Core Viewpoint - The automotive industry is called to adhere to self-discipline and integrity, focusing on technological innovation and product quality to enhance the overall image and competitiveness of the Chinese automotive sector [1]. Group 1: Joint Statement - Li Auto, China Automotive Research, and Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor jointly advocate for strict self-discipline in product development, testing, and promotion, emphasizing the importance of integrity and ethical business practices [1]. - The statement urges the industry to focus resources on improving vehicle safety, core technological breakthroughs, and optimizing user experiences, promoting sustainable development in the automotive sector [1]. Group 2: Apologies and Clarifications - Li Auto expressed sincere apologies for any damage to brand image and misunderstandings caused to long-term supporters of Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor products, clarifying that there was no intention to question the quality and safety of their vehicles [4]. - China Automotive Research acknowledged its failure to clearly communicate the context of the testing, which led to public misunderstandings, and committed to improving its testing management mechanisms [6]. Group 3: Commitment to Quality - Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor emphasizes its commitment to high quality and reliability, focusing on continuous innovation and strengthening core technologies to provide better transportation solutions [7]. - The company asserts its dedication to resisting unfair competition and adhering to legal and compliant business practices, contributing to China's transition from a major automotive nation to a strong automotive power [7].

Core Viewpoint - The joint statement by Li Auto, China Automotive Technology and Research Center (CATARC), and Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor aims to clarify the purpose of the crash test of the Li Auto i8, emphasizing that it is to validate and enhance the vehicle's passive safety performance, not to question the safety and quality of other brands [1][4]. Group 1: Company Responses - Li Auto expressed sincere apologies for any negative impact on Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor's brand image due to the misunderstanding arising from the crash test [4]. - Li Auto committed to taking further measures to prevent similar controversies in the future [5]. - Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor reiterated its commitment to high-quality and reliable products, emphasizing its dedication to innovation and compliance with legal and ethical standards [8]. Group 2: Industry Initiatives - The three parties jointly called for the automotive industry to adhere to self-discipline, emphasizing integrity and ethical business practices in product development, testing, and promotion [9]. - They urged the industry to focus resources on enhancing vehicle safety performance, core technological innovations, and optimizing user experiences to drive industry upgrades [10]. - The parties expressed a willingness to collaborate with industry peers to build a safe, technology-driven, and integrity-based automotive ecosystem, promoting high-quality and sustainable development in the Chinese automotive industry [11].

Core Viewpoint - The joint statement by Li Auto, China Automotive Research, and Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor emphasizes the importance of maintaining integrity and professionalism in the automotive industry, particularly in safety testing and competition practices [1][10]. Group 1: Testing and Safety Performance - The purpose of the collision test for the Li Auto i8 was to verify and enhance its passive safety performance, not to evaluate the safety and quality of other brands' vehicles [2]. - China Automotive Research acknowledged that it failed to clearly communicate that the Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor's used vehicle was only used as a "mobile barrier" for specific standard requirements, leading to public misunderstanding [7]. Group 2: Industry Ethics and Competition - Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor expressed its commitment to resisting unfair competition and adhering to legal and compliant business practices, contributing to China's transition from a major automotive country to a strong automotive nation [8]. - The three parties jointly called for strict self-discipline within the automotive industry, urging adherence to integrity principles and commercial ethics, and the elimination of any form of improper competition, such as disparaging comparisons [9]. Group 3: Focus on Innovation and Quality - The industry is encouraged to focus resources on enhancing vehicle safety performance, breakthrough innovations in core technologies, and optimizing user experiences, thereby promoting industry upgrades and improving the overall image and competitiveness of the Chinese automotive sector [9].

Core Viewpoint - The joint statement by Li Auto, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, and Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor emphasizes the importance of self-discipline and integrity in the automotive industry, advocating for a focus on safety, technological innovation, and the enhancement of the industry's overall image and competitiveness [1][8][9] Group 1: Joint Statement and Industry Standards - The three parties call for strict self-discipline in product development, testing, and promotion, adhering to principles of honesty and commercial ethics, and eliminating any form of unfair competition such as disparaging comparisons [1][8] - They urge testing and certification organizations to maintain professional standards, ensuring that testing processes are scientific, rigorous, and that information released is truthful, accurate, and complete [1][8] Group 2: Incident Clarification and Apologies - The recent incident involving the crash test of the Li Auto i8 and a third-party vehicle (Dongfeng Liuzhou's brand) has sparked widespread public concern regarding the transparency of testing information and brand image protection [2] - Li Auto clarifies that the purpose of the test was to validate and enhance the passive safety performance of the i8, not to target the safety and quality of other brands [2][4] - Both China Automotive Engineering Research Institute and Li Auto acknowledge shortcomings in communication and risk assessment, leading to misunderstandings and negative publicity for Dongfeng Liuzhou [5][6] Group 3: Commitment to Improvement - China Automotive Engineering Research Institute commits to improving its testing management mechanisms and maintaining objectivity and neutrality in its evaluations to uphold industry credibility [5] - Dongfeng Liuzhou emphasizes its commitment to high quality and reliable products, focusing on continuous innovation and resisting unfair competition [6][7]

Group 1 - The automotive service sector increased by 1.34% on August 6, with Alite leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3633.99, up 0.45%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 11177.78, up 0.64% [1] - Alite's stock price rose by 6.21% to 12.49, with a trading volume of 506,500 shares and a transaction value of 618 million yuan [1] Group 2 - The automotive service sector saw a net inflow of 39.03 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors experienced a net outflow of 47.12 million yuan [2] - The trading data for other automotive service stocks showed varying performance, with Jiangyun Co. increasing by 3.34% and China Automotive Research rising by 1.03% [2] - The overall trading volume and transaction values for the automotive service stocks indicate active market participation, with total transaction values reaching billions [1][2]

过去的一周，一段1分30秒的"小车撞8吨卡车"碰撞测试破圈而出。理想i8在发布会播放的撞击视频中， 并未给乘龙卡车方向盘车标打码，这也让乘龙卡车被推上浪尖。上述检测机构人士表示，按照惯例，碰 撞试验会将对比物LOGO打码处理，不打码播出的行为实属罕见。值得一提的是，理想汽车官方视频号 仍可观看碰撞视频，但乘龙卡车方向盘上的车标已打码处理。一位接近东风汽车的相关人士告诉记者， 事件出现后，东风第一时间与理想、中国汽研进行了沟通，但彼时两家公司态度强硬，认为自身也因测 试遭到了水军等攻击，拒绝删除测试视频。交谈无果后，乘龙才发出了侵权声明。"乘龙是被牵连推上 风口浪尖的，有关部门也注意到此事，现在我们提倡'反内卷'，不想再打口水仗。"上述人士表示。 （第一财经） ...

本次论坛的成功举办，是中国汽研践行央企使命、服务国家战略的重要体现，不仅为汽车产业高质量发 展指明了方向，更凝聚了行业共识，汇聚了创新力量。中国汽研将以此次论坛为契机，继续深化与产业 链各方的合作，聚焦智能驾驶、绿色制造等关键技术领域，推动创新成果转化和标准体系建设，助力中 国汽车品牌提升国际竞争力，为建设汽车强国作出新的更大贡献。 （文章来源：证券日报） 在多方协同方面，中国经济信息社、中国汽研签署框架合作协议，共建汽车产业经济信息研究平台，整 合权威数据与技术研究资源，为行业提供精准的市场研判、政策解读和趋势预测；中宣部宣传舆情研究 中心、中国汽研成立汽车行业舆情治理办公室，政策引导与舆情治理协同发力，强化"中国智造"正面叙 事，赋能汽车产业行稳致远；中国消费品质量安全促进会、中国汽研联合筹办汽车品牌专委会，旨在扩 大产业朋友圈，以标准体系赋能测试认证，共塑品牌竞争力。这些重要协同合作，构建起"信息支撑-舆 论护航-品牌赋能"的产业生态服务体系，为汽车产业行稳致远提供了坚实支撑。 在成果发布方面，论坛集中展示了25个汽车新质生产力优秀案例，涵盖了产品创新、技术突破、产业链 协同等多个维度，代表了当前中国汽 ...

Core Viewpoint - The collision test involving a 2.61-ton SUV and an 8-ton truck has raised significant concerns regarding the safety and design of the truck, particularly focusing on the locking mechanism of the truck's cabin and the test conditions [1][6][8]. Group 1: Collision Test Details - The collision test was conducted by Li Auto and China Automotive Research, but many details remain undisclosed, leading to skepticism about the validity of the test [1][4]. - The truck involved was a second-hand Dongfeng Liuqi M3, which had been modified for the test, including weight adjustments and the installation of an autonomous driving system [8][9]. - The test speed was noted to be higher than conventional standards, with the SUV traveling at 60±2 km/h and the truck at 40±2 km/h, resulting in a relative speed of 100 km/h [8][9]. Group 2: Technical Aspects of the Truck - The truck's cabin is designed with a locking mechanism that can be either mechanical or hydraulic, with the hydraulic system being more reliable but costlier [3][4]. - If the locking mechanism is not engaged properly before a collision, the cabin can detach from the chassis, which raises questions about the truck's structural integrity [4][5]. - The test's outcome, where the truck's cabin appeared to detach, suggests that the locking mechanism may not have been engaged, which is atypical for such vehicles [4][5]. Group 3: Industry Reactions and Implications - Dongfeng Liuqi, the manufacturer of the truck, has expressed concerns over the test's execution and the subsequent public perception, emphasizing the need for transparency in the testing process [1][13]. - Li Auto's recent statements indicate a desire to distance itself from the controversy, acknowledging the unintended consequences of the test on Dongfeng Liuqi's reputation [14]. - The incident highlights the ongoing challenges in the commercial vehicle sector regarding safety standards and public trust, especially in the context of competitive marketing strategies [12][14].

Group 1 - The article discusses the public relations responses from three parties involved in a collision test incident, focusing on their strategies and actions in managing the situation [2][11] - The three parties include Li Auto, Dongfeng Truck, and China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, each with significant industry backgrounds [4][6][8] - Li Auto launched its i8 electric SUV on July 29, showcasing a collision test video with a Dongfeng Truck, which sparked public debate and scrutiny [13][14] Group 2 - The collision test video showed significant damage to the truck while Li Auto's i8 remained structurally intact, leading to mixed public reactions regarding the validity of the test results [15][19] - Public sentiment was divided into three main perspectives: belief in the test results, skepticism about the authenticity, and interest in further testing [19][20][21] - Dongfeng Truck's official social media responses included dismissive comments about the test's credibility, indicating a defensive stance against Li Auto's claims [25][26][27] Group 3 - Li Auto's public relations strategy involved continued promotion of the i8, despite the controversy, and they emphasized the role of a third-party testing agency to validate their claims [41][42][124] - China Automotive Engineering Research Institute responded to the incident by asserting the integrity of their testing process, although they were vague about specific standards used [43][129] - Dongfeng Truck issued a formal statement accusing Li Auto of infringement and misrepresentation, highlighting the potential legal implications of the incident [55][60][64] Group 4 - The ongoing public discourse has led to increased visibility for both Li Auto and Dongfeng Truck, with both companies actively engaging in social media to address concerns and promote their products [68][75] - Dongfeng Truck's marketing efforts included live streams and promotional content emphasizing their safety features, aiming to counteract negative perceptions [69][81] - The incident has highlighted the competitive dynamics within the automotive industry, particularly in the electric vehicle and commercial truck sectors, as companies navigate public relations challenges [98][104]

Core Viewpoint - The collision test involving a 2.61-ton SUV and an 8-ton truck has raised significant concerns regarding the safety and quality of the truck, particularly questioning the locking mechanism of the truck's cab and the circumstances leading to the truck being lifted off the ground during the impact [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Details - A 1 minute and 30 seconds video of the collision test has gone viral, prompting responses from both Li Auto and China Automotive Research, yet they have not addressed the most controversial aspects of the test [1]. - The truck's cab reportedly collapsed during the collision, raising questions about whether the cab was properly locked [2]. - The truck, weighing 8 tons, was lifted off the ground by a collision with a much lighter SUV, which is a significant point of concern [1]. Group 2: Company Responses - Insiders close to the truck manufacturer, Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor, indicated that the company has not received detailed data from the collision test, which hampers their ability to assess the situation [2]. - The test was reportedly designed by Li Auto and executed by China Automotive Research, but many details remain undisclosed, leading to skepticism about the validity of the test [2]. - Li Auto stated that the test was conducted according to standards, but further details from China Automotive Research were not available at the time of reporting [2].