"不用主动申领，各地骑手只要缴纳养老保险，最快下个月第一周就能收到平台补贴。"美团相关负责人 表示，这个方案允许骑手根据个人需求选择在户籍地或工作地参保并申请，不管是长期稳定跑单，还是 过渡兼职的骑手，只要骑手在过去6个月内有3个月收入达到当地社保缴费基数下限，就将自动获得养老 保险补贴资格。骑手可根据个人自愿缴纳社保，平台将对符合条件的骑手参保提供50%的补贴支持。 广覆盖、低门槛的补贴方式，不仅减轻了骑手的日常生活负担，还提高了骑手群体的缴纳积极性和稳定 性。"慢慢地，送外卖可能不再是一种过渡工作，我觉得可以一直干下去。"葛少华说。 本报讯（记者杨天悦）"我在北京跑单，在老家交社保，300多元的养老补贴已经到账了！"昨天，首批 外卖骑手领到了美团发放的社保补贴。 11月初，美团发布了行业首个面向全部骑手开放的社保补贴方案，在国内部分城市率先试点。昨天中 午，骑手杨金莲打开手机发现，平台发放的养老保险补贴到账了。 383.1元，是她自己缴纳额度的一 半。按照杨金莲老家河南当地的社保缴费基数下限3831元的20%计算，她每月要交766.2元的养老保 险，这笔钱她已经连续交了八年。"现在平台有了补贴，相当于给我 ...

上海近铁城市广场南区的外立面对比 在杭州阿里巴巴西溪园区的饿了么办公楼里，最近内部广为流传的调侃是："早 C 晚 A 。早上还属于 C 区，晚上就属于 A 区了。"A 区和 C 区就隔了一条马路，淘宝在那头，饿了么在这头。 饿了么诞生于 2008 年的上海交通大学宿舍，外卖战场上的对手从校园一路变成大公司，直到遇到在 百团大战里胜出的美团，饿了么早期成员李立勋对我们说，在被阿里投资且不断加注的那一刻起，"饿 了么的结局就确定了。" 饿了么的故事，是创业草莽对抗巨头、资本狂飙改变行业的缩影。它的改名，标志着一个纯粹外卖平 台时代的结束，它的 "遗产" —— 庞大的商家网络、骑手配送体系，将作为淘宝闪购的基石继续存 在。 10 多年来，我们一直在采访饿了么的员工，无论是过去的还是现在的，在人的讲述里，记住的往往不 是冰冷的数字，而是一个个鲜活的回忆碎片。 饿了么终于失去姓名，关于它的 17 年往事碎片。 文 丨 管艺雯 在上海市区真北路和金沙江路的交叉口，近铁城市广场南区，饿了么总部办公楼，2025 年 12 月 5 日，近 10 块蓝色的巨型电子屏幕被替换成橙色。2025 年中以来全中国铺天盖地刷遍的橙色广告， ...

货拉拉司机郑凯基坦言，之前担心准点率影响抢单，遇到堵车或客户临时调整时间时压力很大，如今知 道准点率与中单无关，"不用再拼命赶路，和用户沟通清楚就好"。 随着这些举措落地，新就业形态劳动者的"时间体验"正悄然改变。外卖骑手不用再为几分钟超时焦虑， 遇到商家出餐慢可上报异常获得补时；货车司机跑单时心里更有底，新司机能参考建议到达时间规划路 线，老司机也不必因意外情况担心收入受影响。司机刘圣说，平台给出的时间很合理，还会提前考虑货 车限行、高峰期堵车等因素，"只考核装货准点率，不牵扯卸货时间，对我们很公平"。 货拉拉司机管理部负责人汪晓兰表示，货拉拉持续公开算法规则，核心是推动平台规则透明化与司机体 验优化。本次公开的建议到达时间，科学地在导航基础时间上，基于距离、车型为司机额外延长更多时 间。同时，明确仅考核快车/特快订单的"装货地准点率"，且不影响司机中单，根本目的是尊重现实路 况复杂性，避免司机因时间压力产生不必要的赶路风险，将安全放在首位。这些举措，都是为了构建更 公平、更安全、更值得信赖的司机工作环境。 在业内人士看来，这场"时间松绑"的本质，是货拉拉等平台型企业的算法从"效率优先"向"人性化协 同"转 ...

Core Viewpoint - Meituan has announced its commitment to continuously optimize platform rules and improve service management levels for merchants and delivery personnel following the implementation of the national standard "Basic Requirements for Delivery Platform Service Management" (GB/T 46862—2025) [1] Group 1: Standard Participation - Meituan was one of the drafting units for the new national standard and actively contributed to its development, including discussions on core clauses [2] - The company highly agrees with the core principles established by the standard, which include fair and rational competition, strict adherence to food safety, enhancement of service quality, and coordination of interests among all parties [2] Group 2: Implementation Commitment - Meituan has pledged to voluntarily implement the national standard and integrate its requirements into platform operations and service processes [1] - The company aims to continuously optimize platform rules to enhance the management of merchants and delivery personnel, improve consumer experience, and safeguard the rights and interests of delivery personnel, consumers, and merchants [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the transformation of food delivery riders into a more respected and secure profession, highlighting the establishment of a comprehensive and flexible social security system that enhances their job stability and dignity [1][29]. Group 1: Employment Trends - The perception of "middle class" is evolving, with food delivery riders emerging as a new group of "quasi-middle class" individuals, earning an average monthly income exceeding 7,000 yuan and an hourly wage of 33.6 yuan, which is 40% higher than that of construction workers [4][5]. - As of July 2025, the number of food delivery riders in China surpassed 14 million, indicating a significant growth in this employment sector [8]. Group 2: Social Security Initiatives - Meituan has initiated a nationwide social security subsidy for riders, covering millions, with a 50% subsidy for those who meet the criteria [8][17]. - The social security framework acknowledges the unique employment relationship of riders, allowing for a more tailored approach to their benefits [15][33]. Group 3: Rider Welfare Programs - Meituan's welfare programs include various forms of support such as occupational injury insurance, educational funds for riders' children, and meal subsidies, which collectively enhance the riders' quality of life [20][23][25]. - The company has established over 52,000 rider rest stations nationwide, providing essential services like drinking water and charging facilities [25]. Group 4: Global Context and Comparisons - The article contrasts Meituan's approach with international attempts to regulate gig economy workers, noting that many foreign models have failed due to their rigid structures [31][32]. - Meituan's model is characterized by inclusivity and voluntary participation, setting transparent rules that empower riders to make their own choices [33][34].

Core Insights - The article discusses the implementation of a pension insurance subsidy policy by Meituan for delivery riders, highlighting its impact on their financial security and work-life balance [2][5][28] - It emphasizes the complex needs and challenges faced by the rider community, particularly regarding social security and employment stability [7][8][12] Group 1: Pension Insurance Subsidy - Meituan's pension insurance subsidy policy provides riders with a monthly subsidy of over 500 yuan, significantly easing their financial burden [2][5] - The policy has been extended nationwide, allowing all types of riders to receive cash subsidies after paying for pension insurance, benefiting millions [5][28] - The subsidy encourages riders to participate in social insurance, transforming it from a financial burden into an affordable safety net [11][30] Group 2: Rider Demographics and Employment Characteristics - As of September 2024, there are 7.45 million riders on Meituan's platform, with 89% working part-time, indicating a highly mobile workforce [6] - Many riders view their job as a transitional phase, leading to a reluctance to commit to long-term social security contributions [7][16] - A significant portion of riders comes from rural areas, complicating their participation in urban social security systems [7][12] Group 3: Challenges in Social Security Participation - Riders face a dilemma between needing immediate cash income and the long-term benefits of social security, leading to resistance against mandatory contributions [7][9] - The traditional binary classification of employment does not adequately address the unique status of delivery riders, who operate in a gray area between dependent and independent labor [11][12] - The high mobility of riders creates challenges in maintaining continuous social security coverage, as many work across multiple platforms [12][13] Group 4: Broader Welfare Needs - Riders express a need for comprehensive protection that goes beyond pension insurance, including coverage for work-related injuries and daily living support [22][24] - Meituan has initiated various welfare programs, such as work injury insurance and meal subsidies, to address the diverse needs of riders [28][30] - The establishment of rider stations offering basic amenities reflects an understanding of the riders' daily challenges and enhances their overall work experience [30][34] Group 5: Future Implications - The article suggests that Meituan's approach to rider welfare could serve as a model for other flexible employment sectors, addressing the broader issue of social security for gig workers [33][34] - The ongoing development of a multi-layered welfare system aims to provide a safety net for a wide range of flexible workers, not just delivery riders [34][35] - The anticipated "social security year" for riders in 2025 marks a significant step in the evolution of labor rights for flexible employment groups [35]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the struggles of small and medium-sized restaurant owners in the face of high commissions and fees imposed by food delivery platforms like Meituan, leading to a growing sentiment of frustration and disillusionment among merchants [1][5][17]. Group 1: Financial Strain on Merchants - Many restaurant owners report that after deducting subsidies, commissions, and delivery fees, their actual earnings from orders are significantly low, often leaving them with less than 6% of the sale price [1][5]. - The high commission rates, which can reach around 30% when including various fees, severely impact the profitability of small businesses, making it difficult for them to sustain operations [15][22]. - Merchants express that despite their efforts to attract customers through promotions and advertising, the costs associated with these strategies often outweigh the benefits, leading to substantial financial losses [14][19]. Group 2: Emotional and Psychological Impact - The ongoing financial pressure creates a sense of defeat and hopelessness among restaurant owners, who feel trapped in a system that favors the platforms over their businesses [5][10]. - Many merchants describe their experiences as a "zero-sum game," where the competition and platform rules create an environment where only a few can thrive, while the majority struggle to survive [20][22]. - The emotional toll of constant financial strain leads some owners to abandon their entrepreneurial dreams, feeling that they are merely working for the platforms rather than running their own businesses [12][18]. Group 3: Shift in Business Strategies - In response to the challenges posed by delivery platforms, some merchants are exploring alternative business models, such as focusing on private customer bases and direct sales to avoid platform fees [23][24]. - There is a growing trend among restaurant owners to seek out new delivery channels, indicating a desire for a more equitable relationship with service providers [23]. - The article suggests that a restructuring of the distribution logic within the food delivery industry is necessary to create a more balanced ecosystem that benefits both merchants and consumers [23][24].