Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation has initiated an investigation into the competitive landscape of the food delivery platform service industry due to concerns over irrational competition practices such as price wars and excessive subsidies, which are negatively impacting the real economy and intensifying "involution" competition [1] Group 1: Government Actions - The State Administration for Market Regulation is conducting an investigation and assessment of the market competition status in the food delivery platform service industry based on the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China [1] - The investigation aims to promote lawful and compliant operations among food delivery platforms, ensuring fair and orderly competition to establish a high-quality market order [1] Group 2: Company Responses - Meituan, Taobao Flash Purchase, and JD Delivery have announced their support for the investigation and expressed their commitment to cooperate fully [2][3] - Meituan has called for a return to rational competition and has opposed "involution" competition, emphasizing the need for industry players to fulfill their market responsibilities and promote innovation and healthy development in the food delivery service sector [2] - Taobao Flash Purchase highlighted the importance of fair competition as a core principle of the market economy and committed to adhering to relevant laws and regulations while providing diverse and high-quality services [2] - JD Delivery expressed strong support for measures that maintain market fairness and protect the rights of consumers, operators, and delivery personnel, while also focusing on high-quality development through supply chain innovation [3] Group 3: Industry Context - The ongoing subsidy wars in the food delivery platform sector have drawn significant attention since 2025, prompting the State Administration for Market Regulation to hold discussions with major platforms to enforce compliance with social responsibilities and promote a healthy market environment [3] - The current investigation will involve on-site verification, interviews, and surveys to gather comprehensive insights into competitive behaviors within the food delivery platforms, aiming to assess monopoly risks and regulate market order [3]

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation is conducting an investigation into the competitive status of the food delivery platform service industry in China, highlighting concerns over unhealthy competition practices such as subsidies, price wars, and traffic control that negatively impact the real economy [1][2]. Group 1: Investigation Purpose and Importance - The investigation aims to express competition concerns, assess monopoly risks, and regulate market order within the food delivery platform service industry [2]. - The food delivery platform service industry is recognized as a significant part of China's platform economy, contributing to consumption, employment, and innovation [1]. Group 2: Investigation Methodology - The investigation will utilize on-site verification, face-to-face interviews, and surveys to gather comprehensive insights into competitive behaviors within the food delivery platforms [2]. - The investigation will seek to collect opinions from various stakeholders, including platform operators, new employment groups, and consumers [2]. Group 3: Compliance and Future Actions - Food delivery platforms are expected to actively cooperate with the market investigation and evaluation, adhering to antitrust compliance responsibilities [2]. - The investigation aims to promote innovation and healthy development within the food delivery platform service industry by ensuring fair market competition [2].

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation has initiated an investigation into the competitive landscape of the food delivery platform service industry in China, aiming to address issues of irrational competition, such as price wars and excessive subsidies, which have negatively impacted the real economy and intensified "involution" within the industry [2] Group 1: Government Actions - The investigation is based on the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China and aims to promote lawful and fair competition within the food delivery platform service sector [2] - The investigation will involve on-site verification, face-to-face interviews, and surveys to gather insights from various stakeholders, including platform operators, new employment groups, and consumers [2] Group 2: Company Responses - Major food delivery platforms, including Meituan, Taobao Shanguo, and JD Delivery, have expressed their support for the investigation and committed to cooperating fully [3] - Meituan has called for a return to rational competition and has emphasized the importance of fulfilling market responsibilities to foster innovation and healthy development in the industry [3] - Taobao Shanguo has highlighted the significance of fair competition as a core principle of market economy and aims to provide diverse and high-quality services in collaboration with partners [3] - JD Delivery has voiced strong support for measures against "involution" and is focused on promoting high-quality development through supply chain innovations [3] Group 3: Industry Challenges - The intense competition among food delivery platforms has led to significant financial losses, with Meituan reporting a net loss of 16 billion yuan in Q3 2025, compared to a profit of 12.8 billion yuan in the same period last year [4] - Alibaba's net profit for the same period fell by 52% to 20.99 billion yuan, while JD's net profit decreased by 55% to 5.3 billion yuan [4] - The high subsidies offered by platforms have created a vicious cycle for the restaurant industry, leading to profit erosion and quality compromise, as businesses face high fixed costs and low demand elasticity [5] Group 4: Expert Insights - An expert has pointed out that the burden of high subsidies is often shifted to restaurants, creating a dilemma where businesses must either participate in subsidy programs or risk losing customer traffic [5] - The expert emphasized the need to scrutinize the mechanisms behind subsidy costs, questioning whether they are borne by the platforms or passed down to merchants through pricing algorithms [5]

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation has initiated an investigation into the competitive landscape of the food delivery platform service industry, emphasizing the need for fair competition and compliance with antitrust laws to foster innovation and healthy development in the sector [1][2]. Group 1: Investigation Announcement - The investigation aims to assess the competitive conditions in the food delivery platform service industry, which has been facing issues such as excessive subsidies, price wars, and traffic control, leading to negative impacts on the real economy and heightened competition [1][2]. - The investigation will involve on-site verification, interviews, and surveys to gather insights from various stakeholders, including platform operators, new employment groups, and consumers [2]. Group 2: Industry Response - Major food delivery platforms, including Meituan, Taobao Shanguo, and JD Delivery, have expressed their support for the investigation and committed to cooperating fully with the regulatory efforts [3]. - Meituan has reiterated its stance against "involution" and emphasized its commitment to fair competition, having publicly stated its position multiple times over the past year [3]. - Taobao Shanguo highlighted the importance of fair competition as a core principle of market economy and pledged to work collaboratively with partners to enhance service quality [3]. - JD Delivery expressed its support for measures that maintain market fairness and protect the rights of consumers and operators, aiming to promote high-quality development in the food delivery sector [3].

Market Performance - US stock markets saw significant gains, with the Dow Jones rising over 100 points, the Nasdaq increasing by approximately 0.5%, and the S&P 500 up by about 0.4% [2] - The December employment report indicated only 50,000 non-farm jobs added, below the Dow Jones estimate of 73,000, suggesting a slow but ongoing economic recovery [3] - The unemployment rate slightly decreased to 4.4%, compared to the expected 4.5%, leading traders to interpret this as a sign of potential economic improvement [3] Technology Sector - Technology stocks experienced a broad increase, particularly in storage chips, with notable gains in companies like Sandisk (+7.53%), Intel (+6.82%), and ASML (+5.09%) [4][5] - Intel's stock surged following a positive meeting between former President Trump and Intel's CEO, with the US government converting approximately $9 billion in federal subsidies into a 10% equity stake in Intel [3] Commodities - Precious metals saw a significant rise, with spot silver surpassing $80 per ounce, marking a 4% increase in a single day [5] - Oil prices also surged due to unrest in Iran, which is affecting the country's oil production of over 3 million barrels per day, as indicated by increased premiums on call options in the oil futures market [7] Chinese Market - Chinese assets faced a downturn, with the Chinese concept stock index dropping about 1.6% and Alibaba's stock falling by 3% amid an investigation into the competitive practices of food delivery platforms [6]

Core Viewpoint - The State Council's Anti-Monopoly and Anti-Unfair Competition Committee Office has announced an investigation and assessment of the market competition status in the food delivery platform service industry [1] Group 1: Company Responses - Taobao Flash Delivery expressed its willingness to cooperate with the investigation and emphasized its commitment to compliance and providing diverse, high-quality services to maintain a fair market environment [1] - Meituan fully supports the investigation and aims to use it as an opportunity to promote innovation and healthy development within the food delivery platform service industry [1] - JD Delivery also supports the decision, agreeing on the importance of maintaining fair competition and protecting the rights of consumers, operators, and delivery personnel [1]

Group 1: Government Policies and Economic Measures - The State Council, led by Premier Li Qiang, has announced a package of fiscal and financial policies aimed at boosting domestic demand, emphasizing the importance of coordinating fiscal and monetary policies to enhance their effectiveness and encourage social capital participation in consumption and investment [1] - The Ministry of Finance and the State Taxation Administration will cancel the VAT export tax rebate for photovoltaic products starting April 1, 2026, and will reduce the VAT export tax rebate rate for battery products from 9% to 6% during 2026, before completely eliminating it in 2027 [2] Group 2: Employment and Economic Indicators - In December, the U.S. non-farm payrolls increased by 50,000, falling short of the expected 70,000, while the unemployment rate decreased to 4.4%, better than the anticipated 4.5% [3] - Traders are betting that the Federal Reserve will pause interest rate cuts, with expectations of a cumulative reduction of about 50 basis points by 2026 [3] Group 3: Industry Investigations and Developments - The State Council's Anti-Monopoly and Anti-Unfair Competition Committee is conducting an investigation into the competitive landscape of the food delivery platform industry, addressing issues such as excessive subsidies and price competition that are impacting the real economy [4] - Shanghai has launched a three-year action plan to support the transformation and upgrading of advanced manufacturing, focusing on emerging sectors like low-altitude economy and humanoid robots [5] Group 4: Market Trends and Investment Opportunities - The price of rare earth concentrates has been raised for the sixth consecutive quarter, with Baotou Steel and Northern Rare Earth announcing price adjustments for the first quarter of 2026 [6] - Elon Musk's xAI plans to invest over $20 billion in building a data center in Mississippi to meet the rising demand for computing power driven by generative AI [10] - The AI sector is seeing significant investment opportunities, particularly in chip design and manufacturing, with companies like Cambrian, Haiguang Information, and SMIC being highlighted for their potential [10] Group 5: Corporate Announcements and Financial Performance - China Merchants Bank announced a cash dividend distribution of approximately 25.55 billion yuan for the first half of 2025 [12] - Luzhou Laojiao plans to distribute around 2 billion yuan in dividends for the mid-2025 period [12] - Several companies, including Jian Kai Technology and Huati Technology, are facing shareholder reductions, while others like Zhongchuan Defense and Greenland Holdings are projecting significant losses for 2025 [17]

来源：中国新闻网 编辑：张嘉怡 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中国官方对外卖平台服务行业市场竞争状况开展调查评估 中新社北京1月9日电 (记者 刘亮)据中国国家市场监管总局9日消息，中国国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委 员会办公室近日依据《中华人民共和国反垄断法》，对外卖平台服务行业市场竞争状况开展调查、评 估。 国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室有关负责人指出，近段时间以来，外卖平台服务行业拼补贴、 拼价格、控流量等问题突出，挤压实体经济，加剧行业"内卷式"竞争，社会各方面反映强烈。此次调查 评估旨在推动外卖平台依法合规经营、公平有序竞争，形成优质优价、良性竞争的市场秩序。 据悉，本次调查评估将通过现场核实、当面访谈、问卷调查等方式，深入了解外卖平台竞争行为，广泛 听取平台内经营者、新就业群体、消费者等各方意见，全面调查市场竞争状况，组织开展分析论证，传 导监管压力，提出处置措施。外卖平台要积极配合市场调查、评估工作，严格落实反垄断合规主体责 任，有效防范化解垄断风险，公平参与市场竞争，促进外卖平台服务行业创新和健康发展。(完) 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及 ...

对此，美团、淘宝闪购均作出回应。 【导读】外卖巨头最新发声，支持开展外卖行业调查评估 外卖巨头，最新发声！ 1月9日，国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会办公室宣布，对外卖平台服务行业市场竞争状况开展调查、评估。 淘宝闪购称，公平竞争是市场经济的核心原则，也是推动外卖平台服务行业持续创新与健康发展的基石。淘宝闪购始终坚持公平、公正、公开的原则，在 商户管理、价格行为、配送员权益保障、消费者权益保护等方面，严格遵守《反垄断法》《反不正当竞争法》等相关法律法规，遵循《外卖平台服务管理 基本要求》开展业务。 淘宝闪购欢迎并将积极配合此次行业市场竞争状况调查、评估工作，严格落实合规主体责任，持续与商户、生态合作伙伴等各方携手，提供更多元化、更 高质量的服务，共同维护好公平有序的市场环境，合力推动外卖服务行业进一步繁荣发展。 美团方面表示，坚决拥护国家开展外卖市场竞争调查评估。近一段时间以来，外卖市场"拼价格、拼补贴、控流量"等非理性竞争问题突出。美团多次呼吁 行业回归理性，坚决反对"内卷式"竞争。 美团将以此次调查为契机，和行业内各平台一起，共同落实市场主体责任，公平参与市场竞争，促进外卖平台服务行业创新和健康发展。 国务 ...

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation has initiated an investigation into the competitive practices of the food delivery platform industry, citing issues such as excessive subsidies, price wars, and traffic control that harm the real economy and exacerbate "involution" competition [1] Group 1: Investigation and Regulatory Actions - The investigation aims to assess the competition status in the food delivery platform sector, evaluate monopoly risks, and regulate market order, utilizing methods such as on-site verification, interviews, and surveys [1] - The investigation reflects the government's commitment to ensuring fair competition and compliance within the industry, urging platforms to cooperate and adhere to antitrust responsibilities [1] Group 2: Industry Responses - Meituan expressed strong support for the investigation and emphasized the need for rational competition, committing to collaborate with other platforms to fulfill market responsibilities and promote healthy industry development [2] - Taobao Shanguo welcomed the investigation, pledging to maintain fair competition and work with merchants and partners to enhance service quality [4] - JD.com also supported the decision, advocating against harmful competition and focusing on quality development through supply chain innovation [7] Group 3: Financial Impact and Historical Context - In the third quarter of 2025, Meituan reported an adjusted net loss of 16 billion yuan, indicating that the price war has not created value for the industry and is unsustainable [9] - Alibaba's operating profit fell by 85% year-on-year to 5.365 billion yuan, with its adjusted EBITA for the e-commerce segment down 76% [10] - JD.com's net profit decreased by 54.7% year-on-year to 5.3 billion yuan, with new business losses significantly increasing [10]