登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 专题：北京公募基金高质量发展系列活动 新时代、新基金、新价值 近日，中国证监会修订发布《公开募集证券投资基金销售费用管理规定》，标志着公募基金行业费率改 革第三阶段正式落地，这是公募基金行业发展的重要里程碑，对于推动行业健康发展、保护投资者利益 具有深远意义。英大基金高度重视此次新规改革，积极响应政策号召，展现出推动行业变革的坚定决心 和信心。 此次销售费用新规改革，聚焦降低投资者综合成本，推动销售机构从重规模向重投资者回报转型，引导 投资者长期持有。新规明确降低认申购费率，规范销售服务费，优化赎回费安排，同时明确代销机构清 算账户沉淀资金利息划归基金财产所有、基金投顾业务不得双重收费、强化信息披露和廉洁从业等内 容。据业内测算，按照近三年平均数据，本轮基金销售费用改革将整体降费约300亿元，加上前两阶段 改革，累计每年向投资者让利超500亿元。 英大基金深刻认识到，此次新规改革不仅是行业发展的必然要求，更是公司提升自身竞争力、服务投资 者的重要契机。公司将严格按照新规要求，全面梳理和调整现有业务流程和产品费率结构，确保各项规 定落实到位。在降低投资者成本方面 ...

Core Viewpoint - The third phase of the public fund industry fee reform has officially started, focusing on the adjustment of sales fees to encourage long-term holding and reduce irrational short-term trading behaviors [2][9][11]. Group 1: Fee Reform Overview - In July 2023, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) released the "Public Fund Industry Fee Reform Work Plan," marking the beginning of the third phase of fee reform [2][9]. - The reform aims to lower the comprehensive fee levels of public funds through a gradual approach, focusing on management fees, transaction fees, and sales fees [9][11]. - The proposed adjustments to redemption fees include a tiered structure for different holding periods, with a minimum of 1.5% for holdings under 7 days and 0.5% for holdings between 30 days to 6 months [12][11]. Group 2: Impact on Fund Market - The new redemption fee structure is expected to clarify the positioning of public products, distinguishing between long-term holding for off-market funds and active trading for ETFs [15][14]. - Frequent trading costs for bond funds are likely to increase, making it difficult for them to serve as tools for short-term trading, thus creating opportunities for bond ETFs [16][14]. - The cost of short-term adjustments for public funds of funds (FOFs) is expected to rise, leading to a trend towards ETF-based investment strategies [21][20]. Group 3: Recommendations for Investors - Investors are advised to optimize their pure bond fund management by using actively managed funds as a base, complemented by bond ETFs for market timing and liquidity management tools [29][31]. - A comprehensive evaluation system for bond ETFs is recommended, focusing on liquidity, tracking ability, and strategy uniqueness [31][32]. - The investment strategy for "fixed income plus" funds may polarize into long-term stable products and high-volatility aggressive products, maintaining a balance between risk and return [33][24]. Group 4: Future Product Development Directions - There is a significant opportunity for the development of bond ETFs, particularly in niche themes and strategies, as the market for these products is expanding rapidly [36][41]. - The diversification of institutional investors in bond ETFs is increasing, with a notable shift in the types of institutions holding these products [37][41]. - Future product innovations may include multi-asset ETFs and fixed-income ETFs, addressing the evolving needs of institutional investors [42][41].

Core Viewpoint - The public fund industry in China is undergoing a significant fee reform, highlighted by the successful early fundraising of the Oriental Red Medical Innovation Mixed Fund (QDII), which is the first floating management fee fund in the medical sector, reflecting investor confidence in the market and the asset management capabilities of Oriental Red [1][2]. Group 1: Fund Performance and Management - The Oriental Red Medical Innovation Mixed Fund (QDII) has gained recognition for its management capabilities, with the fund manager's income linked to investor returns, marking a shift towards prioritizing investor benefits over mere scale [2][4]. - Fund managers Jiang Qi and Gao Yi have extensive backgrounds in the medical and financial sectors, contributing to the fund's strong performance and investor trust [2][3]. - The Oriental Red Medical Upgrade Stock Initiation Fund, managed by Jiang Qi, has shown impressive results, with a net value growth rate of 102.43% over the past year [3]. Group 2: Industry Impact and Future Outlook - The introduction of floating fee structures is expected to have a profound impact across the industry, incentivizing fund managers to enhance their research and risk management capabilities, thereby fostering a culture of long-term value investment [4][5]. - The successful fundraising of the Oriental Red Medical Innovation Mixed Fund (QDII) indicates strong investor confidence in the long-term prospects of the medical industry and the asset management capabilities of Oriental Red [5]. - The collaboration between Oriental Red Asset Management and partners like Pudong Development Bank and Oriental Securities aims to provide long-term investment options and enhance investor engagement, contributing to the high-quality development of the asset management industry [5].

专题：北京公募基金高质量发展系列活动 新时代、新基金、新价值 MACD金叉信号形成，这些股涨势不错！ 责任编辑：石秀珍 SF183 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent revision of the "Sales Expense Management Regulations for Publicly Offered Securities Investment Funds" by the China Securities Regulatory Commission marks a significant step towards the high-quality development of China's public fund industry, aiming to create a healthier and more sustainable industry ecosystem [1] Group 1: Industry Development - The public fund industry in China has rapidly developed, with a total scale exceeding 35 trillion yuan, playing a positive role in capital market reform and resident wealth management [1] - The sales fee reform initiated in July 2023 aims to systematically reduce sales fees and standardize charging models, thereby alleviating the burden on investors and guiding sales institutions to correct their business philosophies [2] Group 2: Fee Structure and Investor Impact - Historically, high subscription and redemption fees in the public fund sector have led to a focus on initial sales rather than ongoing management, with some institutions inducing investors to "redeem old and buy new," harming investor interests [2] - The optimization of sales fees is expected to lower investment costs for investors and compress revenue from flow fees, encouraging sales institutions to shift from earning through "flow" to "retention" [2] Group 3: Regulatory Enhancements - Strengthening regulatory frameworks will reshape the public fund sales landscape, addressing issues such as the ownership of idle fund income and repeated charges for fund advisory services [3] - New regulations will encourage investors to adopt long-term and value investment strategies, with measures such as full redemption fees being included in fund assets and the prohibition of sales service fees for funds held longer than one year [3] Group 4: Future Outlook - The sales fee reform is viewed as the starting point for a new journey in the industry, emphasizing fiduciary duties and enhancing the investment experience for investors [4] - A public fund industry that prioritizes investor interests and fosters mutual growth will play a crucial role in the long-term appreciation of residents' wealth and the maturation of China's capital market [4]

Core Viewpoint - The public fund sales industry in China is undergoing significant changes due to the new regulations issued by the China Securities Regulatory Commission, which aim to reshape the industry ecosystem and promote high-quality development [1][3]. Summary by Relevant Sections New Regulations - The new regulations include lowering subscription fees, optimizing redemption fee arrangements, and standardizing sales service fees, marking the third phase of fee reform in the public fund sector [1]. - Specific changes to redemption fees include a minimum of 1.5% for holdings less than 7 days, 1% for holdings between 7 and 30 days, and 0.5% for holdings between 30 days and 6 months for non-money market funds [1][2]. Impact on Fund Sales Institutions - Fund distribution institutions that previously relied on high subscription and service fees will face revenue limitations, necessitating a reevaluation of their business models and an increase in service capabilities to provide professional investment advice [3]. - The new regulations may lead to a reduction in market share for institutions that do not adapt to the changing landscape [3]. Effects on Fund Companies - Fund companies will need to shift focus from short-term scale growth driven by fee discounts to enhancing professional service capabilities and investment management quality [3]. - The regulations are expected to suppress unreasonable practices in the industry, encouraging companies to invest more in research and development and improve investor education [3]. Long-term Industry Development - The industry is encouraged to adapt proactively and prioritize investor interests, which is essential for achieving high-quality development in the long run [4].

Group 1 - The report analyzes the impact of the third phase of the public fund fee reform, focusing on the structural effects on direct sales and agency sales channels, as well as related estimates [1][2][3] - The reform aims to lower the overall fee levels in the public fund industry through a phased approach, addressing management fees, transaction fees, and sales fees [2][13][16] - The core content of the reform includes reducing subscription fees, optimizing redemption fee arrangements, standardizing sales service fees, focusing on personal customer service, and clarifying the legal positioning of platforms [21][22][34] Group 2 - The reduction of subscription fees will see upper limits set at 0.8% for equity funds, 0.5% for mixed funds, and 0.3% for bond funds, with the aim of lowering investor participation costs [22][23][27] - The optimization of redemption fees will require that all redemption fees be included in the fund's assets, with specific rates set for different holding periods, encouraging long-term investment [34][35] - The standardization of sales service fees will lead to a significant decrease in income for sales institutions, particularly those focused on retail investors with shorter holding periods [3][21][36] Group 3 - The reform is expected to shift the focus of sales institutions from a single fee competition model to a service-oriented approach, enhancing the overall investor experience [3][32] - The estimated impact of the new regulations suggests a potential 43% decline in overall sales service fees by the first half of 2025, with a more significant effect on agency sales [3][20][21] - The report highlights that the changes will likely lead to a decrease in the preference for mixed funds among sales institutions, while potentially increasing the appeal of equity funds [32][33]

Core Viewpoint - The recent recruitment of chief economists by securities firms highlights the ongoing talent movement in the brokerage research sector, driven by multiple factors including policy guidance, industry mergers, fee reforms, and AI empowerment [1][3]. Group 1: Talent Movement in Brokerage Research - There has been a high frequency of personnel changes in key research positions within brokerage firms this year, with notable figures such as Xun Yugen and Yan Xiang switching firms [2]. - The movement of prominent research talents reflects not only personal career choices but also the dynamic adjustments in the brokerage research business landscape [2]. Group 2: Influencing Factors - The deepening reform of public fund fee structures is a key variable triggering talent movement and restructuring within the brokerage research industry, with brokerage commission rates dropping by 33.98% year-on-year in the first half of the year [3]. - Policy guidance has provided direction for the development of brokerage research businesses and talent flow, with new evaluation indicators introduced to encourage positive contributions from chief economists [4]. Group 3: Talent Acquisition Strategies - The demand for research talent is increasing, leading to a clear differentiation in talent acquisition paths, with smaller brokerages relying more on public recruitment to attract top research talent [5]. - Larger brokerages prefer internal cultivation or targeted recruitment to build their research talent pool, ensuring continuity in research style and team stability [6]. Group 4: Future Outlook - The transition of chief economists and core researchers is seen as an inevitable result of changes in industry development stages and competitive landscapes, with expectations for further professional orientation and value creation in brokerage research [6].

Core Viewpoint - The recent reform of public fund sales fees marks a significant milestone, emphasizing a shift towards investor-centric practices and the restructuring of the industry’s business model [1][5]. Summary by Sections Fee Reduction and Investor Benefits - The new regulations significantly lower the maximum subscription fees for equity, mixed, and bond funds, with an estimated annual benefit of approximately 47.21 billion yuan to investors from 2022 to 2024 [2][5]. - This reduction in fees aims to lower investment costs for investors while increasing the demand for enhanced research and management capabilities among fund managers [2]. Encouragement of Long-term Investment - The regulations eliminate sales service fees for investors holding funds for over a year, promoting long-term investment behaviors and discouraging short-term speculative actions [2]. Restructuring Sales and Service Models - The reform changes the distribution of redemption fees, directing all fees to fund assets, which encourages a shift from a sales volume-driven model to a retention and service-oriented model [3]. - Fund managers and sales institutions are now required to prioritize customer satisfaction and long-term relationships to retain clients [3]. Focus on Individual Investor Services - The regulations maintain a cap on trailing commissions for individual investors at 50%, while reducing the cap for institutional investors on bond and money market funds, incentivizing sales institutions to better serve individual investors [3]. Standardization of Advisory Services - The new rules prohibit fund sales institutions from charging maintenance fees on the same client holdings, addressing the issue of double charging in advisory services and promoting a service-oriented industry transformation [4]. Promotion of Direct Sales - The establishment of a centralized platform for institutional direct sales aims to enhance service efficiency and reduce operational costs, ultimately attracting more long-term capital into the market [4]. Overall Impact on the Industry - The reforms signal a commitment to enhancing investor confidence and stabilizing market expectations, contributing to the long-term healthy operation of the A-share market [5]. - The fee reform is seen as a crucial step towards high-quality development in the public fund sector, focusing on investor returns and sustainable industry practices [5].

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has released a draft regulation aimed at reforming the sales fee structure of public funds, marking the third phase of fee rate reform in the industry, which is expected to significantly lower investor costs and shift the focus back to fiduciary responsibilities [1][8]. Group 1: Fee Rate Adjustments - The maximum subscription and redemption fee rates for equity, mixed, and bond funds will be reduced to 0.8%, 0.5%, and 0.3% respectively, representing a decrease of 33%-67% from current standards [2]. - The redemption fee structure will be simplified from four tiers to three, with rates set at 1.5%, 1%, and 0.5% for holding periods of 7 days, 30 days, and 6 months, respectively, encouraging long-term investment [3]. Group 2: Sales Service Fee Regulations - The maximum sales service fee rates for different fund types will be reduced to 0.4% per year for equity and mixed funds, 0.2% for index funds, and 0.15% for money market funds, with no service fees for holdings over one year [4]. - Fund managers are prohibited from treating different investors unfairly by setting exclusive share classes or differential fee rates, promoting a more equitable sales environment [4]. Group 3: Client Maintenance Fee Adjustments - The client maintenance fee for individual investors will remain capped at 50%, while for institutional investors, it will be reduced from 30% to 15% for non-equity funds, encouraging a focus on equity investments [5]. Group 4: Prohibition of Double Charging and Interest Transfer - Fund managers must allocate all interest generated from fund sales settlement funds to the fund property, with sales institutions required to credit interest at no less than the benchmark interest rate set by the People's Bank of China [6]. Group 5: Establishment of Direct Sales Platforms - A unified direct sales service platform for institutional investors will be launched to reduce operational costs and enhance investment efficiency, transitioning the industry focus from channel-driven to product and service-driven [7][8]. - The implementation of the new sales fee management regulation is projected to save investors approximately 30 billion yuan annually, with cumulative savings exceeding 50 billion yuan over three phases of reform [8].