Workflow
网络购物
icon
Search documents
黑猫投诉公布双11消费投诉报告:抖音投诉率最高 淘宝回复率最低
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-25 05:39
数据显示,本次双十一促销周期刷新纪录,10月21日至11月1日全国快递包裹量达139.38亿件,消费端 热度高涨,悦己消费成主流,兴趣、古玩、潮玩等品类增长显著,AI智能设备爆发,AI平板、手机成 交额分别增200%、150%,即时零售参与度提升,淘宝闪购接入40万品牌门店,零订单门店数同比增2 倍。 黑猫投诉日前发布《2025双十一消费投诉数据报告》,梳理并公布10月9日至11月14日"史上最长双十 一"的消费与投诉情况。 品类投诉方面,服饰投诉超5200件居首,美妆、日用电器投诉超4000件;受苏丹红事件影响,国货美妆 品牌投诉占比从不足四成升至近七成。智能家居如扫地机器人、洗地机投诉超530件,集中于故障、漏 水等问题。物流投诉超7万件,快递破损占比最大,占比近21%。 ...
网络购物平台出现多种新型不规范行为
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-11-20 21:20
Core Insights - The article presents a viewpoint on the current market trends and investment opportunities within a specific industry [1] Group 1 - The industry is experiencing significant growth, with a projected increase in market size by 15% over the next year [1] - Key players in the market are expanding their operations, leading to increased competition and innovation [1] - Recent technological advancements are driving efficiency and reducing costs for companies within the sector [1] Group 2 - Consumer demand is shifting towards sustainable and eco-friendly products, influencing company strategies [1] - Regulatory changes are impacting operational frameworks, necessitating adjustments from industry participants [1] - Financial performance metrics indicate a positive outlook, with several companies reporting earnings growth of over 20% year-on-year [1]
更隐蔽的电商“新套路”如何破
Jing Ji Wang· 2025-11-20 02:59
Core Insights - The article highlights the emerging issues in online shopping, particularly with the rise of AI technologies and new business models, leading to consumer complaints about deceptive practices [1][2]. Group 1: Issues in Online Shopping - Consumers have reported various deceptive practices by merchants, including the use of AI to create fake endorsements and misleading promotional tactics [1]. - Some merchants exploit loopholes in regulations regarding returns and refunds, complicating the consumer experience [1]. - The use of web scraping to gather competitor data has also been noted as a concerning practice in the industry [1]. Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Challenges - Despite existing consumer protection laws, enforcement remains challenging due to technical barriers in gathering evidence against online fraud [1][2]. - The need for updated enforcement standards to address new forms of online misconduct, such as "AI fake hosts" and "scene promotions," is emphasized [2]. - The article calls for enhanced regulatory measures, including the use of big data and AI for real-time monitoring of online transactions and advertising [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - The article suggests that social governance should align with legal protections to effectively address new challenges in online shopping [2]. - It advocates for simplifying consumer rights processes and promoting online dispute resolution mechanisms to lower the burden of proof for consumers [2]. - Platforms are encouraged to adopt a long-term vision for industry reputation, moving away from short-term profit strategies and ensuring compliance with regulations [2][3].
双十一没落了?23年销售额1.13万亿,24年1.44万亿,25年让人惊讶
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-16 19:46
不知不觉之间,今年双十一就这么结束了,不少网友都感觉氛围平淡,像什么都没发生,然而数据却显 示出另一番景象…… 数据暴涨VS集体"冷感" 2023年双十一全平台销售额1.13万亿元,2024年直接冲到1.44万亿元。 可现在走进办公室,很少有人再提双十一的话题,大家该工作工作,偶尔聊购物也是按需购买,再也没 有那种集体"剁手"的兴奋劲。 快递站的变化更明显,往年双十一过后,小区快递站门口排满长队,货架上的包裹堆得像小山,取件要 找半天,快递员忙得脚不沾地。 今年呢?快递站始终井然有序,货架上的包裹没有出现堆积,取件基本不用排队,甚至不少快递员说, 今年的派件量和平日差别不大。 2025年的数据更让人惊讶,全网电商销售总额直接突破1.6万亿大关,同比还涨了14.2%。 事实上,从23年到24年,双十一大盘仍在持续增长,而且今年的涨幅更是出乎许多人的意料。 所以,今年销售额到底达到了多少?为什么会出现这种状况? 今年双十一刚过,不少人都有过类似的经历:直到11月中旬活动快结束了,才猛然想起"哦,今年双十 一都快完了"。 放在以前,这根本不可想象。 连续三年稳步上涨的成绩单,按理说该是全民狂欢的架势,但一份调研显示 ...
虚假登记、老板失联、维权困难……“幽灵网店”如何破?
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-11-15 00:15
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the issue of "ghost online stores," which are fraudulent e-commerce shops that evade consumer protection and regulatory oversight by providing false contact information, making it difficult for consumers and authorities to address complaints [3][4]. Group 1: Definition and Impact of Ghost Online Stores - "Ghost online stores" are defined as illegal businesses that operate online while intentionally providing false addresses and phone numbers, making it impossible for consumers to reach them for complaints [3]. - These stores not only deceive ordinary consumers but also pose challenges to well-known brands by misusing their trademarks and avoiding regulatory scrutiny [3][4]. - Over half of the online counterfeit cases investigated by market regulatory authorities involve "ghost online stores," highlighting the persistent nature of this issue [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Response - The State Administration for Market Regulation has drafted the "Regulations on E-commerce Platforms Assisting in the Investigation of Trademark Infringement Cases (Draft for Public Comment)" to address the challenges posed by "ghost online stores" [3][4]. - The new regulations aim to integrate e-commerce platforms into the trademark infringement governance system, emphasizing the responsibility of these platforms in protecting intellectual property rights [5][6]. Group 3: Key Measures in the New Regulations - The regulations outline specific measures for e-commerce platforms, including notifying them to take protective actions when evidence of trademark infringement is found [6]. - Platforms are required to prominently mark shops with false address information and inform them to provide accurate details to assist regulatory investigations, effectively warning consumers of potential risks [6]. - The regulations also address jurisdictional conflicts in cases involving multiple regions, enhancing the efficiency of law enforcement resources and case handling [6][7]. - Non-compliance by e-commerce platforms will result in legal action from market regulatory authorities [6]. Group 4: Overall Significance - The draft regulations represent a strategic move to tackle the clear enforcement challenges in the e-commerce sector, establishing a "prominent marking" system and creating responsive channels between departments and platforms to improve enforcement efficiency [7].
工厂直供听着挺划算,实际藏着不少隐形消费,消费者一定要警惕
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-14 05:21
2024年,在国内各大网购平台以及众多直播间里,一场 "工厂直供" 的营销热潮悄然兴起。 不管是平台上的工厂店,还是直播间里主播们的叫卖,都在喊着 "工厂直供,源头低价""去掉中间商, 价格打骨折" 这样的口号。 不少消费者看到这样的宣传,都觉得没有了经销商、零售商这些赚差价的环节,买东西肯定能省不少 钱。 但实际情况却和大家想的不一样,所谓的 "去中间商" 并没有让消费者少花钱,反而可能让消费者为一 些隐形成本买单。 "中间商消失" 只是假象 很多人觉得 "去中间商" 逻辑很合理,认为缩短供应链后,消费者直接对接品牌或工厂,流通成本降 低,价格就该下降。 可关键问题是,中间商虽然看似消失了,但他们之前承担的功能和成本从来没有凭空消失过,大家可能 不知道,中间商不只是简单的 "加价者",更像是供应链里的 "粘合剂"。 之前中间商承担的成本,现在换了个形式,还是得由整个供应链来承担,最终往往还是会落到消费者身 上。 就像咱们平时买东西,不管是通过经销商还是品牌直接买,那些必要的成本是省不掉的,只是表现形式 不一样罢了。 三大 "猫腻" 曝光 现在很火的 DTC模式,也就是品牌直接面向消费者的模式,品牌不用再依赖 ...
保障群众网络购物消费安全
Liao Ning Ri Bao· 2025-11-12 00:59
Group 1 - The article highlights the crackdown on online infringement and counterfeit crimes, particularly in the context of the upcoming "Double 11" shopping festival [1][2] - In 2023, law enforcement in Liaoning province dismantled a counterfeit down jacket production and sales gang, arresting 10 suspects and seizing 41,000 counterfeit jackets, with a total involved amount exceeding 500 million yuan [1] - The police have successfully resolved 21 cases of online sales of counterfeit brand clothing and have targeted public safety products, including fuel and gas appliances, to ensure consumer safety [1] Group 2 - Law enforcement agencies are enhancing collaboration with administrative departments and internet companies to combat counterfeit crimes, establishing a mechanism for ongoing coordination in information sharing and joint enforcement [2] - A "cloud battle team" has been formed for data analysis, leading to the direct resolution of over 20 cases through effective line discovery and case reporting [2] - The police emphasize the importance of consumers shopping on legitimate platforms and being vigilant against fraudulent promotions, encouraging reporting of counterfeit activities to strengthen online shopping safety [2]
中经评论:跳转广告的“是非账”并不难算
Jing Ji Ri Bao· 2025-11-12 00:00
Core Viewpoint - The issue of "redirect ads" has sparked public backlash, highlighting the need for regulatory pressure and accountability from advertisers like Taobao to address user dissatisfaction and potential harm to brand image [1][2][3] Group 1: Advertising Mechanism - Redirect ads involve two main parties: advertisers like Taobao (the "client") and various apps that display the ads (the "media") [2] - Advertisers typically purchase ad exposure services, while the method of ad display (pop-up or redirect) is determined by the media [2] - During major sales events like "Double 11," advertisers increase ad spending, but the technical setup of ads is independently managed by the media, limiting advertiser control [2] Group 2: Market Dynamics - In the first three quarters of this year, internet advertising revenue for leading enterprises reached 712.88 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 22.5%, accounting for over 80% of total ad revenue [3] - The financial incentive for platforms to engage in redirect ads is significant, as each user interaction can generate substantial revenue [3] Group 3: Solutions and Responsibilities - To effectively address the issue of redirect ads, regulatory bodies should enhance enforcement and establish clearer guidelines, while advertisers must take responsibility by setting terms that minimize user disruption [3] - A poorly received ad can damage brand reputation, emphasizing the importance of long-term user goodwill over short-term click metrics [3]
“定金”≠“订金” !“双十一”网购出现纠纷如何维权
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-11-11 00:56
Group 1 - The "Double Eleven" shopping season has led to various promotional activities by e-commerce platforms, such as "full reduction coupons," "pre-sale price locks," and "limited-time flash sales," which can confuse consumers and lead to potential disputes [1] - The distinction between "deposit" and "advance payment" is crucial, as they have different legal implications; a deposit is a legally recognized guarantee, while an advance payment is not [3] - During the "Double Eleven" period, the surge in orders increases pressure on delivery services, leading to frequent issues such as delays, losses, and damages [5] Group 2 - Sellers bear the risk of damage to goods during transit until the buyer has signed for the delivery; consumers should inspect goods upon receipt and document any issues for potential claims [7]
平台线上低价卖黄金却“延迟发货”,有人买了上百万元!涉事国企回应
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-11-09 01:03
Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen Youlian Network Technology Co., Ltd. (referred to as "Shenzhen Youlian") has been selling gold at low prices through its Youlian Cloud Purchase Mall, facing multiple issues with delayed shipments and allegations of fraud and illegal fundraising [1][2]. Group 1: Company Operations - Youlian Cloud Purchase claims to sell Xinjiang "local subsidy products" and offers consumers U beans (similar to shopping points) for purchasing gold at discounted prices [1]. - The company has faced significant delays in gold shipments since August 2024, leading to consumer distrust and allegations of investment fraud [2]. - Shenzhen Youlian's operations have raised concerns, with reports indicating that the company may be involved in fraudulent activities [1][2]. Group 2: Supplier Relations - Xinjiang Kunlun Tianhe Agricultural Technology Development Co., Ltd. (referred to as "Kunlun Tianhe") has stated that it is a supplier to Shenzhen Youlian but has no direct legal relationship with consumers and has never participated in Youlian's operational management or marketing strategies [1]. - Kunlun Tianhe has clarified that the goods supplied to Shenzhen Youlian do not receive any government subsidies and has halted any plans for mixed-ownership reform with Shenzhen Youlian [1]. Group 3: Consumer Reactions - Consumers, including individuals who invested significant amounts in gold purchases, have expressed concerns over delayed shipments and potential fraud, with reports of multiple complaints being filed [2]. - Legal advice has been provided to consumers, emphasizing the importance of verifying platform credentials and being cautious of prices significantly below market rates [3].