Core Viewpoint - The recent collision test involving a 2.61-ton SUV and an 8-ton truck has raised significant concerns regarding the safety and design of the truck, particularly focusing on the locking mechanism of the truck's cabin and the test conditions [1][6][7]. Group 1: Collision Test Details - The collision test was conducted by Li Auto and China Automotive Research, but many details remain undisclosed, leading to skepticism about the validity of the test [1][3]. - The truck involved was a second-hand Dongfeng Liuqi M3, which had undergone modifications, including weight adjustments and the installation of an autonomous driving system, potentially affecting the test results [7][8]. - The test speed was noted to be higher than conventional standards, with the SUV traveling at 60±2 km/h and the truck at 40±2 km/h, resulting in a relative speed of 100 km/h [7][8]. Group 2: Technical Aspects of the Truck - The truck's cabin is designed with a locking mechanism that can be either mechanical or hydraulic, with the hydraulic system being more reliable but costlier [3][4]. - If the locking mechanism is not engaged properly before a collision, it can lead to the cabin detaching from the chassis, which is a significant safety concern [4][5]. - The incident has raised questions about the structural integrity of the truck, as it is unusual for a truck cabin to detach from the chassis during a collision with a passenger vehicle [4][6]. Group 3: Industry Reactions and Implications - Dongfeng Liuqi, the manufacturer of the truck, has expressed concerns over the lack of detailed data from the collision test, which hampers their ability to assess the situation accurately [1][2]. - The incident has sparked a public relations challenge for both Li Auto and Dongfeng Liuqi, with the latter issuing a statement emphasizing its commitment to quality and safety [11]. - The automotive industry is witnessing a trend where collision tests are used as marketing tools, which may lead to misinterpretations of vehicle safety [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The collision test involving a 2.61-ton SUV and an 8-ton truck has raised significant concerns regarding the safety and structural integrity of the truck, particularly focusing on the locking mechanism of the truck's cabin and the test conditions used [1][2][3]. Group 1: Collision Test Details - The collision test was conducted by Li Auto and China Automotive Research, but many details remain undisclosed, leading to skepticism about the validity of the test [1][3]. - The truck involved was a second-hand Dongfeng Liuqi M3, which may have had maintenance issues affecting the test results [5]. - The test speed was noted to be unusually high, with the SUV traveling at 60±2 km/h and the truck at 40±2 km/h, resulting in a relative speed of 100 km/h, exceeding conventional standards for commercial vehicle testing [5][6]. Group 2: Technical Aspects of the Truck - The truck's cabin is designed with a locking mechanism that can be either mechanical or hydraulic, with the hydraulic version being used in the M3 model [2][3]. - If the hydraulic lock is not properly engaged, even minor impacts can cause the cabin to detach from the chassis, which raises questions about the truck's design and safety features [3][4]. - The test's focus on extreme conditions is not standard for commercial vehicle safety assessments, which typically involve different parameters [6][7]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The incident has sparked a "trust crisis" for Dongfeng Liuqi, a well-established brand in the commercial vehicle sector, which has been in operation for nearly 35 years [1][9]. - The marketing strategies for commercial vehicles differ significantly from passenger vehicles, with less emphasis on dramatic safety tests, which may affect public perception [8][9]. - Li Auto's recent statements indicate a desire to distance itself from the controversy while acknowledging the impact on Dongfeng Liuqi's reputation [9].

Group 1 - The automotive service sector increased by 1.17% on August 5, with Jiaoyun Co. leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3617.6, up 0.96%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 11106.96, up 0.59% [1] - Key stocks in the automotive service sector showed various performance metrics, with Jiaoyun Co. closing at 5.69, up 3.08% [1] Group 2 - The automotive service sector saw a net inflow of 8.83 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors contributed a net inflow of 8.39 million yuan [2] - The overall net outflow from speculative funds was 17.22 million yuan [2] - Detailed stock performance indicated that Xiamen Xinda had a significant net outflow from institutional investors of 37.26 million yuan [3]

Group 1 - The unconventional collision test of the newly launched Li Auto i8 has attracted significant public attention [2] - The test was conducted by the China Automotive Engineering Research Institute (CAERI) and aimed to verify the safety of the Li Auto i8, not to evaluate the safety of other brands [2] - During the test, the Li Auto i8 collided with a Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor truck at speeds of 60±2 km/h and 40±2 km/h respectively, resulting in the truck's cabin separating from its cargo area while the i8's passenger compartment remained intact [2] Group 2 - Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor issued statements questioning the validity of the test, highlighting discrepancies in vehicle conditions and testing scenarios that could mislead consumers [2] - Li Auto responded by clarifying that the test was designed to validate the safety of its "short front suspension structure" and emphasized that there was no intention to evaluate Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor's product quality [2][3] - Li Auto highlighted the innovative safety features of the i8, including multiple energy-absorbing structures and the integrity of safety components during the test, which demonstrated the vehicle's passive safety performance [3]

Core Viewpoint - The official statements from Li Auto and China Automotive Engineering Research Institute (China Automotive Research) address the controversy surrounding the crash test video involving the Li Auto i8 and Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor's Chenglong truck, clarifying that the test was aimed at validating the safety performance of the Li i8 and not evaluating other brands' products [2][4][5]. Group 1: Test Purpose and Execution - The crash test was designed to verify and enhance the passive safety performance of the Li i8, with the test outline created by Li Auto and executed by China Automotive Research [2][4]. - The test involved a collision scenario of a small car (Li i8) against a larger vehicle (Chenglong truck), a method commonly used by major automotive manufacturers to demonstrate vehicle safety [4][5]. - The test was conducted on June 27 at the Sichuan test base, with the Li i8 colliding at a speed of 60±2 km/h and the Chenglong truck at 40±2 km/h [5]. Group 2: Response to Controversy - The delayed response from Li Auto and China Automotive Research has been criticized, as they did not address key concerns raised by Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor regarding the test conditions and vehicle status [3][7]. - Li Auto emphasized that the Chenglong truck was used merely as a movable barrier and that there was no intention to make quality assessments of the truck [5][8]. - The controversy has led to increased visibility for the Chenglong brand, with significant growth in social media followers and public support following the incident [9]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The incident highlights the potential risks associated with marketing strategies that involve crash tests, as they can inadvertently affect the reputation of other brands [6][8]. - The involvement of a state-owned enterprise like China Automotive Research adds a layer of complexity to the situation, as it navigates public perception and industry standards [9]. - The event has sparked discussions about the integrity of crash testing and the importance of transparency in the automotive industry [7][9].

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the crash test conducted by Li Auto and the subsequent reactions from involved parties highlights significant issues related to commercial ethics, legal compliance, and the competitive landscape in the automotive industry [2][4][6]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Li Auto conducted a crash test simulating real traffic scenarios, which inadvertently involved Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor's brand, leading to public controversy [2]. - Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor claims that the crash test constitutes serious infringement and misleads the public, damaging its brand reputation [2]. - China Automotive Engineering Research Institute (China Automotive Research) emphasized its commitment to scientific rigor and objectivity, while reserving the right to pursue legal action against malicious interpretations [2][3]. Group 2: Commercial Ethics - Respect for commercial ethics is crucial, encompassing honesty, fair competition, and social responsibility [4]. - Violating commercial ethics can lead to a loss of public trust, which is harder to regain compared to breaches of legal regulations [4]. - The ongoing crash test incident has heightened public attention, influencing marketing strategies and pushing boundaries of commercial ethics [4]. Group 3: Legal Compliance - The crash test videos fall under advertising law, as they serve a promotional purpose beyond standard safety testing [5]. - Non-standard tests conducted for marketing purposes are subject to advertising regulations, and any resulting damage to competitors can be considered commercial defamation under anti-unfair competition laws [5]. Group 4: Industry Competition - The automotive sector, particularly in the context of new energy vehicles, is under scrutiny for irrational competition practices [6]. - Regulatory bodies are emphasizing the importance of addressing non-rational competition in the industry, which includes not only pricing but also marketing tactics like the crash test [6]. - The crash test incident may evoke concerns about hidden forms of irrational competition, necessitating a cautious approach to such promotional activities [6].

理想汽车发布《关于理想 i8 安全性碰撞测试的说明》，对为什么要做这次测试、测试结果、事件舆论等方面进行了回应，其中对东风柳汽乘龙品牌被意外 卷入舆情争议，官方表示只是"无心之举"，并且与东风柳汽乘龙不存在直接竞争关系。 理想 i8 对撞 8 吨卡车的舆论还在发酵。 当乘龙卡车一方发出声明之后，理想汽车和第三方测试机构中国汽研在 8 月 3 日晚相继作出公开回应。 中国汽研发布声明函，对整个测试作出详细说明，表示这次测试仅验证理想 i8 的安全性，非标准车对车碰撞试验，不涉及其他品牌车辆的安全性能评价。 三方声明｜图源：官方 不过整体看下来，理想汽车和中国汽研似乎还有几点没有讲清，以至于电车通并未完全释疑。 三方争议难以休止 经过梳理，理想 i8 撞 8 吨卡车事件主要有三点质疑： 1.卡车状态、测试数据没有完全公开，结果无法让所有人信服。 2.测试状态和测试场景存在定向设计的可能性？ 3.首发视频没有给关键信息打码，后续却悄然打码，是否有"先踩后补"的意味？ 根据中国汽研发布的声明可以得出以下关键信息：理想来制定大纲，中国汽研负责执行；卡车是在市场端随机购买的，配重到 8 吨，测试过程中理想 i8 的 碰撞 ...

Core Viewpoint - The collision test between an 8-ton truck and the Li Auto i8 SUV has sparked controversy regarding its validity and the implications for automotive safety testing standards [1][3][5] Group 1: Collision Test Controversy - The test is criticized for being a non-standard vehicle-to-vehicle collision test, which does not evaluate the safety performance of other truck brands [1][3] - Concerns have been raised about the authenticity of the test scenario and the independence of the third-party testing agency [5][7] - The use of an empty truck (8 tons) in the test contrasts with the typical loaded weight of 20 tons or more in real accidents, raising questions about the energy differences in collision scenarios [5] Group 2: Statements from Involved Parties - China Automotive Technology and Research Center (CATARC) clarified that the test was solely to verify the safety of the Li Auto i8 and not to assess other brands [1][7] - Li Auto stated that the truck was merely a "mobile barrier" and that they did not intend to make quality assessments of the truck brand involved [3] - The truck manufacturer, Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor Co., emphasized that the test conditions were significantly different from real traffic situations [5] Group 3: Financial Performance of Testing Agency - CATARC reported a revenue of 4.697 billion yuan in 2023, a 14.65% increase year-on-year, with a profit of 1.14 billion yuan, also up 14% [8] - The automotive technology services segment contributed the most to revenue, generating 4.125 billion yuan, a 21.36% increase, with a gross margin of nearly 50% [9] - The revenue from new energy and intelligent connected vehicle development and testing grew by 42.86%, although its gross margin slightly decreased to 47.61% [9] Group 4: Industry Insights and Testing Practices - The automotive testing industry is under scrutiny for potentially prioritizing visually impactful test scenarios over rigorous safety evaluations [13][14] - Traditional collision tests are still conducted, but there is a growing trend for more sensational testing methods to attract consumer attention [13] - The automotive testing process involves multiple stages, including enterprise-commissioned tests and government approvals, ensuring that vehicles meet safety standards before market entry [11][12]

近期，中国汽车业经历了激烈的竞争，在一定程度上导致一些过度设计与过度营销的现象。现在， 反"内卷式"竞争的行动使得企业不能继续依靠降价赢得市场优势，有分析认为一些"测试"可能成为新的 营销方式，有的去纽北赛道刷成绩，有的测辅助驾驶系统水平，各显神通。"测试"的优势在于它能够以 直播或短视频等方式在短时间内获取流量，用视觉影像征服消费者，而不只是消费者的需求以及产品内 在品质等因素。 汽车产业目前存在两个挑战。一是产业"内卷式"竞争导致在价格不断下行过程中，一些车企通过"减 配"降低成本，可能会降低车辆安全性、耐用性与使用价值。二是我国在全球汽车产业电动化、智能 化、网联化发展中占据一定优势，随着越来越多新技术的市场化应用，使用功能变化迫切需要新的质量 安全治理体系。 降成本压力与新技术应用都会对汽车的安全质量与可靠性产生冲击。我国汽车产业正处于快速发展的关 键阶段，在追逐技术迭代的产业狂奔中，各方需要清醒地认识到，严格的检验检测是保障质量安全、提 升产业竞争力的关键环节，是保障数智时代汽车产业安全发展的生命线。如果不能制定严格的标准以及 加强检验检测，任何一个产业都难以走远。 因此，要通过专业且严格的标准制定 ...

Core Viewpoint - The collision test of the Li Auto i8, conducted by China Automotive Engineering Research Institute, has sparked controversy, particularly from the truck manufacturer Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor, which claims the test misrepresents real-world scenarios and infringes on its rights [1][3]. Group 1: Collision Test Details - The collision test aimed to validate the passive safety performance of the Li Auto i8, utilizing a "short front suspension safety structure" and various energy-absorbing structures [1]. - The test results indicated that the A and B pillars of the i8 showed no significant deformation, nine airbags deployed correctly, and there were no leaks or fire from the battery pack [1]. - The test specifically simulated a "small car colliding with a large truck" scenario, with the truck used merely as a movable barrier, not as a comparison to other brands [1][3]. Group 2: Reactions from Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor - Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor criticized the test, stating that the testing conditions significantly differ from actual traffic situations, which they argue constitutes infringement [3]. - The company has actively responded to the controversy through social media, emphasizing their safety principles and accusing the test of distorting the truth [5]. - Their social media engagement has led to a significant increase in followers and interactions, indicating heightened public interest in the issue [5]. Group 3: Impact on Li Auto - Following the test and subsequent controversy, Li Auto's stock price has experienced a decline, dropping 6.2% on the day of the i8's launch after an initial rise [8]. - As of August 1, the stock price had accumulated a total decline of 13.53% since the launch [8]. - In terms of sales performance, Li Auto has lowered its 2025 delivery target from 700,000 units to 640,000 units, with July deliveries down 39.74% year-over-year [9].