Report Industry Investment Rating - Not provided in the content Core Viewpoints - This week, the A-share market adjusted with shrinking volume. Mid-cap stocks had a large correction, while banks and insurance in the large financial sector performed well. The precious metal prices continued to rise, and the prices of London gold and London silver both reached record highs. The trading volume of the two markets decreased, and liquidity continued to shrink. The report suggests paying attention to the structural opportunities brought by the marginal changes in capital flow and optimizing positions in precious metals opportunistically [1][10][15] Summary by Directory 1. This Week's Market Review 1.1 Industry Index - Only the banking, coal, food and beverage, and transportation sectors rose this week, with a significant increase in the weekly trading volume proportion compared to last week. The media sector's trading activity decreased significantly. The non-ferrous metals sector, which was strong in the past 3 months, fell 2.91% this week, but its trading volume proportion increased to a four - week high of 8.27%. The neutral hedge fund's average and median absolute returns were -0.12% and -0.06% respectively [10] 1.2 Market Style - The growth style index significantly corrected by 5.82% this week, and its trading volume proportion dropped to a four - week low of 56.25%. The consumer style index fell 1.31%, and its trading volume proportion rose to a four - week high of 9.49%. The financial style index rose 1.57%, and its trading volume proportion slightly increased to 6.74%. The cyclical style index fell 3.78%, and its trading volume proportion was at a four - week high of 23.55%. The stable style index slightly fell 0.52%, and its trading volume proportion was at a four - week high of 3.97%. Mid - cap stocks had a larger decline, with the CSI 500 index falling 5.17% and its trading volume proportion dropping to a four - week low of 19.30%, while the Shanghai and Shenzhen 300 index fell 2.22%, and its trading volume proportion dropped to 30.09% [14] 2. Active Equity Funds 2.1 Funds with Excellent Performance in Different Theme Tracks This Week - Single - track funds are those with a position in a certain sector greater than 70% for multiple consecutive periods, and double - track funds are those with positions in two sectors both greater than 30% for multiple consecutive periods. The report lists the top five funds in different theme tracks such as TMT, financial real estate, consumption, medicine, manufacturing, and cyclical sectors [19][20] 2.2 Funds with Excellent Performance in Different Strategy Classifications - The funds are divided into deep - undervalued, high - growth, high - quality, quality - growth, quality - undervalued, GARP, and balanced - cost - effective types. The report lists the funds with relatively excellent performance in different types of funds this week [21] 3. Index - Enhanced Funds 3.1 This Week's Excess Return Distribution of Index - Enhanced Funds - The average and median excess returns of CSI 300 index - enhanced funds were 0.10% and 0.12% respectively; those of CSI 500 index - enhanced funds were 0.81% and 0.75% respectively; those of CSI 1000 index - enhanced funds were 0.57% and 0.60% respectively; those of CSI 2000 index - enhanced funds were 0.47% and 0.70% respectively; those of CSI A500 index - enhanced funds were 0.36% and 0.39% respectively; those of ChiNext index - enhanced funds were 0.64% and 0.80% respectively; and those of Science and Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship 50 index - enhanced funds were 0.27% and 0.25% respectively. The average and median absolute returns of neutral hedge funds were -0.12% and -0.06% respectively, and those of quantitative long - only funds were -3.25% and -3.43% respectively [24][26] 4. This Week's High - Frequency Position Detection of Funds - In the past week, active equity funds significantly increased their positions in the computer (0.44%), electronics (0.31%), and non - ferrous metals (0.19%) industries; and significantly reduced their positions in the non - banking financial (0.17%), banking (0.14%), and automobile (0.13%) industries. From a one - month perspective, the positions in the computer (1.65%) and electronics (0.84%) industries increased significantly, while the position in the pharmaceutical (0.51%) industry decreased significantly [3][42]

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant information provided. Core Viewpoints of the Report The report comprehensively analyzes the secondary market and ETF products from multiple perspectives, including the performance of major indices, the market performance of different types of ETFs, their fund flows, trading volumes, margin trading, and new product launches during the sample period from October 13 to October 17, 2025 [1][20]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. Secondary Market Overview - **Index Performance**: SGE Gold 9999, S&P 500, and Nikkei 225 had the top weekly returns, at 10.71%, 1.70%, and -1.05% respectively. The PE valuation quantile of CSI 300 was the highest at 95.88%, while that of CSI 2000 was the lowest at 86.83% [10]. - **Industry Performance**: Among Shenwan primary industries, Bank, Coal, and Food & Beverage had the top returns, at 4.89%, 4.17%, and 0.86% respectively. Electronics, Media, and Automobile had the lowest returns, at -7.14%, -6.27%, and -5.99% respectively. The industries with the highest valuation quantiles were Coal, Utilities, and Non - Ferrous Metals, at 99.59%, 97.94%, and 97.53% respectively [16]. 2. ETF Product Overview 2.1 ETF Market Performance - **By Product Type**: Commodity ETFs had the best average performance, with a weighted average return of 10.90%, while QDII ETFs had the worst, at -5.03%. - **By Listing Plate**: ETFs corresponding to Japanese stocks had better performance, with a weighted average return of 1.63%. Science and Technology Innovation Board - related and Hong Kong stock ETFs had poor performance, with weighted average returns of -6.31% and -5.87% respectively. - **By Industry Plate**: Consumer sector ETFs had the best average performance, with a weighted average return of -0.16%, while Technology sector ETFs had the worst, at -7.36%. - **By Theme**: Bank and Dividend ETFs performed well, with weighted average returns of 5.18% and 1.32% respectively. Robot and Consumer Electronics ETFs had relatively poor performance, with weighted average returns of -9.41% and -7.77% respectively [20][25]. 2.2 ETF Fund Inflows and Outflows - **By ETF Category**: Industry - themed ETFs had the largest net fund inflow of 467.78 billion yuan, while broad - based ETFs had the smallest, at -205.63 billion yuan. - **By Listing Plate**: Hong Kong stock ETFs had the largest net fund inflow of 217.57 billion yuan, while ChiNext - related ETFs had the smallest, at -40.60 billion yuan. - **By Industry Plate**: Financial Real Estate sector ETFs had the largest net fund inflow of 160.23 billion yuan, while Biomedical sector ETFs had the smallest, at 27.90 billion yuan. - **By Theme**: Non - Bank and Bank ETFs had the largest net fund inflows, at 82.25 billion yuan and 78.57 billion yuan respectively. Consumer Electronics and Artificial Intelligence ETFs had the smallest, at -6.07 billion yuan and -1.30 billion yuan respectively [27][29]. 2.3 ETF Trading Volume - **By ETF Category**: Commodity ETFs had the largest increase in the daily average trading volume change rate, at 95.63%, while broad - based ETFs had the smallest, at 1.72%. - **By Listing Plate**: Japanese stock ETFs had the largest increase in the daily average trading volume change rate, at 69.17%, while CSI 2000 had the largest decrease, at -11.10%. - **By Industry Plate**: Cyclical sector ETFs had the largest increase in the daily average trading volume change rate, at 40.81%, while Biomedical sector ETFs had the largest decrease, at -9.90%. - **By Theme**: Non - Bank and Chip Semiconductor ETFs had the largest 5 - day average daily trading volumes, at 314.43 billion yuan and 158.86 billion yuan respectively. Bank and Dividend ETFs had the largest increases in the daily average trading volume change rate, at 64.61% and 31.52% respectively. Artificial Intelligence and Robot ETFs had the largest decreases, at -24.54% and -23.49% respectively [34][40][41]. 2.4 ETF Margin Trading - The net margin purchase of all equity ETFs was 2.174 billion yuan, and the net short - selling was 543 million yuan. During the sample period, the net margin purchase of Huatai - PineBridge CSI Main Consumption ETF was the largest, and the net short - selling of Southern CSI 500 ETF was the largest [2][47]. 2.5 ETF New Launches and Listings - One fund was established and seven funds were listed during the sample period [3][49].

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market is experiencing a decline in investor sentiment following a significant correction last week, leading to lower trading volumes and a temporary halt in the current market trend [1][2]. Group 1: ETF Issuance and Market Trends - As of October 18, 2023, a total of 257 stock ETFs have been established this year, with an issuance scale of 1460.14 billion [3][4]. - The issuance of ETFs has shown a correlation with market conditions, with a peak issuance in February at 261.93 billion, despite the market's volatility in April and subsequent recovery [7][8]. - Monthly ETF issuance has remained relatively stable, with no significant fluctuations in the number of ETFs launched each month [8]. Group 2: ETF Performance and Investor Preferences - The majority of newly issued ETFs are focused on thematic industry indices, which account for over 40% of the total, reflecting investor interest in sectors like technology and anti-involution [10]. - Specific indices such as the ChiNext Composite Index and the Science and Technology Innovation Index have seen significant ETF tracking, with notable year-to-date returns [11][12]. - Despite the overall positive performance of many ETFs, the average issuance scale is 5.68 billion, and over 70% of the ETFs have seen a decrease in scale since issuance [13][15]. Group 3: Challenges for Fund Companies - Fund companies face challenges as the overall scale of newly issued ETFs has decreased by 71 billion since their launch, impacting profitability [15][24]. - The competition among ETF providers is intensifying, with many companies struggling to maintain scale while managing costs associated with new ETF launches [20][21]. - Only a few fund companies, such as GF Fund and Huaxia Fund, have seen significant growth in their newly issued ETFs, while the majority have experienced scale shrinkage [23][24].

Report Summary 1. Market Overview - On October 20, 2025, the Shanghai Composite Index rose 0.63% to 3863.89 points, the Shenzhen Component Index rose 0.98% to 12813.21 points, and the ChiNext Index rose 1.98% to 2993.45 points. The total trading volume of A - shares in the two markets was 17515 billion yuan. The top - performing sectors were communication (3.21%), coal (3.04%), and power equipment (1.54%), while the bottom - performing sectors were non - ferrous metals (-1.34%), agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry and fishery (-0.88%), and beauty care (-0.38%) [2][6] 2. Stock ETFs - The top - trading - volume stock ETFs on this day were: Huaxia CSI A500 ETF, which rose 0.44% with a discount rate of 0.50%; Huaxia Shanghai Stock Exchange Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 ETF, which rose 0.28% with a discount rate of 0.39%; and Cathay CSI A500 ETF, which rose 0.53% with a discount rate of 0.60% [3][7] 3. Bond ETFs - The top - trading - volume bond ETFs on this day were: Haifutong CSI Short - Term Financing Bond ETF, which rose 0.00% with a discount rate of 0.01%; Huitianfu CSI AAA Sci - tech Innovation Bond ETF, which rose 0.00% with a discount rate of -0.19%; and Boshi CSI Convertible Bond and Exchangeable Bond ETF, which rose 0.05% with a discount rate of 0.12% [4][9] 4. Gold ETFs - On this day, gold AU9999 fell 2.29% and Shanghai Gold fell 2.64%. The top - trading - volume gold ETFs were: Huaan Gold ETF, which fell 3.14% with a discount rate of -2.86%; E Fund Gold ETF, which fell 3.18% with a discount rate of -2.82%; and Boshi Gold ETF, which fell 3.21% with a discount rate of -2.85% [12] 5. Commodity Futures ETFs - On this day, Dacheng Non - ferrous Metals Futures ETF rose 0.68% with a discount rate of 0.25%; Jianxin Yisheng Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange Energy and Chemical Futures ETF fell 0.24% with a discount rate of -0.93%; and Huaxia Feed Soybean Meal Futures ETF rose 0.42% with a discount rate of 4.14% [13] 6. Cross - border ETFs - The previous trading day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.52%, the Nasdaq Composite rose 0.52%, the S&P 500 rose 0.53%, and the German DAX fell 1.82%. On this day, the Hang Seng Index rose 2.42% and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index rose 2.45%. The top - trading - volume cross - border ETFs on this day were: E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF, which rose 0.54% with a discount rate of 1.07%; Huatai - Peregrine Hang Seng Tech ETF, which rose 2.34% with a discount rate of 3.52%; and Huaxia Hang Seng Tech ETF, which rose 2.17% with a discount rate of 3.26% [15] 7. Money ETFs - The top - trading - volume money ETFs on this day were Huabao Tianyi ETF, Yin Hua Rili ETF, and Money ETF Jianxin Tianyi [17]

Market Overview - The market rebounded today with over 4,000 stocks rising across the board, led by sectors such as cultivated diamonds, coal mining and processing, gas, electric machines, brain-computer interfaces, and CPO-related hardware [1] - The gold concept, pork, rare earth permanent magnets, and energy sectors saw declines [1] - The Hong Kong stock market remained stable at high levels, with semiconductor and internet sectors collectively rebounding [1] Index Performance - The CSI 500 Index rose by 0.6% [1] - The CSI 300 Index increased by 0.5% [1] - The ChiNext Index surged by 2.0% [1] - The STAR Market 50 Index gained 0.4% [1] - The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index climbed by 2.5% [1] ETF Tracking - The HuShen 300 ETF and the CSI A500 ETF both tracked their respective indices with the HuShen 300 Index up by 0.5% and the CSI A500 Index up by 0.6% [3] - The rolling P/E ratio for the HuShen 300 Index is 14.2 times, while for the CSI A500 Index it is 16.6 times [3] - The ChiNext ETF, which tracks the ChiNext Index, reported a rise of 2.0% [4] - The STAR Market 50 ETF, tracking the STAR Market 50 Index, has a rolling P/E ratio of 41.3 times [4] - The H-share ETF, which tracks the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index, increased by 2.5% with a rolling P/E ratio of 10.5 times [6]

Core Viewpoint - The personal pension fund market is experiencing a significant turnaround in performance, with many funds showing positive returns and a growing number of products, although challenges remain in terms of scale and investor engagement [4][5][6]. Performance and Growth - As of October 17, 2023, the average return of personal pension funds (Y shares) for the year reached 15.46%, a substantial increase from 3.12% at the end of the second quarter [4][5]. - Among the existing funds, 96% of the 132 products established by the end of 2022 have positive cumulative returns, indicating a recovery from previous losses [5]. - Notable performers include the Tianhong CSI Innovation and Entrepreneurship 50 ETF, which has risen by 46.37% year-to-date, and the Guotai Min'an Pension 2040 Fund, which has achieved a return of 43.1% [4][5]. Market Dynamics - The total scale of personal pension funds reached 12.405 billion yuan by the end of the second quarter, marking a 35.65% increase from the previous year [6]. - Despite the positive performance, over half of the funds still have scales below 10 million yuan, with some facing automatic liquidation due to insufficient assets [9][10]. Challenges in Investor Engagement - The personal pension fund market still faces the "good performance but low participation" dilemma, with many investors lacking understanding and experience with these products [8][12]. - There is a need for improved marketing and education to enhance investor confidence and participation, as many view these products as complex and are influenced by short-term market fluctuations [12][14]. Recommendations for Improvement - Industry experts suggest enhancing the marketing of personal pension funds, simplifying the account opening process, and integrating pension investment into life planning scenarios to increase engagement [14]. - There is also a call for fund companies to focus on long-term investment strategies and to better communicate the benefits of these funds to potential investors [13][14].

Core Viewpoint - The recent leadership changes at Huaxia Fund Management Co., Ltd. mark a new governance phase with the appointment of Zou Yingguang as the new chairman and Li Yimei as the vice chairman, following the resignation of Zhang Youjun [2][5][10]. Management Changes - Zhang Youjun has officially stepped down as chairman, with the transition smoothly completed [3][5]. - Zou Yingguang, a veteran in the financial industry with nearly 30 years of experience, has taken over as chairman and legal representative [5][6]. - Li Yimei, who has been with Huaxia Fund since 2001, has been promoted to vice chairman, showcasing the company's internal talent development [7][10]. Shareholder Structure Adjustment - Prior to the management changes, Huaxia Fund underwent a significant shareholder structure adjustment, with Tianjin Haipeng Technology Consulting Co., Ltd. transferring its 10% stake to a Qatar sovereign wealth fund entity [8]. - The new shareholder structure consists of Citic Securities holding 62.2%, Canada’s Mackenzie Financial Corporation holding 27.8%, and Qatar Holdings holding 10% [8]. Company Performance - As of the end of Q2 2025, Huaxia Fund's total assets under management exceeded 3 trillion yuan, reaching 30,345 billion yuan [9]. - For the first half of 2025, the company reported revenues of 4.258 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 16.05%, and a net profit of 1.123 billion yuan, up 5.74% [9]. Industry Position - Huaxia Fund, established in April 1998, is one of the first public fund management companies in China and has become a significant player in the industry [9][10]. - The dual adjustments in management and shareholder structure are viewed as strategic moves to adapt to industry changes and position for future growth [9].

Core Insights - The average return of pension fund Y shares has reached 15.46% year-to-date, with 96% of the 132 products established at the end of 2022 showing positive cumulative returns [1][2][3] - Despite the positive performance, over half of the products have a scale of less than 10 million yuan, and several have been forced to liquidate due to not meeting scale requirements [1][6][7] Performance Overview - As of October 17, 2023, nearly all pension fund Y share products have increased in value, with only one product showing a slight decline of 0.77% [2] - Eight products have achieved returns exceeding 40%, with the highest being Tianhong Zhongzheng Kechuang Chuangye 50 ETF, which has risen by 46.37% [2] - The number of products with positive returns since inception has increased significantly, from 70 to 127, indicating a recovery in early investments [3] Market Dynamics - The total scale of pension fund Y shares reached 12.405 billion yuan by the end of Q2 2023, marking a 35.65% increase from the end of 2022 [5] - Despite the overall positive market changes, the average scale of pension fund Y shares remains below 50 million yuan, with many products below 10 million yuan [7][8] Challenges and Opportunities - The industry faces challenges in scaling and attracting investors, with many products struggling to gain traction despite positive performance [6][9] - There is a need for improved investor education and experience to enhance participation in pension funds, as many investors lack understanding of the long-term value of these products [9][11] Strategic Recommendations - The industry is encouraged to focus on long-term investment strategies and enhance product design to emphasize sustained contributions and long-term growth [10] - Simplifying the account opening process and integrating pension investment into life planning scenarios could improve investor engagement [11]

Core Insights - The "Fund Manager 100" series of high-end interviews, co-hosted by 21st Century Business Herald and Dianshi Investment, will officially launch on October 22 in Shanghai, focusing on the long-term viability of the "Fixed Income +" strategy [2][12] - The event aims to create a professional and high-quality communication platform, emphasizing the performance of fund managers and their products [2][3] Group 1: Event Overview - The first event will feature discussions on asset allocation strategies, stock-bond mixed strategies, and achieving low-volatility returns [3] - Notable fund managers from various firms, including Anxin Fund, GF Fund, and others, will participate in roundtable discussions to share practical insights on "Fixed Income +" investments [3][5] Group 2: Fund Performance Highlights - Anxin Stable Growth A, managed by Li Jun, has achieved positive returns every year since its inception in 2015, with a total scale of 10.371 billion [4] - GF Fund's GF Jiyu A, managed by Zeng Gang, has a year-to-date return of 9.37% and is highly favored by institutional investors, with over 98% institutional holding [4][5] - The newly established mixed bond fund, Zhao Shang An Ning A, has been co-managed by experienced managers with over 12 years in the industry [5] Group 3: Professional Engagement - The event is expected to attract a diverse audience from the asset management industry, including investment managers, researchers, and product experts from various sectors [10][11] - The focus will be on fostering deep exchanges of ideas and experiences among participants, enhancing the overall quality of discussions [11]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the content. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Last week (Oct 13 - Oct 17, 2025), the bond market sentiment warmed up with yields oscillating and recovering. The stock market's decline and the central bank's loose liquidity pushed the ultra - long - end bonds to rebound and lead the market. The short - term bond market's allocation cost - performance improved, and it may continue a mild oscillating pattern [3][10]. - The continuous decline of bond yields needs further observation, affected by factors such as the "15th Five - Year Plan" policy signals from the Fourth Plenary Session, the possibility of monetary policy easing (e.g., interest rate cuts), and the results of Sino - US trade negotiations [10]. - Last week, the US Treasury yields declined. The 10 - year US Treasury yield once fell below 4.0% and then rebounded above 4.0% due to improved market sentiment [10]. - Last week, the CSI REITs Total Return Index declined by 1.44%. Various types of REITs generally fell, but there were new developments in the primary market [11]. 3. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 3.1 Weekly Market Observation 3.1.1 Pan - Fixed - Income Market Review and Observation - **Domestic Bond Market**: From Oct 13 to Oct 17, 2025, the 1 - year Treasury yield rose 5.93BP to 1.44%, the 10 - year yield dropped 1.4BP to 1.82%, and the 30 - year yield dropped 7BP to 2.20%. The short - term bond market may maintain a mild oscillating pattern, and the continuous decline of yields needs further observation [10]. - **US Bond Market**: From Oct 13 to Oct 17, 2025, the 1 - year US Treasury yield dropped 4BP to 3.56%, the 2 - year yield dropped 6BP to 3.46%, and the 10 - year yield dropped 3BP to 4.02%. The 10 - year yield once fell below 4.0% and then rebounded [10]. - **REITs Market**: From Oct 13 to Oct 17, 2025, the CSI REITs Total Return Index declined 1.44% to 1043.46 points. There were 3 new first - issue REITs and 2 new expansion - offering REITs in the primary market [11]. 3.1.2 Public Fund Market Dynamics - On Oct 14, 2025, the CITIC Construction Investment Shenyang International Software Park Closed - end Infrastructure Securities Investment Fund completed its fundraising, becoming the first successfully issued public REITs project in Northeast China [3][12]. 3.2 Pan - Fixed - Income Fund Index Performance Tracking | Index Classification | Last Week's Return | Since Inception Return | | --- | --- | --- | | Money Enhancement Index | 0.03% | 4.19% | | Short - Term Bond Fund Preferred Index | 0.05% | 4.32% | | Medium - and Long - Term Bond Fund Preferred Index | 0.16% | 6.23% | | Low - Volatility Fixed - Income + Fund Preferred Index | - 0.06% | 3.93% | | Medium - Volatility Fixed - Income + Fund Preferred Index | - 0.85% | 4.69% | | High - Volatility Fixed - Income + Fund Preferred Index | - 1.00% | 6.70% | | Convertible Bond Fund Preferred Index | - 2.61% | 19.80% | | QDII Bond Fund Preferred Index | 0.18% | 10.57% | | REITs Fund Preferred Index | - 2.43% | 31.01% | [4][5][13] 3.2.1 Money Enhancement Index Tracking - **Money Enhancement Strategy Index**: Aims at liquidity management, pursues a curve surpassing money funds. It mainly allocates money market funds and inter - bank certificate of deposit index funds. The performance benchmark is the CSI Money Fund Index [14]. 3.2.2 Pure Bond Index Tracking - **Short - Term Bond Fund Preferred Index**: Aims at liquidity management, pursues a smooth curve while controlling drawdowns. It mainly configures 5 funds with stable long - term returns, strict drawdown control, and significant absolute return capabilities. The performance benchmark is 50% * Short - Term Pure Bond Fund Index + 50% * Ordinary Money Fund Index [18]. - **Medium - and Long - Term Bond Fund Preferred Index**: Invests in medium - and long - term pure bond funds, pursues stable returns while controlling drawdowns. It selects 5 funds each period, adjusting duration and the ratio of credit bond funds and interest - rate bond funds according to the market [18]. 3.2.3 Fixed - Income + Index Tracking - **Low - Volatility Fixed - Income + Preferred Index**: The equity center is 10%, with 10 funds selected each period. It focuses on funds with an equity center within 15% in the past three years and recently. The performance benchmark is 10% CSI 800 Index + 90% ChinaBond New Composite Full - Price Index [22]. - **Medium - Volatility Fixed - Income + Preferred Index**: The equity center is 20%, with 5 funds selected each period. It selects funds with an equity center between 15% - 25% in the past three years and recently [23]. - **High - Volatility Fixed - Income + Preferred Index**: The equity center is 30%, with 5 funds selected each period. It selects funds with an equity center between 25% - 35% in the past three years and recently, focusing on bond - end stability and equity - end offensive capabilities [27]. 3.2.4 Convertible Bond Fund Preferred Index - Selects bond - type funds with an average convertible bond investment proportion of at least 60% in the latest period and at least 80% in the past four quarters. It constructs an evaluation system from multiple dimensions and selects 5 funds to form the index [30]. 3.2.5 QDII Bond Fund Preferred Index Tracking - The underlying assets are overseas bonds. It selects 6 funds with stable returns and good risk control according to credit and duration [32]. 3.2.6 REITs Fund Preferred Index Tracking - The underlying assets are mainly high - quality and stable infrastructure projects. It selects 10 funds with stable operations, reasonable valuations, and certain elasticity according to the type of underlying assets [33].