Index Performance - The CSI A500 Index decreased by 3.31% this week, closing at 5392.97 points on October 17 [5] - The average daily trading volume for the week was 8521.04 billion yuan, reflecting a 22.20% decrease compared to the previous week [5] Top Performers - The top ten gainers in the CSI A500 index included: 1. Shanghai Pudong Development Bank (600000.SH) with a gain of 12.50% 2. Agricultural Bank of China (601288.SH) with a gain of 11.57% 3. Huatian Technology (002185.SZ) with a gain of 10.02% 4. Shanghai Jahwa United Co., Ltd. (600315.SH) with a gain of 9.42% 5. Hainan Airport (600515.SH) with a gain of 8.96% 6. Shaanxi Coal and Chemical Industry (601225.SH) with a gain of 8.61% 7. Jiangsu Bank (600919.SH) with a gain of 8.60% 8. Tongwei Co., Ltd. (600438.SH) with a gain of 8.31% 9. Air China (601111.SH) with a gain of 7.63% 10. China Pacific Insurance (601319.SH) with a gain of 7.32% [2] Bottom Performers - The top ten losers in the CSI A500 index included: 1. Shengquan Group (605589.SH) with a loss of 18.04% 2. Wentai Technology (600745.SH) with a loss of 17.17% 3. Betta Pharmaceuticals (300558.SZ) with a loss of 16.98% 4. Leo Group (002131.SZ) with a loss of 16.55% 5. Jinlang Technology (300763.SZ) with a loss of 15.40% 6. Tongfu Microelectronics (002156.SZ) with a loss of 14.98% 7. Yake Technology (002409.SZ) with a loss of 14.35% 8. Lens Technology (300433.SZ) with a loss of 14.26% 9. Zhongding Sealing Parts (000887.SZ) with a loss of 13.99% 10. Robot Technology (300757.SZ) with a loss of 13.95% [2] Fund Performance - All 40 CSI A500 ETFs experienced declines, with notable drops in Huatai-PB's CSI A500 Enhanced ETF and Guolian's A500 Enhanced ETF, both falling over 4% [5] - The total scale of the CSI A500 ETFs fell below 200 billion yuan, with Huatai-PB's fund at 249.03 billion yuan, Guotai's at 226.56 billion yuan, and E Fund's at 221.29 billion yuan [5] Market Insights - Pacific Securities research team suggests a balanced allocation towards low-position sectors, particularly banks and insurance with dividend protection attributes, as well as coal and agriculture sectors benefiting from domestic demand recovery [6] - Guohai Securities research team indicates that uncertainties from trade frictions may lead to a rotation in market styles, with a shift from overvalued growth sectors to undervalued sectors [6]

王志恒表示，当前可持续发展进程充满挑战，全球环境治理表现低于预期，贫富差距和生态破坏等矛盾 仍在加剧。联合国秘书长古特雷斯先生曾呼吁国际社会采取集体行动，为可持续、公正与和平的全球秩 序共同努力。中国作为全球可持续发展目标实现的重要力量，近年来在气候治理、共同富裕、人工智能 等领域取得显著进展。 "治理是可持续发展的核心和基石，农业银行把党的领导贯彻到公司治理全过程，持续完善上下贯通的 可持续发展治理架构。"王志恒强调。他表示，在董事会战略规划与可持续发展委员会下，该行设可持 续发展工作组，高管层及其专委会落实可持续发展重要议程的管理。遴选ESG专家和女性董事，优化治 理层履职能力和决策效能。整体推进、全面深化可持续发展管理体系建设，明确可持续发展总体目标和 实施路径。 据王志恒介绍，在服务国家战略与民生需求方面，农行持续发力并取得显著成效。一方面，其立足三农 特色深耕县域市场，截至今年 6 月末，农行县域贷款余额突破10万亿元，粮食和重要农产品保供贷款达 1.24万亿元；另一方面，农行坚持绿色发展方向，将绿色低碳要求纳入信贷政策指引，完善绿色金融重 大项目库，创新推出"海洋牧场贷""和美乡村贷"等特色产品， ...

Market Overview - The A-share market experienced a collective decline, with the Shanghai Composite Index falling by 1.95% to close at 3839.76 points, the Shenzhen Component Index down 3.04% at 12688.94 points, and the ChiNext Index dropping 3.36% to 2935.37 points [3][4] - The trading volume in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets reached 1.9381 trillion yuan, a slight increase of 7 billion yuan compared to the previous day [3] Banking Sector Analysis - Despite a strong opening for bank stocks, most ended the day lower, with Agricultural Bank of China showing "hugging" characteristics, reaching a new high of 7.69 yuan per share [5] - Agricultural Bank's closing price of 7.62 yuan is close to its net asset value of 7.65 yuan, indicating a speculative interest rather than a focus on fundamentals [5] Market Sentiment and External Factors - The decline in the market was influenced by a significant drop in U.S. stock markets due to debt scandals involving regional banks, raising concerns about the fragility of the U.S. financial sector [5][6] - Increased risk awareness among investors has led to a heightened focus on potential corrections in previously inflated stocks, with three key indicators signaling market risk: intensified selling pressure from major shareholders, accelerated IPO issuance, and stricter risk control standards from brokerages [6] Technical Indicators - The Shanghai Composite Index's decline of 1.95% is relatively modest, remaining within a consolidation range above 3800 points, while the Shenzhen Component and ChiNext indices have shown more severe declines, indicating a potential downtrend [6] - A total of 4596 stocks fell today, while only 588 rose, suggesting a broad market downturn, with a trading volume of 1.93 trillion yuan indicating a "large volume drop" [6] Market Dynamics - The number of stocks hitting the daily limit down increased, but the overall market has not yet entered a panic phase, with net outflows of 132.2 billion yuan from major funds and approximately 120 billion yuan from northbound trading [7] - The day coincided with a stock index futures settlement, which historically leads to significant market volatility [8] Comparative Market Performance - The Hong Kong market showed even weaker performance, with the Hang Seng Index dropping over 2.7% and the Hang Seng Tech Index falling more than 4.28%, indicating a pronounced downward trend [9]

Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index fell by 1.47% this week, while the Shenzhen Component Index dropped by 4.99%, and the ChiNext Index decreased by 5.71%. The CSI 300 Index declined by 2.22% [1] - Among the tradable A-shares, 1,104 stocks rose, accounting for 20.33%, while 4,285 stocks fell [1] Capital Flow - This week, the total net outflow of main funds was 301.749 billion yuan, with net outflows recorded on each trading day. The ChiNext saw a net outflow of 80.378 billion yuan, while the STAR Market had a net outflow of 33.297 billion yuan, and the CSI 300 components experienced a net outflow of 88.522 billion yuan [1][2] Industry Performance - Only four industries saw gains this week, with the banking and coal industries leading with increases of 4.89% and 4.17%, respectively. Conversely, the electronics and media sectors faced significant declines of 7.14% and 6.27% [2][3] - In terms of capital flow, the banking sector had a net inflow of 2.419 billion yuan, while the coal sector saw a net inflow of 0.267 billion yuan. In contrast, 29 industries experienced net outflows, with the electronics sector leading the outflow at 70.079 billion yuan [3][4] Individual Stock Performance - A total of 1,257 stocks experienced net inflows this week, with 147 stocks seeing inflows exceeding 100 million yuan. Agricultural Bank of China had the highest net inflow of 2.472 billion yuan, followed by Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and Changan Automobile [4] - On the other hand, 735 stocks had net outflows exceeding 100 million yuan, with CATL, SMIC, and Northern Rare Earth leading the outflows at 4.045 billion yuan, 3.950 billion yuan, and 3.756 billion yuan, respectively [4]

Core Viewpoint - The stock market experienced significant net outflows, with a total of 750.49 billion yuan leaving the market, while only 11 stocks saw net inflows exceeding 2 billion yuan, indicating a bearish sentiment among investors [1] Group 1: Market Overview - The Shanghai Composite Index closed down by 1.95%, reflecting overall market weakness [1] - A total of 1,290 stocks had net inflows, while 3,424 stocks experienced net outflows, highlighting a trend of capital leaving the market [1] Group 2: Sector Performance - Only two sectors saw net inflows: textiles and apparel (4.17 billion yuan) and agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery (0.93 billion yuan) [1] - The electronics sector faced the largest net outflow, with 194.73 billion yuan, followed by power equipment with 135.05 billion yuan [1] Group 3: Individual Stock Performance - Zhongji Xuchuang led the net inflows with 18.94 billion yuan, followed by Dongxin He Ping with 7.30 billion yuan [1][2] - The stocks with the highest net outflows included Yangguang Electric with 16.53 billion yuan, ZTE with 15.68 billion yuan, and BYD with 14.10 billion yuan [1][4] Group 4: Stock Price Movements - Stocks with net inflows exceeding 2 billion yuan saw an average increase of 8.73%, outperforming the Shanghai Composite Index [2] - Notable performers included Haixia Innovation and Pingtan Development, which closed at their daily limit up [2]

1288 董事會會議召開日期 中國農業銀行股份有限公司（「本行」）董事會（「董事會」）謹此宣佈，本行將於2025年10月 30日（星期四）召開董事會會議，以考慮及批准（其中包括）本行截至2025年9月30日的第三 季度業績。 AGRICULTURAL BANK OF CHINA LIMITED 香港交易及結算所有限公司及香港聯合交易所有限公司對本公告的內容概不負責，對其準確性或完整性亦不發表任 何聲明，並明確表示，概不對因本公告全部或任何部份內容而產生或因倚賴該等內容而引致的任何損失承擔任何責 任。 承董事會命 中國農業銀行股份有限公司 劉清 公司秘書 中國北京 2025年10月17日 於本公告日期，本行的執行董事為谷澍先生、王志恒先生和林立先生；本行的非執行董事為周濟女士、李蔚先生、 劉曉鵬先生和張奇先生；本行的獨立非執行董事為梁高美懿女士、吳聯生先生、汪昌雲先生、鞠建東先生、 莊毓敏女士和張琦先生。 ...

Investment Ratings - Banking: Overweight (Maintain) [1] - Securities: Market Weight (Maintain) [1] - Insurance: Overweight (Maintain) [1] Core Insights - The banking sector is seen as a safe haven amid rising market uncertainties, with high dividend yield assets becoming increasingly attractive [1][41] - The securities sector is benefiting from a surge in trading volumes and increased stamp duty revenues, indicating strong performance in upcoming quarterly reports [1][43] - The insurance sector is experiencing significant growth in investment income and new business value, driven by increased equity market exposure and favorable policy support [1][45] Summary by Sections Market Review - As of October 16, 2025, the banking index increased by 5.53%, the securities index decreased by 0.57%, and the insurance index rose by 6.27%, while the CSI 300 index fell by 0.48% [11] - Among the sub-sectors, Chongqing Bank (+15.90%), GF Securities (+8.98%), and New China Life Insurance (+12.21%) showed the best performance [11] Valuation Situation - As of October 16, 2025, the banking sector's price-to-book (PB) ratio is 0.73, with state-owned banks at 0.79, joint-stock banks at 0.62, city commercial banks at 0.73, and rural commercial banks at 0.65 [22] - The securities sector's PB ratio is 1.59, indicating potential for valuation recovery [24] - Insurance companies' price-to-earnings value (PEV) ratios are as follows: New China Life (0.74), China Pacific Insurance (0.59), Ping An (0.69), and China Life (0.72) [25] Recent Market Indicators - As of October 16, 2025, the one-year Medium-term Lending Facility (MLF) rate is 2.0%, and the one-year and five-year Loan Prime Rates (LPR) are 3.0% and 3.50%, respectively [29] - The average daily trading volume in the A-share market is 22,359.31 billion, showing a decrease of 13.57% [33] - The total social financing scale reached 437.08 trillion yuan, with a year-on-year growth of 8.7% [41] Company Announcements - New China Life Insurance expects a net profit of 29.986 billion to 34.122 billion yuan for the first three quarters of 2025, representing a year-on-year increase of 45% to 65% [45] - Shanghai Bank announced a cash dividend of 0.30 yuan per share, totaling 4.263 billion yuan [41]

Group 1 - Agricultural Bank of China (ABC) A-share price-to-book ratio (PB) reached 1 for the first time, breaking the long-standing "below book value" situation of state-owned banks [1] - As of October 17, ABC's stock price closed at 7.62 yuan, with a market capitalization of 2.67 trillion yuan, and the stock has increased over 49% year-to-date [1] - Other major state-owned banks still have PB ratios below 1, with Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) and China Construction Bank (CCB) both at 0.72, Bank of China (BOC) at 0.65, Bank of Communications (BoCom) at 0.55, and Postal Savings Bank of China (PSBC) at 0.7 [1] Group 2 - Tianfeng Securities report attributes the long-term PB ratio below 1 for banks to significant exposure of non-performing assets and ongoing pressure [2] - Market expectations of continued pressure on bank profitability contribute to the low PB ratios [2] - The growth rate of banks' net assets per share is significantly higher than that of other sectors, which negatively impacts the denominator in the PB valuation [2]

Core Viewpoint - Recent announcements from multiple banks indicate a concerted effort to clean up long-dormant accounts, which include both personal and corporate accounts, primarily targeting low-balance accounts with no recent transactions [2][5][7]. Summary by Relevant Sections Long-Dormant Account Cleanup - Banks are initiating a wave of clean-up actions for long-dormant accounts, with varying criteria for what constitutes a "long-dormant account" [2][7]. - The criteria generally include accounts that have not had any active transactions for over three years, excluding interest-related transactions [7][11]. Reasons Behind the Cleanup - The clean-up is driven by three main factors: preventing misuse of dormant accounts for illegal activities such as money laundering and fraud, optimizing resource allocation by reducing the number of inactive accounts, and complying with regulatory requirements for customer identity verification [7][14]. Variability in Standards - Different banks have established their own criteria for identifying long-dormant accounts, leading to inconsistencies across the industry [11][12]. - For example, some banks define long-dormant accounts as those with balances below 10 yuan and no transactions for over a year, while others may have different thresholds [10][12]. Expansion of Cleanup Scope - The cleanup efforts are not limited to personal accounts; some banks are also targeting corporate accounts that have been inactive for over a year [13]. - Specific criteria for corporate accounts include those that have not had any payment activities for over a year and have no outstanding loans [13]. Consumer Impact and Recommendations - The cleanup of long-dormant accounts may pose risks to consumers, such as potential fees for maintaining inactive accounts and the risk of accounts being used for fraudulent activities [10][14]. - Industry experts suggest that banks should establish clearer and more consistent criteria for account cleanup to protect consumer rights and reduce confusion [14].

Investment Rating - The report maintains a positive outlook on the banking sector, suggesting that several banks are undervalued based on their asset quality and excess provisioning metrics [4][3]. Core Insights - The valuation premium of banks typically arises from their middle-income and liability advantages, while valuation discounts are often due to concerns over asset quality [2][10]. - The report introduces two key indicators: "broad non-performing asset ratio" and "excess provisioning profit multiple" to objectively assess and compare the current asset quality status of banks [2][10]. - A total of 56 AH-listed banks are analyzed, expanding from the previous report's focus on 42 A-share listed banks, to provide a comprehensive overview of excess provisioning levels and trends [2][10]. Summary by Sections 1. Introduction: Significance of Asset Quality - The report emphasizes the importance of objectively assessing asset quality, as it significantly impacts bank valuations and performance [10]. 2. How to Objectively Assess Bank Non-Performing Assets - Traditional asset quality indicators may not accurately reflect the true provisioning situation due to inconsistent standards and incomplete coverage of assets [14]. - The report proposes a "broad non-performing asset ratio" to better capture the credit risk within banks [14][15]. 3. Construction of Excess Provisioning Profit Multiple Indicator - The excess provisioning profit multiple is constructed to measure the performance elasticity of banks, indicating their potential for future earnings recovery [7][14]. - The report highlights that banks with higher excess provisioning ratios, such as Hangzhou Bank, show strong risk mitigation capabilities [7][14]. 4. Valuation from the Perspective of Broad Excess Provisioning - The long-term correlation between bank valuation levels and ROE is noted, with excess provisioning contributing to performance and valuation improvements [3][4]. - Several banks, including Wuxi Bank and Agricultural Bank (H), are identified as being significantly above the PB-excess provisioning profit multiple regression line, indicating potential investment opportunities [3][4].