（原标题：高估值赛道产品审批收紧，考验公募产品布局能力） 市场持续上涨、热点轮动，监管正逐步收紧对高估值赛道权益基金的审批。业内人士认为，此举将降低 同质化竞争以及单一赛道过度拥挤的风险，保护投资者利益。基金公司应顺应监管逆周期调节的导向， 提升产品布局能力。 "监管层通过动态调整产品注册节奏，从供给端实施逆周期调节，抑制非理性跟风投资，是为了更好保 护投资者的利益，构建更有利于长期投资的市场环境。"王铁牛称。 在南开大学金融学教授田利辉看来，热门赛道基金审批节奏调整，其核心逻辑是"逆周期调节"与"投资 者适当性管理"的深度融合。 "当前，部分科技创新赛道估值已处于历史较高分位，资金若在情绪高点通过新发基金集中涌入，极易 催生局部泡沫，加剧市场波动。"田利辉指出，监管此举的目的是主动平抑这种"顺周期"募资冲动，防 止行业"产品供给"与"价值发现"基本功能的错位。从更深层看，这也是从源头治理"风格漂移"等顽疾， 引导行业从追逐短期热点的"题材驱动"，回归遵循契约精神的"策略驱动"。 公募应提升逆周期产品布局能力 受访人士认为，监管从产品供给端着手进行逆周期调节，有利于抑制同质化竞争，降低单一赛道过度拥 挤的风险 ...

【导读】高估值赛道审批逆周期调节，考验公募产品布局能力 中国基金报记者 张玲 市场持续上涨、热点轮动，监管正逐步收紧对高估值赛道权益基金的审批。业内人士认为， 此举将降低同质化竞争以及单一赛道过度拥挤的风险，保护投资者利益。基金公司应顺应监 管逆周期调节的导向，提升产品布局能力。 高估值赛道产品审批收紧 Wind 数据显示，过去一年，有 31 只 AI 主题基金申报但仍处于待审批状态，有 15 只提交 申请材料超 3 个月未受理，其中， 1 只产品早在去年 2 月就提交了材料；在半导体、机器 人主题产品中，约 20% 的产品上报超 3 个月未受理。 记者了解到， 2025 年以来，监管逐步收紧对估值较高的权益类新基金的审批。此前曾要求 权益基金的业绩比较基准指数最近五年滚动估值在历史 90% 分位数以下，随后又进一步调整 至 80% 分位数以下。 从近两个月的产品获批情况看，除了宽基指数基金、全市场选股的主动权益类产品外，获批 的行业主题基金多聚焦在新能源、工程机械等估值相对较低的板块。 资深基金研究员王铁牛表示，目前 AI 、芯片、机器人等热门赛道估值风险逐渐积累。例如， 中证人工智能指数市盈率达 70.8 ...

Market Overview - The A-share market is experiencing an upward trend, with the Shanghai Composite Index surpassing 4000 points and reaching 4100 points, while daily trading volume exceeds 3 trillion yuan [1][8] - The market is undergoing a "stress test" as the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges announced an adjustment to the financing margin ratio to 100%, indicating an intention to cool down the market [1][12] Investment Trends - Investors are actively seeking opportunities in sectors like commercial aerospace, with significant gains reported; for instance, the Wind Commercial Aerospace Index saw a daily increase of over 10% [1][9] - The commercial aerospace theme has attracted attention due to supportive government policies, including plans to launch 200,000 satellites, which has heightened investor interest [1][9] Investor Sentiment - Some investors, like Tao Ye, are optimistic about the market and are recommending funds to friends, believing in a significant market rally [2][9] - Conversely, other investors, such as Zhou Yun, express anxiety over missed opportunities in previous market rallies, particularly in AI technology, and are cautious about their current investments [2][10] Market Dynamics - The market is characterized by frequent rotations among sectors, including commercial aerospace, AI applications, and power, making it challenging for investors to identify strong stocks [4][12] - The recent policy change to increase the minimum financing margin ratio is interpreted as a measure to prevent irrational speculation and manage the active leverage in the market [12] Personal Investment Strategies - Investors are adopting varied strategies; some, like Tao Ye, view investing as a game and are willing to take risks, while others, like Zhou Yun, are more conservative and focused on stability [5][11] - The emotional impact of market fluctuations is evident, with some investors feeling the pressure of managing family assets and the fear of disappointing loved ones [11][13] Future Outlook - Despite recent market corrections, investors maintain a long-term confidence in the market trends, drawing parallels between current conditions and previous successful rallies [5][13] - The market's volatility is acknowledged, with investors preparing to adapt their strategies in response to ongoing changes [15][16]

Core Insights - The article highlights the significant disparity in investment outcomes among investors who employed a systematic investment strategy in index funds, with over 60% of investors in the CSI 300 index experiencing losses, averaging an 8.7% decline, while a different group achieved a 12% annualized return [1][3]. Group 1: Investment Strategy Errors - Investors commonly made two critical mistakes: selecting the wrong assets and mismanaging investment timing [1][3]. - Many investors fell into the "chasing hot spots" trap, investing in high-volatility sectors like renewable energy and semiconductors, which led to substantial losses [3][4]. - For instance, a renewable energy index fund saw its net value drop from 2.5 yuan in September 2022 to 1.8 yuan in August 2025, resulting in an 11% loss for consistent investors [3][4]. Group 2: Comparison of Investment Outcomes - Broad-based index funds, such as the CSI 300, emerged as the "winners" in systematic investment strategies, yielding a 5.2% annualized return despite market downturns [4][10]. - In contrast, thematic funds averaged a -3.8% return during the same period, underscoring the importance of asset selection [4][10]. Group 3: Valuation Considerations - A common error among investors was neglecting valuation, leading to blind investments without considering price rationality [6][7]. - The CSI 300 index experienced significant valuation fluctuations, with its price-to-earnings ratio ranging from 12 to 15 during the investment period, affecting returns based on timing of investments [6][7]. - An investor who adjusted their investment based on valuation metrics achieved a 14% profit, while another who did not lost 5% [6][10]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - To enhance investment outcomes, investors should prioritize selecting "evergreen" assets and avoid sectors with high cyclicality or rapid technological changes [4][12]. - Implementing a dynamic investment strategy based on valuation metrics can significantly reduce average costs and improve returns [7][10]. - Investors are advised to regularly assess their investment choices and adjust their strategies according to market conditions and asset valuations [12].

Market Performance - On September 17, the market showed a strong rebound with major indices recovering from earlier lows, leading to over 2,500 stocks rising across the market [1] - The trading volume in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets reached 2.38 trillion yuan, an increase of 35.3 billion yuan compared to the previous trading day [1] Fund Performance Top Performing Funds - The top performing fund for the day was Jin Xin Selected Growth A, with a daily net value growth rate of 7.71% and a year-to-date return of 46.49% [2] - Other notable funds included Jin Xin Stable Strategy A with a 7.47% daily increase and a year-to-date return of 42.4%, and Jin Xin Industry Preferred A with a 7.45% daily increase and a year-to-date return of 44.69% [2] Underperforming Funds - The worst performing fund was Qianhai Kaiyuan Gold and Silver Jewelry A, which saw a daily net value decrease of 2.5% but still had a year-to-date return of 65.42% [3] - Other underperformers included Huafu Yongxin A with a -2.41% daily return and a year-to-date return of 67.93%, and Yin Hua Tong Li Selected with a -2.15% daily return and a year-to-date return of 49.47% [3] Bond Fund Performance - The top performing bond fund was Bosera Pu Hui One-Year Holding A, with a daily net value growth rate of 2.18% and a year-to-date return of 25.8% [4] - Other notable bond funds included Golden Eagle Yuan Feng A with a 2.17% daily increase and a year-to-date return of 31.11%, and ICBC Balanced Return 6-Month Holding A with a 1.9% daily increase and a year-to-date return of 10.37% [4] Company News - Tianpu Co., Ltd. announced that its stock trading suspension for verification has been completed, and it will resume trading on September 18, 2025 [5] - The company had previously experienced a continuous rise in stock price for 11 trading days, leading to a halt for verification of trading anomalies [5]