Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Federal Court has blocked Trump's tariffs, leading to significant movements in major asset classes, including a rise in the dollar, U.S. stock index futures, and crude oil prices, while gold prices fell sharply [1][9]. Group 1: Court Ruling and Market Reactions - The U.S. International Trade Court ruled that Trump's imposition of comprehensive tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act was an overreach of authority, as the Constitution grants Congress exclusive power to manage trade with other nations [8][9]. - Following the court's decision, gold prices dropped below $3250 per ounce, while Brent crude oil prices rose above $65 per barrel [1][9]. - The dollar index surpassed 100, with the Japanese yen and other safe-haven currencies declining [4][5]. Group 2: Implications of the Ruling - The court's ruling imposes a permanent injunction against Trump's tariffs until agreements are reached with most other trading partners, effectively suspending most of Trump's tariffs [9][10]. - The lawsuit was initiated by the Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small U.S. businesses importing goods from targeted countries, claiming that the tariffs would harm their business capabilities [9][11]. - The ruling can be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and potentially to the U.S. Supreme Court [9][10]. Group 3: Broader Context and Historical Trends - The opposition to Trump's tariff policies has gained momentum, forming a legal coalition across states and industries [13]. - Trump's tariff announcements have historically caused market volatility, leading to a trading strategy known as "TACO" (Trump Always Chickens Out), where initial tariff announcements lead to market declines followed by subsequent rollbacks that boost the market [14][15]. - Trump's recent tariff policies have raised concerns about potential insider trading, as they directly influence market expectations and could benefit his supporters or donors [15].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses potential insider trading by U.S. government officials and Congress members, highlighting suspicious stock transactions that coincide with significant market events related to tariff policies announced by President Trump [1][3][5]. Group 1: Insider Trading Allegations - A nonprofit news site reported that several high-ranking U.S. officials and Congress staff made timely stock trades, often before major announcements that affected the market [1][3]. - U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi sold shares of Trump Media Technology Group worth between $1 million and $5 million on April 2, just before a significant market drop following Trump's tariff announcement [1]. - Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy sold stocks of about 30 companies two days before Trump announced tariffs, with his department claiming the trades were managed by a client advisor without his input [3]. Group 2: Market Manipulation Concerns - President Trump faced scrutiny for potentially manipulating the stock market, with claims that he and his associates profited from insider knowledge of tariff changes [5][6]. - On April 9, Trump tweeted about stock purchases, and later announced a pause on certain tariffs, leading to a significant increase in the stock price of his media company [6]. - Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called for accountability for those who profited from trades made just before tariff announcements [8]. Group 3: Political Reactions - Senator Elizabeth Warren urged an investigation into whether Trump helped insiders profit from his erratic tariff policies, suggesting it could be a form of corruption [11][12]. - Senator Adam Schiff questioned who in the government had prior knowledge of Trump's tariff changes and profited from stock trades [9].

川普继续用嘴操纵市场一支穿云箭，千军万马来相见还是只能做波段 ...

Group 1 - Market experts indicate that recent market volatility has led to record-high options trading volumes, making it difficult to assess suspicious trades [1] - Interactive Brokers' chief strategist Steve Sosnick notes the significant trading volume and volatility, expressing uncertainty about whether the savvy buying is normal or indicative of malicious trading [1] - Cboe Global Markets' VP Henry Schwartz states that it is unclear if buyers were simply lucky, and he has not found any evidence to support claims of manipulation [1] Group 2 - The White House has not directly addressed concerns about market manipulation, with spokesperson Kush Desai emphasizing the president's responsibility to assure economic security amid media-induced panic [1] - The SEC has refrained from commenting, although it has previously acted against insider trading related to options [1] - House Democratic leader Jeffries mentions that some lawmakers will actively seek answers and transparency regarding stock purchases made in recent days [1] Group 3 - California Democratic Senator Schiff calls for a congressional investigation into whether Trump was involved in insider trading or market manipulation, citing the damaging effects of fluctuating tariff policies [2] - Trump's trade representative, Jamieson Greer, appeared unaware of Trump's decision to suspend tariffs while testifying before a House committee, which raises questions about intentional market manipulation [2]