以下文章来源于Sir电影 ，作者毒Sir Sir电影 . 爱电影的人，一直关注我 本文来自微信公众号： Sir电影 ，作者：毒Sir，编辑助理：摩卡夫卡布奇诺，题图来自：AI生成 这个热点相信你看到了吧。 魔法世界风云再起。 9月24日，艾玛在做客一档播客节目《On Purpose》的时候，首次回应了她与JK·罗琳在近几年以来 的争端。 但这一和解的信号，直接被罗琳回应——"婉拒了哈"。 这几年，J·K·罗琳在舆论风暴中处于劣势地位。 但如今风向已经反转。 艾玛成了网友口中忘恩负义的"插刀女"。 罗琳当即被指控为是歧视跨性别者。 罗琳坚称自己是手滑，但争议的种子开始埋下。 这一轮交锋暂告段落。 结果是，粉丝懂得了对角色祛魅，以至于对"影版"祛魅，罗琳作为《哈利·波特》的正主归位——毕 竟手握IP的她，即将迎来新的剧版改编。 此时的对与错已经不是最重要的了。 因为这个事件昭示的便是：某些正确的话语，或许能兴起一时。但风头过后，你才会发现世界牢牢掌 握在谁手中——那些常常缄默而保守的，产权所有者。 一 一切事情的起源，要追溯到七年以前。 2018年，罗琳点赞了一条推特，内容将跨性别女性称为"穿裙子的男人"。 此后 ...

9月24日，艾玛在做客一档播客节目《On Purpose》的时候，首次回应了她与JK·罗琳在近几年以来的争端。 但这一和解的信号，直接被罗琳回应——"婉拒了哈"。 这几年，J·K·罗琳在舆论风暴中处于劣势地位。 但如今风向已经反转。 艾玛成了网友口中忘恩负义的"插刀女"。 这个热点相信你看到了吧。 魔法世界风云再起。 这一轮交锋暂告段落。 结果是，粉丝懂得了对角色祛魅，以至于对"影版"祛魅，罗琳作为《哈利·波特》的正主归位——毕竟手握IP的她，即将迎来新的剧版改编。 此时的对与错已经不是最重要的了。 因为这个事件昭示的便是：某些正确的话语，或许能兴起一时。但风头过后，你才会发现世界牢牢掌握在谁手中——那些常常缄默而保守的，产权所有 者。 一 一切事情的起源，要追溯到七年以前。 2018年，罗琳点赞了一条推特，内容将跨性别女性称为"穿裙子的男人"。 罗琳当即被指控为是歧视跨性别者。 罗琳坚称自己是手滑，但争议的种子开始埋下。 此后，2019年12月，罗琳的另一条言论，引起了轩然大波： 你们可以有穿衣自由，也可以有称谓自由，也可以有成年双方同意前提下的性自由，完全可以活得平静、安稳、精彩，但逼迫女性丢掉工作来 认 ...

9月30日，赫格塞斯把全球美军将级军官统统召回，在匡提科的海军陆战队大学开会。这样的召集本来 就高度不寻常，后来又传出特朗普将亲自训话，外界就开始猜测美国国家安全战略要发生什么变化。 万斯指责媒体炒作，坚持认为国防部长发出这样的召集并没有什么特别，但现任北约军事委员会主席的 意大利海军上将朱塞佩·卡沃·德拉贡尼却说："在我49年的军事生涯里，还从没有见到过这样的事。" 最要紧的当然是赫格塞斯和特朗普的训话内容。赫格塞斯首先训话，特朗普接着训话。与外界猜测的国 家安全战略转向不同，赫格塞斯大谈的是"武士精神"（warrior ethos），特朗普大谈的是美军参与国内 镇暴。这些与赫格塞斯和特朗普上任以来一直鼓吹的东西相符，他们倒是不指东打西。 赫格塞斯首先强调军人的体能标准，尤其是"最高的男子汉标准"（highest male standard），即使把这部 分女子排除在外也在所不惜："标准必须一致、不分男女，标准必须很高"。他同时强调军人仪容的重要 性，大胖子军人必须整改，大胡子之类不再容许，匿名举报也将废除。 其次，赫格塞斯强调"武士精神"作为军人的灵魂，要从军中清除政治正确和"觉醒文化"。他要启动美军 的 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the European Union's involvement in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, highlighting that former President Trump criticized the EU for meddling in matters that do not concern them [1][4] - It points out the declining economic performance of the EU over the past 20 years, particularly in new sectors like the internet and AI, while also emphasizing the EU's struggles in the renewable energy sector compared to China [3] - The article mentions that EU politicians are more focused on political correctness and moral high ground rather than improving the economic conditions for their citizens, which has led to a loss of opportunities [3][4] Group 2 - The EU's reliance on expensive American liquefied gas instead of cheaper Russian energy is criticized, suggesting that political correctness has taken precedence over economic rationality [3] - Trump's return to the political scene has led to a stark realization for the EU, as they are now being told that their involvement in the Ukraine situation is irrelevant, which undermines their previous efforts and investments in the region [4] - The article concludes that the EU's previous sense of superiority has been shattered, leaving them in a precarious position without a clear path forward [4]

Core Perspective - The article discusses the recent debates in the U.S. surrounding the casting of diverse actors in classic fairy tale roles, highlighting a growing divide between traditional narratives and contemporary realities [2][3]. Summary by Sections Book Overview - "Empire of Truth" is a unique work that systematically analyzes American history and reality from a non-Western perspective, breaking away from Western discourse [2][4]. - The book employs a "news as history" approach, using recent news events to explore deeper historical roots and institutional logic behind contemporary issues in the U.S. [3][4]. Key Themes - The book covers ten critical aspects of America, including identity crises, indigenous tragedies, racial discrimination, the "American Dream," American democracy, "American exceptionalism," war tendencies, the dollar system, and technology monopolies [3][4]. - Each chapter provides both macro analysis and vivid personal stories, connecting historical events to individual fates, emphasizing the narrative that "people are the creators of history" [4]. Global Context - "Empire of Truth" places the U.S. within a broader global context, offering a multi-faceted and authentic portrayal of America, which caters to both professional researchers and general readers [4]. - The book aims to provide a rational effort to understand America, which is essential for comprehending the evolving international order [4].

Core Viewpoint - The "Mama Post" policy is a creative approach to address social fertility issues by redistributing mother subsidies based on past rural poverty alleviation experiences, representing a localized adaptation of Japan's administrative practices [2][3]. Group 1 - The essence of the "Mama Post" is precise poverty alleviation, creatively linking rural poverty alleviation experiences to social fertility issues through targeted mother subsidies [3]. - The discussion around increasing women's rights as a solution to low birth rates is critiqued, suggesting that even significant incentives like housing would not necessarily lead to higher birth rates [4][6]. - The "Mama Post" is seen as a more precise distribution method compared to previous broad approaches, which are referred to as "flood irrigation" [12]. Group 2 - The debate surrounding women's employment often centers on social responsibility and political correctness rather than productivity, indicating a disconnect from market efficiency discussions [19][21]. - The necessity of maintaining a certain number of female employees in the workforce is rooted in historical social norms and the need for societal continuity, which is linked to mother subsidies [23][29]. - The "Mama Post" is compared to Japan's administrative practices, emphasizing that if the goal is to support mothers, the most efficient method should be employed, even if it means lower-paying jobs [33]. Group 3 - The "Mama Post" reflects a societal model designed around marriage and childbirth, suggesting that those who do not conform to this model may not be the target beneficiaries of such policies [35][36]. - The impact of the "Mama Post" is primarily felt by women who previously occupied positions benefiting from the preferential treatment of mothers, highlighting a shift in employment dynamics [41][42]. - Historical patterns indicate that societal norms and economic realities will persist, regardless of contemporary beliefs about gender roles and employment [43][44].

Group 1 - The core issue involves the freezing of over $3 billion in federal education funds for Harvard University since April 2025, alongside the revocation of its eligibility to enroll foreign students, although this order was quickly halted by a U.S. court [2] - Other prestigious institutions like Princeton University and the University of Pennsylvania have also seen millions of dollars in federal education funds frozen [2] - The U.S. Department of Education is investigating 10 universities for alleged anti-Semitism and 52 universities for cases related to racism [2] Group 2 - Right-wing individuals in the U.S. perceive universities as breeding grounds for liberal ideologies, claiming that campuses have become leftist institutions pursuing "absolute freedom" [6] - The Trump administration believes that protests against Israel during the Israel-Palestine conflict have morphed into support for racism, anti-Semitism, and terrorism under leftist influence [6] - A survey conducted by Harvard's anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim bias investigation group revealed that many Jewish and Muslim students face bias, exclusion, and alienation in academic settings [6] Group 3 - The Trump administration aims to replace the previous administration's notion of "political correctness" with a stricter version, leading to concerns about freedom of speech on campuses [8] - International students express worries that their viewpoints may affect their studies and employment opportunities in the U.S., including visa revocation [8] - The ideological divide in the U.S. is impacting the normal academic and social lives of international students, particularly Chinese students, who face more complex challenges compared to their peers from other countries [8] - The U.S. may impose restrictions on Chinese students' applications in various fields under the guise of national security, leading to the most challenging application environment in 20 years for Chinese students studying in the U.S. [8]