圆满完成各项议程后，省十四届人大常委会第二十次会议9月29日在郑州闭幕。省委书记、省人大常委 会主任刘宁主持并讲话。 刘宁指出，本次会议表决通过了《河南省社会治理条例》《河南省粮食安全保障条例》《河南省法律援 助条例（修订）》《河南省人民代表大会常务委员会关于废止<河南省村庄和集镇规划建设管理条例> 等四部地方性法规的决定》，审查批准了16件设区的市地方性法规。各有关方面要认真做好相关法规的 学习宣传贯彻工作，确保法规全面有效实施。要持续强化党建引领，更好凝聚服务群众，突出抓基层、 强基础、固根本，高度重视法治和诚信建设，盯牢风险隐患排查和治理，不断提升系统治理、依法治 理、综合治理、源头治理水平，以高效能治理支撑高质量发展和高水平安全良性互动，坚决维护政治安 全、社会安定、人民安宁。要不断强化粮食安全是"国之大者"的意识，统筹抓好粮食生产、储备、流通 等工作，紧抓耕地和种子"两个要害"，结合融入服务全国统一大市场建设，加快建设现代粮食经营体 系，不断增强粮食和重要农产品供应保障能力和市场竞争力。要进一步规范和促进法律援助工作，畅通 弱势群体维权渠道，更加有效地维护社会公平正义。 刘宁强调，本次会议初次审议了 ...

Core Viewpoint - The newly passed Shanghai Private Economy Promotion Regulation aims to enhance the role of private enterprises in the local economy, emphasizing protection and encouragement for these businesses [1][2]. Group 1: Legislative Framework - The Shanghai Private Economy Promotion Regulation will take effect on October 20, 2023, and is a local legislative refinement based on the national Private Economy Promotion Law [1]. - The regulation consists of 11 chapters, which is two more than the national law, focusing on protecting private enterprises and ensuring fair competition [2]. Group 2: Key Areas of Focus - The regulation addresses six main areas: removing hidden market entry barriers, enhancing policy guidance, solving financing issues, boosting innovation capabilities, optimizing services for enterprises going global, and strengthening rights protection [2][3]. - It emphasizes the implementation of a unified negative list for market entry, ensuring equal treatment of all economic organizations [2]. Group 3: Financing and Global Expansion - The regulation aims to improve credit fairness and establish a government financing guarantee system to support private enterprises [3]. - It includes measures to enhance overseas service systems, facilitate customs processes, and optimize cross-border financial services for private enterprises [3]. Group 4: Economic Performance and Future Plans - In the first half of the year, private enterprises in Shanghai showed positive growth, with industrial output increasing by 8.8% and service sector revenue rising by 9.9% [4]. - The Shanghai Development and Reform Commission plans to implement a "6-in-1" approach to ensure the effective execution of the regulation, focusing on comprehensive policy measures and communication mechanisms [5][6].

Group 1 - The Shanghai Municipal People's Congress passed six regulations, including the "Regulations on Promoting the Private Economy" and the revised "Regulations on the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone" [1] - The Private Economy Promotion Regulations aim to enhance fair competition, stimulate investment, address financing challenges, improve technological innovation capabilities, and support enterprises in expanding internationally [1] - The revised Free Trade Zone regulations introduce new chapters on technological innovation, talent development, full industry chain innovation, digital economy development, and border management, providing legal support for Shanghai's reform and opening-up [1] Group 2 - The meeting also approved several local regulations, including the "Regulations on Legal Aid in Shanghai" and the "Water Conservation Regulations in Shanghai" [1] - The focus of legislative supervision will be on optimizing the business environment, protecting intellectual property rights, and managing urban waste [2] - Personnel changes were made, including the removal of several officials from key positions and the appointment of a new chief prosecutor for the Fengxian District People's Procuratorate [3]

会议对部分议题进行了分组审议。 市人大常委会副主任郑钢淼、周慧琳、宗明、陈靖、张全出席。副市长张亚宏，市监委、市高院、 市检察院、各区人大常委会负责同志及部分市人大代表列席。 会议听取了关于《上海市优化营商环境条例修正案（草案）》《上海市特种行业和公共场所治安管 理条例（修订草案）》《上海市单用途预付消费卡管理规定（修订草案）》《上海市燃气条例（草 案）》《上海市各级人民代表大会常务委员会监督条例（草案）》等的说明和相关审议意见报告。提请 审议的优化营商环境条例修正草案是2020年通过以来的第四次修改，贯彻落实中央和市委关于优化营商 环境的最新要求，对标世行新评估体系，推进惠企全流程服务、加强中小企业合法权益保护、规范专项 检查行为，为持续打造市场化、法治化、国际化一流营商环境提供有力法治保障。提请审议的燃气条例 草案对于建设安全可靠的韧性城市具有重要意义，在加强规划建设、规范经营服务、强化用气管理、加 强设施保护等方面作出新的规定，以严密法治保障燃气安全。提请审议的监督条例草案是市人大常委会 制定的首部综合性监督法规，对于贯彻落实新修改的监督法，进一步推进正确监督、有效监督、依法监 督具有重要作用。 会议听 ...

Group 1 - The Shanghai Municipal People's Congress Standing Committee held its 51st director meeting, deciding to hold the 24th meeting from September 23 to 25 [1] - The meeting reviewed several legislative drafts including the "Shanghai Private Economy Promotion Regulations (Draft)" and the "Shanghai Food Safety Regulations Amendment (Draft)" among others, which will be further discussed in the upcoming meeting [1] - Reports on the balanced layout of medical resources, the promotion of farmers' income, and women's rights protection were presented, with decisions to submit these reports for review at the 24th meeting [2] Group 2 - The meeting also included discussions on the construction of the "Five New Cities" and the "North-South Transformation" development work, with reports to be discussed in the upcoming meeting [2] - Personnel appointment proposals were presented and will be submitted for review and voting at the 24th meeting [2] - Other matters were also discussed during the meeting [2]

Core Viewpoint - The private economy is a vital force in advancing Chinese-style modernization, and regulating enterprise-related law enforcement and judicial actions is crucial for protecting the rights of private enterprises and boosting market confidence [1][10]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions and Legal Cases - On September 17, the Supreme People's Court and the Ministry of Justice jointly released 10 typical cases aimed at standardizing enterprise-related law enforcement and judicial review, covering various administrative management areas such as administrative licensing and penalties [1][10]. - A case involving 103 companies in Jiangsu Province highlighted the importance of ensuring that administrative decisions do not violate procedural laws, leading to the annulment of a decision that revoked building qualifications due to "major procedural violations" [2][3]. - Another case from Heilongjiang Province addressed the issue of administrative bodies unlawfully adding conditions, emphasizing the principle that "no action without authorization" must be adhered to by administrative enforcement agencies [3][4]. Group 2: Principles of Fair Enforcement - The principle of proportionality in penalties was exemplified in a case involving a traditional Chinese medicine clinic, where the administrative review body reduced penalties based on the clinic's status as a first-time offender and its proactive rectification efforts [4][5]. - A construction company case in Sichuan Province illustrated the necessity of reasonable enforcement actions, where the administrative body was found to have overstepped by equating registration behavior with collusion in bidding, leading to the annulment of the penalty [5][6]. Group 3: Commitment to Promises and Compensation - A landmark case involving a real estate company in Henan Province established that administrative bodies must honor their commitments, resulting in a ruling that mandated the government to pay over 8.41 million yuan in compensation for unfulfilled promises [6][7]. - The case involving a public transport group in Jilin Province reinforced the requirement for administrative bodies to fulfill contractual obligations, with the court ordering the government to continue fulfilling its agreement or face compensation [8][9]. Group 4: Overall Impact and Future Directions - The series of cases collectively signal a strong commitment to supervising administrative bodies to ensure lawful conduct and adherence to promises, aiming to create a stable, fair, and transparent legal environment for private enterprises [10][11]. - The ongoing efforts by courts and administrative review bodies will focus on deepening the regulation of enterprise-related law enforcement and promoting substantive resolutions to administrative disputes, thereby supporting the healthy development of the private economy [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court and the Ministry of Justice have selected and published 10 typical cases of administrative review and litigation to promote the implementation of the Private Economy Promotion Law and enhance the protection of private enterprises' rights and interests [1][2][3] Group 1: Administrative Review Cases - Case 1: 103 companies challenged the withdrawal of construction qualifications by a housing and urban-rural development department in Jiangsu Province, arguing that their rights to be informed and to defend themselves were not adequately protected [5][6] - Case 2: A development company contested the collection of a penalty by a natural resources and planning bureau in Zhejiang Province, emphasizing that supervision should be conducted on a per-lot basis [9][10] - Case 3: A traditional Chinese medicine clinic disputed an administrative penalty imposed by a market supervision bureau in Shanghai, claiming the punishment was excessive compared to the violations [13][14] - Case 4: A real estate company filed a review against a housing and urban-rural development bureau in Heilongjiang Province for failing to perform statutory duties regarding project completion verification [17][18] - Case 5: A construction company opposed an administrative penalty from a city management bureau in Sichuan Province, arguing that the determination of collusion in bidding should be based on comprehensive judgment [20][21] Group 2: Administrative Agreements and Compensation - Case 6: A real estate company sought compensation from a municipal government for unfulfilled promises regarding land compensation, resulting in a court ruling that mandated the government to pay over 8.41 million yuan [24][26] - Case 7: A passenger transport group sued a municipal government for not fulfilling an administrative agreement related to the transformation of intercity bus services, leading to a court ruling that required the government to comply with the agreement [28][30] - Case 8: An investment company challenged a police bureau's refusal to issue a special industry license, arguing that the bureau's regulations violated higher laws [33][34] - Case 9: A machinery company sought to enforce a meeting record regarding capacity replacement, resulting in a court ruling that emphasized the protection of trust interests in administrative actions [36][39] - Case 10: A mining company requested compensation from a county government due to the overlap of its mining rights with a newly designated water source protection area, leading to a court ruling for compensation of over 5.83 million yuan [40][42]

Group 1 - China's modernization is continuously promoted through reform and opening up, providing a broad prospect for future development [1] - The number of private economic organizations in China reached 185 million by May 2025, accounting for 96.76% of total business entities, indicating a thriving private sector [2] - China's global innovation index ranking improved from 34th in 2012 to 11th in 2024, showcasing significant advancements in technology and innovation capabilities [2] Group 2 - The government aims to deepen reforms and transform reform momentum into strong driving forces for high-quality development [3] - Key reform measures include promoting a unified national market, enhancing state-owned enterprise reforms, and expanding self-initiated and unilateral openings [3] - The government emphasizes the importance of public participation in reforms, particularly in education, healthcare, and social security sectors, to ensure reforms meet the needs of the populace [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court issued the "Guiding Opinions on Implementing the Law on Promoting the Development of the Private Economy," aiming to enhance legal support for the healthy development of the private economy through 25 specific measures [1] Group 1: Legal Framework and Market Environment - The Guiding Opinions emphasize the need for equal legal treatment of private enterprises and the establishment of a fair and transparent business environment [1] - It highlights the importance of strengthening anti-monopoly and anti-unfair competition judicial efforts to ensure fair market participation [2] - The Opinions call for the implementation of a national negative list for market access to eliminate local protectionism and hidden barriers [2] Group 2: Financial and Debt Issues - The Opinions address the common issues of debt defaults and financing difficulties faced by private enterprises, proposing mechanisms for debt collection and enforcement [4] - It mandates the regulation of financial institutions' practices regarding loan conditions to protect the rights of private enterprises [4] - The document also emphasizes the need to combat illegal lending practices and enhance the financing environment for private businesses [4] Group 3: Dispute Resolution and Credit System - To reduce the costs of dispute resolution for private enterprises, the Opinions propose improvements to the credit repair and punishment mechanisms [5] - The document states that over 1.1 million individuals have returned to the market through credit repair initiatives in the first half of the year [5] - It also outlines the need for a dynamic adjustment mechanism for credit ratings based on compliance with obligations [5] Group 4: Technological and Data Protection - The Opinions include provisions for the judicial protection of technological innovation and the handling of data rights disputes [3] - It emphasizes the need for stronger intellectual property protections while curbing malicious litigation in the tech sector [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has issued guiding opinions to implement the Private Economy Promotion Law, aiming to address challenges faced by the private sector and provide stronger legal support for its healthy development [1] Summary by Relevant Categories Overall Requirements - The guiding opinions outline five key areas: overall requirements, equal legal treatment, encouraging lawful and standardized operations, strict and fair judicial practices, and improving the judicial system [1] Equal Treatment - Emphasis on the principle of equal treatment under the law for private enterprises, ensuring that they are not discriminated against in legal proceedings [1] Encouragement of Lawful Operations - The guidelines encourage private enterprises to operate within the law and adhere to regulations, promoting a culture of compliance [1] Judicial Fairness - The document stresses the importance of strict and impartial judicial practices to protect the rights and interests of private enterprises [1] Judicial System Improvement - Proposals for enhancing the judicial system to better support the private economy, including 25 specific measures aimed at resolving existing issues [1]