Group 1 - The U.S. has threatened tariffs on 14 countries, with rates as high as 40%, violating international trade rules and disregarding the most-favored-nation principle [1][3] - The U.S. is using national security as a justification for these tariffs, which has been criticized by the WTO as inappropriate in non-war situations [1][3] - Developing countries, such as Laos, are particularly vulnerable to these tariff threats, which could significantly increase their operational costs [3][5] Group 2 - The U.S. is perceived as engaging in hegemonic behavior, with other countries expressing frustration and calling for a reevaluation of the U.S.'s role in the WTO [3][5] - There is a growing sentiment among nations to potentially exclude the U.S. from the WTO, although achieving this requires a significant consensus [1][3] - The long-term implications of U.S. tariff policies may lead to a decline in the dollar's dominance and the emergence of new currencies for trade settlements [5]

Group 1 - South Korea is actively seeking to extend the 90-day tariff suspension period originally set to expire on July 9, due to the current negotiation progress not being sufficient to meet the deadline [1] - The recent high-level trade talks between South Korea and the U.S. marked the third round of technical negotiations since the agreement to formulate a tariff reduction plan by July 9 was reached in late April [1] - The South Korean official indicated that some countries may reach agreements before July 8, while others may require extensions, and some may continue negotiations under the existing tariff framework [1] Group 2 - The U.S. focused on non-tariff barriers during the recent talks, shifting attention from nearly zero tariffs on U.S. imports to technical trade barriers and regulatory standards [2] - Discussions regarding foreign exchange rate policies and the sharing of defense costs for U.S. troops stationed in South Korea are being conducted through separate channels [2] - The ongoing tariff negotiations reflect a deeper strategic competition between South Korea and the U.S., with South Korea's key industries like automotive and steel urgently needing tariff relief, while the U.S. aims to reshape the Asia-Pacific trade landscape through new trade rules [2]

Group 1 - The European Commission President accused China of ignoring global trade rules and providing substantial subsidies to domestic companies, claiming that China is weaponizing its dominance in rare earths and transferring excess capacity to global markets [1] - China firmly opposes these statements, asserting that its industrial subsidy policies adhere to open, fair, and compliant principles, and that it strictly follows WTO rules [1] - China's industrial development relies on continuous technological innovation, a complete supply chain system, sufficient market competition, and abundant human resources, rather than subsidies [1] Group 2 - The notion of "overcapacity" is essentially a concern of certain countries regarding their competitiveness and market share, using it as a pretext for protectionist measures [2] - The EU has been implementing industrial policies and providing substantial subsidies to support European companies, with an estimated total of over €1.44 trillion in various subsidies from 2021 to 2030, and over €300 billion already disbursed by 2024 [2] - China emphasizes its commitment to high-level opening-up and aims to provide European companies with vast market opportunities, while opposing any attempts that undermine China's development rights for the benefit of others [2]

在中美贸易谈判达成重要共识后，美股迎来剧烈上涨。 美股三大指数收涨，纳指涨4.35%，标普500指数涨3.26%，均创3月3日以来收盘新高；道指涨2.81%， 创3月27日以来收盘新高。 大型科技股多数上涨，亚马逊涨超8%，Meta涨超7%，苹果、特斯拉涨超6%，英伟达涨逾5%，谷歌、 英特尔涨逾3%，微软涨超2%。 纳斯达克中国金龙指数大幅收涨5.40%，创4月4日以来新高。热门中概股普涨，文远知行涨超27%，小 马智行涨近12%，小鹏汽车、哔哩哔哩涨近8%，京东、拼多多、理想汽车涨逾6%，蔚来、阿里巴巴、 百度涨超5%。 只是在一片涨声中，特朗普发起的对等关税将迎来司法大考。这背后 是美国中小企业群体的绝望呐 喊。 与选择沉默的大公司不同，这些资金链濒临断裂的经营者正以法律为最后武器，试图阻止关税政策对其 商业模式的毁灭性打击。 而司法部则表示，总统历来通过贸易监管来处理外交事务并确保国家安全，国会通过批准 IEEPA 有效地将紧急情况下监管进口的权力授权给了总统，川普总统宣布紧急状态属于政治问题，司法部 门无权事后推翻。 审理该案的美国国际贸易法院在职能上与其他联邦地区法院大致相似，但也有其独特之处。 ...