（数据来源：WIND资讯） 以上内容与数据，与有连云立场无关，不构成投资建议。据此操作，风险自担。 本周继续关注本轮债市调整以来平安公司债ETF（511030）回撤控制排名第一，近一周场内成交贴水最少，净值相对稳健且回撤可控，可参考 下表（本轮债市调整自2025年8月8日起算）： | 代码 | 同移 | 场内简称 | 托管/ | 規模(亿) | 近1周成交量 | 近1周後 | 近1周均贴 | 近1周涨跌 | 质押率 | 本就讀整 | 近年 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | (47) | 手率 | 水率 | 1981 | | 最大回簽 | Calmark | | 511030.SH | 平安中债-中高等级公司债利差因子ETF | 公司價IF | 千安装行最份有限公司 | 224.05 | 123.66 | 58.65% | -0.02% | 0.044% | 63.00 | -0.1925 | 3.9284 | | 511220SH | 海富通上证城投债ETF | 城投债 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the concept of "anti-involution," which opposes disorderly competition and overcapacity in various industries, emphasizing the negative cycle caused by irrational subsidies and blind production expansion [1] Industry Analysis - Local governments have historically used subsidies and preferential policies to attract businesses, aiming for GDP growth, which has led to irrational production expansions without sufficient market demand [1] - This blind expansion results in overcapacity, creating significant inventory pressures for companies, which in turn leads to inevitable price wars [1] - The low-price competition sacrifices reasonable profits, R&D investments, and product quality, resulting in a vicious cycle that harms not only individual companies but also the entire industry ecosystem and long-term economic development [1] Investment Opportunity - The Ping An Company Bond ETF (511030) has a duration of 2 years and a current static yield of 1.93%, showing significant differentiation from other market benchmarks and tech bond ETFs [1] - This ETF has ranked first in controlling drawdown during the recent bond market adjustment, with the least market discount in the past week, indicating a relatively stable net value and manageable drawdown [1] - The data table provided compares various bond ETFs, highlighting the performance metrics such as scale, recent discount rates, and year-to-date performance, which can guide investment decisions [1]

Core Insights - The article highlights the arrival of a bull market driven by economic recovery and market liquidity, suggesting three main investment directions: 1) Technological AI+ breakthroughs led by open-source initiatives, 2) Valuation recovery in consumer stocks and gradual recovery in consumer segmentation, 3) Continued rise of undervalued dividends [1] Investment Themes - The low valuation of the consumer sector, declining interest rates, and policy catalysts are expected to support a recovery cycle, even if the slope is weak, indicating that being overly pessimistic about consumption based on macro narratives poses a risk [1] - The performance of the Ping An Company Bond ETF (511030) has been notable, ranking first in terms of drawdown control during the recent bond market adjustment, with minimal trading discounts and stable net value [1] Bond Market Analysis - The table provided lists various bond ETFs, highlighting their scale, recent trading discounts, and performance metrics since the bond market adjustment began on August 8, 2025. For instance, the Ping An Company Bond ETF has a scale of 22.353 billion, with a recent average discount of -0.06% and a year-to-date performance of 0.84% [1]

（数据来源：WIND资讯） 以上内容与数据，与有连云立场无关，不构成投资建议。据此操作，风险自担。 | 代码 | 简称 | 场内简称 | 托管人 | 規模(亿) | | 近1周均贴 近1周涨跌 | 今年以来 | 质押率 | 本監道學 | 近1年 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | | 水率 | 를 | FID (4) | | 最大回撤 | Calmar H | | 511030.SH | 平安中债-中高等级公司债利差因子ETF | 公司债ETF | 平安银行股份有限公司 | 223.53 | -0.06% | -0.119% | 0.84 | 63.00 | -0.1925 | 3.6503 | | 511220.SH | 海富通上证城投债ETF | 玻技 喷ETF | 中国银行股份有限公司 | 245.11 | -0.19% | -0.407% | 1.05 | 0.00 | -0.2907 | 2.1636 | | 511070.SH | 南方上证基准做市公司债ETF | 上证公司债 ...

Core Insights - The recent inclusion of credit bond ETFs in the pledged repo trading has significantly boosted trading activity, with two benchmark market-making credit bond ETFs exceeding transaction volumes of 10 billion yuan on June 11 [1][2] - The rapid influx of capital has led to four credit bond ETFs, established for less than six months, joining the "100 billion club" [1][2] Trading Activity - On June 11, the Southern CSI Benchmark Market-Making Corporate Bond ETF recorded a transaction volume exceeding 15.5 billion yuan, marking an increase of over 7 billion yuan from the previous trading day and setting a new single-day transaction record [2] - Other ETFs, such as the E Fund CSI Benchmark Market-Making Corporate Bond ETF, also saw significant trading volumes, with over 9 billion yuan, while several others surpassed 6 billion yuan [2] Fund Inflows - In the past month, four major credit bond ETFs have seen net inflows exceeding 5 billion yuan, with the E Fund and Southern ETFs leading the way [3] - The inclusion of credit bond ETFs in the pledged repo has enhanced liquidity and provided a tool for liquidity management, allowing investors to use these ETFs for financing during tight liquidity periods [3] Investment Strategies - The inclusion of credit bond ETFs in pledged repo trading is viewed as a key measure to address developmental shortcomings, significantly enhancing their investment appeal [4] - Investors can utilize a "buy ETF - pledge financing - reinvest" leverage strategy to increase returns, improving overall capital efficiency for institutional investors [4] - Various investment strategies, including pure bond strategies, multi-asset strategies, and structured investment strategies, can benefit from leveraging credit bond ETFs [4]

Core Viewpoint - The credit bond ETF market has experienced unprecedented growth, with total scale surpassing 200 billion yuan, driven by a shift in investor preference towards stable income assets and supported by favorable policies [1][3][6]. Group 1: Market Growth and Scale - As of June 23, the total scale of credit bond ETFs reached 204.68 billion yuan, accounting for approximately 57% of the entire bond ETF market [3]. - The initial launch of eight benchmark market-making products at the beginning of the year laid the foundation for this growth, with their combined initial issuance scale of 21.71 billion yuan now exceeding 10 billion yuan each [3]. - The Huaxia Shanghai Stock Exchange Benchmark Market-Making Corporate Bond ETF has seen its scale grow from 3 billion yuan at the start of the year to over 20 billion yuan, contributing significantly to the overall growth of credit bond ETFs [3]. Group 2: Policy Support and Market Dynamics - Continuous policy support has been a driving force for the development of credit bond ETFs, including the inclusion of these products in the bond general repurchase pledge library [3]. - The announcement of the ability to conduct general pledge-style repurchase transactions for credit bond ETFs led to a significant increase in subscription volume, with the market value of newly listed corporate bond ETFs rising from 39.1 billion yuan to 64.9 billion yuan, a 66% increase [4]. Group 3: Product Characteristics and Investor Demand - Credit bond ETFs are characterized by low volatility, low cost, and high liquidity, making them an attractive option for investors seeking stable income assets in a market characterized by "asset scarcity" [2][5]. - The passive nature of bond funds has gained favor among institutions, leading to an expansion in the scale of credit bond ETFs as they offer a combination of lower risk and relatively stable returns [6]. Group 4: Performance and Cost Advantages - Credit bond ETFs have demonstrated robust long-term return capabilities, often outperforming actively managed credit bond funds in terms of returns while exhibiting lower volatility [8][9]. - The average management fee for credit bond ETFs is approximately 0.165%, with a total cost of around 0.22%, which is lower than the average fees for actively managed credit bond funds [10]. Group 5: Future Outlook and Investment Strategies - The demand for stable income assets is expected to continue rising, and credit bond ETFs are likely to become a preferred choice for more investors, with potential for further growth in scale [10]. - Investors are advised to select credit bond ETFs based on their specific needs, such as liquidity management or credit risk exposure, given the current market's limited variety of these products [11].

Core Viewpoint - The first batch of 8 benchmark market-making credit bond ETFs has shown strong capital-raising ability, with a total scale reaching nearly 112 billion yuan, reflecting a growth of approximately 416% in just five months [2][4]. Group 1: Performance and Growth of Credit Bond ETFs - The first batch of 8 benchmark market-making credit bond ETFs was approved for issuance in January, with a total fundraising scale of 21.71 billion yuan, and has since grown to 111.95 billion yuan by June 23, marking a 415.66% increase [4][5]. - The latest scale of the Huaxia Shanghai Stock Exchange Benchmark Market-Making Corporate Bond ETF has surpassed 20 billion yuan, reaching 20.04 billion yuan, while the E Fund ETF reached 18.28 billion yuan [4]. - The Southern ETF has exceeded 15 billion yuan, reaching 16.55 billion yuan, with other ETFs also crossing the 10 billion yuan mark [4]. Group 2: Market Activity and Investor Interest - Since June 6, the total net inflow of funds into credit bond ETFs has exceeded 40 billion yuan, with some days seeing net inflows surpassing 10 billion yuan [5]. - The trading activity of benchmark market-making credit bond ETFs has been robust, with average daily trading volume increasing from 2.398 billion yuan to over 6.4 billion yuan after June 6 [6]. Group 3: Overall Bond ETF Market Trends - The total scale of bond ETFs has approached 360 billion yuan, with credit bond ETFs accounting for nearly 57% of this market, totaling approximately 204.68 billion yuan [8]. - The recent emergence of 500 billion yuan-level super ETFs, such as the Hai Futong and Fu Guo government bond ETFs, indicates significant growth in the bond ETF sector [8]. Group 4: Historical Context and Future Potential - The development of domestic credit bond ETFs has faced challenges since the first credit bond ETF was launched in December 2014, but a turning point was reached with the approval of the first batch of 8 benchmark market-making credit bond ETFs in December 2023 [9]. - The inclusion of these ETFs in the general pledged repo market has enhanced their attractiveness and facilitated greater participation from various investors, indicating substantial future growth potential for credit bond ETFs [9].

Core Viewpoint - The recent surge in the scale of benchmark market-making credit bond ETFs in China, with four ETFs surpassing 10 billion yuan, indicates strong market demand and effective liquidity management tools for investors [1][4]. Group 1: ETF Scale and Performance - Four benchmark market-making credit bond ETFs have surpassed 10 billion yuan in scale, including E Fund, Southern, Huaxia, and Haifutong ETFs, with respective scales of 140.12 billion yuan, 139.44 billion yuan, 112 billion yuan, and 107.67 billion yuan [4]. - The total scale of eight benchmark market-making credit bond ETFs has reached 817.91 billion yuan, reflecting a significant increase of nearly 277% in just four months [1][4]. - On June 11, the trading volume for benchmark market-making credit bond ETFs reached 619.22 billion yuan, with notable daily trading amounts for Southern and Haifutong ETFs at 155.68 billion yuan and 101.75 billion yuan, respectively [2]. Group 2: Market Dynamics and Investor Behavior - The inclusion of credit bond ETFs in the general repurchase pledge library has enhanced liquidity management for investors, promoting the healthy development of the credit bond market [1][5]. - The recent influx of 167.82 billion yuan in net buying for these ETFs in June indicates strong market interest and confidence among investors [4]. - The current low-interest-rate environment, coupled with the central bank's recent policy adjustments, has increased the attractiveness of medium-term high-rated credit bond yields, further driving demand for credit bond ETFs [5].

Core Insights - The recent inclusion of credit bond ETFs in the pledged repo trading has significantly boosted trading activity, with two benchmark market-making credit bond ETFs exceeding 10 billion yuan in trading volume on June 11 [1][2] - The rapid influx of funds has led to four credit bond ETFs, established for less than six months, joining the "100 billion club" [1][2] - Fund managers believe that the ability to use credit bond ETFs for pledged financing enhances their attractiveness and expands the potential investor base [1][3] Trading Activity - On June 11, the trading volume of the Southern CSI Benchmark Market-Making Corporate Bond ETF surpassed 15.5 billion yuan, marking an increase of over 7 billion yuan from the previous trading day, setting a new single-day trading record [1] - The E Fund CSI Benchmark Market-Making Corporate Bond ETF also saw trading volume exceed 9 billion yuan, while several other ETFs recorded volumes above 6 billion yuan [1] Growth in Scale - As of June 10, four benchmark market-making credit bond ETFs have surpassed the 10 billion yuan mark in scale, with specific figures being 13.72 billion yuan for E Fund, 13.21 billion yuan for Southern, 10.76 billion yuan for Hai Fu Tong, and 10.17 billion yuan for Hua Xia [2] - Other ETFs like Bosera and GF have also shown significant scale growth, reaching 9.01 billion yuan and 8.27 billion yuan respectively [2] Leverage Strategies - The recent month has seen net inflows exceeding 5 billion yuan for the top four credit bond ETFs, with GF's deep credit bond ETF seeing net inflows over 4 billion yuan [2] - The ability to employ a "buy ETF - pledge financing - reinvest" strategy allows investors to enhance returns through leverage [4] Liquidity Management - The inclusion of credit bond ETFs in the pledged repo trading enhances liquidity and serves as a liquidity management tool, allowing investors to mitigate short-term liquidity risks [3] - This move is seen as a critical step in addressing the developmental shortcomings of credit bond ETFs, significantly increasing their investment appeal [3]

Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided Core View of the Report - On June 9, 2025, the A-share market showed an overall upward trend, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising 0.43%, the Shenzhen Component Index rising 0.65%, and the ChiNext Index rising 1.07%. The trading volume of the two markets reached 1312.8 billion yuan. The sectors with the highest gains were Medicine and Biology (2.30%), Agriculture, Forestry, Animal Husbandry and Fishery (1.72%), and Textile and Apparel (1.61%), while the sector with the largest decline was Food and Beverage (-0.43%) [2][6] Summary by Relevant Catalogs Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3399.77 points, up 0.43%; the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 10250.14 points, up 0.65%; the ChiNext Index closed at 2061.29 points, up 1.07%. The trading volume of the two A-share markets was 1312.8 billion yuan. The sectors with the highest gains were Medicine and Biology (2.30%), Agriculture, Forestry, Animal Husbandry and Fishery (1.72%), and Textile and Apparel (1.61%), while the sector with the largest decline was Food and Beverage (-0.43%) [2][6] Stock ETF - The top three stock ETFs in terms of trading volume were Huaxia CSI A500 ETF (up 0.32%, discount rate 0.34%), Harvest CSI A500 ETF (up 0.41%, discount rate 0.39%), and Huatai-PineBridge CSI 300 ETF (up 0.23%, discount rate 0.32%) [3][7] Bond ETF - The top three bond ETFs in terms of trading volume were E Fund Shanghai Stock Exchange Benchmark Market-Making Corporate Bond ETF (down 0.00%, discount rate 0.11%), Southern Shanghai Stock Exchange Benchmark Market-Making Corporate Bond ETF (down 0.00%, discount rate 0.11%), and Bosera Shenzhen Stock Exchange Benchmark Market-Making Credit Bond ETF (down 0.02%, discount rate 0.09%) [4][9] Gold ETF - Gold AU9999 fell 0.97%, and Shanghai Gold fell 1.11%. The top three gold ETFs in terms of trading volume were Huaan Gold ETF (down 1.08%, discount rate -1.06%), E Fund Gold ETF (down 1.07%, discount rate -1.07%), and Bosera Gold ETF (down 1.07%, discount rate -1.07%) [12] Commodity Futures ETF - Huaxia Feed Soybean Meal Futures ETF rose 0.26%, with a discount rate of 1.11%; China Construction Yisheng Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange Energy and Chemical Futures ETF rose 0.08%, with a discount rate of -0.25%; Dacheng Nonferrous Metals Futures ETF had a change of 0.00%, with a discount rate of 0.00% [15] Cross-Border ETF - The previous trading day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 1.05%, the Nasdaq Composite rose 1.20%, and the S&P 500 rose 1.03%, while the German DAX fell 0.08%. On June 9, the Hang Seng Index rose 1.63%, and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index rose 1.74%. The top three cross-border ETFs in terms of trading volume were GF CSI Hong Kong Innovative Drug ETF (up 4.72%, discount rate 4.42%), E Fund CSI Hong Kong Securities Investment Theme ETF (up 2.48%, discount rate 2.44%), and Huatai-PineBridge CSOP Hang Seng Tech ETF (up 2.41%, discount rate 2.65%) [17] Money ETF - The top three money ETFs in terms of trading volume were Yin Hua Ri Li ETF, Hua Bao Tian Yi ETF, and Money ETF Jian Xin Tian Yi [19]