues of communication are limited due to various pressures [2][4] - The interaction with AI can help teenagers manage their emotions and provide a sense of companionship during lonely times [2][3] Group 2: Risks of Over-Reliance on AI - There is a concern that excessive reliance on AI for emotional support may hinder the development of real-life social skills and interpersonal relationships [4][5] - AI lacks the ability to provide the nuanced feedback that human interactions offer, which is essential for socialization and emotional growth [5][6] - The potential for emotional dependency on AI could lead to a decline in the ability to engage in meaningful human relationships [5][6] Group 3: Future of AI in Mental Health - Ongoing research is focused on developing AI that can effectively support mental health while ensuring safety and reliability [6] - Schools are encouraged to consider integrating quality AI tools for emotional support, while also emphasizing the importance of human connections [6] - It is crucial to educate teenagers about the limitations of AI and encourage them to seek support from trusted adults and peers [6]