以下文章来源于Sir电影 ，作者毒Sir Sir电影 . 爱电影的人，一直关注我 本文来自微信公众号： Sir电影 ，作者：毒Sir，编辑助理：摩卡夫卡布奇诺，题图来自：AI生成 这个热点相信你看到了吧。 魔法世界风云再起。 9月24日，艾玛在做客一档播客节目《On Purpose》的时候，首次回应了她与JK·罗琳在近几年以来 的争端。 但这一和解的信号，直接被罗琳回应——"婉拒了哈"。 这几年，J·K·罗琳在舆论风暴中处于劣势地位。 但如今风向已经反转。 艾玛成了网友口中忘恩负义的"插刀女"。 罗琳当即被指控为是歧视跨性别者。 罗琳坚称自己是手滑，但争议的种子开始埋下。 这一轮交锋暂告段落。 结果是，粉丝懂得了对角色祛魅，以至于对"影版"祛魅，罗琳作为《哈利·波特》的正主归位——毕 竟手握IP的她，即将迎来新的剧版改编。 此时的对与错已经不是最重要的了。 因为这个事件昭示的便是：某些正确的话语，或许能兴起一时。但风头过后，你才会发现世界牢牢掌 握在谁手中——那些常常缄默而保守的，产权所有者。 一 一切事情的起源，要追溯到七年以前。 2018年，罗琳点赞了一条推特，内容将跨性别女性称为"穿裙子的男人"。 此后 ...

9月24日，艾玛在做客一档播客节目《On Purpose》的时候，首次回应了她与JK·罗琳在近几年以来的争端。 但这一和解的信号，直接被罗琳回应——"婉拒了哈"。 这几年，J·K·罗琳在舆论风暴中处于劣势地位。 但如今风向已经反转。 艾玛成了网友口中忘恩负义的"插刀女"。 这个热点相信你看到了吧。 魔法世界风云再起。 这一轮交锋暂告段落。 结果是，粉丝懂得了对角色祛魅，以至于对"影版"祛魅，罗琳作为《哈利·波特》的正主归位——毕竟手握IP的她，即将迎来新的剧版改编。 此时的对与错已经不是最重要的了。 因为这个事件昭示的便是：某些正确的话语，或许能兴起一时。但风头过后，你才会发现世界牢牢掌握在谁手中——那些常常缄默而保守的，产权所有 者。 一 一切事情的起源，要追溯到七年以前。 2018年，罗琳点赞了一条推特，内容将跨性别女性称为"穿裙子的男人"。 罗琳当即被指控为是歧视跨性别者。 罗琳坚称自己是手滑，但争议的种子开始埋下。 此后，2019年12月，罗琳的另一条言论，引起了轩然大波： 你们可以有穿衣自由，也可以有称谓自由，也可以有成年双方同意前提下的性自由，完全可以活得平静、安稳、精彩，但逼迫女性丢掉工作来 认 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. House of Representatives' "China Task Force" is investigating Harvard University for its collaborations with Chinese military-related institutions in dual-use technologies such as microelectronics, artificial intelligence, and quantum science [1] - Republican lawmakers, led by Chairman Mulvaney, have sent a 14-page letter to Harvard's president demanding internal documents and communications regarding the university's foreign partnerships, threatening to revoke its tax-exempt status if improper disclosures are found [1] - The investigation is part of a broader scrutiny of Harvard's operations, which has included inquiries into its handling of anti-Semitism and alleged collusion on tuition with other Ivy League schools [1] Group 2 - The U.S. government has been systematically targeting major universities for alleged violations of civil rights laws, resulting in significant federal funding cuts, including $400 million from Columbia University and nearly $1 billion from Cornell University [2] - The escalation of scrutiny towards Harvard reflects a political strategy by the U.S. government and Congress to establish boundaries regarding university operations and their connections with China, aiming to reshape higher education culture and demonize cultural exchanges with China [2]

Core Viewpoint - Wealthy private foundations in the U.S. are informally uniting to protect their tax-exempt status amid threats from the Trump administration to revoke it [1][2]. Group 1: Foundation Responses - Major foundations, including the Ford Foundation and Gates Foundation, are discussing potential responses to government attempts to challenge their tax-exempt status [1]. - Some foundations are considering seeking collective or individual legal representation if their tax-exempt status is threatened [1][2]. - John Palfrey, president of the MacArthur Foundation, emphasized that any government efforts to revoke tax-exempt status based on foundation activities would be met with strong legal opposition [2]. Group 2: Government Actions and Concerns - The Trump administration is exploring broader challenges to the tax-exempt status of non-profit organizations, including threats to revoke the status of institutions like Harvard University [1][2]. - A recent executive order from Trump directed federal agencies to identify potential investigations into large non-profits, raising concerns among charitable organizations [2][4]. - Foundations are worried about potential increases in the excise tax on their investment income and changes to spending requirements [3][4]. Group 3: Financial Impact - Revoking tax-exempt status could significantly reduce the funding available for various charitable causes, as many foundations rely on tax incentives to motivate donations [1][4]. - In 2023, foundations donated over $100 billion to U.S. charities, making them the second-largest source of funding after individual donors [4]. Group 4: Industry Collaboration - Discussions among foundations are being facilitated by the Council on Foundations, which emphasizes the importance of independent operation for these organizations [5]. - Some foundations are seeking individual legal representation while others may opt for a united front against government actions [5].