Core Viewpoint - Huawei expresses gratitude to the Suqian court for its fair and efficient judicial protection of its brand following a trademark infringement and unfair competition case involving its FreeClip earphones [1][5]. Summary by Sections Case Background - Huawei launched its first open FreeClip earphones in December 2023, which quickly gained market recognition due to their unique design [2]. - Huawei discovered that two Shenzhen companies were selling earphones with packaging and branding that closely resembled its FreeClip product, using misleading terms that suggested a connection to Huawei [2]. Court Ruling - The Suqian court found that the packaging of the infringing earphones was highly similar to Huawei's FreeClip, likely causing consumer confusion [3]. - The court ruled that the use of Huawei's trademarks in product listings constituted trademark infringement, leveraging Huawei's brand recognition to attract customers [3]. False Advertising - The court identified that the infringing company used misleading statements in its marketing, suggesting performance equivalence or superiority to Huawei's products, which constituted unfair competition [4]. - The court ordered the infringing companies to cease production and sales of the similar earphones and mandated compensation payments totaling 900,000 yuan (approximately 90,000 USD) [4]. Judicial Support for Innovation - This case exemplifies judicial protection for innovative products in the context of a "first launch economy," maintaining market order during the critical initial phase of product release [5]. - The court's actions reflect a commitment to fostering a fair business environment and protecting intellectual property rights, which is crucial for high-tech companies like Huawei [6].

证券代码：002798 证券简称：帝欧水华 公告编号：2025-147 债券代码：127047 债券简称：帝欧转债 帝欧水华集团股份有限公司 关于股份回购进展情况的公告 本公司及全体董事会成员保证信息披露内容的真实、准确和完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大 遗漏。 帝欧水华集团股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于2024年7月10日召开的第五届董事会第十九次会议审 议通过了《关于回购公司股份方案的议案》，同意公司使用自有资金以集中竞价交易的方式回购公司部 分已发行的人民币普通股（A股）股票，本次回购的股份全部用于转换上市公司发行的可转换为股票的 公司债券。本次回购数量区间为上限不超过16,700,000股，下限不少于8,500,000股，回购价格不超过人 民币5.00元/股（含）。按照回购价格和回购数量上限测算回购资金总额不超过人民币8,350.00万元。具 体回购数量以回购结束时实际回购的股份数量为准。本次回购股份的实施期限为自董事会审议通过股份 回购方案之日起12个月内。鉴于公司取得了金融机构出具的《贷款承诺函》，经公司第五届董事会第三 十次会议审议通过，同意公司回购股份的资金来源增加自筹资金。 202 ...

Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen Lingming Photon Technology Co., Ltd. has issued a statement denying allegations of a lawsuit against the company for "infringing trade secrets" and emphasizes its commitment to protecting intellectual property rights [1] Group 1 - The company has not received any legal documents regarding the alleged lawsuit [1] - Lingming Photon firmly opposes any malicious competition or commercial defamation disguised as legal actions [1] - The company reserves the right to pursue legal responsibility against any actions that unjustly harm its reputation and legal rights [1]

Core Viewpoint - The company strongly condemns the recent trend of short dramas imitating its major long drama "Family Business," asserting that such actions disrespect original creators and undermine the integrity of artistic creation [1][2][3]. Group 1: Company Statement - The company has issued a formal statement denouncing the unethical behavior of creating short dramas based on promotional materials and core creative elements of "Family Business" [2][3]. - It emphasizes that artistic creation is not merely a process of copying and pasting, and that the production of a quality long drama involves significant effort from the creative team over months or even years [2][3]. - The company plans to collect evidence of infringement and reserves the right to pursue civil compensation, administrative penalties, and even criminal liability against infringing parties under relevant laws [2][3]. Group 2: Industry Call to Action - The company calls on the entire industry to uphold the principles of originality, respect every creative achievement, and protect intellectual property rights to maintain a healthy and orderly industry ecosystem [2][3]. - It highlights that the act of imitation not only disrupts fair competition but also discourages creators and hinders the positive development of the industry [2][3].

格隆汇12月1日｜华策影视(300133)今日发布《关于谴责短剧跟风拍摄的严正声明》称，近期，市场上 出现跟风模仿公司重点打造精品长剧《家业》的短剧作品。对此，公司声明："严厉谴责一切基于我司 《家业》等精品长剧宣传内容、核心创意进行跟风拍摄的不道德行为；我司将对涉嫌侵权的相关证据进 行固定，并将保留依据《著作权法》《反不正当竞争法》等相关法律法规，追究侵权方民事赔偿、行政 处罚乃至刑事责任的一切诉讼权利；呼吁全行业坚守原创底线，尊重每一份创作成果、尊重知识产权， 共同维护健康有序的产业生态"。 ...

Core Insights - The company has received two domestic invention patent certificates and twelve domestic utility model patent certificates from the National Intellectual Property Administration, along with two international trademark registrations [1] - The invention patents include "Steel Beam Arc Lifting Device" and "Straightening and Bending Integrated Machine and Steel Processing Method," while the utility model patents cover "Welding Device" and "Welding Equipment" [1] - The duration of the invention patents is twenty years from the application date, and the utility model patents are valid for ten years from the application date [1] - The international trademark registrations are valid from December 29, 2023, to December 29, 2033, in Georgia and Thailand [1] - The acquisition of these patents and trademarks enhances the company's intellectual property protection system and improves its core competitiveness [1]

（原标题：上市公司起诉前员工团队！EMB量产前夜，一场专利竞夺悄然展开！） 近日，A股上市公司伯特利(603596)披露，公司作为原告，以侵犯知识产权为由，向苏州坐标系智能科 技有限公司（下称"坐标系"）、苏州时睿千驷科技有限公司（下称"时睿千驷"）、颜士富、杨昆、章贞 等5名被告提起诉讼。 三名自然人被告均是伯特利前员工，颜士富还曾短暂出任过公司总经理。 证券时报·e公司记者注意到，这是一场围绕EMB（电子机械制动系统）专利的诉讼。当前，EMB正处 于从技术研发到量产的前夜，国内外厂商均在争抢产业化先机。伯特利、坐标系均是这场产业竞赛的参 与方。 上市公司起诉前员工团队 伯特利成立于2004年，于2018年4月在A股上市。公司主要从事汽车底盘系统及智能驾驶系统的研发、 制造与销售。 伯特利认为，坐标系所取得的"一种线控底盘系统及控制方法""一种路面激励的手感模拟系统及控制方 法"等5项专利属于非法取得，颜士富、杨昆通过所获知的公司（即伯特利）EMB等产品的相关核心技 术秘密，并在中国境内以申请专利的方式披露了该技术秘密，坐标系将该专利申请权/专利权据为己 有，构成侵犯公司知识产权的违法行为。 企查查显示，坐 ...

Core Points - The National Intellectual Property Administration of China announced the implementation of a comprehensive protection system for intellectual property rights, achieving an average examination period for invention patents reduced to 15 months and maintaining an average trademark registration examination period of 4 months, both of which are the fastest internationally under the same examination system [1] - The establishment of 129 national-level intellectual property protection centers and rapid rights protection centers is underway, contributing to an increase in public satisfaction regarding intellectual property protection from 80.05 points in 2020 to 82.36 points in 2024 [1]

Core Viewpoint - TSMC has filed a lawsuit against former senior executive Luo Wei-ren for allegedly taking valuable trade secrets to Intel, raising concerns about competition and the semiconductor industry landscape [1][11]. Group 1: Legal Action and Allegations - TSMC officially filed a lawsuit against Luo Wei-ren for violating non-compete agreements and trade secret laws, specifically accusing him of transferring core business secrets to Intel [1][11]. - The lawsuit highlights TSMC's anger towards Intel, indicating the seriousness of the allegations and the potential implications for both companies [1][6]. Group 2: Background of Luo Wei-ren - Luo Wei-ren, aged 75, has a distinguished career in semiconductor manufacturing, having worked at Intel for 18 years before joining TSMC in 2004, where he played a crucial role in advanced process technology [2][3]. - During his tenure at TSMC, he was instrumental in obtaining over 1500 patents, with around 1000 being U.S. patents, contributing significantly to TSMC's rise as a global leader in chip manufacturing [2][3]. Group 3: Details of the Allegations - TSMC claims that Luo misled the company about his future plans, stating he would pursue an academic career, while he actually joined Intel just three months after his retirement [3][5]. - It is alleged that Luo took sensitive information, including details about 2nm technology and other advanced processes, which could provide Intel with a significant competitive advantage [4][5]. Group 4: Implications for the Semiconductor Industry - The case could have far-reaching effects on the semiconductor industry, particularly regarding talent mobility and intellectual property protection, as it underscores the risks associated with insider knowledge transfer [11]. - TSMC's concerns about the potential leakage of advanced technology to Intel could alter the competitive dynamics in the semiconductor market, especially as both companies vie for leadership in cutting-edge manufacturing processes [5][11]. Group 5: Intel's Position - Intel has remained relatively silent on the allegations, with CEO Pat Gelsinger dismissing them as rumors, while not providing details on the hiring process for Luo [6][9]. - The timing of Luo's move to Intel is critical, as the company is attempting to revitalize its foundry business and regain its competitive edge in semiconductor manufacturing [7][9]. Group 6: Previous Incidents of Data Breach - This incident is not isolated, as TSMC faced a similar data breach earlier in the year involving an employee leaking confidential information to a competitor, raising questions about internal security measures [10]. - The semiconductor industry, characterized by high R&D investments, faces significant challenges in protecting proprietary technologies from unauthorized access and competition [10].

Core Viewpoint - TSMC has filed a lawsuit against former senior executive Luo Wei-ren for allegedly taking valuable trade secrets to Intel, highlighting the intense competition in the semiconductor industry and the potential impact on the global chip foundry landscape [2][5]. Group 1: Legal Action and Allegations - TSMC officially filed a lawsuit against Luo Wei-ren for violating non-compete agreements and trade secret laws, specifically accusing him of transferring core business secrets to Intel [2][5]. - The lawsuit has drawn global attention due to the competitive relationship between TSMC and Intel, which could reshape the semiconductor industry [2][5]. - TSMC's legal action is based on Luo's alleged concealment of his intentions to join Intel shortly after retirement, which TSMC views as a breach of trust and contractual obligations [5][8]. Group 2: Luo Wei-ren's Background and Role - Luo Wei-ren, a 75-year-old semiconductor expert, has a significant history in the industry, having worked at Intel for 18 years before joining TSMC in 2004 [3][4]. - During his 21 years at TSMC, Luo played a crucial role in the development of advanced process technologies, holding over 1,500 patents, with approximately 1,000 being U.S. patents [3][4]. - His contributions were pivotal in TSMC's rise as a global leader in chip foundry services, particularly in advanced nodes from 28nm to 2nm [3][4]. Group 3: Technology Transfer and Implications - TSMC alleges that Luo took sensitive information related to 2nm technology and other advanced processes, which could provide Intel with a significant competitive advantage [8][12]. - The 2nm process is set to begin mass production in late 2025 and represents the pinnacle of semiconductor manufacturing technology [8][12]. - If the information is indeed transferred to Intel, it could allow the company to close the technological gap with TSMC and potentially reclaim key customers [8][12]. Group 4: Industry Context and Competitive Dynamics - The relationship between TSMC and Intel has evolved from competition to collaboration and back to rivalry, reflecting the complexities of the semiconductor industry [12][13]. - Intel has faced challenges in maintaining its technological edge, particularly in advanced process nodes, which has led to a reliance on TSMC for some manufacturing needs [12][13]. - The ongoing legal battle may have broader implications for talent mobility and intellectual property protection within the semiconductor sector [17]. Group 5: Internal Control and Security Concerns - TSMC has faced multiple incidents of internal leaks, raising questions about its ability to safeguard sensitive information [14][15]. - The company invests over $10 billion annually in R&D, making the protection of its core technologies critical to its competitive position [17]. - The outcome of the lawsuit could influence future practices regarding employee transitions and the safeguarding of proprietary information in the industry [17].