Core Viewpoint - Shanghai Bank's fundamentals are stabilizing as credit structure transforms and risks are systematically resolved, with high dividend advantages and convertible bond themes likely to boost its valuation during the bank sector's recovery phase [1] Group 1: Financial Performance - The expected dividend payout ratio for the first half of 2025 is 32.2%, translating to a projected dividend yield of 5.6% based on the current stock price [1] - Forecasted net profit growth rates for the parent company from 2025 to 2027 are 2.1%, 3.5%, and 5.6% respectively [1] Group 2: Valuation and Investment Rating - The closing price on September 25 corresponds to a price-to-book (PB) ratio of 0.51 for 2025, with a target valuation of 0.6 times PB, indicating an 18% upside potential [1] - The company is given an "overweight" rating for the first time [1] Group 3: Economic Context - Shanghai Bank is positioned in a key economic and financial center, which will allow it to benefit significantly from economic recovery if positive trends continue [1] - The bank's performance elasticity is expected to become more pronounced with the anticipated economic recovery [1]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No information about the report industry investment rating is provided in the given content. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - External environment factors such as interest rate fluctuations, bond supply - demand, and policy orientation jointly impact bond investment returns. In H1 2025, the bond investment of 42 listed banks showed certain characteristics in scale, structure, and profit and loss, but there are still challenges in maintaining stable returns in the future [1]. - The overall bond investment scale of 42 listed banks expanded steadily in H1 2025. There were differences in the investment structure among different types of banks, with state - owned banks and city commercial banks having stable growth in the bond allocation portfolio, while joint - stock banks and rural commercial banks increased their efforts in the bond trading portfolio. The bond investment portfolio generally presented a pattern of "stable foundation and flexible gain" [1]. - The coupon income of 42 listed banks was generally stable in H1 2025 but showed a slight year - on - year decline. The fair value change loss was significant, and the investment income increased. However, the bond investment of the banking industry still faces pressure to maintain stable returns [1]. 3. Summary According to the Table of Contents 3.1 42 Listed Banks' Bond Investment Volume - **Overall Bond Investment Scale: Steady Expansion**: In H1 2025, the total scale of the three types of bond - type financial assets of 42 listed banks showed a steady expansion trend. The growth of debt investment - type financial assets measured at amortized cost was relatively slow, while the growth of trading financial assets measured at fair value and included in current profits and losses was relatively large, indicating that banks increased the proportion of trading positions [9]. - **Differentiated Bond Investment Distribution Structures among Different Bank Types**: In H1 2025, state - owned banks and city commercial banks showed stable growth in the bond allocation portfolio, which may be related to their participation in the primary - market issuance of important national and regional bond varieties. Joint - stock banks and rural commercial banks slightly weakened their bond allocation power but significantly increased their efforts in the bond trading portfolio, showing a differentiated feature of "stable allocation by large banks and prominent trading flexibility by small and medium - sized banks" [13]. - **Bond Investment Allocation Tilted towards Government - Related Bonds**: In H1 2025, commercial banks increased their allocation of government - related bonds, with an average month - on - month increase of about 10% for state - owned banks, joint - stock banks, and city commercial banks, and a slightly smaller increase for rural commercial banks. The allocation of financial bonds and other bonds was differentiated. All banks held a relatively large scale of government - related bonds, followed by financial bonds and credit - related bonds [18]. - **Correlation between Financial Asset Types and Bond Variety Structures**: The banking industry maintained a stable growth of interest - rate bonds in the bond allocation portfolio and increased the allocation of credit bonds, while the allocation of financial bonds was relatively weak. In the bond trading portfolio, interest - rate bonds and financial bonds were the core varieties, with a more significant increase than credit bonds, showing a "stable foundation and flexible gain" pattern [22]. 3.2 42 Listed Banks' Bond Investment Profit and Loss - **Coupon Income: Generally Stable and Still the Main Source of Income**: In H1 2025, the total coupon income of 42 listed banks decreased slightly year - on - year. Although the scale of held - to - maturity bonds increased, the decline in the coupon rate of newly issued bonds led to a decrease in coupon income. In the future, coupon income is still expected to be the main source of bond investment income for commercial banks [26]. - **Fair Value Change Loss: Losses in the Trading Level**: In H1 2025, the total fair value change loss of 42 listed banks decreased significantly year - on - year, indicating that it was difficult to obtain capital gains through short - term trading in the volatile bond market, and there were floating losses in bond trading [28]. - **Investment Income: Growth in All Bank Types**: In H1 2025, the actual investment income of 42 listed banks in the bond field increased significantly year - on - year. Although the book value appreciation of bond - type trading financial assets and other debt investment - type financial assets was not as good as that of the previous year, banks could still increase their investment income by selling floating - profit old bonds and waiting for the maturity of high - coupon bonds [31]. 3.3 Attribution and Summary - **External Environment Driving Factors: Interest Rate Fluctuations, Bond Supply - Demand, and Policy Orientation Jointly Impact Bond Investment Returns**: In H1 2025, the "more adjustments and fewer opportunities" bond market environment led to a general decline in the prices of existing bonds, resulting in a significant year - on - year decline in the fair value change loss of listed banks' bond investment. The supply of national bonds, local government bonds, and policy - based financial bonds increased, but the coupon rate of newly issued bonds decreased, leading to a decline in coupon income. Regulatory policies indirectly affected bond investment performance [35]. - **Banking Industry's Bond Investment Pressure and Future Outlook** - Overall Income Shows a Positive Trend but There Are Still Hidden Concerns: In H1 2025, the actual bond investment income of 42 listed banks increased slightly year - on - year, but the coupon income faced downward pressure in the interest - rate downward cycle, and it was more difficult to obtain spread income through band trading. Since H2 2025, the "stock - strong and bond - weak" pattern has emerged, and the loss caused by fair value change will be more obvious [3]. - Different Bank Types Show Differentiated Performance, and State - owned Banks' Pressure Is Relatively Controllable: State - owned banks can maintain a certain profit - making ability in the low - interest - rate volatile bond market due to their advantages in bond allocation and trading portfolios. Joint - stock banks, city commercial banks, and rural commercial banks are more vulnerable, and they may increase their capital allocation in the equity market, commodity market, and related structured fixed - income products in the future [3].

上 市 公 司 公 司 研 究 / 公 司 深 银行 2025 年 09 月 26 日 上海银行 (601229) ——重塑信贷结构，化风险夯实基本面 报告原因：首次覆盖 增持（首次评级） | 市场数据： | 2025 年 09 月 25 日 | | --- | --- | | 收盘价（元） | 8.95 | | 一年内最高/最低（元） | 11.47/7.06 | | 市净率 | 0.5 | | 股息率%（分红/股价） | 5.59 | | 流通 A 股市值（百万元） | 127,170 | | 上证指数/深证成指 | 3,853.30/13,445.90 | 注："股息率"以最近一年已公布分红计算 | 基础数据: | 2025 年 06 月 30 日 | | --- | --- | | 每股净资产（元） | 17.11 | | 资产负债率% | 91.99 | | 总股本/流通 A 股（百万） | 14,209/14,209 | | 流通 B 股/H 股（百万） | -/- | 一年内股价与大盘对比走势： 09-25 10-25 11-25 12-25 01-25 02-25 03-25 04-25 05 ...

【导读】香港金管局公布人民币流动资金安排优化措施，将于10月9日生效 为更好地满足离岸人民币业务增长所带来的潜在流动性需求，香港金融管理局（以下简称香港金管局）于9月26日宣布，将推出人民币流动资金安排优化 措施（以下简称优化措施），于2025年10月9日生效。 两方面优化人民币流动资金安排 据香港金管局总裁余伟文介绍，从今年10月9日起，香港金管局推出"人民币业务资金安排"，取代现有的"人民币贸易融资流动资金安排"，并实施多项优 化措施及扩展合资格资金用途。优化措施包括两方面： 一是重新分配日间和即日隔夜人民币资金额度。香港金管局现时通过人民币流动资金安排提供各200亿元的日间和隔夜人民币资金额度。自生效日起，维 持400亿元人民币的总额不变，日间和隔夜的人民币资金额度将分别改为300亿元人民币及100亿元人民币。 香港金管局表示，随着离岸人民币业务在本港不断增长，这次的优化措施将更有助银行应付日益增加的跨境人民币支付结算日间资金需求。一级流动性提 供行安排的200亿元人民币总额则维持不变。 二是优化措施将增加翌日（T+1）交收的两周和一个月期限回购协议。现有的流动资金安排除提供翌日交收（T+1）的一天和一 ...

炒股就看金麒麟分析师研报，权威，专业，及时，全面，助您挖掘潜力主题机会！ 证券代码：601229 证券简称：上海银行 公告编号：临2025-052 ● 证券停复牌情况：适用 因实施2025年中期权益分派,公司的相关证券停复牌情况如下：自本次普通股权益分派实施公告前一交 易日（2025年10月9日）至权益分派股权登记日期间，"上银转债"将停止转股，本次权益分派股权登记 日后的第一个交易日起"上银转债"恢复转股。 ■ 注：停牌终止日及复牌日可在公司后续发布的可转债转股价格调整公告中查阅。 一、2025年中期普通股权益分派基本情况 优先股代码：360029 优先股简称：上银优1 可转债代码：113042 可转债简称：上银转债 上海银行股份有限公司关于实施2025年中期权益分派时 "上银转债"停止转股的提示性公告 上海银行股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误 导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 联系部门：董事会办公室 联系电话：021-68476988 联系传真：021-68476215 联系地址：中国上海市黄浦区中山 ...

Investment Rating - The investment rating for the banking industry is "Positive" (maintained) [1] Core Insights - The banking sector is experiencing a shift in fund investment behavior, with banks redeeming low-yield money market funds and increasing their holdings in credit bond funds to enhance returns [5][57] - The total fund holdings of listed banks reached approximately 6.37 trillion yuan, accounting for 2.03% of total assets as of the end of the first half of 2025 [15][18] - The proportion of fund investments in the fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) category is 48.5%, with city commercial banks showing even higher ratios [15][22] Summary by Sections 1. Fund Investment Participation and Scale - The self-managed fund holdings of listed banks as of June 2025 were approximately 6.37 trillion yuan, with shareholding banks and city commercial banks having significant investment scales of 2.84 trillion yuan and 1.72 trillion yuan, respectively [15][18] - The investment in money market funds decreased to 9.10%, while the proportion of passive index bond funds increased to 7.90% [23][25] 2. Changes in Fund Investment Behavior - Banks are redeeming money market funds and low-yield rate bond funds while increasing their investment in credit bond funds [5][57] - The redemption pressure for money market funds was primarily concentrated in the first quarter of 2025, driven by liquidity management needs and yield enhancement [49][55] 3. Future Expansion and Impact of Redemption Fee Reform - Smaller banks have greater expansion potential in fund investments, driven by the need for redundant fund screening and tax-exempt income [3][3] - The implementation of redemption fee reforms may catalyze preventive redemptions by banks, leading to a preference for customized bond funds and bond ETFs [3][3]

证券日报网讯 9月25日晚间，上海银行发布公告称，因实施2025年中期权益分派，公司的相关证券停复 牌情况如下：自本次普通股权益分派实施公告前一交易日（2025年10月9日）至权益分派股权登记日期 间，"上银转债"将停止转股，本次权益分派股权登记日后的第一个交易日起"上银转债"恢复转股。 （编辑 楚丽君） ...

上海银行股份有限公司关于实施 2025 年中期权益分派时 "上银转债"停止转股的提示性公告 上海银行股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）董事会及全体董事保证本公告 内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准 确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： | 证券代码：601229 | 证券简称：上海银行 | 公告编号：临 2025-052 | | --- | --- | --- | | 优先股代码：360029 | | 优先股简称：上银优 1 | | 可转债代码：113042 | | 可转债简称：上银转债 | 证券停复牌情况：适用 因实施 2025 年中期权益分派,公司的相关证券停复牌情况如下：自本次普通 股权益分派实施公告前一交易日（2025 年 10 月 9 日）至权益分派股权登记日期间， "上银转债"将停止转股，本次权益分派股权登记日后的第一个交易日起"上银 转债"恢复转股。 | 证券代码 | 证券简称 | 停复牌类型 | 停牌 | 停牌 | 停牌 | 复牌日 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | 起始日 | 期 ...

Market Performance - The city commercial bank sector declined by 0.94% on September 25, with Chongqing Bank leading the decline [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3853.3, down 0.01%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13445.9, up 0.67% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Chongqing Bank closed at 8.94, down 1.65% with a trading volume of 170,700 shares and a transaction value of 153 million [1] - Other notable declines include Xi'an Bank down 1.50% to 3.95, Zhengzhou Bank down 1.48% to 2.00, and Qingdao Bank down 1.44% to 4.78 [1] - Shanghai Bank and Xiamen Bank also saw declines of 1.43% and 1.39%, respectively [1] Capital Flow Analysis - The city commercial bank sector experienced a net outflow of 278 million from institutional investors, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 152 million [1] - The table indicates that Suzhou Bank had a significant net outflow from institutional investors of 48.08 million, while Qilu Bank had a net inflow of 25.86 million [2] - Chongqing Bank specifically had a net outflow of 5.68 million from institutional investors but a net inflow of 10.91 million from retail investors [2]

Market Performance - The city commercial bank sector increased by 1.64% on September 24, with Qilu Bank leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3853.64, up 0.83%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13356.14, up 1.8% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Qilu Bank closed at 5.87, with a rise of 1.73% and a trading volume of 1.0666 million shares, amounting to a transaction value of 624 million yuan [1] - Hangzhou Bank closed at 15.32, up 0.66%, with a trading volume of 451,600 shares and a transaction value of 691 million yuan [1] - Zhengzhou Bank closed at 2.03, up 0.50%, with a trading volume of 920,500 shares and a transaction value of 18.7 million yuan [1] - Nanjing Bank closed at 11.01, up 0.46%, with a trading volume of 1.7333 million shares and a transaction value of 806 million yuan [1] - Other banks such as Changsha Bank, Ningbo Bank, and Qingdao Bank also showed slight increases in their stock prices [1] Capital Flow Analysis - The city commercial bank sector experienced a net outflow of 69.1764 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 55.8208 million yuan [2] - The overall capital flow indicates a mixed sentiment, with institutional investors withdrawing funds while retail investors continued to invest [2] Detailed Capital Flow for Selected Banks - Ningbo Bank had a net inflow of 74.388 million yuan from institutional investors, but a net outflow of 51.098 million yuan from speculative funds [3] - Shanghai Bank saw a net inflow of 17.1761 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors had a net outflow of 30.1701 million yuan [3] - Chengdu Bank experienced a net inflow of 16.3117 million yuan from institutional investors, with a net outflow from retail investors [3]