上述媒体报道指出，在特朗普发起的贸易争端中，其多次将波音公司作为改变双边贸易关系的重要谈判 工具。这主要是基于飞机的特性——作为大宗、高价值的标志性贸易商品，飞机在国家间贸易协定的谈 判中具有显著的战略价值。 报道认为，如果特朗普政府限制或禁止飞机零部件出口至中国，预计将对中国航空公司机队的维护与运 行保障产生不利影响。同时，美国通用电气航空（GE.N）等相关供应商的业务亦可能受到波及、面临 挑战，因为波音737 MAX使用的LEAP发动机，以及波音777和787两种喷气式飞机发动机均由该公司生 产。 在日前白宫的一次简报会上，特朗普强调了中国对美国航空航天供应的需求，认为这是贸易谈判可用 的"杠杆"选项。 报道称，特朗普政府一系列"超常规"的贸易政策已经显著减少了与包括中国在内的世界多国的贸易往 来。长期以来，中美是重要的货物贸易伙伴。2024年，中国是美国第三大货物贸易伙伴、第三大出口市 场、第二大进口来源地。 【文/观察者网 王勇 编辑/赵乾坤】 据美国消费者新闻与商业频道（CNBC）、路透社及德国POLITICO网站等媒体10月11日报道，特朗普 10月10日在白宫接受记者采访时表示，作为对中国稀土出 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses President Trump's demands for China to supply rare earth magnets to the U.S., threatening a 200% tariff if compliance is not met, highlighting the implications for U.S.-China trade relations and the potential impact on global supply chains [1][3]. Group 1: U.S.-China Trade Relations - Trump's statements reflect a belief that the U.S. holds greater influence over China in trade matters, asserting that the U.S. has sufficient countermeasures, such as halting the supply of Boeing parts, which could leave 200 aircraft grounded in China [3][5]. - The article critiques Trump's unilateral approach, suggesting it misjudges the interdependence of U.S. and Chinese industries, particularly in high-end manufacturing [5][7]. Group 2: Rare Earth Magnet Industry - Rare earth magnets are essential for strategic industries like electric vehicles, high-end chips, and aerospace, with China's dominance in this sector resulting from long-term resource advantages and technological development [5][9]. - The potential U.S. tariffs and trade halts could disrupt the established global supply chain, which is based on mutual economic needs rather than political maneuvering [5][9]. Group 3: Economic Implications - A halt in U.S. supplies of Boeing parts could adversely affect Boeing's stability and the livelihoods of U.S. suppliers, creating a detrimental cycle for both nations [7][9]. - The article emphasizes that the U.S. is increasingly dependent on China for various sectors, while China's reliance on the U.S. is decreasing, suggesting that extreme pressure tactics may backfire and accelerate China's self-sufficiency in key industries [9].