Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Buy" rating for key companies in the coal mining sector, including China Shenhua, Shaanxi Coal, and others [3][6]. Core Insights - Indonesia's new regulations have increased the coal export mining rights tax rate by 1%, which is expected to impact miners' profitability. The tax rate will vary based on calorific value and mining method, with higher rates applicable when the coal reference price exceeds $90 per ton [2][3]. - The report highlights that Indonesia's non-tax state revenue from the mining and coal sector is projected to reach 140.5 trillion Indonesian Rupiah (approximately $8.33 billion) in 2024, accounting for 52.1% of the country's non-tax revenue [2]. - The report suggests that some miners may shift towards domestic supply to mitigate tax pressure, although the domestic market's absorption capacity remains uncertain, potentially leading to production cuts and capacity constraints [2]. Summary by Sections Coal Mining - The report notes fluctuations in global energy prices, with Brent crude oil futures rising by 7.31% to $67.96 per barrel and WTI crude oil futures increasing by 7.67% to $64.68 per barrel [1]. - Coal prices showed mixed trends, with Newcastle coal (6000K) FOB price at $95.1 per ton (up 0.2%), while European ARA coal price decreased by 0.7% to $99.9 per ton [1][34]. Key Companies - The report identifies key investment targets in the coal sector, including China Shenhua, Shaanxi Coal, and others, with projected earnings per share (EPS) and price-to-earnings (PE) ratios indicating strong growth potential [6]. - Specific companies are highlighted for their stock repurchase plans, indicating confidence in their future performance [3]. Market Trends - The report provides a graphical representation of coal mining sector trends, indicating a potential recovery in the market after recent declines [4]. - It emphasizes the importance of monitoring coal prices and regulatory changes in Indonesia, which could significantly impact the sector's dynamics [2][3].

Investment Rating - The report maintains an "Accumulate" rating for the coal mining industry [1] Core Viewpoints - The current coal prices are primarily influenced by the seasonal decline in demand and the stable increase in hydropower during the flood season, limiting upward momentum [1] - Short-term demand remains reliant on long-term contracts and essential purchases by power plants, while non-electric enterprises show weak demand due to warmer weather and high inventory levels, making significant price increases unlikely in the short term [1][2] Summary by Sections Industry Overview - During the week of April 14 to April 18, the spot price of thermal coal at ports decreased by 27 yuan/ton, closing at 663 yuan/ton [1] - The average daily inflow of coal to the four ports in the Bohai Rim was 1.7611 million tons, a decrease of 75,300 tons week-on-week, down 4.10% [1] - The average daily outflow from the same ports was 1.4799 million tons, a decrease of 371,000 tons week-on-week, down 20.04% [1] - The inventory at the Bohai Rim ports increased to 31.948 million tons, up 2.07 million tons week-on-week, an increase of 6.93% [1] Price Trends - The price of thermal coal at the production site showed a slight decline, with the price for 5500 kcal thermal coal in Datong at 555 yuan/ton, down 27 yuan/ton [18] - The price for 6000 kcal thermal block coal in Yanzhou decreased by 90 yuan/ton, closing at 800 yuan/ton [18] - The Bohai Rim thermal coal price index remained stable at 678 yuan/ton [21] Market Dynamics - The report highlights a continued focus on the influx of insurance capital, with premium income maintaining positive growth concentrated towards leading insurance companies [2][37] - The report recommends focusing on elastic stocks in thermal coal, particularly those with low valuations such as Guanghui Energy and Haohua Energy [2][37] Shipping and Logistics - Domestic shipping costs increased by 2.45 yuan/ton, closing at 37.45 yuan/ton, a rise of 6.95% [35]

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core Viewpoints - Credit bond yields increased slightly, and the credit spreads of medium - and short - term bonds declined slightly. The long - end of interest rates performed better than the short - end this week [2][5]. - Urban investment bond spreads generally continued to decline slightly, with the spreads of Guizhou's low - grade varieties slightly rising [2][9]. - Industrial bond spreads were relatively stable, while the spreads of private real - estate bonds increased [2][18]. - The yield curve of secondary and perpetual bonds became slightly steeper, with medium - and high - grade bonds performing better, and the spreads of 3Y medium - and high - grade secondary bonds compressed significantly [2][28]. - The excess spreads of industrial perpetual bonds were basically flat, while those of urban investment perpetual bonds increased [2][31]. Summary by Directory 1. Credit bond yields increased slightly, and the 3Y spreads compressed most significantly - Interest rates fluctuated within a narrow range this week, with the long - end performing better than the short - end. The yields of 1Y, 3Y, and 5Y China Development Bank bonds increased by 2BP, 3BP, and 2BP respectively, while those of 7Y and 10Y decreased by 1BP and 2BP respectively [2][5]. - Credit bond yields increased slightly overall. The yields of 1Y AA - grade and above credit bonds increased by 1 - 2BP, and the AA - grade remained the same as last week; the yields of 3Y AA and AA + grade credit bonds increased by 2 - 4BP, and the AAA and AA - varieties remained flat; the yields of 5Y AA + and above grade varieties increased by 0 - 1BP, and the AA and AA - varieties increased by 2 - 4BP; the yields of 7Y all - grade credit bonds decreased by 0 - 1BP; the yields of 10Y all - grade varieties increased by 4BP [2][5]. - In terms of credit spreads, the medium - and short - term spreads declined slightly, while those of long - term varieties increased. The spreads of 1Y AA and above varieties remained the same as last week, and the AA - spread decreased by 1BP; the spreads of 3Y AA - grade varieties remained flat, and the other varieties decreased by 1 - 4BP; the spreads of 5Y AAA and AA + grades decreased by 1 - 2BP, the AA - grade increased by 3BP, and the AA - spread remained the same as last week; the spreads of 7Y all - grade increased by 0 - 1BP; the spreads of 10Y all - grade increased by 6BP [2][5]. 2. Urban investment bond spreads declined slightly, and some weakly - qualified regions rebounded and widened - This week, the spreads of urban investment bonds continued to decline slightly. The credit spreads of externally - rated AAA and AA - grade platforms decreased by 1BP, and the spreads of AA + - grade platforms remained the same as last week [2][9]. - Among provinces, the spreads of most AAA - grade platforms decreased by 0 - 1BP, with Yunnan decreasing by 3BP and Gansu increasing by 2BP; the spreads of most AA + - grade platforms decreased by 0 - 1BP, with Tibet and Shaanxi decreasing by 3BP and 4BP respectively, and Anhui, Beijing, and Heilongjiang increasing by 1 - 2BP; the spreads of most AA - grade platforms decreased by 0 - 2BP, with Shanxi decreasing by 5BP, Gansu decreasing by 15BP, and Guizhou increasing by 5BP [2][9]. - In terms of administrative levels, the credit spreads of provincial platforms decreased by 1BP, and the spreads of prefecture - level and district - county - level platforms remained the same as last week. The spreads of most provincial platforms decreased by 0 - 1BP, with Yunnan decreasing by 3BP; the spreads of most prefecture - level platforms in various regions decreased by 0 - 2BP, with Gansu decreasing by 15BP; the spreads of most district - county - level platforms remained flat or increased by 1BP, with Hebei and Liaoning decreasing by 3BP, Shaanxi decreasing by 4BP, and Guizhou increasing by 8BP [2][9][15]. 3. Industrial bond spreads declined overall, and the spreads of private real - estate bonds increased - Industrial bond spreads were relatively stable, while the spreads of private real - estate bonds increased. This week, the spreads of central - state - owned and local - state - owned real - estate bonds decreased by 0 - 1BP, and the spreads of mixed - ownership real - estate bonds decreased by 69BP. The spreads of private real - estate bonds increased by 14BP overall, with the spread of Longfor decreasing by 6BP, the spreads of Midea Real Estate and Huafa Co., Ltd. remaining flat, and the spread of CIFI increasing by 384BP [2][18]. - The spreads of all - grade coal bonds decreased by 0 - 1BP; the spreads of AAA - grade steel bonds remained flat; the spreads of AAA - grade chemical bonds increased by 1BP, and the AA + spreads decreased by 2BP. The spread of Shaanxi Coal Industry increased by 1BP; the spread of Jinkong Coal Industry decreased by 1BP; the spread of HBIS increased by 2BP [2][18]. 4. The yields of secondary and perpetual bonds showed a long - short differentiation, and most credit spreads declined - This week, the yield curve of secondary and perpetual bonds became slightly steeper, with medium - and high - grade bonds performing better, and the spreads of 3Y medium - and high - grade secondary bonds compressed significantly. Specifically, the yields of 1Y commercial bank secondary capital bonds decreased by 0 - 3BP, the yields of perpetual bonds decreased by 2BP, and the spreads of 1Y secondary and perpetual bonds decreased by 2 - 4BP overall [2][28]. - The yields of 3Y AAA - and AA + - grade secondary capital bonds decreased by 0 - 2BP, the AA yield increased by 1BP, and the spreads of 3Y secondary bonds decreased by 2 - 5BP; the yields of 3Y AAA - and AA + - grade perpetual bonds increased by 1BP, the spreads decreased by 2BP, the AA - grade yield increased by 4BP, and the spread increased by 1BP; the yields of 5Y commercial bank secondary capital bonds increased by 0 - 2BP, the spreads decreased by 0 - 2BP, the yields of perpetual bonds increased by 2BP, and the spreads were basically flat [2][28]. 5. The excess spreads of industrial perpetual bonds were basically flat, and the excess spreads of urban investment perpetual bonds increased - This week, the excess spreads of industrial AAA3Y perpetual bonds decreased slightly by 0.01BP to 9.20BP, at the 8.80% quantile since 2015; the excess spreads of industrial AAA5Y perpetual bonds remained flat at 8.72BP, at the 6.38% quantile; the excess spreads of urban investment AAA3Y perpetual bonds increased by 1.25BP to 8.24BP, at the 6.02% quantile; the excess spreads of urban investment AAA5Y perpetual bonds increased by 0.89BP to 9.73BP, at the 7.92% quantile [2][31]. 6. Credit spread database compilation instructions - The overall market credit spreads, commercial bank secondary and perpetual spreads, and the credit spreads of urban investment/industrial perpetual bonds are calculated based on the data of ChinaBond Medium - and Short - Term Notes and ChinaBond Perpetual Bonds. The historical quantiles are since the beginning of 2015; the relevant credit spreads of urban investment and industrial bonds are compiled and statistically analyzed by the R & D Center of Cinda Securities, and the historical quantiles are since the beginning of 2015 [38]. - The credit spreads of industrial and urban investment individual bonds = the individual bond's ChinaBond valuation (exercise) - the yield to maturity of the same - term China Development Bank bond (calculated by the linear interpolation method), and finally the credit spreads of the industry or regional urban investment are obtained by the arithmetic average method [38][39]. - The excess spreads of bank secondary capital bonds/perpetual bonds = the credit spreads of bank secondary capital bonds/perpetual bonds - the credit spreads of bank ordinary bonds of the same grade and term; the excess spreads of industrial/urban investment perpetual bonds = the credit spreads of industrial/urban investment perpetual bonds - the credit spreads of medium - and short - term notes of the same grade and term [39]. - Sample selection criteria: Both industrial and urban investment bonds select samples of medium - term notes and public - offering corporate bonds, and exclude guaranteed bonds and perpetual bonds; if the remaining term of an individual bond is less than 0.5 years or more than 5 years, it will be excluded from the statistical sample; industrial and urban investment bonds are externally - rated by the issuer, while commercial banks use ChinaBond's implied bond ratings [40].

Summary of Conference Call Company/Industry Involved - The conference call primarily discusses the A-share market, focusing on various sectors including technology, real estate, construction materials, and chemicals. Core Points and Arguments 1. **Market Adjustment**: The A-share market experienced a noticeable adjustment last week, attributed to the exposure of domestic economic data and upcoming corporate earnings reports in April, marking a verification period for economic performance [2][3][8]. 2. **Performance Correlation**: There is a strong positive correlation between stock performance and earnings reports in April, indicating that investors should focus on fundamental data rather than optimistic narratives [3][10]. 3. **Market Sentiment Indicators**: Indicators of market sentiment, such as style differentiation and turnover rates, suggest an overheated market, particularly in technology stocks, which have yet to show earnings realization [4][5]. 4. **Overseas Risks**: The call emphasizes the importance of overseas risks, particularly the impact of U.S.-China trade investigations and tariffs, which could significantly affect A-share market sentiment [6][8]. 5. **Sector Opportunities**: Despite macroeconomic uncertainties, certain sectors like construction machinery, non-ferrous metals, chemicals, and military industries are expected to show strong performance in upcoming earnings reports [10][11]. 6. **Real Estate Market Dynamics**: The real estate sector is experiencing a unique year, with cash reserves increasing compared to last year, but the potential for a full cycle restart remains challenging due to limited tools available for expansion [12][13]. 7. **Building Materials Sector**: The building materials sector is seeing strong demand, particularly in northern regions, driven by large-scale infrastructure projects, with significant growth in cement sales [18][19]. 8. **Chemical Industry Outlook**: The chemical sector is expected to see price increases for certain products, driven by strong demand and improved supply dynamics, particularly in refrigerants and fertilizers [22][24]. 9. **Steel Industry Confidence**: The steel sector is witnessing a recovery in demand, with low inventory levels and a shift in the demand structure away from real estate, indicating a potential bottoming out of the cycle [34][35][36]. 10. **Coal Market Trends**: The coal market is expected to rebound as demand from construction and infrastructure projects increases, despite recent price declines due to seasonal factors [47][50][51]. Other Important but Possibly Overlooked Content 1. **Investment Strategy Shifts**: The focus of market speculation is shifting towards high dividend-yielding stocks as companies are required to disclose management plans and dividend strategies in their annual reports [28][29]. 2. **Technological and Industrial Innovations**: The call highlights the potential of deep-sea technology and marine engineering as significant growth areas, with companies like China Communications Construction Company being identified as undervalued [31][32]. 3. **Long-term Trends in Commodities**: The chemical and materials sectors are expected to benefit from long-term trends in pricing and demand, particularly in the context of global supply chain adjustments [24][25][46]. 4. **Regulatory Environment**: The impact of regulatory changes on the real estate and construction sectors is noted, with a focus on how these changes could influence market dynamics and investment opportunities [27][28]. This summary encapsulates the key insights and discussions from the conference call, providing a comprehensive overview of the current market landscape and future outlook across various sectors.

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Positive" outlook on the coal industry, indicating an expectation for performance improvement due to supply contraction leading to a rebound in coal prices and company performance [1]. Core Insights - The domestic raw coal production increased by 7.7% year-on-year in the first two months of 2025, totaling 765 million tons, while coal imports saw a decline of 0.9% year-on-year [2][3]. - The average price of thermal coal and coking coal at ports dropped significantly in Q1 2025, with thermal coal prices falling approximately 19.92% year-on-year and coking coal prices down about 40.21% year-on-year [2][16]. - Key companies in the coal sector are expected to report varying performance in their Q1 2025 earnings, with China Shenhua and Electric Power Investment Energy showing better-than-expected results, while Shaanxi Black Cat is anticipated to underperform [2][18]. Summary by Sections Supply and Demand Dynamics - Domestic raw coal production increased by 600.6 million tons, a 7.7% rise compared to the same period in 2024, with significant contributions from Shanxi (20.3% increase) and Inner Mongolia (2.0% increase) [3][8]. - Coal imports for the first three months of 2025 totaled 11.5 million tons, reflecting a 0.9% decrease year-on-year, with March marking the first month of negative growth since January 2023 [11][13]. Price Trends - The average price of 5500 kcal thermal coal at ports was approximately 723 RMB/ton in Q1 2025, down from 903 RMB/ton in Q1 2024, marking a decline of 19.92% [2][16]. - Coking coal prices also saw a significant drop, with the average price for Shanxi's main coking coal at 1444 RMB/ton in Q1 2025, down 40.21% from 2416 RMB/ton in Q1 2024 [2][17]. Company Performance Forecasts - China Shenhua is expected to report an EPS of 0.70, a year-on-year decrease of 12.94%, while Electric Power Investment Energy is projected to have an EPS of 0.84, down 3.6% year-on-year [2][18]. - Companies like Shaanxi Coal and Yanzhou Coal are expected to report earnings that are in line with expectations, while Shaanxi Black Cat is forecasted to underperform with an EPS of -0.27, a significant drop of 169.28% year-on-year [2][18]. Investment Recommendations - The report recommends focusing on companies benefiting from increased market coal and stable operations with high dividends, such as China Shenhua and Shaanxi Coal, while also considering undervalued companies like Huabei Mining and Pingmei Shenma [2].

Core Viewpoint - The company has successfully implemented a new advanced support system in its mining operations to address increasing underground pressure and improve safety and efficiency in coal extraction [1][2][3]. Group 1: Challenges and Innovations - The mining operation faced significant challenges due to increased stress in the working face, which hindered production efficiency and safety [2]. - Traditional support methods were inadequate, leading to slow progress and higher accident risks, prompting the need for innovative solutions [2][3]. Group 2: Customized Support Solutions - A specialized task force was established to develop a tailored support solution, resulting in the adoption of a unit support device that meets the geological conditions of the mine [3]. - The working face dimensions were specified, and the new support method was optimized to enhance the strength and mechanization of the support system [3][4]. Group 3: Efficiency and Safety Improvements - The new unit support device effectively addressed support challenges in critical areas, reducing the workforce required for maintenance from 15 to 6 personnel daily, thus saving labor and resources [5]. - The implementation of the new support system maintained the original specifications of the tunnels, ensuring operational efficiency and safety for ongoing mining activities [5].

证券研究报告 | 行业周报 gszqdatemark 】 2025 04 13 年 月 日 煤炭开采 3 重倒挂助煤价以时间换空间，"中特煤"以行动书写担当 行情回顾（2025.4.7~2025.4.11）： 基本面方面，我们持续强调"把握行业本质属性，坚定信心、坚守定力"。 "一利稳定增长，五率持续优化"，着力提高央企控股上市公司质量，强化投资者回 报。 中信煤炭指数 3,157.77 点，下跌 5.04%，跑输沪深 300 指数 2.16pct，位列中信板 块涨跌幅榜第 16 位。 本周两大煤炭央企发声"积极支持控股上市公司高质量发展"。此外，多部委机构打 出稳市组合拳，场外增量资金充足，我们认为"财务报表优异，低资本开支&现金流 充裕，具备高分红、高股息的央企"尤为受益。 考虑到煤价属周期波动，煤炭企业或通过加大成本管控力度，保证企业效益稳步提 升。以神华、中煤两大央企为例，在 24 年煤价中枢明显下移的背景下，其业绩降幅 显著低于煤价降幅，降本增效成效显著，诚意满满。 加大回购注销、分红力度，推动资产注入，延伸产业链布局均是提高 ROE 的方向。 重点领域分析： 增持（维持） 行业走势 -30% -2 ...

Investment Rating - The report recommends a "Buy" rating for key coal enterprises such as China Shenhua and China Coal Energy, highlighting their strong financial performance and potential for high dividends [8][10]. Core Viewpoints - The coal industry is experiencing a cyclical downturn, but companies are focusing on cost control and operational efficiency to maintain profitability. Major state-owned enterprises like Shenhua and China Coal have shown a significant reduction in performance decline compared to coal price drops, indicating effective cost management [3][8]. - The report emphasizes the importance of maintaining investor confidence through high-quality development and asset integration within state-owned enterprises [2][3]. - The current coal prices are seen as bottoming out, with expectations of benefiting from domestic policies aimed at stabilizing growth and increasing domestic demand [2][8]. Summary by Sections Industry Overview - The CITIC Coal Index decreased by 5.04% during the week of April 7-11, 2025, underperforming the CSI 300 Index by 2.16 percentage points [1][75]. - The report notes that the coal market is currently in a phase of narrow fluctuations, with supply stability and limited demand growth impacting price movements [11][33]. Key Company Analysis - China Shenhua's coal production cost for 2024 is reported at 179 RMB/ton, remaining stable year-on-year, while China Coal Energy's cost is 282 RMB/ton, down 25 RMB/ton from the previous year [6][8]. - Both companies are expected to increase share buybacks and dividends, enhancing shareholder returns [8][10]. Market Dynamics - The report indicates that the coal market is characterized by a seasonal downturn, with limited demand from power plants and a shift towards cleaner energy sources impacting coal consumption [11][33]. - The report highlights that the focus on cost control and operational efficiency is crucial for maintaining profitability amid fluctuating coal prices [3][8]. Price Trends - As of April 11, 2025, the price of Qinhuangdao port Q5500 thermal coal is reported at 676 RMB/ton, showing stability week-on-week [11][33]. - The report anticipates that coal prices will remain under pressure due to weak demand and high inventory levels, but significant price drops are not expected in the short term [11][33].

Core Viewpoints - The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for March showed a year-on-year decrease of 0.1%, an improvement from the previous value of -0.7%, while the Producer Price Index (PPI) decreased by 2.5% year-on-year, slightly worse than the expected 2.2% [8][59] - The increase in household appliance CPI to a ten-year high reflects improved consumer demand, despite weak PPI performance due to falling prices of major commodities like oil and coal [2][60] - The overall low CPI is primarily influenced by weak food CPI, which is attributed to sufficient food supply [3][19] CPI and PPI Analysis - March PPI decreased by 0.4% month-on-month, with significant contributions from falling oil prices (down 6%) and coal prices (down 7.9%), which together dragged PPI down by approximately 0.5% [2][9] - Core commodity PPI fell by 0.6 percentage points to -1.6%, while core commodity CPI slightly increased by 0.2 percentage points to 0.1%, indicating a shift in price sampling towards "trade-in" products [2][60] - Food CPI showed a slight recovery to -1.4% year-on-year, but the first quarter's food CPI was still down 1.4% compared to Q4 of the previous year, reflecting a strong supply of fresh vegetables and fruits [3][19] Service Sector Insights - The service CPI increased by only 0.3% month-on-month in March, which is lower than the typical seasonal increase of 1.4% seen in previous years, indicating a decline in post-holiday consumer activity [3][27] - Core service CPI decreased by 0.6%, significantly underperforming compared to the previous year's figure of -0.1%, with travel-related prices dropping due to reduced travel demand [3][61] Future Outlook - The potential increase in tariffs may exert downward pressure on PPI, while the recovery of domestic demand is expected to support CPI, leading to a forecast of CPI performing better than PPI throughout the year [4][33] - The anticipated average year-on-year PPI is projected at -1.5%, while CPI is expected to average at 0.1% [4][33]

以下文章来源于申万宏源策略 ，作者申万宏源策略 申万宏源策略 . 我们强调体系性、实战性 证券分析师： 陆灏川 A0230520080001、王雪蓉 A0230523070003 牟瑾瑾 A0230524100002、王胜 A0230511060001 研究支持： 王雪蓉 A0230523070003 多重因素共振下，A股红利板块持续调整。 年初至今，中证红利指数跌幅达2.5%，整体股息 率从5.04%提升至6.30%。一方面，降息预期延迟以及股债跷跷板效应显现，10年期国债上行 16BP；另一方面，国产大模型取得突破，成长预期回归，在风险偏好上升阶段，红利板块面临资 金分流压力。 申万三级行业口径下，2025年初至今红利板块内部结构分化显著： 股份行、白酒、 非运动服饰、乳品等板块估值提升；而动力煤、焦煤、炼油化工、房屋建设、教育出版等板块估 值回落、性价比提升， 具体见图一。 港股红利板块稳中有进，相较于A股红利板块的性价比优势缩窄。 年初至今，中证港股通高 息精选指数上涨2.8%。我们梳理A+H两地上市的高股息股票（A股股息率>3%，且港股股息率 AH红利溢价指数(算术平均) AH红利溢价指数(市值加权 ...