因刹车失灵问题 福特汽车将在美国召回超27万辆汽车 智通财经5月14日电，美国国家公路交通安全管理局（NHTSA）表示，福特汽车将在美国召回273789辆 汽车，原因是刹车功能失灵可能会增加车祸风险。美国国家公路交通安全管理局补充表示，此次召回涉 及部分2022-2024年款Navigator和Expedition汽车。 ...

美国国家公路交通安全管理局：福特汽车(F.N)召回273,789辆美国车辆，因制动功能丧失增加了发生碰 撞的风险。 ...

福特汽车公司在美国召回27.38万辆汽车。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Ford's strategy in China has shifted from ambitious growth plans to a more conservative approach focused on profitability, with recent signs of recovery in 2024 after years of losses [5][6][23]. Group 1: Strategic Shifts and Performance - In 2017, Ford announced its "China 2025 Plan," aiming to launch over 50 new models by the end of 2025, including 8 new SUVs and at least 15 electric vehicles [1][2]. - After six years of declining sales and losses, Ford China finally achieved profitability in 2024, earning $600 million, a significant turnaround from a $1.1 billion loss in 2018 [6][20]. - Ford's global revenue reached $176.2 billion, with the Ford Blue segment (traditional vehicles) generating $101.9 billion in revenue and $5.3 billion in profit, while the electric vehicle segment (Model e) reported $3.9 billion in revenue but a loss of $5.1 billion [7][13]. Group 2: Market Adaptation and Challenges - Ford's recent profitability in China is attributed to a strategic shift towards high-margin products and a reduction in low-margin offerings, focusing on personalized models [14][15]. - The company has leveraged its partnerships with Changan and Jiangling to establish China as a global export hub, with a 60% increase in exports in 2024, totaling 170,000 vehicles [16][17]. - Despite the positive performance, Ford faces challenges due to potential trade wars and tariffs, which could jeopardize its export strategy and profitability [4][22]. Group 3: Future Directions and Recommendations - Ford must accelerate local R&D efforts to develop a robust vehicle platform in China, addressing the unique preferences of Chinese consumers [29]. - The company needs to enhance its electric vehicle strategy, moving beyond a few imported models to a comprehensive platform that caters to the A and B segments [29]. - Ford's commercial vehicle segment remains a potential growth area, with opportunities to digitize fleet management and enhance after-sales services [30]. Group 4: Brand Perception and Market Position - Ford's brand image among younger consumers is mixed, necessitating a comprehensive rebranding strategy to resonate with the under-30 demographic [31]. - The competitive landscape in China is increasingly challenging, with local brands advancing rapidly in technology and pricing, leaving Ford at risk of falling behind [37]. - The year 2025 will be critical for Ford to demonstrate its ability to adapt and thrive in the Chinese market, moving beyond mere survival to a more aggressive market presence [38][40].

Group 1: Global Automotive Market Overview - In Q1 2025, global automotive sales reached 22.64 million units, a 5% increase year-on-year, surpassing 2019 levels [2] - New energy vehicle (NEV) sales reached 4.46 million units, with a penetration rate rising from 13% in 2022 to 19% [2] - The Chinese market holds nearly 70% of the global NEV market share, intensifying competition among automakers [2] Group 2: Traditional Automakers Performance - A series of consumer stimulus policies led to a positive start for the automotive industry in Q1 2025, with many companies reporting net profit growth [3] - BYD, SAIC Motor, Great Wall Motors, and Changan Automobile accounted for over 70% of total revenue among listed automakers, with their net profits making up over 90% of the total net profit of 25 A-share listed companies [3] Group 3: BYD's Strong Growth - BYD achieved revenue of 170.36 billion yuan, a 36.35% year-on-year increase, and net profit of 9.15 billion yuan, up 100.38% [4] - BYD's sales exceeded 1 million units in Q1, marking a 59.81% increase year-on-year [4] - R&D expenses reached 14.22 billion yuan, accounting for 8.35% of total revenue [4] Group 4: SAIC Motor's Recovery - SAIC Motor sold 945,000 vehicles in Q1, a 13.3% increase, with NEV sales reaching 272,900 units, up nearly 30% [5] - The company reported revenue of 140.86 billion yuan, a slight decline of 1.55%, and net profit of 3.02 billion yuan, up 11.4% [5] Group 5: Changan Automobile's Performance - Changan's net profit reached 1.353 billion yuan, a 16.81% increase, while its non-recurring net profit surged 601.31% to 783 million yuan [5] - The company delivered 705,200 vehicles, a 2% increase, with NEV sales growing 62% to 87,000 units [5] Group 6: Geely's Profit Forecast - Geely expects Q1 net profit between 5.2 billion to 5.8 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 220% to 270% [6] - The company reported total sales of 946,600 units, a 31% increase, with NEV sales reaching 339,200 units, up 135% [6] Group 7: Great Wall Motors' Struggles - Great Wall Motors reported revenue of 40.02 billion yuan, a 6.63% decline, and net profit of 1.751 billion yuan, down 45.6% [6] - The company’s overall sales fell 6.73% to 256,800 units, with significant declines in several brands [7] Group 8: GAC Group's Decline - GAC Group's Q1 sales totaled 371,200 units, down 9.42%, with NEV sales declining 6.46% to 66,800 units [8] - The company reported revenue of 19.879 billion yuan, a 7.82% decline, and a net loss of 731 million yuan [8] Group 9: New Energy Vehicle Startups - New energy vehicle startups are increasingly focused on achieving profitability, with companies like Li Auto and Zeekr making significant strides [10][11] - Li Auto delivered 92,900 vehicles in Q1, while Zeekr reported a 162.1% increase in deliveries to 87,600 units [10][11] Group 10: International Automakers' Challenges - International automakers face challenges from tariffs and declining profits, with Volkswagen reporting a 37% drop in operating profit [16][17] - Mercedes-Benz and BMW also experienced significant profit declines, with net profits down 43% and 26.4%, respectively [17][18] Group 11: General Motors' Performance in China - General Motors reported a 53.2% increase in NEV sales in China, maintaining a positive growth trend in the market [19] - Despite challenges, GM's Chinese operations achieved profitability in Q1 [19] Group 12: Tesla's Declining Profitability - Tesla's Q1 automotive revenue fell 19.6% to $13.967 billion, with net profit down 71% [20] - The company's global vehicle deliveries reached approximately 336,700 units, the lowest since Q4 2022 [20]

Group 1 - BYD reported a value of 1583.74 with a decrease of 10.36, indicating a decline in performance [2] - Ferrari's value stands at 867.42, showing a slight decrease of 2.7 [2] - Volkswagen experienced an increase of 7.49, reaching a value of 570.91 [2] - Mercedes-Benz reported a value of 565.48, with a significant increase of 19.12 [2] Group 2 - BMW's value is 560.88, reflecting an increase of 12.66 [3] - Porsche's value is 483.99, with an increase of 7.2 [3] - General Motors reported a value of 476.97, showing a notable increase of 20.28 [3] - Mahindra Automotive's value is 438.87, with an increase of 17.33 [3] - Honda's value stands at 435.85, reflecting an increase of 6.48 [3] - Ford's value is 419.53, with an increase of 10.75 [3] - Hyundai's value is 337.81 [3] - Tata Motors reported a value of 312.69, with an increase of 5.35 [3] - Stellantis' value is 301.59, reflecting an increase of 18.43 [3] - Li Auto's value is 284.75, with an increase of 17.55 [3] - SAIC Motor's value stands at 267.71, reflecting an increase of 2.73 [3] - Kia's value is 263.74, with an increase of 3.1 [3] - Suzuki's value is 245.79, showing an increase of 10.9 [3] - Geely's value is 240.91, reflecting a decrease of 4.67 [3] - Great Wall Motors reported a value of 239.73, with a slight decrease of 0.1 [3] - Xpeng Motors' value is 202.01, reflecting an increase of 14.25 [3] Group 3 - Renault's value is 153.69, with a slight increase of 0.73 [4] - Changan Automobile reported a value of 150.77, reflecting a minor decrease of 0.24 [4] - Subaru's value stands at 140.06, with an increase of 4.92 [4] - GAC Group's value is 115.22, reflecting an increase of 0.99 [4] - NIO's value is 94.59, with an increase of 5.18 [4] - VinFast Auto reported a value of 87.71, reflecting an increase of 0.7 [4] - Nissan's value stands at 84.45, with an increase of 2.62 [4] - Zeekr's value is 73.18, reflecting an increase of 1.78 [4]

ATLANTA, May 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- nuVizz, a leading innovator in last-mile transportation management solutions (TMS), will present alongside Ford Motor Company at Home Delivery World 2025, one of North America's premier logistics and supply chain conferences. This session will provide a behind-the- scenes look at how nuVizz's specialized last-mile TMS is streamlining one of the most expensive aspects of Ford's logistics operations, creating a more innovative and efficient Dealer Delivery Service (DD ...

据德国德新社援引工会消息称，福特汽车(F.N)科隆工厂的工人将于周三举行罢工。 ...

Group 1: Overview of Companies - Ford Motor Company, Target, and Pfizer are all components of the S&P 500, offering dividends above 4%, with some exceeding 5%, and are trading at least 30% below their 52-week highs [1][2] - These companies are currently out of favor in the market, presenting potential investment opportunities for long-term holders [2] Group 2: Ford Motor Company - Ford's stock has fallen 31% from its summer high, reflecting a decline in investor sentiment despite positive revenue growth in the years following the pandemic [3][4] - In the latest quarterly update, Ford reported a 5% revenue decline to $40.7 billion, but exceeded profit expectations by earning $0.14 per share, significantly beating analyst forecasts [5] - The company suspended forward guidance due to trade war uncertainties, anticipating a $2.5 billion hit on adjusted earnings before interest and taxes from tariffs, while aiming for $1 billion in cost savings [6] - The average age of passenger cars on the road is a record 14 years, indicating strong demand for auto sales, with Ford's nearly 6% yield closely aligned with projected free cash flow [7] Group 3: Target - Target has experienced sales declines in four of the past seven quarters, with its stock down 42% from its August peak, indicating a lack of resonance with investors [8] - The company is well-positioned for economic downturns due to its non-discretionary grocery items and strong private-label sales, with a 4.6% dividend that appears safe in the near term [9] Group 4: Pfizer - Pfizer's 7.6% yield raises concerns about its product pipeline, as key products are coming off patent and competition is increasing, leading to expected revenue declines over the next five years [11][12] - Despite challenges, Pfizer has the potential to succeed with new treatments or through acquisitions, although its streak of 16 consecutive years of dividend hikes may be at risk if profits do not recover [12]

Group 1 - The stock market has shown a recovery in April despite concerns regarding tariffs, chip export restrictions, and recession fears [1] - Automaker Ford has benefited from the stock market rebound [1]