加拿大的外交策略发生了明显的转变：从曾经与盟友一同对中国实施围堵，到如今主动寻求与中国的合 作。最近，加拿大总理卡尼在东盟峰会前公开表示，中国是加拿大的重要战略伙伴，并且表示希望能与 中国高层进行会面。这一言论让许多人感到十分意外，因为过去，加拿大在美国对中国实施限制措施 时，通常都是第一个站队支持美国的。 然而，令人更加惊讶的是，卡尼的表态才刚一出来，特朗普就急忙发布声明，宣布终止与加拿大的所有 贸易谈判。美国这一举动让人有些摸不清楚究竟是因为担忧，还是单纯的出于某种情绪反应？ 实际上，加拿大的举动并不是突发的冲动，而是经济压力下的理性选择。过去，加拿大和美国一起对中 国征收关税，还曾对中国的电动汽车实施限制，原本以为能因此获利，却反而自己陷入困境。加拿大的 油菜籽，原本是中国市场的重要商品，但如今中国开始转向巴西和乌克兰采购，导致加拿大的36亿斤油 菜籽积压在仓库里，无法售出。这使得西部的四万多农户遭遇了严重的经济损失，日子变得难以维系。 加拿大全面跟随美国对中国采取行动，这样的做法显然是失误。中国作为全球155个国家和地区的最大 贸易伙伴，显然是一个不容忽视的重要市场。即便加拿大与美国保持紧密关系，也不 ...

在和平与安全问题上，中国是纪录最好的大国，中国坚持走和平发展道路，坚定奉行防御性国防政策， 始终把自身的核力量维持在国家安全需要的最低水平。七国集团对美核裁军特殊优先责任和美英澳三边 安全伙伴关系造成核扩散风险避而不谈，还拿中国说事，这是典型的是非不分。 中国对出口管制体系进行规范和完善，符合国际通行做法，目的是更好地维护世界和平与地区稳定，履 行国际义务。所谓"中国产能过剩和非市场行为"已被事实证明是伪命题，完全不值一驳。七国集团应停 止将经贸问题政治化、武器化，以免破坏国际经济秩序和全球产供链。 中方再次敦促七国集团，认清世界大势，摒弃冷战思维和意识形态偏见，停止操弄涉华议题、干涉中国 内政，多做有利于国际社会团结合作的事。(完) 林剑：你提到了七国集团外长会联合声明，我在这里做一个总体的回应。七国集团外长会联合声明再次 罔顾事实、颠倒黑白，蓄意污蔑抹黑中国，粗暴干涉中国内政。中方对此强烈不满，坚决反对。 台湾问题纯属中国内政，如何解决台湾问题是中国人自己的事，不容任何外部干涉。当前东海、南海的 局势总体保持稳定，七国集团应停止借涉海问题挑动争议、加剧局势紧张、破坏地区和平稳定。 中方在乌克兰危机问题上一 ...

Core Viewpoint - The warning from Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán highlights the heightened risk of war in Europe, the implications of military expansion, and the underlying tensions within the EU regarding security policies and energy dependence on Russia [1][3][4]. Group 1: Military Expansion and Security Concerns - Orbán's assertion that Europe faces the highest risk of war since the Ukraine conflict emphasizes the urgency of the situation [1]. - The EU is rapidly advancing military initiatives, including an €800 billion rearmament plan, which reflects a growing trend of military expansion among member states [1][4]. - The fragmentation of military resources within the EU, with multiple types of main battle tanks and warships, leads to inefficiencies and waste, undermining collective security efforts [4]. Group 2: Economic Implications of Military Spending - The rising military expenditures are straining national budgets, with France's public debt to GDP ratio reaching 113% and Italy's at 135%, necessitating potential tax increases or cuts to social services [5]. - Ordinary citizens are feeling the impact of military spending, as funds are diverted from essential services like healthcare and education to support military initiatives [5][6]. Group 3: Diplomatic Solutions and the Call for Peace - Orbán's stance against military escalation and his call for dialogue over confrontation reflect a broader sentiment among smaller nations that prioritize economic stability and peace [3][6]. - The need for genuine dialogue and negotiation, rather than unilateral demands, is emphasized as essential for achieving lasting peace in Europe [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent tensions within the G7 regarding U.S. President Trump's call for imposing tariffs on China and India for purchasing Russian oil, highlighting Japan's refusal to support this initiative and the implications for U.S. influence in global politics [1][3][10]. Group 1: U.S. Position and G7 Dynamics - Trump is pushing G7 allies to impose tariffs on China and India, claiming that doing business with Russia should have consequences [1][3]. - The U.S. stance is met with hesitation from other G7 members, indicating a shift in the traditional dynamics where the U.S. could easily rally support [10][12]. - Japan's finance minister publicly disagrees with the U.S. proposal, emphasizing that the rationale for tariffs is insufficient and overly simplistic [5][8]. Group 2: Japan's Strategic Position - Japan's refusal to support U.S. tariffs is rooted in its strong economic ties with China, making it impractical to sever relations over the issue of Russian oil purchases [5][7]. - The Japanese government is cautious about potential retaliatory measures from China, recalling past experiences from trade disputes [7][12]. - Japan's position reflects a broader trend among nations seeking to navigate complex geopolitical landscapes without aligning too closely with either the U.S. or China [8][13]. Group 3: Implications for Global Trade - The article suggests that the era of U.S. dominance in setting global trade rules is waning, as countries like Japan assert their own interests [10][15]. - The G7's internal divisions may weaken U.S. leverage in international negotiations, as countries prioritize their own economic stability over collective actions [12][15]. - Japan's stance may signal a growing trend among nations to adopt a more pragmatic approach to international relations, balancing cooperation and independence [13][17].

Group 1 - The Philippine Defense Secretary Teodoro will attend the 14th Seoul Security Dialogue in South Korea, focusing on geopolitical competition and strategic stability [1] - Teodoro has made several public statements recently, including derogatory remarks about China, particularly during events commemorating the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Second Sino-Japanese War [1] - The Chinese Embassy in the Philippines criticized Teodoro's comments, highlighting the historical context of China's sacrifices during the war and emphasizing the importance of mutual respect in international relations [1] Group 2 - The Chinese spokesperson emphasized the ongoing global trends of peace, development, cooperation, and win-win outcomes, while also addressing the persistence of Cold War mentality and hegemonism [2] - China proposed a global governance initiative at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit, aiming to build a more just and reasonable global governance system, which received positive responses from international leaders [2] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry warned the Philippine Defense Secretary against exacerbating trust deficits in China-Philippines relations and criticized his remarks regarding Taiwan as a challenge to China's core interests [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Mission to the EU strongly refutes the comments made by EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, regarding China's stance during the "9.3" commemorative events, emphasizing that such remarks reflect Cold War mentality and ideological bias, which harm both the EU's international reputation and its own interests [1][2]. Group 1 - The Chinese Mission criticizes EU officials for their ideologically biased statements, claiming they lack basic historical knowledge and disrespect the history of World War II [1][2]. - The Chinese government emphasizes the importance of commemorating the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, highlighting the participation of 26 foreign heads of state and government leaders, as well as over 100 foreign diplomats, indicating broad international recognition of China's historical contributions [2]. - The current international situation is described as chaotic, with a call for greater unity and cooperation, urging EU leaders to adopt a correct view of World War II history and rational understanding of China [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government strongly opposes and condemns the remarks made by EU officials regarding China's commemorative activities, asserting that such statements reflect ideological bias and a lack of historical understanding [1][2]. Group 1: China's Response to EU Remarks - The Chinese government criticizes the EU's comments as ideologically biased and historically ignorant, arguing that they disrespect the history of World War II and harm the EU's own interests [1]. - The commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War is framed as a means to remember history, honor heroes, cherish peace, and create a future [1]. - The event was attended by 26 foreign heads of state and government, along with representatives from over 100 countries, including 19 European nations, indicating broad international recognition of China's historical contributions and a shared desire for world peace [1]. Group 2: Call for Cooperation - The current international situation is described as chaotic, emphasizing the need for unity and cooperation more than ever [2]. - The Chinese government urges EU leaders to adopt a correct view of World War II history and to rationally understand China, calling for the immediate correction of erroneous statements to mitigate negative impacts [2]. - The statement highlights that the actions of some EU leaders, who cling to Cold War mentalities, are detrimental to the EU's international reputation and influence, as well as to its own interests [2].

Group 1: Economic Misjudgments - The Trump administration underestimated China's economic resilience, with China's GDP growth rate remaining at 6.1% in 2019 despite trade tensions [1] - The trade war has resulted in hundreds of billions of dollars in additional costs for American consumers and businesses annually, leading to a significant drop in export orders from Midwest agricultural states [5] Group 2: Strategic Responses - China has demonstrated a strong willingness to retaliate against U.S. tariffs, implementing measures such as restricting rare earth exports, which are crucial for high-tech industries [3][6] - The U.S. continues to impose high tariffs on Chinese goods, such as a 1157.53% tariff on low-speed electric vehicles, despite the growing popularity of these vehicles in the U.S. market [8] Group 3: Technological Developments - Chinese companies have adapted to U.S. sanctions, achieving significant advancements in domestic technology, including the development of EDA tools and the C919 aircraft, with local component production increasing from 10% to over 55% [10] - In the first quarter of 2025, China's high-tech product exports grew by 39%, with AI chips and complete products seeing over 60% growth [13] Group 4: Global Alliances and Trade Relations - The Trump administration's attempts to isolate China have faced resistance from other countries, with Japan and South Korea expressing concerns about the impact on their industries [11] - The EU has moved to strengthen trade relations with China, planning to increase trade volume to $2 trillion by 2030, indicating a shift away from U.S. influence [13] Group 5: Strategic Reflections - The misjudgments of the Trump administration have prompted reflections within the U.S. strategic community, recognizing China's significant military and technological advancements [14][16] - The contradictory policies of imposing tariffs while seeking cooperation on rare earths highlight the confusion and anxiety within U.S. strategy towards China [16]

Core Points - The meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) member states' heads of state was held on September 1 in Tianjin, emphasizing the importance of fairness and justice in international relations [1] - President Xi Jinping advocated for a correct understanding of World War II history, opposing Cold War mentality, bloc confrontation, and bullying behavior [1] - The need to maintain an international system centered around the United Nations and support a multilateral trade system led by the World Trade Organization was highlighted [1] - The call for a more equitable and orderly multipolar world and inclusive economic globalization was made, aiming to promote a fairer global governance system [1]

Group 1 - European leaders are emphasizing the importance of a unified front in addressing the Ukraine crisis, as evidenced by their collective visit to meet with U.S. President Trump [2] - The ongoing Ukraine crisis has led to significant economic repercussions for Europe, including loss of the Russian market and energy supplies, contributing to deindustrialization and capital flight [4] - The crisis has highlighted Europe's increasing dependency on the U.S. for security, while simultaneously diminishing its own influence and decision-making power [4][5] Group 2 - The NATO expansion strategy, led by the U.S., is identified as a fundamental cause of the Ukraine crisis, with many European nations blindly following this approach [3][4] - The Ukraine crisis serves as a costly lesson for Europe, underscoring the urgent need for strategic autonomy and the reformation of its security architecture [5] - European leaders are urged to take greater responsibility in resolving the crisis and to establish a sustainable security framework for long-term peace [5]