Core Argument - The article discusses the corruption of science in the United States, particularly in the fields of nutrition and health, due to the influence of big capital and military funding, which has transformed science from a creative force for human progress into a destructive one [1][2]. Group 1: Nutrition Science Critique - Nutrition science is essential for human health, yet nearly half of American adults suffer from diet-related chronic diseases, leading to significant mortality [2][3]. - A significant portion of chronic disease patients (12% of adults) accounts for over 40% of national healthcare spending [3]. - The article highlights scandals in nutrition research, such as the case of Brian Wansink, whose academic misconduct revealed deeper issues of corruption in food and health research [3][4][5]. Group 2: Government Dietary Guidelines - The U.S. government releases dietary guidelines every five years, which significantly influence American eating habits and are foundational for nutrition education and food assistance programs [8][9]. - The latest guidelines received unprecedented public attention, with 29,000 comments, indicating widespread concern over their scientific validity and potential conflicts of interest [12]. - Criticism arose regarding the reliance on data from health organizations funded by food and pharmaceutical companies, undermining the credibility of the guidelines [12][16]. Group 3: Sugar Industry Influence - Evidence suggests that the sugar industry has historically influenced nutrition and heart disease research, leading to misleading dietary recommendations [17][18]. - Internal documents reveal that the sugar industry funded research to downplay sugar's role in heart disease while promoting saturated fats as the primary culprit [17][18]. - The article emphasizes that the corruption in nutrition science has long-term implications for public health policies, contributing to the obesity epidemic in the U.S. [19]. Group 4: Corporate Influence on Research - Companies like Coca-Cola have funded research to shift blame for obesity from sugary drinks to lack of exercise, manipulating scientific discourse [20][21]. - The Global Energy Balance Network, funded by Coca-Cola, falsely claimed that obesity was primarily due to insufficient physical activity, rather than dietary intake [20][21]. - Investigations revealed that influential scientists collaborated with corporations to promote misleading scientific narratives, further complicating public health messaging [22][23]. Group 5: Nutritional Reductionism - The article critiques the reductionist approach in nutrition science, which focuses on isolated nutrients rather than whole foods, leading to misleading conclusions about health [37][41]. - This reductionism has been shaped by corporate interests, which prioritize profit over comprehensive food research, ultimately threatening public health [42].