2025.10. 31 本文字数：3316，阅读时长大约5分钟 作者 | 第一财经 曹璐 周楠 当标榜消费主题基金却猛炒科技股、号称稳健混合却波动赛过股票……为根治基金投资风格漂移、破解产品名不 副实的行业顽疾，公募基金行业正迎来一场旨在强化"基准锚定"的深度变革。 作为基金的"投资坐标"，业绩比较基准本应通过锚定风格、丈量表现，约束投资行为并引导理性考核。但现实 是，截至10月30日，超六成主动权益基金近三年跑输业绩基准。 10月31日，在业内讨论已久的公募基金业绩比较基准迎来相关规定的征求意见稿。新规直击行业长期痛点核心是 让业绩比较基准真正发挥"锚"与"尺"的作用：既约束投资行为，防止"挂羊头卖狗肉"，也将直接与基金经理的薪 酬挂钩，此举严于部分境外成熟市场。 据第一财经了解，为平稳推进存量产品的基准调整，监管层已初步设立一年的过渡期。下一步还将修订出台薪酬 考核规则，细化基金经理薪酬考核具体指标要求。 事实上，业内对此次新规落地早有预期，部分机构已提前行动。Wind数据显示，截至10月31日，年内至少132 只基金产品出现基准变更，数量已超过去年全年，释放出行业加速规范的强烈信号。 这场围绕"锚"和" ...

Core Insights - The report emphasizes the importance of the "representativeness" of performance benchmarks for public funds, which should reflect the fund's investment style, objectives, scope, strategy, and proportions [1] - Internal controls are directly linked to performance benchmarks, enhancing the investment managers' focus on these benchmarks. Significant deviations from the benchmark will require review by the investment decision committee [1] - The weight of performance benchmarks in performance evaluation and fund assessment has significantly increased, with clear guidelines on how to compare active equity fund performance against benchmarks [1] Summary by Sections Performance Benchmark Adjustments - Adjustments to performance benchmarks can be made without convening a holder's meeting, except when there are changes to the investment scope, such as adding Hong Kong stock investments [1] - Existing products will have a one-year transition period for benchmark adjustments [1] Market Impact Discussion - The report suggests that public fund managers will likely reduce overall deviations from benchmarks, but the ability to make subjective adjustments remains crucial for generating excess returns [1] - During market opportunities, public funds may still have strong incentives to deviate from benchmarks to pursue relative returns, but in market correction phases, there may be a tendency to align more closely with benchmarks [1] - Historical trends indicate that growth-style managers tend to outperform benchmarks in growth-dominant phases, while value-style managers face more challenges in outperforming during value-dominant phases [1] - The distinction between indices suitable for active versus passive investment is clear, with active investment indices having more diverse constituents and greater stock differentiation [1]

Core Insights - SOTON Development (603612.SH) reported its Q3 2025 results, revealing that 17 institutional investors hold a total of 55.8463 million shares, representing 11.21% of the company's total equity [1] - The top ten institutional investors collectively own 10.77% of the shares, with a decrease of 1.83 percentage points compared to the previous quarter [1] Institutional Holdings - Among public funds, one fund, CITIC Securities Rui Li A, increased its holdings slightly, while seven funds, including Guotai Junan Value Advantage Flexible Allocation Mixed Fund, reduced their holdings by 1.18% [2] - Three new public funds disclosed their holdings in SOTON Development, while 230 funds did not disclose their holdings this quarter, including notable funds like Southern CSI 1000 ETF and Harvest New Energy New Materials Stock A [2] Social Security Fund - One new social security fund, the National Social Security Fund 502 Portfolio, disclosed its holdings in SOTON Development this quarter [2]

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has released two important drafts aimed at enhancing the stability of public fund investment behavior, clarifying product investment styles, and improving investor experience through the establishment of performance benchmarks for publicly offered securities investment funds [2]. Group 1: Performance Benchmark Guidelines - The drafts aim to clarify the internal setting, changing, and disclosure norms of performance benchmarks, as well as to improve internal control mechanisms [2]. - The guidelines emphasize that benchmarks should reflect the product's positioning and investment style, aligning with the fund contract's investment goals and strategies [4]. - Fund managers are required to appoint experienced fund managers based on the performance benchmark, which should not be changed arbitrarily due to short-term market fluctuations or performance assessments [4]. Group 2: Strengthening Constraints on Benchmarks - Historically, there has been insufficient monitoring and control over fund managers, leading to issues such as "style drift" [7]. - The guidelines require fund managers to establish a comprehensive control mechanism covering the selection, disclosure, monitoring, and accountability of performance benchmarks [8]. - An independent department must monitor deviations from the benchmark, ensuring that fund managers are held accountable for their investment decisions [9][10]. Group 3: Constructing a Positive Interaction Ecosystem - The guidelines call for custodians, sales, and evaluation institutions to effectively supervise and utilize performance benchmarks to avoid them becoming ineffective [14]. - Custodians are tasked with responsibilities such as reviewing fund contracts and monitoring investment style stability [14]. - Fund evaluation agencies are encouraged to use performance benchmarks as a key criterion for assessing fund management [14]. Group 4: Supporting Measures for Implementation - The CSRC plans to guide industry institutions in optimizing existing products' benchmarks during a transition period to ensure market stability [17]. - A benchmark library will be established to encourage standardized selection of benchmarks that represent equity assets [17]. - The CSRC will enhance daily supervision of fund managers and related institutions to ensure compliance with the new guidelines [18].

事关公募基金业绩比较基准新规出炉。 10月31日，中国证监会就《公开募集证券投资基金业绩比较基准指引（征求意见稿）》（以下简称《指 引》）公开征求意见。 为指导行业机构更好落实《指引》，基金业协会同步起草了《公开募集证券投资基金业绩比较基准操作 细则（征求意见稿）》，进一步明确业绩比较基准的选取展示、信息披露、风险控制、合规管理等具体 操作规范，并向社会公开征求意见。 速览：《指引》共六章二十一条，主要内容如下： 一是突出业绩比较基准的表征作用，业绩比较基准应当体现基金合同约定的核心要素和投资风格，一经 选定则不得随意变更。 二是强化业绩比较基准的约束作用，基金管理人应当建立全流程内控机制，提高内部决策层级，确保投 资风格稳定性。 三是发挥业绩比较基准的评价作用，规范薪酬考核、基金销售、基金评价等对业绩比较基准的使用要 求。 四是健全多道防线，在基金管理人自我约束基础上，进一步加强信息披露和基金托管人监督。 明确"锚"和"尺" 从《指引》起草背景看，业绩比较基准是基金合同的基本要素，是基金管理人基于产品定位和投资目标 而为基金设定的业绩参考标准。从功能作用看，业绩比较基准是基金投资的"锚"和"尺"，发挥确定产 ...

Group 1 - The CSI A500 Index experienced a slight decline of 0.05% this week, closing at 5583.72 points as of October 31 [1] - The average daily trading volume for the week was 8921.90 billion, with a week-on-week increase of 37.23% [1] - Among the 40 CSI A500 ETFs, only the Guotai Fund's CSI A500 Enhanced ETF saw a decrease of 0.5%, while the Huaan Fund's CSI A500 Enhanced ETF increased by 0.95% [1] Group 2 - The total scale of A500 ETFs has returned to over 2000 billion, with the top three funds being Huatai-PineBridge, E Fund, and Guotai, with scales of 254.98 billion, 234.41 billion, and 224.57 billion respectively [1] - According to Xinda Securities, by Q3 2025, a market recovery is expected, leading to profit-taking trends in broad indices like the Sci-Tech 50 and CSI 300, while ETF funds will continue to favor Hong Kong stocks and certain low-position sectors [1] - Significant net outflows exceeding 100 billion are concentrated in core broad-based and growth sectors, including the Sci-Tech 50, CSI 300, CSI A500, and others [1][2] Group 3 - Guojin Securities has raised net profit forecasts for the years 2025 and 2026 across major indices, including the Shanghai 50, CSI 300, and ChiNext Index, while the CSI 500 saw mixed adjustments [2] - The profit forecasts for large/mid-cap growth/value styles have been increased for 2025 and 2026, whereas small-cap growth forecasts have been lowered [2]

业绩基准不再"纸上谈兵"，行业"盲盒"时代要结束？ 当标榜消费主题基金却猛炒科技股、号称稳健混合却波动赛过股票……为根治基金投资风格漂移、破解 产品名不副实的行业顽疾，公募基金行业正迎来一场旨在强化"基准锚定"的深度变革。 作为基金的"投资坐标"，业绩比较基准本应通过锚定风格、丈量表现，约束投资行为并引导理性考核。 但现实是，截至10月30日，超六成主动权益基金近三年跑输业绩基准。 10月31日，在业内讨论已久的公募基金业绩比较基准迎来相关规定的征求意见稿。新规直击行业长期痛 点核心是让业绩比较基准真正发挥"锚"与"尺"的作用：既约束投资行为，防止"挂羊头卖狗肉"，也将直 接与基金经理的薪酬挂钩，此举严于部分境外成熟市场。 据第一财经了解，为平稳推进存量产品的基准调整，监管层已初步设立一年的过渡期。下一步还将修订 出台薪酬考核规则，细化基金经理薪酬考核具体指标要求。 事实上，业内对此次新规落地早有预期，部分机构已提前行动。Wind数据显示，截至10月31日，年内 至少132只基金产品出现基准变更，数量已超过去年全年，释放出行业加速规范的强烈信号。 这场围绕"锚"和"尺"的改革，能否终结基金"盲盒"乱象？答案将 ...

为规范公募基金业绩比较基准的选取和使用，切实发挥业绩比较基准表征风格、约束投资和衡量业绩等功能作用，10月31日，中国证监会发文称，起草了 《公开募集证券投资基金业绩比较基准指引（征求意见稿）》（以下简称《指引》），并向社会公开征求意见。整体来看，《指引》涉及了突出业绩比较基 准的表征作用、强化其约束作用、规范薪酬考核等对业绩比较基准的使用要求等。同日，中基协也起草了《公开募集证券投资基金业绩比较基准操作细则 （征求意见稿）》（以下简称《操作细则》），进一步明确具体操作规范，并公开征求意见。 意在解决"风格漂移"等问题 10月31日，中国证监会就《指引》公开征求意见。据悉，《指引》共二十一条，分为总则、基准的规范、管理人的内部控制、基准的外部约束、监督管理、 附则等六章，主要包括四方面内容。 一是突出业绩比较基准的表征作用，业绩比较基准应当体现基金合同约定的核心要素和投资风格，一经选定则不得随意变更。二是强化业绩比较基准的约束 作用，基金管理人应当建立全流程内控机制，提高内部决策层级，确保投资风格稳定性。三是发挥业绩比较基准的评价作用，规范薪酬考核、基金销售、基 金评价等对业绩比较基准的使用要求。四是健全多道 ...

每经记者｜李蕾 每经编辑｜何小桃 彭水萍 《每日经济新闻》记者获悉，备受市场关注的公募基金业绩比较基准新规征求意见稿正式公布。 10月31日，中国证监会发布《公开募集证券投资基金业绩比较基准指引（征求意见稿）》（以下简称《指引》），基金业协会同步发布了《公开募集证券 投资基金业绩比较基准操作细则（征求意见稿）》（以下简称《操作细则》），向社会公开征求意见。 今年5月，证监会印发《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》（以下简称《行动方案》），对公募基金高质量发展提出系列改革任务。其中，业绩比较基 准改革是本次公募基金改革的关键举措之一，基准的规范选取和有效使用也将有助于提升公募基金投资风格的清晰度和投资行为的稳定性，纠治"风格漂 移"等问题。 此次出台《指引》《操作细则》，既是落实《行动方案》要求的具体举措，填补公募基金监管规则的空白，也是推动境内公募基金业绩比较基准规范化， 强化投资管理的纪律性的"关键一步"，将引导行业机构回归"受人之托、代客理财"的初心，构建更加稳定的投资风格，更好发挥公募基金价值投资工具属 性，为投资者提供长期稳健回报，为资本市场引入更多中长期资金。 《操作细则》共六章二十九条，进一步明确了 ...

- The report does not contain any specific quantitative models or factors for analysis[1][2][3] - The report primarily focuses on fund market trends, industry allocation, and stock allocation without detailing quantitative models or factors[6][7][9] - No formulas or construction processes for quantitative models or factors are provided in the report[23][28][29]