又有8国收到美最后通牒？巴西不忍了！一马当先，直接吹响反制的号角。 巴西总统卢拉 据央视新闻最新报道称，当地时间7月9日时，美国总统特朗普在社交平台上发布了最新的加税信件，而收到信件的8个国家，分 别是巴西、菲律宾、利比亚等国。 阿尔克明还补充道，他看不出美国有任何理由要对巴西提高关税，美国确实是有贸易逆差，但对巴西是顺差。并且在美国对巴 西出口的产品中，大多数都是零关税入境的，甚至不需要缴税。 但值得注意的是，除了巴西的产品被强制征收50％的关税外，其余7国的税率都没超过30％。并且巴西所面临的新关税税率，远 高于4月2日时，美国对巴西所征收的10％的关税。此外，在特朗普宣布对巴西征收50％的惩罚性关税后，他还下令要对巴西展 开不公平的贸易行为调查。 由此可见，美国这次是在故意针对巴西了。 在收到特朗普这一信函后，巴西的副总统兼服务部长——热拉尔多·阿尔克明，立即在当天回应道，特朗普对巴西所征收的新关 税，是十分不公平的。 巴西的副总统兼服务部长——热拉尔多·阿尔克明 但即便是阿尔克明立即回应了，特朗普的这一针对性行径，也改变不了美国政府硬要对巴西征收高额关税的现实。 而巴西总统卢拉也深知这一点，但他并未束 ...

Core Viewpoint - India, traditionally cautious in its diplomatic strategies, has unexpectedly chosen to confront the United States amidst the backdrop of Trump's impending "reciprocal tariffs" policy, signaling a significant shift in its approach to U.S. relations [1][3][5]. Group 1: India-U.S. Trade Relations - India has been under pressure from the Trump administration to lower tariffs on U.S. goods, especially as the U.S. has become one of India's largest trading partners [5][7]. - Despite a history of friendly relations, the U.S. demands, particularly regarding agricultural products, have led to a stalemate, with India unwilling to compromise on its agricultural market [8][10]. - On July 4, India announced retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods worth approximately $725 million, marking a public counteraction against U.S. trade strategies [11]. Group 2: Diplomatic Maneuvers - India's stance at the BRICS summit has shifted, moving from a supportive role of U.S. interests to a more confrontational position, indicating a strategic pivot in its international relations [12][15]. - India is also seeking to undermine U.S. influence on the global stage by collaborating with other international organizations and advocating for reforms in the International Monetary Fund (IMF) [13][15]. Group 3: Domestic Considerations - The Indian government's response to U.S. demands is influenced by domestic political factors, particularly the religious and cultural implications of agricultural policies, which are critical to Prime Minister Modi's political standing [17][19]. - Modi's firm stance on agricultural market control reflects the need to maintain support from significant voter demographics, particularly those influenced by Hindu religious beliefs [17][19]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The ongoing trade tensions between India and the U.S. could have wider repercussions, potentially affecting U.S. trade strategies and its broader geopolitical objectives, including its approach to China [19][20]. - India's awareness of China's trade negotiations with the U.S. has prompted it to adopt a more assertive position, as it seeks to enhance its own standing on the global economic stage [20].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing US-EU trade negotiations are facing significant challenges, with both sides having substantial differences in their core demands, making a comprehensive agreement unlikely [1][5][6]. Group 1: Trade Negotiations - The EU is striving to reach a preliminary bilateral trade agreement with the US by July 9, while also preparing for all possible outcomes, including a retaliatory list [1]. - The US currently imposes a 50% tariff on EU steel and aluminum products, a 25% tariff on automobiles, and a 10% baseline tariff on nearly all other goods [1]. - The EU has decided to postpone retaliatory measures against US products worth €210 billion until July 14 to allow more time for negotiations [1]. Group 2: Strategic Perspectives - The political leadership in the US has undergone a profound change in its strategic perception of the EU, while European political elites have not yet adjusted their views, leading to a significant gap in mutual understanding [2]. - The Biden administration emphasizes the importance of European allies, but the return of Trump has altered the strategic dynamics, with the US viewing the EU as a contributor to its trade deficit [2][3]. Group 3: Internal EU Disagreements - Within the EU, there are significant internal disagreements regarding the acceptance of a 10% baseline tax rate, with countries like Germany and Italy being more amenable compared to France [5]. - The EU is willing to make concessions on purchasing US agricultural products and liquefied natural gas, but the US insists on addressing its trade deficit, focusing on non-tariff barriers [5]. Group 4: Future Relations - The relationship between the US and EU is expected to remain fraught with distrust and conflict, extending beyond trade to include technology, investment, and geopolitical strategies [6]. - European political elites are increasingly anxious about their competitive position in the global technology race, leading to a consensus on the need for strategic autonomy and resilience [7][12]. Group 5: Economic and Technological Interaction - The US and EU are both adopting protective measures in their economic policies, leading to increased competition and mutual suspicion [9][10]. - The US is focusing on protecting traditional industries and advancing critical technologies, while the EU aims to bolster its own industries and regulatory frameworks [9][10]. Group 6: Supply Chain Security - Both the US and EU are restructuring their supply chains to enhance economic resilience, but they are doing so independently [11]. - The US has been actively forming agreements with countries for critical mineral supply chains, while the EU is prioritizing supply chain security as a core economic strategy [11]. Group 7: Strategic Autonomy - In response to the "America First" policy, Europe is seeking to strengthen its strategic autonomy by enhancing its industrial policies and reducing reliance on the US [12]. - The EU is also working on developing its own security frameworks, recognizing the need to rely less on NATO and the US for defense [12].