又有8国收到美最后通牒？巴西不忍了！一马当先，直接吹响反制的号角。 巴西总统卢拉 据央视新闻最新报道称，当地时间7月9日时，美国总统特朗普在社交平台上发布了最新的加税信件，而收到信件的8个国家，分 别是巴西、菲律宾、利比亚等国。 阿尔克明还补充道，他看不出美国有任何理由要对巴西提高关税，美国确实是有贸易逆差，但对巴西是顺差。并且在美国对巴 西出口的产品中，大多数都是零关税入境的，甚至不需要缴税。 但值得注意的是，除了巴西的产品被强制征收50％的关税外，其余7国的税率都没超过30％。并且巴西所面临的新关税税率，远 高于4月2日时，美国对巴西所征收的10％的关税。此外，在特朗普宣布对巴西征收50％的惩罚性关税后，他还下令要对巴西展 开不公平的贸易行为调查。 由此可见，美国这次是在故意针对巴西了。 在收到特朗普这一信函后，巴西的副总统兼服务部长——热拉尔多·阿尔克明，立即在当天回应道，特朗普对巴西所征收的新关 税，是十分不公平的。 巴西的副总统兼服务部长——热拉尔多·阿尔克明 但即便是阿尔克明立即回应了，特朗普的这一针对性行径，也改变不了美国政府硬要对巴西征收高额关税的现实。 而巴西总统卢拉也深知这一点，但他并未束 ...

不仅如此，印度与美国的关系一直处于友好状态，特朗普本人更是多次公开表示，印度可能会成为第一个与美国达成关税协议的国家。特朗普的这番话并非 空穴来风，毕竟印度并非能轻松脱离美国市场。然而，在特朗普的关税战中，印度也作出了妥协，特别是在特朗普对中国钢铁产品加征关税的问题上，印度 接受了这一要求。 都说"兔子急了也会咬人"，更何况是世界人口最多的印度。印度这个巨大的发展中国家，历来在外交策略上比较谨慎，尤其是在与超级大国美国的互动中， 它一直寻求建立稳固的合作关系。然而，在特朗普政府即将实施"对等关税"的背景下，印度却选择了与美国硬碰硬，出乎了所有人的预料。 长期以来，印度和美国的力量差距有目共睹，尤其是在经济、科技以及军事方面，印度显然处于下风。那么，印度究竟凭什么敢挑战美国的强势呢？是出于 一时的冲动，还是背后有着深厚的底气和自信？ 自特朗普宣布对全球范围内进行关税征收以来，印度无疑成了特朗普政策关注的焦点。在特朗普的策略中，印度应该在美国加征关税的压力下，作出相应的 让步，降低对美国商品的关税。如果能够将美国商品的关税降至零，便是最理想的局面。毕竟，美国早已是印度最大的贸易伙伴之一，而印度的经济也在很 大程度 ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing US-EU trade negotiations are facing significant challenges, with both sides having substantial differences in their core demands, making a comprehensive agreement unlikely [1][5][6]. Group 1: Trade Negotiations - The EU is striving to reach a preliminary bilateral trade agreement with the US by July 9, while also preparing for all possible outcomes, including a retaliatory list [1]. - The US currently imposes a 50% tariff on EU steel and aluminum products, a 25% tariff on automobiles, and a 10% baseline tariff on nearly all other goods [1]. - The EU has decided to postpone retaliatory measures against US products worth €210 billion until July 14 to allow more time for negotiations [1]. Group 2: Strategic Perspectives - The political leadership in the US has undergone a profound change in its strategic perception of the EU, while European political elites have not yet adjusted their views, leading to a significant gap in mutual understanding [2]. - The Biden administration emphasizes the importance of European allies, but the return of Trump has altered the strategic dynamics, with the US viewing the EU as a contributor to its trade deficit [2][3]. Group 3: Internal EU Disagreements - Within the EU, there are significant internal disagreements regarding the acceptance of a 10% baseline tax rate, with countries like Germany and Italy being more amenable compared to France [5]. - The EU is willing to make concessions on purchasing US agricultural products and liquefied natural gas, but the US insists on addressing its trade deficit, focusing on non-tariff barriers [5]. Group 4: Future Relations - The relationship between the US and EU is expected to remain fraught with distrust and conflict, extending beyond trade to include technology, investment, and geopolitical strategies [6]. - European political elites are increasingly anxious about their competitive position in the global technology race, leading to a consensus on the need for strategic autonomy and resilience [7][12]. Group 5: Economic and Technological Interaction - The US and EU are both adopting protective measures in their economic policies, leading to increased competition and mutual suspicion [9][10]. - The US is focusing on protecting traditional industries and advancing critical technologies, while the EU aims to bolster its own industries and regulatory frameworks [9][10]. Group 6: Supply Chain Security - Both the US and EU are restructuring their supply chains to enhance economic resilience, but they are doing so independently [11]. - The US has been actively forming agreements with countries for critical mineral supply chains, while the EU is prioritizing supply chain security as a core economic strategy [11]. Group 7: Strategic Autonomy - In response to the "America First" policy, Europe is seeking to strengthen its strategic autonomy by enhancing its industrial policies and reducing reliance on the US [12]. - The EU is also working on developing its own security frameworks, recognizing the need to rely less on NATO and the US for defense [12].