关于《上海概伦电子股份有限公司股票交易 异常波动问询函》的回函 上海概伦电子股份有限公司： 第一大股东(盖章):KLProTech H.K. Eimited 2025年6月3日 二、截至目前，本单位不存在处于筹划阶段的涉及贵公司的重大事项，包括但 不限于并购重组、股份发行、债务重组、业务重组、资产剥离和资产注入等重大 事项； 三、在本次股票交易异常波动期间，本单位不存在买卖贵公司股票的情形。 特此函复。 （本页以下无正文） (本页无正文,为《关于<上海概伦电子股份有限公司股票交易异常波动问 询函>的回函》之盖章页) 贵公司发出的《上海概伦电子股份有限公司股票交易异常波动问询函》已收 悉，经认真自查核实，现将有关问题回复如下： 一、截至目前，本单位不存在涉及贵公司的应披露而未披露的重大信息； ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent BIS requirement for EDA companies to suspend all business with Chinese clients is significant, but its actual impact may be limited due to the presence of numerous domestic EDA companies in China [1][4]. Group 1: EDA Market Overview - The global EDA market is dominated by three major companies, which account for over 70% of the market share, and even more than 80% in China [1][2]. - Despite the dominance of these three companies, there are over 60 domestic EDA companies in China, which is a surprising number that exceeds the total number of global EDA firms [2][3]. Group 2: Challenges for Domestic EDA - Domestic EDA tools have been developed, but their usability and effectiveness remain questionable, particularly in advanced process nodes [2][3]. - The EDA industry faces a paradox where tools that are less used tend to be of lower quality, making it difficult for new entrants to improve their offerings without substantial industry adoption [3][4]. Group 3: Implications of BIS Regulations - The BIS regulations could provide an opportunity for domestic EDA companies to gain traction as fabless companies in China may have no choice but to use local tools [4][5]. - However, the complete reliance on domestic technology without the ability to utilize imported technology could lead to significant setbacks for the Chinese semiconductor industry [5][6]. Group 4: Current State of Semiconductor Production - The current ability to design and produce chips in China relies heavily on imported equipment and materials, indicating that a complete decoupling from foreign technology is not feasible at this time [6][7]. - The use of imported EDA tools is critical for the success of Chinese fabless companies, as they require close collaboration with foundries for design verification [6][7]. Group 5: Long-term Concerns - There is a growing concern that the window for utilizing foreign technology is closing, which could pose a significant risk if domestic capabilities do not catch up in time [9][10]. - The industry must accelerate the development of domestic technologies while also finding ways to extend the use of imported technologies as long as possible [9][10].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant impact of the EDA supply ban initiated by the Trump administration, highlighting the contrasting perspectives within the industry regarding the capabilities of domestic EDA tools and the challenges faced in achieving true competitiveness against established international giants [1][3]. Group 1: Market Position and Performance - The current market share of domestic EDA tools is only 11.5%, primarily in areas like analog circuits and yield testing, with a less than 30% localization rate for core digital chip design tools [5]. - Major international EDA companies like Synopsys and Cadence have seen substantial market capital losses, with Synopsys losing approximately $8.2 billion and Cadence about $8 billion in a single day, reflecting the volatility and sensitivity of the market [6][7]. - The revenue of Synopsys for 2024 is projected at $5.3 billion (approximately 38.3 billion RMB), while the revenue of domestic leader Huada Jiutian is only 1.22 billion RMB, representing just 3.2% of Synopsys' revenue [13]. Group 2: Challenges in Domestic EDA Development - Domestic EDA tools are reported to have longer verification cycles and lower yield rates compared to their international counterparts, with one engineer noting that using domestic tools for 28nm chip design resulted in a verification cycle three times longer than Synopsys and a 15% lower yield [6]. - The profitability of domestic EDA companies is significantly lower, with Synopsys achieving a net profit margin of 36.5%, while Huada Jiutian barely breaks even, indicating a substantial gap in operational efficiency and market trust [13][14]. - The domestic EDA industry is fragmented, with over 120 companies competing for a market worth 15.3 billion RMB, yet more than half of these companies report annual revenues of less than 10 million RMB, highlighting the challenges of scale and consolidation [17]. Group 3: Acquisition and Growth Strategies - The article emphasizes the importance of mergers and acquisitions in the EDA industry, noting that the top three international companies have completed over 270 acquisitions to build their competitive edge [16]. - Domestic leaders like Huada Jiutian and Gekun Electronics are struggling to grow through acquisitions, with their recent efforts yielding limited success compared to the scale of acquisitions by international giants [14][17]. - The integration of acquired tools and technologies poses significant risks, as compatibility and feature matching are critical for successful toolchain integration, which can take 3-5 years, a timeline that many smaller companies cannot afford [17].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) has mandated that major American EDA companies, Synopsys and Cadence, cease supplying EDA software tools to Chinese companies, particularly those identified as "military end users" [2][4][7]. Group 1: Company Responses - Synopsys announced it received a notification from BIS regarding new export restrictions and is currently assessing the potential impact on its business and financial performance [2]. - Cadence confirmed it must obtain licenses for exporting EDA software to Chinese entities, especially those linked to military applications, as per BIS guidelines [4]. - Siemens EDA has also reportedly received similar notifications and is verifying EDA software needs with its Chinese clients [4]. Group 2: Market Impact - The new restrictions affect the three major EDA companies, which collectively hold over 80% of the Chinese market share, leading to a significant supply disruption for new products [5]. - Following the announcements, shares of U.S. EDA firms like Cadence and Synopsys fell by over 10%, while domestic EDA companies in China, such as Huada Empyrean and GY Electronics, saw stock increases of 15% and 20%, respectively [5]. Group 3: Industry Context - The global EDA software market was valued at approximately $13.437 billion in 2022, with a projected growth to $14.526 billion in 2023. In China, the EDA market was about 11.56 billion yuan in 2022, expected to reach 13.05 billion yuan in 2023 [6]. - Synopsys and Cadence hold 32% and 29% of the global EDA market, respectively, while their combined revenue from the Chinese market is projected to exceed 10 billion yuan in the 2024 fiscal year [6]. Group 4: Domestic EDA Development - The Chinese EDA ecosystem is still developing, with the number of domestic EDA companies increasing from 10 to over 120 in the past five years. The domestic EDA market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of over 14% from 2021 to 2025 [12][16]. - Domestic EDA firms are actively pursuing mergers and acquisitions to enhance their capabilities and market presence, with notable transactions announced by Huada Empyrean and GY Electronics [12][16]. Group 5: Government and Regulatory Actions - The U.S. government has intensified export controls on EDA software, particularly targeting companies like Huawei and SMIC, which are on the entity list, thereby pushing China to accelerate the development of its own EDA tools [11][17]. - The Chinese government has expressed concerns over the U.S. export restrictions, stating that such actions threaten the stability of the global semiconductor supply chain and could ultimately harm U.S. industry competitiveness [17].

Core Viewpoint - The A-share EDA (Electronic Design Automation) companies experienced a significant stock price increase, indicating a positive market sentiment towards the sector amid ongoing developments in the industry [1]. Industry Overview - The EDA industry is highly concentrated, dominated by three major players: Cadence, Synopsys, and Siemens EDA, which hold a significant competitive advantage [4]. - Chinese companies like Huada Jiutian, Gai Lun Electronics, and Guangliwei are emerging as key players, with Huada Jiutian focusing on comprehensive digital EDA solutions, Gai Lun Electronics specializing in analog circuit design, and Guangliwei concentrating on EDA verification tools [5][6]. - The domestic EDA market is witnessing a push for localization, driven by the need for independent EDA tools due to restrictions on software access [4]. Mergers and Acquisitions - The trend of mergers and acquisitions is prevalent in the EDA industry, with nearly 300 acquisitions occurring over the past 30 years, highlighting the importance of consolidation for growth [5]. - Huada Jiutian and Gai Lun Electronics have initiated their own acquisition strategies to enhance their capabilities and market position [6]. - Gai Lun Electronics' acquisition of Ruicheng Semiconductor is expected to strengthen its IP layout and improve product development efficiency [6]. Competitive Landscape - The primary gap between domestic EDA firms and international leaders lies in the lack of a full-process capability and weaknesses in certain areas, such as system-level EDA tools and high-end IP library development [7]. - The domestic EDA companies are expected to gradually catch up in specific segments, but overall integration and consolidation will be necessary to close the gap with global leaders [7].

Macro Dynamics - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce urges the U.S. to completely eliminate unilateral tariffs, emphasizing that trade wars have no winners and protectionism leads to negative outcomes [1] - The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs firmly opposes the U.S. decision to unjustly cancel Chinese student visas, stating it harms the legitimate rights of Chinese students and disrupts normal cultural exchanges between the two countries [2] Market Data - On May 29, the A-share market saw the ChiNext Index rise by 1.37%, with significant gains in digital currency and EDA concepts, as well as autonomous driving and innovative drug sectors [7] - The total market turnover reached 1.2 trillion yuan, an increase from the previous day's 1 trillion yuan, with over 4,400 stocks rising [7] - As of May 28, the total margin balance in the two markets increased by 2.95 billion yuan, with the Shanghai Stock Exchange's margin balance at 909.99 billion yuan and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange's at 883.23 billion yuan [8] Company Dynamics - Tesla's CEO Elon Musk announced that the Model Y autonomous driving vehicle will be delivered to customers in June, with successful testing on public roads in Austin [10] - Ideal Auto reported a total revenue of 25.9 billion yuan for Q1 2025, a year-on-year increase of 1.1%, and a net profit of 647 million yuan, up 9.4% year-on-year, with total vehicle deliveries of 92,900 units, reflecting a 15.5% increase [12]

Market Overview - The A-share market experienced an overall increase on May 29, with the Shanghai Composite Index closing at 3363.45 points, up 0.7%, the Shenzhen Component Index at 10127.2 points, up 1.24%, and the ChiNext Index at 2012.55 points, up 1.37%. The North Star 50 Index rose by 2.73%. Total trading volume reached 12136.01 billion yuan, an increase of 1795.28 billion yuan compared to the previous trading day [1]. Capital Flow - The net inflow of main funds in the A-share market was 74.33 billion yuan, with an opening net outflow of 19.58 billion yuan and a closing net inflow of 23.89 billion yuan [2]. - The net inflow for the CSI 300 was 12.91 billion yuan, while the ChiNext saw a net inflow of 42.65 billion yuan, and the STAR Market experienced a net outflow of 17.3 billion yuan [4]. Sector Performance - Among the 23 sectors, the computer industry led with a net inflow of 191.73 billion yuan, followed by the electronics sector with 124.39 billion yuan, and the pharmaceutical and biological sector with 112.04 billion yuan. The non-bank financial sector saw a net inflow of 47.51 billion yuan, while the communication sector had 34.87 billion yuan [6][7]. - The sectors with the largest net outflows included food and beverage with -21.56 billion yuan, basic chemicals with -12.02 billion yuan, and banking with -8.89 billion yuan [7]. Individual Stock Activity - The stock with the highest net inflow was Shanzhi Gaoke, with 7.11 billion yuan [8]. - Institutional investors showed significant interest in several stocks, with Wangzi New Materials receiving a net buy of 41.11 million yuan, and Sifang Precision receiving 36.17 million yuan [11][12]. Institutional Focus - Recent institutional ratings highlighted several stocks, including Huichuan Technology with a target price of 73.00 yuan, indicating an upside potential of 8.83%, and Longying Precision with a target price of 24.70 yuan, suggesting a 19.73% upside [14].

证券代码：688206 证券简称：概伦电子 上海概伦电子股份有限公司 2024 年年度股东大会会议资料 二○二五年六月 目 录 | 上海概伦电子股份有限公司 | | 2024 年年度股东大会会议须知 | 2 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | 上海概伦电子股份有限公司 2024 | 年年度股东大会会议议程 | 4 | | 议案一 | 关于审议公司《2024 年年度报告》及其摘要的议案 | | 6 | | 议案二 | 关于审议公司 年度董事会工作报告的议案 2024 | | 7 | | 议案三 | 关于审议公司 2024 年度监事会工作报告的议案 | | 8 | | 议案四 | 关于审议公司 年度财务决算报告的议案 2024 | | 9 | | 议案五 | 关于审议公司续聘 2025 年度会计师事务所的议案 | | 10 | | 议案六 | 关于审议公司 年度利润分配方案的议案 2024 | | 11 | | 议案七 | 关于确认公司董事 2024 年度薪酬及审议 2025 | 年度薪酬方案的议案 | 13 | | 议案八 | 关于确认公司监事 年度薪酬及审议 2024 2025 | ...

本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性依法承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 现金红利总额：由 12,978,938.25 元（含税）调整为 13,016,333.49 元（含 税）。 本次调整原因： 证券代码：688206 证券简称：概伦电子 公告编号：2025-034 上海概伦电子股份有限公司 关于调整 2024 年年度利润分配现金分红总额的 公 告 公司将按照维持每股分配比例不变的原则，对 2024 年年度利润分配现金分 红总额进行相应调整。 一、 调整前利润分配方案内容 公司于 2025 年 4 月 29 日召开第二届董事会第十二次会议及第二届监事会第 十一次会议，分别审议通过了《关于审议公司 2024 年度利润分配方案的议案》， 公司 2024 年度拟以实施权益分派股权登记日登记的总股本扣减公司回购专用证 券账户中的股份数后的股本为基数分配利润，向全体股东每 10 股派发现金红利 0.3 元（含税），不进行资本公积转增股本，不送红股。截至 2025 年 4 月 29 日， 公司总股本为 433,931,345 股，扣除回购专用 ...

Market Performance - The A-share market showed strong performance today, with the Shanghai Composite Index closing at 3363.45 points, up 0.7%, the Shenzhen Component Index at 10127.2 points, up 1.24%, and the ChiNext Index at 2012.55 points, up 1.37% [1] Technology Sector Highlights - The EDA concept and automotive sectors were the main drivers of market enthusiasm, with the EDA sector seeing an overall increase of over 6%, and several stocks like Gexun Electronics hitting the daily limit [2] - The autonomous driving concept also performed well, with stocks like Yunnei Power and Tongda Electric achieving consecutive gains [2] Market Drivers 1. **Policy Support and Liquidity** - The central bank conducted a 266 billion yuan reverse repurchase operation, injecting 111.5 billion yuan into the market, which supports liquidity [3] - Recent financial policy measures include a 0.5% reduction in the reserve requirement ratio and a 0.1% cut in policy rates [3] 2. **Easing Trade Tensions** - A U.S. court ruling against Trump's tariff policy has alleviated global trade tensions, positively impacting market risk appetite [4] 3. **Optimized Fund Structure** - Funds are shifting from banking sectors back to small and medium-sized enterprises, with significant inflows into the electronics sector [5] - Domestic capital flow reversed after a period of outflows, providing momentum for market rebound [5] Future Outlook - Regulatory support is expected to stabilize market expectations, with long-term funds from state-owned entities likely to support the A-share market [6] - A potential rebound in thematic concepts is anticipated in June, following a rotation in market sectors [6]