查处垄断协议案件35起、滥用市场支配地位案件25起、罚没款总计29.3亿元、审结民生领域经营者 集中案件950起……市场监管总局开展民生领域反垄断执法专项行动3年来，以一串硬核数据交出亮眼答 卷，用执法力度守护民生温度，切实保障了消费者权益，维护了公平竞争市场秩序。 医药领域高压亮剑，守护"救命钱"安全。专项行动开展3年来，市场监管总局共查处药品领域垄断 协议和滥用市场支配地位案件12件，罚没款合计超过24亿元，形成强大执法震慑，有效遏制药品领域垄 断行为。其中，上药生化案、津药药业案、上海信谊联合案分别罚没12.19亿元、3.62亿元和2.23亿元， 对违法主体形成有力震慑，涉案药品降价均超过40%，降幅最高达95%，降低了患者用药成本和国家医 保支出。 "药品领域垄断行为破坏公平竞争市场秩序，损害人民群众切身利益，要坚持将打击药品领域垄断 行为作为重中之重，始终保持高压态势。"市场监管总局反垄断一司副司长刘健表示，今年制定出台 《关于药品领域的反垄断指南》，明确药品联合涨价和滥用市场支配地位推高药价、限定交易等垄断行 为的认定规则，强化医药行业反垄断合规指导，发挥重大典型垄断案件的警示和示范作用，强化药品 ...

Group 1 - The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) has conducted a special anti-monopoly enforcement action in the livelihood sector over the past three years, resulting in 35 cases of monopoly agreements and 25 cases of abuse of market dominance, with total fines amounting to 2.93 billion yuan [1] - In the pharmaceutical sector, SAMR has addressed 12 cases of monopoly agreements and abuse of market dominance, imposing fines exceeding 2.4 billion yuan, which has effectively curbed monopolistic behaviors and led to price reductions of over 40% for involved drugs, with some prices dropping by as much as 95% [1][2] - The enforcement actions have also targeted public utilities, with 16 cases in the water, electricity, gas, and heating sectors resulting in fines of 183 million yuan, addressing issues like price collusion and bundled sales [2][3] Group 2 - SAMR emphasizes the importance of combating monopolistic behaviors in the pharmaceutical sector, with the introduction of guidelines to clarify the identification of price-fixing and abuse of market dominance [2] - The agency has focused on reducing costs for consumers in public utilities by addressing collusion among service providers, ensuring fair competition and protecting consumer rights [3] - In the platform economy, SAMR is enhancing regular supervision to address risks such as "lowest price" guarantees and "choose one from two" practices, promoting compliance and healthy development of the sector [4] Group 3 - SAMR has conducted competitive assessments in key industries and emerging fields, including semiconductors and online payment, to provide insights for regulatory enforcement and business strategy adjustments [5] - The agency continues to implement a "three letters and one notice" system to categorize and address potential risks in enterprises, promoting compliance and proactive management [5] - Future efforts will focus on a comprehensive regulatory mechanism centered on risk warning, compliance guidance, and precise regulation to foster a fair market environment [6]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the joint efforts by Beijing's housing authority and multiple departments to address and regulate the spread of misinformation and chaotic practices in the real estate sector through internet platforms [1] Group 2 - As of December 12, under the supervision of relevant authorities, platforms such as 58 Tongcheng, Douyin, Xiaohongshu, Xianyu, and Beike have collectively self-checked and cleared over 17,000 pieces of illegal and harmful information [2] - A total of over 2,300 accounts and live streams that amplified market fluctuations, spread anxiety, speculated on policies, and disseminated false content have been removed, including accounts like Beijing Apartment, Lao Li Talks about Beijing Housing, and others [2] - Lianjia, Wo Ai Wo Jia, and Maitian have screened over 1.3 million online housing listings, taking down and rectifying more than 480 non-compliant listings [2]

Core Viewpoint - The regulatory authorities in Beijing are intensifying efforts to address the spread of false information and market panic regarding the real estate sector, targeting several internet platforms for their role in disseminating misleading content [2][4]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - A joint meeting was held on December 5, involving the Beijing Municipal Housing and Urban-Rural Development Committee, the Municipal Cyberspace Administration, and the Public Security Bureau, to address issues related to platforms like Douyin, Xiaohongshu, Beike, 58.com, Xianyu, Lianjia, and Wo Ai Wo Jia [2][3]. - The meeting highlighted that some self-media accounts were spreading negative narratives about the Beijing real estate market, which disrupts market order and harms consumer rights [4][6]. Group 2: Platform Responsibilities - Certain platforms have been criticized for lax oversight of illegal and misleading information, relying heavily on algorithmic recommendations that allow the spread of low-quality content [4][5]. - Platforms like Xiaohongshu have been found to host fictitious listings, such as a "two-bedroom apartment in Chaoyang for 3,000 yuan," which misled users and violated consumer protection laws [4][5]. Group 3: Data Security and User Protection - Some platforms have been accused of improperly collecting and using user data, raising concerns about data security and social responsibility [5][6]. - The regulatory approach includes a combination of "interviews, penalties, and credit ratings" to compel platforms to reassess their content ecosystem and ensure compliance with legal obligations [5][6]. Group 4: Long-term Mechanisms - The regulatory initiative aims to establish three long-term mechanisms: mandatory verification codes for listings, AI-driven content review, and a credit rating system for accounts based on their history of violations [6][7]. - Platforms like Beike are implementing systems to verify the authenticity of listings, achieving a 98% identification rate for false listings [7][8]. - A cross-platform blacklist mechanism is being developed to jointly penalize accounts that post misleading content across multiple platforms [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of having convenient and effective complaint channels for consumers to protect their rights in the digital age, highlighting the evolution from traditional methods to more diverse and accessible options [1][10]. Group 1: Official Online Platforms - The development of e-government has made it unprecedentedly easy for consumers to file complaints against companies [2][11]. - The national 12315 platform is identified as the most authoritative online complaint entry, achieving "one-stop service" [12]. - Consumers can submit complaints through various channels such as websites, mobile apps, and social media, ensuring ease of access [17][22]. Group 2: Industry-Specific Complaint Platforms - Specialized complaint platforms managed by industry authorities provide more professional and direct handling of specific issues [3][14]. - These channels have also adopted multi-channel access, allowing consumers to easily find the appropriate complaint entry [14]. Group 3: Third-Party Online Complaint Platforms - Third-party platforms like Black Cat Complaint have become popular due to their low entry barriers and strong information dissemination capabilities, serving as a preferred choice for many consumers [4][15]. - The core value of these platforms lies in their ability to quickly reach out and exert public opinion pressure [4][15]. - Black Cat Complaint offers features such as collective complaints and public visibility of complaint cases, enhancing consumer advocacy [5][18]. Group 4: Internal Company Complaint Channels - Companies' own customer service systems should not be overlooked as they provide the most direct and rapid resolution paths [7][19]. Group 5: Strategies for Effective Complaints - A combination strategy is recommended for maximizing complaint effectiveness, such as starting with internal channels before escalating to external ones [8][20]. - Utilizing both official and online platforms simultaneously can enhance the likelihood of a timely response from companies [8][20]. - Clear evidence and concise expression of demands are fundamental for successful complaints, regardless of the channel used [8][20]. Group 6: Summary - The article concludes that consumers have a rich and convenient array of complaint channels available, including internal company channels, official online platforms like 12315, and third-party platforms like Black Cat Complaint, allowing for flexible and effective rights protection [9][21].

又比如，针对有的平台企业要求平台内商家销售商品价格不得高于其他竞争性平台，《指引》提示平台 要求商家"全网最低价"行为可能构成滥用市场支配地位或者垄断协议行为。 再比如，针对有的平台算法不公开、不透明，"算法黑箱"损害平台内商家和消费者利益，《指引》将实 现算法向善作为平台企业重要的合规目标，并列举"算法共谋"等风险示例，同时鼓励平台企业开展算法 筛查，构建算法垄断识别防控体系，从源头上防范垄断行为的发生。 刘健表示，将坚持监管规范和促进发展并重，加快推动《指引》出台，加强平台经济反垄断监管执法， 推动平台竞争生态持续向好，维护相关主体合法权益，为平台经济创新和健康发展创造优质市场环境。 近期发布的《互联网平台反垄断合规指引（征求意见稿）》（以下简称《指引》）提出了8个新型垄断 风险，为平台企业提供了务实管用的合规指导。 12月17日，市场监管总局反垄断执法一司副司长刘健在市场监管总局召开的新闻发布会上介绍称，研究 制定《指引》，目的是引导平台企业加强风险识别、风险管理和合规保障，有效防范反垄断合规风险， 促进平台经济创新和健康发展。 近年来，我国平台经济快速发展，业态日益多元，在促进经济社会发展、推动技术进 ...

来源：新华视点 作者：刘开雄 吴慧珺 制造低资金流水假象、虚构运输业务链条、购买轨迹信息伪装……一些平台企业花样百出，不仅自己偷 逃税、虚开发票，还拓展"业务"成为下游企业偷逃税的"帮凶"。 互联网不是法外之地。12月17日，浙江、陕西、辽宁等地税务部门公布了近年查处的3起平台企业涉税 违法案件。涉案的上下游开票、受票企业也受到税务部门相应处罚。这是税务部门首次对互联网平台企 业涉税违法案件进行曝光。 在浙江，温州市税务局第二稽查局对一家平台企业——浙江嫲嫲团网络科技有限公司立案检查时发现， 该公司在与供应商进行货款结算时都会加收服务费，又通过会计手段将这些服务费伪装成"负债"，将其 藏匿在报表的"其他应付款"科目中，少缴税费款297.29万元。此外，嫲嫲团公司还通过个人账户向推广 人员支付劳动报酬，却未代扣代缴个人所得税，造成国家税款流失达472.75万元。 ——货运平台"无中生有"业务造假。 在陕西，网络货运平台运是滴科技发展有限责任公司虚构运输业务、伪造资金流水，甚至花钱购买运输 信息、货车导航定位等伪造运营的"真实性"，进而对外虚开增值税专用发票，非法收取"开票费"。经税 务部门查实，该企业接受上游企 ...

中国官方：平台要求商家"全网最低价"或构成垄断 中新社北京12月17日电 (记者 刘亮)中国国家市场监管总局反垄断执法一司副司长刘健17日透露，市场 监管部门将加快推动《互联网平台反垄断合规指引》(下称《指引》)出台，未来平台要求商家"全网最 低价"或构成滥用市场支配地位或者垄断协议行为。 当日，国家市场监管总局召开民生领域反垄断执法专项行动成果宣介专题新闻发布会，刘健在会上作上 述表示。 国家市场监管总局今年11月发布《互联网平台反垄断合规指引(征求意见稿)》，旨在更好地帮助平台经 营者精准识别、评估、防范反垄断合规风险，进一步明晰行为边界。 刘健指出，平台经济具有明显区别于传统经济的竞争特点。如头部平台企业规模效应、网络效应明显， 易于开展跨界竞争、快速扩张，实现"赢者通吃"；平台企业作为"关键一个"，相对于平台内商家和消费 者等"庞大一群"具有天然优势，具有制定规则、掌握数据、利用算法、分配流量的管理者属性。同时， 平台经济具有独特的商业逻辑和行为模式，涉及平台生态多方主体利益，如何科学划定行为边界更为复 杂。 刘健介绍，《指引》总结执法经验，提示具有市场支配地位的平台企业，要避免通过惩罚性或者激励性 ...

Core Points - The National Market Regulation Administration has taken significant actions against monopolistic practices, including 35 cases of monopoly agreements and 25 cases of abuse of market dominance, resulting in a total fine of 2.93 billion yuan [1] - The administration has also concluded 950 cases related to business concentration in the livelihood sector, supporting companies in improving operational efficiency through mergers and acquisitions [1] Group 1: Antitrust Enforcement in Key Sectors - In the pharmaceutical sector, 12 major cases were handled over three years, with fines totaling 1.219 billion yuan, 362 million yuan, and 223 million yuan for specific companies, leading to price reductions of over 40% for involved drugs, with some reductions reaching 95% [1] - In public utilities, 16 cases of monopolistic behavior in water, electricity, gas, and heating sectors were addressed, resulting in fines of 183 million yuan, effectively curbing practices like bundled sales and ensuring consumer choice [1] Group 2: Platform Economy Regulation - The administration is enhancing regular supervision of the platform economy, focusing on competitive behaviors and issues like "lowest price" guarantees and "choose one of two" practices, aiming to protect the interests of small merchants and consumers [2] - A draft guideline for antitrust compliance in internet platforms has been released for public feedback, aiming to provide practical guidance for platform enterprises and address monopolistic behaviors [2][3] Group 3: Future Regulatory Focus - Future regulatory efforts will emphasize breaking local protectionism and administrative monopolies, which are crucial for optimizing the business environment and protecting consumer interests [3] - The administration plans to increase enforcement against the abuse of administrative power, promote fair competition review systems, and enhance policy coordination to ensure a unified national market [3][4] Group 4: Comprehensive Regulatory Approach - The administration adheres to a dual approach of regulation and service, employing a comprehensive regulatory toolset to promote self-discipline among enterprises and ensure a healthy market environment [4] - A core regulatory mechanism focusing on risk warning, compliance guidance, and precise regulation will be further refined to foster a competitive and orderly market environment [4]

下一步，相关部门将继续强化协同配合，始终坚持以正面声音引导舆论、以主流价值凝聚共识、 以时代新风净化网络， 对各类扰乱房地产市场秩序的网络乱象保持"零容忍"高压态势。 对整改 推进不力、继续侵犯群众利益的互联网平台，将依法从严查处，全力营造清朗网络空间。 截至12月12日，在相关部门督导下， 58同城、抖音、小红书、闲鱼、贝壳等网站平台已累计自 查清理各类违法违规和不良信息1.7万余条； 处置放大市场波动、贩卖焦虑、臆测政策、传播虚 假内容博取流量、误导预期促成交的违规房产类账号、直播间2300余个；删除处理违规笔记 100余篇。链家、我爱我家、麦田共筛查平台网络房源130余万条，下架整改不合规房源信息 480余条。 来源：北京住建委微信公众号 据北京市住建委微信公众号12月17日消息，为切实加强网络生态治理，坚决遏制房地产领域网 络乱象，12月5日，北京市住房城乡建设委会同市委网信办、市公安局等部门， 对抖音、小红 书、贝壳、58同城、闲鱼、链家、我爱我家、麦田等互联网平台进行联合约谈。 会议指出， 部分自媒体账号存在在网络上发布和传播唱衰北京楼市、制造市场恐慌、散布不实 信息、虚假房源引流等违规信息问题， ...