报道称，美国农业正遭受多重打击，包括持续的贸易战、农产品价格低迷、国际市场竞争加剧、生产资 料成本上升、天气影响及其他因素。美国弗吉尼亚州农民海尼日前在接受美国多媒体新闻机构"Talk Business & Politics"采访时表示，联邦政府"停摆"已进入第13天，本就对许多农民而言不容乐观的农业 前景，如今愈发糟糕。 文章提到，海尼家族在弗吉尼亚州拥有9000英亩土地，在阿肯色州三角洲地区还拥有5000英亩农田。他 称，若情况无改善，其家族农场可能在2026年春季停业。 海尼解释称，当农产品价格低迷时，许多农民会将大米等谷物储存在农场，等待次年春夏价格回升。为 维持收支平衡，他们通常会向美国政府申请"农产品信贷公司"贷款，并以储存的谷物作为抵押。一旦价 格回升，农民便可偿还贷款。但政府"停摆"期间，他们完全无法申请这类贷款。 此外，特朗普政府近期批准与阿根廷达成大规模货币互换协议，用美元兑换阿根廷比索，帮助该国稳定 经济。海尼认为，美国在帮助一个快速抢占国际大豆市场份额、取代美国农民的外国政府稳定经济，这 让美国农民"腹背受敌"。 "这届政府上台时承诺会帮助农民，如今却背弃了我们。"他说。 海尼还指出， ...

2018年，美国又一次陷入一幕熟悉的困境。中美关税战让美国农民担心要承受巨额损失，预计可能高达450亿美元。与此同时，美国政府因为两党在临时拨 款法案上的分歧而出现了停摆，这让本就压力山大的经济形势更加雪上加霜。为了缓解困境，特朗普政府在全球范围内寻找愿意"接盘"的国家和市场，中方 也给出了一句明确的忠告。 这段时间里，特朗普政府可谓是喜忧参半。一边是盟友对美方在关税问题上的不满与背刺，另一边则是对外谈判的压力与艰难。更让内外部都焦虑的是，美 国农民向政府抱怨，中国大幅减少对美农产品的购买，导致他们可能面临的亏损继续扩大。与此同时，随着共和党和民主党在拨款问题上的僵持，政府从10 月1日开始进入部分停摆，白宫也难以从容应对。 很明显，这场停摆会严重削弱政府在内政和外贸事务上的协调与推进能力，外界也担心中美贸易谈判会因此受挫。需要指出的是，不久前，美国财政部长还 口头承诺不久就会与中国方面会面，解决双方之间尚未解决的事项。除了稀土问题以外，最紧迫的还是美国的农产品出口。 在特朗普亲自出面寻求对话的同时，中国对这轮谈判的态度并没有改变：一方面坚持继续谈判，另一方面强调希望两国关系稳定发展，并且在平等、相互尊 重、 ...

Core Insights - The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) agricultural technology exchange training demonstration base has achieved significant results in agricultural technology promotion over the past six years, establishing 11 agricultural technology demonstration parks in SCO member countries [1][2] - The agricultural base in Shaanxi Province has become a key platform for agricultural technology exchange and cooperation among SCO countries, focusing on areas such as arid zone agriculture and digital agriculture [1][2] Group 1 - The SCO agricultural base has developed 7 crop production standards and over 10 production technology regulations, demonstrating positive outcomes in agricultural technology promotion [1] - Shaanxi Province has leveraged its agricultural science and education resources to enhance the infrastructure of the Yangling demonstration zone, facilitating its role as an important platform for agricultural technology exchange [1] - The agricultural base has established 4 joint laboratories with Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan, focusing on key agricultural technologies and conducting collaborative research [1] Group 2 - The base has dispatched over 190 experts in 73 batches to conduct trials on 115 superior varieties across 13 categories, with successful technology demonstrations in Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan [2] - Agricultural trade between Shaanxi and SCO countries has seen rapid growth, with import and export values increasing from 640 million yuan in 2021 to 2.14 billion yuan in 2024, representing a growth of over 230% [2] - Shaanxi aims to further develop the SCO agricultural base, focusing on key areas such as arid zone seed industry and agricultural water-saving irrigation, to enhance practical cooperation and contribute to agricultural development in SCO countries [2]

又有8国收到美最后通牒？巴西不忍了！一马当先，直接吹响反制的号角。 巴西总统卢拉 据央视新闻最新报道称，当地时间7月9日时，美国总统特朗普在社交平台上发布了最新的加税信件，而收到信件的8个国家，分 别是巴西、菲律宾、利比亚等国。 阿尔克明还补充道，他看不出美国有任何理由要对巴西提高关税，美国确实是有贸易逆差，但对巴西是顺差。并且在美国对巴 西出口的产品中，大多数都是零关税入境的，甚至不需要缴税。 但值得注意的是，除了巴西的产品被强制征收50％的关税外，其余7国的税率都没超过30％。并且巴西所面临的新关税税率，远 高于4月2日时，美国对巴西所征收的10％的关税。此外，在特朗普宣布对巴西征收50％的惩罚性关税后，他还下令要对巴西展 开不公平的贸易行为调查。 由此可见，美国这次是在故意针对巴西了。 在收到特朗普这一信函后，巴西的副总统兼服务部长——热拉尔多·阿尔克明，立即在当天回应道，特朗普对巴西所征收的新关 税，是十分不公平的。 巴西的副总统兼服务部长——热拉尔多·阿尔克明 但即便是阿尔克明立即回应了，特朗普的这一针对性行径，也改变不了美国政府硬要对巴西征收高额关税的现实。 而巴西总统卢拉也深知这一点，但他并未束 ...

Core Viewpoint - India, traditionally cautious in its diplomatic strategies, has unexpectedly chosen to confront the United States amidst the backdrop of Trump's impending "reciprocal tariffs" policy, signaling a significant shift in its approach to U.S. relations [1][3][5]. Group 1: India-U.S. Trade Relations - India has been under pressure from the Trump administration to lower tariffs on U.S. goods, especially as the U.S. has become one of India's largest trading partners [5][7]. - Despite a history of friendly relations, the U.S. demands, particularly regarding agricultural products, have led to a stalemate, with India unwilling to compromise on its agricultural market [8][10]. - On July 4, India announced retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods worth approximately $725 million, marking a public counteraction against U.S. trade strategies [11]. Group 2: Diplomatic Maneuvers - India's stance at the BRICS summit has shifted, moving from a supportive role of U.S. interests to a more confrontational position, indicating a strategic pivot in its international relations [12][15]. - India is also seeking to undermine U.S. influence on the global stage by collaborating with other international organizations and advocating for reforms in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) [13][15]. Group 3: Domestic Considerations - The Indian government's response to U.S. demands is influenced by domestic political factors, particularly the religious and cultural implications of agricultural policies, which are critical to Prime Minister Modi's political standing [17][19]. - Modi's firm stance on agricultural market control reflects the need to maintain support from significant voter demographics, particularly those influenced by Hindu religious beliefs [17][19]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The ongoing trade tensions between India and the U.S. could have wider repercussions, potentially affecting U.S. trade strategies and its broader geopolitical objectives, including its approach to China [19][20]. - India's awareness of China's trade negotiations with the U.S. has prompted it to adopt a more assertive position, as it seeks to enhance its own standing on the global economic stage [20].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing US-EU trade negotiations are facing significant challenges, with both sides having substantial differences in their core demands, making a comprehensive agreement unlikely [1][5][6]. Group 1: Trade Negotiations - The EU is striving to reach a preliminary bilateral trade agreement with the US by July 9, while also preparing for all possible outcomes, including a retaliatory list [1]. - The US currently imposes a 50% tariff on EU steel and aluminum products, a 25% tariff on automobiles, and a 10% baseline tariff on nearly all other goods [1]. - The EU has decided to postpone retaliatory measures against US products worth €210 billion until July 14 to allow more time for negotiations [1]. Group 2: Strategic Perspectives - The political leadership in the US has undergone a profound change in its strategic perception of the EU, while European political elites have not yet adjusted their views, leading to a significant gap in mutual understanding [2]. - The Biden administration emphasizes the importance of European allies, but the return of Trump has altered the strategic dynamics, with the US viewing the EU as a contributor to its trade deficit [2][3]. Group 3: Internal EU Disagreements - Within the EU, there are significant internal disagreements regarding the acceptance of a 10% baseline tax rate, with countries like Germany and Italy being more amenable compared to France [5]. - The EU is willing to make concessions on purchasing US agricultural products and liquefied natural gas, but the US insists on addressing its trade deficit, focusing on non-tariff barriers [5]. Group 4: Future Relations - The relationship between the US and EU is expected to remain fraught with distrust and conflict, extending beyond trade to include technology, investment, and geopolitical strategies [6]. - European political elites are increasingly anxious about their competitive position in the global technology race, leading to a consensus on the need for strategic autonomy and resilience [7][12]. Group 5: Economic and Technological Interaction - The US and EU are both adopting protective measures in their economic policies, leading to increased competition and mutual suspicion [9][10]. - The US is focusing on protecting traditional industries and advancing critical technologies, while the EU aims to bolster its own industries and regulatory frameworks [9][10]. Group 6: Supply Chain Security - Both the US and EU are restructuring their supply chains to enhance economic resilience, but they are doing so independently [11]. - The US has been actively forming agreements with countries for critical mineral supply chains, while the EU is prioritizing supply chain security as a core economic strategy [11]. Group 7: Strategic Autonomy - In response to the "America First" policy, Europe is seeking to strengthen its strategic autonomy by enhancing its industrial policies and reducing reliance on the US [12]. - The EU is also working on developing its own security frameworks, recognizing the need to rely less on NATO and the US for defense [12].

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation has approved the acquisition of equity in Witte by Bunge Global Limited with additional restrictive conditions to ensure fair competition in the agricultural market [1] Group 1: Acquisition Details - The acquisition involves two major global grain traders, Bunge and Witte, highlighting the significance of this merger in the agricultural sector [1] - The approval process considered the potential impact on global grain markets and the domestic soybean and agricultural product trade in China [1] Group 2: Commitments and Conditions - Bunge and Witte have made five commitments to continue performance, stabilize prices, and ensure supply, which are aimed at maintaining stable supply and reasonable pricing for soybeans and other agricultural products [1] - These commitments are designed to protect the interests of downstream customers and consumers [1] Group 3: Regulatory Implications - The decision reflects the fair, just, and lawful administration of antitrust enforcement by China's regulatory body [1] - It underscores China's important role in maintaining fair competition in the grain trade market [1]