Core Viewpoint - The collision test involving Li Auto's i8 and the Chenglong truck has sparked significant public discourse, leading to responses from both companies and the China Automotive Engineering Research Institute (C-AE). The test aimed to validate the i8's passive safety performance, not to evaluate other brands' vehicles [2][4]. Group 1: Test Details - The collision test was conducted on June 27, 2025, at the Sino-German Intelligent Connected Vehicle Sichuan Test Base, focusing solely on the Li i8's safety [4]. - The test utilized a second-hand Chenglong truck as a mobile barrier, with the i8 colliding at a speed of 60±2 km/h and the truck at 40±2 km/h [4]. - Results indicated that the i8's passenger compartment showed no significant deformation, airbags deployed normally, and there were no leaks or fires from the battery pack [4][5]. Group 2: Company Responses - Li Auto emphasized that the test was not intended to target other brands and was conducted according to national standards [2]. - Chenglong truck's official statements criticized the test for not accurately reflecting real-world traffic scenarios and claimed it constituted infringement [2][7]. - C-AE clarified that the test was strictly for the i8's safety validation and did not involve safety evaluations of other vehicles [4][5]. Group 3: Market Impact - Following the test and subsequent discussions, Li Auto's stock price experienced a decline, with a drop of 13.53% by August 1, 2025, after an initial rise of 6% on the day of the i8's launch [9]. - Li Auto revised its 2025 delivery target from 700,000 units to 640,000 units, with July deliveries at 30,700 units, a 39.74% year-on-year decrease [10].

Core Viewpoint - The incident surrounding the crash test conducted by Li Auto and China Automotive Engineering Research Institute has raised significant concerns regarding commercial ethics, legal compliance, and potential unfair competition in the automotive industry [1][2][3] Group 1: Commercial Ethics - All parties involved must respect commercial ethics, which include honesty, fair competition, and social responsibility [3] - Violating commercial ethics can lead to a loss of public trust, making it difficult to regain once lost [3] - The ongoing attention on the crash test incident has blurred the lines of marketing strategies, pushing them into a gray area of commercial ethics [3] Group 2: Legal Compliance - The crash test videos fall under the category of advertising as per the current advertising law, which regulates promotional activities [4] - Non-standard tests initiated by companies for marketing purposes, rather than for internal validation, are subject to advertising law regulations [4] - The current anti-unfair competition law prohibits commercial defamation, focusing on the objective damage caused rather than the subjective intent behind actions [4] Group 3: Industry Context - The automotive industry, particularly the new energy vehicle sector, is under scrutiny for irrational competition, which could lead to severe penalties [5] - Recent government initiatives emphasize the importance of regulating irrational competition in the new energy vehicle industry [5] - The crash test incident may evoke public perceptions of irrational competition within the automotive sector, highlighting the need for caution in marketing practices [5]

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the crash test conducted by Li Auto has sparked a significant public relations battle among the involved parties, including Li Auto, Dongfeng Liuqi, and the testing agency, China Automotive Research Institute [2][3][4]. Group 1: Li Auto's Position - Li Auto stated that the crash test was commissioned to assess the safety of its i8 vehicle and did not intend to evaluate the safety of other brands, specifically Dongfeng Liuqi's truck [2][3]. - Despite claiming no intention to cause harm, Li Auto's testing process led to the identification of the truck involved, prompting a backlash from Dongfeng Liuqi [3][4]. - Li Auto is urged to issue a sincere apology and actively engage in addressing the controversy stemming from the test [3]. Group 2: Dongfeng Liuqi's Response - Dongfeng Liuqi responded to the test results by asserting that the testing conditions were not representative of real-world scenarios, and they have initiated legal procedures to address the situation [2][4]. - The company criticized the test for being misleading and questioned the integrity of the testing parameters, suggesting that the test was designed to favor Li Auto [4][5]. - Dongfeng Liuqi's official statements emphasized their commitment to quality and reliability, attempting to counter the negative publicity generated by the crash test [2][3]. Group 3: China Automotive Research Institute's Role - China Automotive Research Institute clarified that the test was not a standard vehicle-to-vehicle collision test and was solely focused on Li Auto's vehicle safety [2][4]. - The institute is expected to maintain all legal documents and test data in light of potential legal actions from Dongfeng Liuqi [4][5]. - The agency's involvement has raised questions about the transparency and credibility of the testing process, with calls for a more open and rigorous safety evaluation [4].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the safety collision tests of the Li Auto i8 and the subsequent controversy involving Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor's Chenglong trucks [1][2] - Li Auto stated that the tests were designed based on common traffic accident scenarios and were conducted by China Automotive Research Institute (CARI) [2][11] - CARI clarified that the tests were solely to verify the safety of the Li Auto i8 and did not evaluate the safety performance of other brands [3][9] Group 2 - Dongfeng Liuzhou Motor responded to the controversy, claiming that their brand was misrepresented and that the testing video was used without authorization [5][4] - The company emphasized adherence to a "real-world protection" principle in their safety systems and condemned any actions that undermine industry integrity [5][4] - Both Li Auto and CARI confirmed that the i8's passenger compartment showed no significant deformation during the tests, with airbags deploying normally and no leakage or fire from the battery pack [12][16] Group 3 - Concerns were raised regarding the testing methods, with experts noting that collisions between lighter and heavier vehicles typically result in more damage to the lighter vehicle [10][20] - CARI and Li Auto maintained that the tests were conducted under scientifically rigorous standards, with CARI being a state-owned enterprise and a recognized authority in automotive testing [13][16] - There is a suggestion from industry professionals that third-party testing should be subject to public notarization to enhance credibility [19][20]

每经记者｜孙磊 每经编辑｜裴健如 对于近期理想i8与乘龙卡车安全性碰撞测试引发的争议，理想汽车和中国汽研正式作出公开回应。 8月3日晚，理想汽车官方微博发布《关于理想i8安全性碰撞测试的说明》称，本次测试参照普通公路高频发生的交通事故情形制定测试要求，委托中国汽研 执行。"对于测试过程导致东风柳汽乘龙品牌被意外卷入舆情争议，我们实属无心之举。"理想汽车表示。 当晚，理想i8对撞试验的测试方中国汽研也发布声明函称，该测试项目仅验证理想i8车辆安全性，非标准车对车碰撞试验，不涉及其他品牌车辆的安全性能 评价。 测试是为了验证车辆安全性 值得一提的是，在此次测试引发争议后，乘龙卡车方面在7月31日进行了首次公开的正式回应。当晚，据乘龙卡车微信公众号，东风柳州汽车有限公司（以 下简称东风柳汽）发表声明，回应某品牌对撞乘龙卡车测试。 该声明提到，"某品牌未经授权使用并扭曲传播乘龙卡车碰撞测试视频，已构成严重侵权，超过正常商业竞争范畴；乘龙卡车安全体系严格遵循'真实场景防 护'原则；东风柳汽作为央国企，坚决反对任何通过贬损同业、恶意攀比等破坏行业生态的行为"。 图片来源：乘龙卡车微信公众号 关于此次测试，理想汽车在8月3 ...

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the testing of the new i8 model by Li Auto, which resulted in a dramatic crash scenario, has raised questions about the integrity and commercial practices of third-party automotive testing institutions in China, particularly China Automotive Research (China Qi Yan) [1] Group 1: Company Background - China Automotive Research, formerly known as Chongqing Automotive Research Institute, was officially listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange in June 2012, with a major shareholder being China Certification & Inspection Group Co., Ltd., which holds approximately 53% of the shares [1] - China Certification & Inspection Group was established in 1980 and is a central enterprise managed by the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council [1] Group 2: Testing Practices - The testing conducted for Li Auto's i8 was described as a commissioned project by China Qi Yan, indicating that most automotive testing institutions engage in similar commercial practices, which are tailored to client specifications rather than standardized testing protocols [1] - The term "one enterprise, one policy" is used to describe the customized nature of these tests, suggesting a lack of fixed standards in the collision tests conducted [1] Group 3: Ethical Concerns - There are concerns regarding whether the commercial interests of third-party automotive testing institutions could compromise their impartiality and the establishment of a scientific and fair evaluation system within the automotive industry [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the commercial operations and ethical concerns surrounding China Automotive Research (中国汽研), particularly in light of a controversial testing incident involving Li Auto's new model i8, raising questions about the integrity of third-party automotive testing institutions [1] Group 1: Company Overview - China Automotive Research, formerly known as Chongqing Automotive Research Institute, was officially listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange in June 2012 after several restructuring and renaming efforts [1] - The major shareholder of China Automotive Research is China Certification & Inspection Group Co., Ltd., which holds approximately 53% of the shares and is a central enterprise managed by the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council [1] Group 2: Incident Details - The incident involved a testing video where a truck was dramatically struck by an SUV, leading to public outcry and scrutiny of the testing methods employed by China Automotive Research [1] - Both China Automotive Research and Li Auto issued statements clarifying that the testing was based on typical traffic accident scenarios on public roads, emphasizing adherence to established testing guidelines [1] Group 3: Ethical Concerns - The article raises critical questions about how a third-party testing institution, backed by a state-owned enterprise, can maintain impartiality in its commercial operations [1] - It highlights the need for a scientific and fair evaluation system within the automotive testing industry, particularly in balancing commercial interests with ethical standards [1]

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the Ideal i8 vehicle colliding with a truck has raised significant public concern regarding the integrity and scientific validity of automotive testing conducted by third-party institutions like China Automotive Research (CARS) [1][8] Group 1: Incident and Response - The collision test video showing the Ideal i8 causing a truck to "fly" has sparked widespread debate about the realism and physics of such outcomes [1] - Both CARS and Ideal Automotive issued statements clarifying that the test was designed based on common traffic accident scenarios [1] Group 2: Testing Procedures - The collision tests are typically customized projects where the manufacturer specifies the testing requirements, leading to a lack of standardized procedures [2][4] - Preparations for these tests involve multiple steps, including site selection and equipment setup, requiring collaboration between the manufacturer and the testing agency [2][3] Group 3: Market Dynamics - CARS has developed commercial testing projects like SUPER CRASH, which are utilized by various automotive manufacturers to validate safety features [5][6] - The pricing for these tests varies significantly based on complexity, with costs ranging from hundreds of thousands to millions of yuan [6] Group 4: Credibility Challenges - The intertwining of commercial interests and testing integrity poses challenges to the credibility of third-party testing agencies, as they must balance business sustainability with impartiality [7][8] - The recent Ideal i8 incident has highlighted the potential for misleading results that could distort public perception of vehicle safety [8] Group 5: Industry Trends - The automotive testing industry is expanding, particularly in the realm of intelligent driving assessments, driven by regulatory changes and market demand [9][10] - There is a growing need for a comprehensive and scientifically valid evaluation system for intelligent driving technologies, as current methods may not adequately reflect real-world performance [10]

Market Overview - On August 4, the automotive service sector rose by 0.7%, with Jiaoyun Co., Ltd. leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3583.31, up 0.66%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 11041.56, up 0.46% [1] Stock Performance - Jiaoyun Co., Ltd. (600676) closed at 5.52, with a gain of 5.75% and a trading volume of 496,500 shares, amounting to 266 million yuan [1] - China Automotive Research (601965) closed at 19.46, up 0.57%, with a trading volume of 73,800 shares, totaling 144 million yuan [1] - Other notable stocks include: - Zhongqi Co., Ltd. (301215) at 6.18, up 0.32% [1] - Alter (300825) at 11.74, up 0.26% [1] - Shanghai Material Trade (600822) at 11.99, up 0.25% [1] Capital Flow - The automotive service sector saw a net inflow of 13.82 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors experienced a net outflow of 17.47 million yuan [2] - The main capital flow details include: - Jiaoyun Co., Ltd. had a net inflow of 27.98 million yuan from institutional investors [3] - National Machinery Automotive (600335) saw a net inflow of 4.11 million yuan [3] - Xiamen Xinda (000701) experienced a net outflow of 13.48 million yuan from institutional investors [3]

Core Viewpoint - The collision test of the Li Auto i8 conducted by China Automotive Research (China汽研) is aimed solely at verifying the vehicle's safety and does not involve safety evaluations of other brands [1][5][6]. Group 1: Test Details - The test was designed based on typical traffic accident scenarios on ordinary roads, with a focus on high-frequency accident conditions [5][6]. - A second-hand Dongfeng Liuzhou brand truck was used as a mobile barrier for the test, which was randomly purchased from the market [1][5]. - The Li Auto i8 underwent inspection and verification before the test, and the mobile barrier truck was modified and weighted to 8 tons [5]. Group 2: Company Statements - Li Auto emphasized that the purpose of the test was to validate and enhance the passive safety performance of the i8, not to evaluate the quality of other brands [6]. - The company clarified that it does not intend to make quality assessments of the Dongfeng Liuzhou brand truck and that there is no direct competition between Li Auto and Dongfeng Liuzhou [6]. Group 3: Public Reaction and Controversy - Following the test, there was significant public attention, particularly regarding the identification of the truck brand involved in the collision [7][10]. - Dongfeng Liuzhou responded to the controversy by releasing their own collision test video, highlighting the safety features of their trucks [7][10]. - The truck brand's social media platforms received numerous comments from users expressing concerns about the safety implications of the test [10][12].