Core Viewpoint - The legal dispute between Zhong An Ke and the leading brokerage firm, China Merchants Securities, has concluded with both parties withdrawing their lawsuits, raising questions about the responsibilities of intermediary institutions in financial transactions [2][9]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - Zhong An Ke, formerly known as Fei Le Co., initiated a major asset restructuring in 2013, planning to acquire 100% of Zhong An Xiao Technology for a transaction value of 28.59 billion yuan [7]. - The restructuring involved violations, as Zhong An Xiao Technology included a project in its profit forecast that could not be fulfilled due to policy changes, leading to inflated asset valuations [7]. - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) investigated and penalized Zhong An Ke in 2019 for misleading statements, while China Merchants Securities was also fined for failing to perform due diligence [7][8]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - In October 2024, Zhong An Ke filed a lawsuit against China Merchants Securities, claiming 1.5 billion yuan in damages due to professional judgment errors [8]. - China Merchants Securities counter-sued for 287 million yuan, seeking to recover payments made to investors due to its liability in the case [8]. - The legal battle, which lasted nearly a year, ended with both parties agreeing to withdraw their lawsuits and settle the matter amicably [9][10]. Group 3: Market Implications - The resolution of the dispute has sparked discussions about the boundaries of the "gatekeeper" responsibilities of intermediary institutions, emphasizing the need for substantial judgment on project authenticity [9][11]. - Zhong An Ke's financial performance has been under pressure, with a reported net profit of only 2 million yuan in 2024, a decline of 77.76% year-on-year [11]. - The withdrawal of lawsuits allows both parties to avoid further legal exposure, particularly for China Merchants Securities, which may have faced additional risks had the case proceeded [11].

Core Insights - Securities firms are increasingly adopting market-oriented recruitment for senior executives, as evidenced by recent announcements from Hongta Securities and Caida Securities [2][3][10] - The shift from internal promotions to market-based hiring reflects a broader industry trend towards quality enhancement and the need for versatile talent to drive digital and integrated business strategies [5][13] Group 1: Hongta Securities - Hongta Securities announced the recruitment of four senior executives, including positions for Vice President, Chief Information Officer, and Board Secretary, with a focus on candidates under 50 years old [6][8] - The requirements for the Vice President position include at least three years of relevant experience in securities, funds, finance, law, or accounting, and prior leadership roles in financial institutions [7][8] - The Chief Information Officer must have over ten years of experience in information technology, while the Board Secretary should possess necessary financial, management, and legal knowledge [8][10] Group 2: Caida Securities - Caida Securities is also conducting a market-oriented selection for three key positions: General Manager, Vice President of Securities Investment, and General Manager of the Caida Research Institute [10][12] - The General Manager role requires candidates to have over ten years of experience in the securities industry and at least three years in a senior management position at a comparable firm [11] - The Vice President of Securities Investment must have at least eight years of experience in the securities industry, with specific requirements for leadership roles in investment management [11][12] Group 3: Industry Trends - The trend of market-based executive recruitment is not isolated to Hongta and Caida Securities; several other firms, including Huaxin Securities and Guosheng Securities, have also announced similar initiatives this year [13][14] - This approach allows for a broader talent pool, enhancing the efficiency of matching candidates to roles and fostering healthy competition within the industry [14][15]

每经头条（nbdtoutiao）——"9·24"一周年，A股总市值破116万亿元！四大变革重塑中国资本市场新生 态 （记者 王瀚黎） 截至发稿，湘财股份市值为363亿元。 每经AI快讯，湘财股份（SH 600095，收盘价：12.71元）9月24日晚间发布公告称，湘财股份有限公司 控股股东的一致行动人衢州信安发展股份有限公司持有公司股份约4.64亿股，占公司总股本的16.24%， 本次质押后衢州发展累计质押股份数量约为4.43亿股，占其持股数量的95.47%，占公司总股本的 15.51%。衢州发展及其一致行动人合计持有公司股份约11.54亿股，占公司总股本的40.37%，本次质押 后衢州发展及其一致行动人累计质押股份数量约为11.33亿股，占其持股数量的98.17%，占公司总股本 的39.63%。 2024年1至12月份，湘财股份的营业收入构成为：其他证券业占比75.27%，贸易占比18.68%，其他业务 占比4.85%，大豆深加工占比0.39%，防水卷材占比0.36%。 ...

Quantitative Factors and Construction 1. Factor Name: Market Style Factors - **Construction Idea**: The market style factors track the performance and volatility of different market styles, such as large-cap vs. small-cap and value vs. growth, to identify prevailing market trends and shifts in investor preferences [12][14] - **Construction Process**: - **Size Style**: Measure the relative performance of small-cap stocks versus large-cap stocks - **Value-Growth Style**: Measure the relative performance of value-oriented stocks versus growth-oriented stocks - **Volatility Metrics**: Calculate the volatility of each style to assess the stability of the trend - **Evaluation**: These factors provide insights into the dominant market style and its stability, which can guide portfolio allocation strategies [12][14] 2. Factor Name: Market Structure Factors - **Construction Idea**: These factors analyze the dispersion and concentration of returns across industries and stocks to understand market breadth and sector rotation [12][14] - **Construction Process**: - **Industry Excess Return Dispersion**: Measure the spread of excess returns across industry indices - **Sector Rotation Speed**: Quantify the rate at which different sectors outperform or underperform - **Stock Concentration**: Calculate the proportion of total market turnover contributed by the top 100 stocks and the top 5 industries - **Evaluation**: These factors help identify whether the market is driven by a few sectors or stocks, or if performance is more evenly distributed [12][14] 3. Factor Name: Market Activity Factors - **Construction Idea**: These factors measure the overall activity and liquidity in the market, including volatility and turnover rates, to gauge investor participation and sentiment [13][14] - **Construction Process**: - **Market Volatility**: Calculate the standard deviation of market returns over a specific period - **Turnover Rate**: Measure the trading volume relative to the total market capitalization - **Evaluation**: These factors are useful for assessing market sentiment and liquidity conditions, which are critical for timing and risk management [13][14] 4. Factor Name: Commodity Market Factors - **Construction Idea**: These factors track trends, momentum, and liquidity in commodity markets to identify opportunities and risks in different commodity sectors [24][30] - **Construction Process**: - **Trend Strength**: Measure the directional movement in commodity prices for sectors like metals, energy, and agriculture - **Basis Momentum**: Calculate the change in the basis (spot price minus futures price) over time - **Volatility**: Assess the price fluctuations in commodity indices - **Liquidity**: Measure the trading volume and bid-ask spread in commodity markets - **Evaluation**: These factors provide a comprehensive view of commodity market dynamics, aiding in asset allocation and hedging strategies [24][30] 5. Factor Name: Option Market Factors - **Construction Idea**: These factors analyze implied volatility and skewness in option markets to infer market expectations and risk sentiment [33][34] - **Construction Process**: - **Implied Volatility**: Measure the market's expectation of future volatility for indices like SSE 50 and CSI 1000 - **Option Skewness**: Calculate the difference in implied volatility between out-of-the-money calls and puts to assess directional bias - **Evaluation**: These factors are valuable for understanding market sentiment and hedging demand, especially during periods of uncertainty [33][34] 6. Factor Name: Convertible Bond Market Factors - **Construction Idea**: These factors evaluate the valuation and liquidity of convertible bonds to identify market trends and investment opportunities [36][39] - **Construction Process**: - **Conversion Premium**: Measure the difference between the market price of the bond and its conversion value - **Low Premium Proportion**: Calculate the proportion of bonds with low conversion premiums - **Market Liquidity**: Assess the trading volume and turnover in the convertible bond market - **Evaluation**: These factors provide insights into the attractiveness and liquidity of convertible bonds, which are important for fixed-income and hybrid strategies [36][39] --- Backtesting Results of Factors 1. Market Style Factors - **Size Style**: Small-cap outperformed large-cap during the week [12][14] - **Value-Growth Style**: Growth stocks outperformed value stocks during the week [12][14] - **Volatility**: Size style volatility decreased, while value-growth style volatility increased [12][14] 2. Market Structure Factors - **Industry Excess Return Dispersion**: Remained stable compared to the previous week [12][14] - **Sector Rotation Speed**: Decreased compared to the previous week [12][14] - **Stock Concentration**: Top 100 stocks and top 5 industries maintained their turnover proportions [12][14] 3. Market Activity Factors - **Market Volatility**: Slightly decreased during the week [13][14] - **Turnover Rate**: Remained at a high level over the past year [13][14] 4. Commodity Market Factors - **Trend Strength**: Increased for metals and precious metals, decreased for energy commodities [24][30] - **Basis Momentum**: Declined across all commodity sectors [24][30] - **Volatility**: Increased slightly across all commodity sectors [24][30] - **Liquidity**: Showed mixed performance across different sectors [24][30] 5. Option Market Factors - **Implied Volatility**: SSE 50 and CSI 1000 remained in a range-bound state [33][34] - **Option Skewness**: Call skewness decreased, indicating reduced bullish sentiment [33][34] 6. Convertible Bond Market Factors - **Conversion Premium**: Stable for bonds priced around par value [36][39] - **Low Premium Proportion**: Increased significantly, indicating rising demand for low-premium bonds [36][39] - **Market Liquidity**: Maintained healthy trading levels [36][39]

浙商证券9月24日晚间公告，董事会会议审议通过《关于申请调增融资类业务规模指标风险限额的议 案》。为促进信用业务发展及做好融资类业务规模管控，董事会同意调增融资类业务规模，将融资类业 务规模由400亿元提高至500亿元。 ...

人民财讯9月24日电，9月24日，在由证券时报与南方基金联合主办的2025中国证券业财富经纪高峰论坛 上，湘财证券总裁周乐峰表示，从新"国九条"到去年"9·24一揽子金融政策"，当下应以更长眼光审视中 国资本市场未来五到十年服务国家战略的使命，参与其中分享红利。他还提到，在波谲云诡的国际形势 下，证券行业的首要使命是发挥功能性，保障居民财富稳定增长，这与过去三十年截然不同。 （原标题：湘财证券总裁周乐峰：应以更长眼光审视中国资本市场服务国家战略的使命） ...

（原标题：湘财证券总裁周乐峰：买方投顾转型势在必行，是一个系统性工程） 人民财讯9月24日电，9月24日，在由证券时报与南方基金联合主办的2025中国证券业财富经纪高峰论坛 上，湘财证券总裁周乐峰表示，在行业佣金率、两融息差及销售费用普遍下滑的背景下，买方投顾转型 势在必行，是一个体系性工程。其核心是打破零和博弈，实现金融机构与客户共同成长。这要求券商全 面提升投教、投顾、投研及投资能力，具备与国际一流机构竞争的实力。 ...

胡昱指出，买方投顾转型是一个体系化工程，而非单一业务。其核心在于三大能力建设：在资产端，超 越单纯产品筛选，构建涵盖产品交易、企划、运营和财富规划的综合能力；在投顾端，关键在于考核机 制改革，借助数字化赋能投顾提升能力，必须将员工长期利益、公司商业价值与客户长期利益紧密结 合；在客户端，难点在于如何将宏大叙事转化为对个体投资者具体诉求的深刻理解与陪伴，并推动中后 台专业力量深入一线服务客户。他强调，万变不离其宗的是将专业能力、客户服务刻入公司基因与文化 信仰，并最终体现在组织变革中。 （原标题：中金财富证券副总裁胡昱：买方投顾转型需要三大能力建设） 人民财讯9月24日电，9月24日，在由证券时报与南方基金联合主办的2025中国证券业财富经纪高峰论坛 上，中金财富证券执委会委员、副总裁胡昱认为，证券行业的核心矛盾在于如何从红海竞争走向蓝海市 场，探索新盈利模式。 ...

证券研究报告：固定收益报告 研究所 上周债市情绪反复，利率全周呈现 V 型震荡，信用债同样涨跌互 现，其中二永超跌有所修复，超长信用债表现继续低迷。上周多空力 量交织，资金面边际收敛，利率债整体走势震荡，10 年国债活跃券在 1.76%-1.81%的区间反复，但空头力量略强，全周震荡走弱；而信用债 不同期限的品种表现分化。超长期限信用债行情继续走弱，10Y 品种 跌幅基本都超过同期限利率债，超长二永债的表现也较为一般。 二永债行情在大上周超调后部分期限有所修复，1Y-5Y 收益率有 所下行，超长期限部分跌幅跟超长信用债接近。1-5 年、7 年、10 年 AAA-银行二级资本债收益率分别下行了 1.19BP、1.21BP、2.58BP、 0.53BP、1.51BP、上行了 1.63BP、3.53BP。3 年及以上的部分离 2025 年以来收益率最低点位的差距还有 30BP-46BP。与上一轮急跌 7 月底 的情况对比，2 年以上的收益率点位已突破新高，调整幅度高于 7 月 底的急跌行情，4 年以上的甚至收益率突破了今年 2 月底的熊平位置。 从二永债活跃成交的情况来看，前半周修复情绪较高，后半周则 较为悲观。9 ...

人民财讯9月24日电，9月24日，在由证券时报与南方基金联合主办的2025中国证券业财富经纪高峰论坛 上，东莞证券总裁杨阳认为，券商开展财富管理应回归自身本质优势，即围绕交易和风险管理能力进行 差异化竞争，走有券商特色的财富管理之路。以东莞证券为例，东莞证券目前对基金投顾模式尚在探索 中，其策略是优先聚焦交易环节，致力于打造对ETF最优的交易环境，加大ETF做市业务投入，吸引零 售和机构客户进行ETF交易。ETF流动性是生态繁荣的基础，这恰恰是券商的专业优势所在。他主张券 商应首先围绕ETF将交易流动性和生态做活，在此基础上再培育财富管理业务，使其逐步发展壮大。 ...