一顿操作猛如虎，基金净值已更新，谁是基金中的王者，谁又垫底，请看数据： | 基金简称 PK | | | 最新净使 !! 手의则面原因人 | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | 银河核心优 ... C | 1.1329 | | 9.86% | 8 | | | 016981 | 2026-2-3 | | | | | 2 | 银河核心优 ... A | 1.1458 | | 9.86% | 8 | | | 011629 | 2026-2-3 | | | | | 3 | 银华成长智... A | 1.3371 | | 8.96% | 8 | | | 024455 | 2026-2-3 | | | | | 4 | 银华成长智 ... C | 1.3328 | | 8.96% | 27 | | | 024456 | 2026-2-3 | | | | | 5 | 广发上海金E ... C | 2.3002 | | 8.40% | 7 | | | 008987 | 2026-2-3 | | | | | 6 | 广发上海金E ... A | 2.3448 | 8.40 ...

Group 1 - The article highlights the Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund Inc (FOF) as a notable investment opportunity within closed-end funds [1] - The author emphasizes a synergistic approach combining investment consulting and active intraday trading to maximize returns [1] - The analysis aims to provide actionable investment ideas for building a balanced portfolio of U.S. securities, leveraging macro-economic analysis and real-world trading experience [1] Group 2 - The author has a background in Finance and Economics, which serves as a foundation for their expertise in management and trading [1] - The goal is to identify profitable and undervalued investment opportunities primarily in the U.S. market to create a high-yield, balanced portfolio [1]

Core Viewpoint - The recent incident involving Debang Fund's rapid capital inflow of 12 billion yuan has highlighted the chaotic internet marketing practices within the fund industry, prompting regulatory scrutiny on misleading tools like real-time valuation and ranking lists [1][19]. Group 1: Regulatory Response - Regulators have emphasized the need for fund sales institutions and third-party platforms to conduct self-examinations and remove misleading tools that could mislead investors [1]. - This is not the first regulatory action; in June 2023, regulators had already mandated the removal of real-time valuation features due to risks of significant discrepancies between estimated and actual net values [13][19]. - The case of Debang Fund serves as a catalyst for renewed regulatory focus on the potential harm caused by misleading valuation data and its impact on investor behavior [19][20]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - Since February, there has been a surge in posts sharing fund valuation tools on social media platforms, with some influencers directing followers to private groups for access [4][12]. - Some self-media accounts have begun selling real-time valuation software, with prices ranging from a few yuan to over ten yuan [4]. - Despite regulatory requirements to remove certain features, some platforms have continued to offer modified versions of these tools, indicating a reluctance to fully comply with regulations [9][10]. Group 3: Investor Behavior and Risks - The rapid dissemination of distorted valuation data through social networks can create herd behavior among investors, leading to irrational trading decisions [18]. - The discrepancy between real-time valuation and actual net value can mislead investors, as seen in the case of Debang Fund, where the reported real-time increase was significantly higher than the actual net value increase [19]. - There is a strong demand from investors for more data and tools to bridge the information gap, which may lead to further regulatory challenges as platforms seek to meet this demand while remaining compliant [16][22].

Core Viewpoint - The recent incident involving Debon Fund, which attracted 12 billion yuan in a single day, has highlighted the chaotic internet marketing practices of fund companies, prompting regulatory scrutiny and calls for self-correction among fund sales institutions and third-party platforms [2][23]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Regulatory authorities have emphasized the need for fund sales institutions and third-party platforms to conduct self-examinations and remove misleading features such as "real-time valuation" and "ranking lists" that could mislead investors [2][17]. - Major platforms like Ant Fund, JD Finance, and others have quickly removed related functionalities following regulatory guidance [2]. - The regulatory push against misleading valuation practices is not new, as similar actions were taken in June 2023, citing risks of investor complaints due to significant discrepancies between real-time estimates and actual net asset values [17][21]. Group 2: Market Reactions - Following the regulatory actions, some platforms have attempted to retain user engagement by offering membership incentives and creating new fan groups, leading to a rapid increase in group memberships [15][16]. - Despite the removal of certain features, some platforms have continued to provide similar functionalities under different names, indicating a reluctance to fully comply with regulatory demands [13][14]. Group 3: Social Media Influence - Social media influencers have been observed promoting alternative tools for fund valuation, often leading investors to private groups for further information, which raises concerns about compliance and the potential for misleading practices [3][6][8]. - The rapid spread of posts related to fund valuation tools on platforms like Xiaohongshu has created a significant flow of traffic, with some influencers monetizing these tools by selling them at various price points [8][12]. Group 4: Impact on Investor Behavior - The incident with Debon Fund, where the real-time valuation showed a 13.01% increase while the actual net value was only 8.31%, exemplifies how misleading valuation data can distort investor behavior and lead to short-term trading rather than long-term asset allocation [23][24]. - The discrepancy between real-time estimates and actual net values can exacerbate during market volatility, leading to further investor confusion and potential losses [18][19].

Core Viewpoint - The sudden valuation adjustment by Guotou Ruijin Fund led to a dramatic drop in the net asset value (NAV) of Guotou Silver LOF, causing significant investor confusion and concern as the NAV plummeted by 31.5% in a single day, marking a record decline for public funds [2][3][8] Group 1: Valuation Adjustment Details - On February 2, 2026, Guotou Ruijin Fund announced a valuation adjustment for Guotou Silver LOF, referencing the price fluctuations of silver futures in major international markets to ensure the NAV accurately reflects the underlying asset status [3][10] - The adjustment was prompted by a significant discrepancy between the Shanghai Futures Exchange silver futures prices and international market prices, with international silver prices dropping by 31% over two trading days, while the Shanghai prices fell by less than 20% [3][10] - The adjustment aimed to align the fund's NAV with the true international price level, as the previous valuation was deemed to have an inflated value exceeding 10% [3][10] Group 2: Investor Reactions and Market Impact - Following the valuation adjustment, Guotou Silver LOF faced a rapid increase in market skepticism, with discussions on social media questioning the legality and appropriateness of the sudden change [8][10] - Investors who had purchased the fund at a premium faced dual risks due to the sharp decline in silver futures prices and the high premium rate of nearly 90% on the fund's market price [5][6] - The fund experienced a significant sell-off, with over 55 billion yuan in sell orders at the limit down price, indicating a severe market reaction to the valuation adjustment [6][10] Group 3: Compliance and Regulatory Considerations - Legal experts noted that the fund's contract allows for valuation adjustments under specific circumstances, and the adjustment was deemed compliant with industry guidelines, which support fair value adjustments [10][11] - The timing of the announcement raised questions about the adequacy of information disclosure, as investors were not informed prior to the adjustment, leading to potential losses for those who redeemed their shares before the announcement [11][12] - Despite the legal backing for the adjustment, investor sentiment remained negative, with many expressing a loss of trust in the fund management due to the abrupt nature of the change [12][13]

Core Viewpoint - The only silver-themed fund in China, Guotou Ruijin Silver Futures (LOF), urgently adjusted its valuation after experiencing a significant drop, with A/C shares falling by 31.5% on February 2, exceeding the daily limit for both LOF and domestic silver futures contracts [1][3] Fund Valuation Adjustment - On February 2, Guotou Ruijin Silver Futures A/C shares recorded a 31.5% drop, setting a record for the largest single-day decline in public funds, surpassing the 10% limit for LOF and the 17% limit for domestic silver futures [3] - In response to the drastic decline, the fund manager announced on the evening of February 2 that they would reassess the fund's assets based on significant fluctuations in international silver market prices [3][4] - Starting February 2, the fund will adjust the valuation of its silver futures contracts based on the price changes in the international market relative to the previous trading day's closing price [3][4] Investor Concerns - Investors expressed dissatisfaction, with complaints about losing a month's worth of returns in a single day and questioning the timing of the valuation adjustment by the fund manager [6][7] - Some investors criticized the fund management for adjusting the valuation only after the significant drop, suggesting a lack of timely communication [6][7] Market Dynamics - Research from multiple futures companies indicates a high correlation between the Shanghai Futures Exchange silver futures and international market prices, suggesting that the domestic market's price limits can lead to valuation discrepancies [4] - The recent extreme market conditions have shown that international silver prices can fluctuate significantly beyond the domestic market's limits, leading to potential overvaluation of the fund's net asset value if domestic prices are used for valuation [4][5] Regulatory and Structural Issues - The fund's contract allows for valuation adjustments if the standard method does not reflect fair value, which the fund management deemed necessary due to recent market conditions [5] - The fund's structure has inherent flaws, as domestic price limits do not fully capture the volatility of international prices, raising concerns about the accuracy of net asset valuations [7][10] Long-term Outlook - Despite the recent volatility, some analysts believe that silver prices may rise in the long term, driven by monetary attributes and ongoing demand [10] - The Guotou Ruijin Silver Futures (LOF) is recognized as a high-risk fund linked to futures, necessitating investor awareness of the associated risks and market dynamics [10][11]

东海祥苏短债A/C成立于2020年03月12日，截至2026年02月02日，其今年来收益率为0.15%、0.13%，成 立来收益率为17.64%、16.21%，累计净值为1.1764元、1.1621元。东海祥苏短债E成立于2022年04月11 日，截至2026年02月02日，其今年来收益率为0.14%，成立来收益率为11.23%，累计净值为1.1123元。 | 基金名称 | 东海祥利纯债债券型证券投资基金 | | --- | --- | | 基金简称 | 东海祥利纯债 | | 基金主代码 | 006747 | | 基金管理人名称 | 东海基金管理有限责任公司 | | 公告依据 | 根据《中华人民共和国证券投资基金法》《公开募集证券投资基金 | | | 运作管理办法》《公开募集证券投资基金信息披露管理办法》及其 | | | 他有关法律法规以及本基金相关法律文件等 | | 基金经理变更类型 | 增聘基金经理 | | 新任基金经理姓名 | 梁思琦 | | 共同管理本基金的其他经 | 邢炜 | | 理姓名 | | 中国经济网北京2月3日讯近日，东海基金公告，东海祥利纯债、东海锐安短债发起式、东海祥苏短债增 聘梁思琦。 ...

记者丨金珊 李益文 编辑丨江佩霞 2月3日，黄金、白银反弹，现货黄金一度重回4800美元，现货白银日内触及85美元，截至 10:22，黄金、白银涨幅均有所收窄。 虽然金银价格有所反弹，但A股市场黄金概念股开盘仍多数下跌。其中，豫光金铅、四川黄 金、招金黄金、白银有色、盛达资源、中国黄金、湖南白银跌停，值得注意的是，豫光金 铅、盛达资源、招金黄金、四川黄金、白银有色为连续第三日跌停。 港股方面，黄金概念股集体反弹，截至发稿，招金矿业涨近2%，赤峰黄金涨超2%，紫金黄金 国际涨超3%，万国黄金集团涨超4%。 2月3日，国投白银LOF今日复牌再度跌停，报4.25元，最新溢价率为88.94%。国投白银LOF2 日发布公告称，决定参考白银期货国际主要市场的价格变动幅度，对基金资产进行合理重 估；国投瑞银白银LOF2日晚间更新净值后显示，单日净值跌幅达31.5%，创公募基金单日下 跌历史纪录。 国泰海通证券认为，本轮贵金属价格的大幅下跌是对年初以来非理性上涨的技术性调整，而 非黄金长期牛市的终结。短期来看，前期过热投机情绪的降温，以及资金杠杆水平的下降有 助于黄金重回更健康与稳健的上涨趋势。长期来看，在各国信任程度下降的 ...

Core Viewpoint - The public fund industry in China is set to undergo significant institutional changes aimed at promoting high-quality development through revised information disclosure standards [1][2][7] Group 1: Key Revisions in Disclosure Standards - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has released a draft for public consultation regarding the revised "Guidelines for Information Disclosure of Publicly Offered Securities Investment Funds" [1][2] - The new guidelines consolidate existing disclosure requirements for annual, semi-annual, and quarterly reports into a single normative document, enhancing clarity and reducing redundancy [2][3] - The revisions aim to simplify and adjust certain disclosure requirements based on higher regulations and industry practices, drawing from experiences in mature foreign markets [1][2][3] Group 2: Focus on Investor-Centric Disclosure - The revised standards emphasize an "investor-centric" approach, requiring funds to disclose long-term performance metrics over 7 and 10 years, while eliminating short-term performance data from the past month [4][5] - This shift encourages a focus on long-term investment and value investment principles, aiming to cultivate a more rational investment culture among investors [5][6] Group 3: Enhancing Stability in Investment Behavior - The new guidelines mandate the disclosure of stock turnover rates in annual reports, addressing concerns over high turnover rates that contradict long-term investment principles [6][7] - This requirement is intended to promote more prudent investment practices among fund managers and enhance the stability of investment behaviors within the industry [6][7] Group 4: Overall Impact on the Industry - The integration and revision of disclosure rules are seen as a crucial step towards high-quality development in the public fund sector, reducing the complexity and execution friction associated with fragmented regulations [7] - By establishing targeted and tiered disclosure requirements based on the different functions of various reports, the revisions aim to improve the relevance and readability of disclosed information [7]

2月2日晚间，国投白银LOF公告，鉴于近期白银国际主要市场价格出现显著波动，与上期所白银期货差异较大。根据 《中国证监会关于证券投资基金估 值业务的指导意见》及《国投瑞银白银期货证券投资基金（LOF）基金合同》的相关规定，为保护基金持有人利益，确保基金净值能够真实、公允地反映 底层资产状况，国投瑞银基金管理有限公司经与相关基金托管人协商一致， 决定参考白银期货国际主要市场的价格变动幅度，对基金资产进行合理重 估。 自2026年2月2日起，公司对旗下证券投资基金持有的白银期货合约AG2604、AG2605、AG2606、AG2608、AG2610、AG2612， 参考估值日北京时间下午 3点的白银期货国际主要市场价格相对前一交易日北京时间下午3点的波动幅度进行估值调整。 公司将综合参考各项相关影响因素并与基金托管人协商，自上述合约交易体现了活跃市场交易特征后，恢复按结算价估值方法进行估值，届时不再另行公 告。 N # 啊 _ | ■ i 同日，国投白银LOF还发布公告， 国投瑞银基金管理有限公司旗下国投瑞银白银期货证券投资基金（LOF）A类基金份额（场内简称：国投白银LOF；交 易代码：161226）二级市场交 ...