据央视新闻报道，当地时间8月12日，由于美国联邦政府继续以创纪录的速度积累债务，美国国债总额首次超过37万亿美元。 美国财政部发布的最新数据显示，截至当日下午，美国国债总额已达到37004817625842美元。美国联邦预算问责委员会主席马娅·麦吉尼亚斯对此表 示，美国财政状况严重失衡，但国会却不断让情况恶化。 ...

（文章来源：央视新闻客户端） 美国财政部发布的最新数据显示，截至当日下午，美国国债总额已达到37004817625842美元。 当地时间8月12日，总台记者获悉，由于美国联邦政府继续以创纪录的速度积累债务，美国国债总额首 次超过37万亿美元。 美国联邦预算问责委员会主席马娅·麦吉尼亚斯对此表示，美国财政状况严重失衡，但国会却不断让情 况恶化。 ...

以下文章来源于财经图解 ，作者乘桴于海 财经图解 . 财经大事早知道，关注东方财富股票！ 美联储官网于北京时间8月10日发布了美联储副主席米歇尔·鲍曼的最新讲话稿。鲍曼表示，关税政策推动的物价上涨不太可能持续推高通胀，物价稳定面 临的上行风险已减弱，支持在2025年年内降息三次，这一立场因美国近期疲弱的劳动力市场数据而得到了强化。 与日本的低利率环境不同的是，美国的债务总量与高利率环境叠加，造成了庞大的利息支出。数据显示，截至2025年4月，美国国债加权平均利率高达 3.28%，预计全年利息支出将接近1.2万亿美元，相当于财政收入的1/4，超过军费成为联邦政府的第二大开支，仅次于社会保障支出。 分析人士指出，美国财政已陷入 "借新还旧+利息吞噬财政" 的死亡螺旋。尽管短期依靠美元霸权维系，但长期债务增速远超GDP、全球去美元化加速、民 生负担加重三重压力下，37万亿不仅是数字，更是信用货币体系的压力测试。 仅供投资者参考，不构成投资建议 免责声明 文章转载自公众号"财经图解"，以上观点来自相关机构，不代表天天基金的观点，不对观点 的准确性和完整性做任何保证。收益率数据仅供参考，过往业绩和走势风格不预示未来表 ...

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government has launched two online donation channels to encourage citizens to voluntarily contribute towards repaying the $37 trillion national debt, a move that has faced significant criticism [1] Group 1: Donation Program Details - The initiative, named "Reduce Public Debt Donations," has been operational since 1996, primarily using bank transfer payments before introducing online platforms like PayPal and Venmo [1] - Since its inception, the program has raised $67.3 million, which is negligible compared to the current national debt, sufficient to cover only about 20 minutes of debt accumulation [1] Group 2: Debt Growth and Public Impact - The U.S. national debt is increasing at a rate of $55,000 per second, highlighting the minimal impact of public donations on debt reduction [1] - According to the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, to fully repay the national debt, each American would need to donate at least $100,000 [1]

自从特朗普上任以来，美联储主席鲍威尔就已经成了特朗普主要抨击对象，可以说是啥时候想起来，啥时候都会抨击！ 对此，特朗普还给鲍威尔起了多个称谓，比如最好听的一个"太迟先生"，其余称谓要比这个难听太多了！ 而这一切的主要因素，就是特朗普多次施压鲍威尔降息，然而鲍威尔一直因为关税为通胀带来不确定性，同时就业劳动力市场依然强劲，始终没有降息。 鲍威尔还曾公开表示，美联储不降息的主要原因就是美国总统特朗普的关税政策，最终又把这个锅甩给了特朗普。 特朗普频繁施压也看不到降息的希望，就将降息转变为换个美联储主席！ 7月19日，据知情人士透露，美国财政部长贝森特近日私下向总统特朗普建议：不应试图解雇美联储主席鲍威尔。这一举动发生在特朗普对鲍威尔"加码逼 宫"的关键时刻，凸显了白宫内部在美联储问题上的深刻分歧。 特朗普政府找到了一个全新的、极具画面感的武器，来攻击鲍威尔——美联储总部的翻修工程。 白宫预算办主任沃特公开炮轰，称这项耗资近25亿美元的工程是"招摇的大修"，指责其包含VIP餐厅等奢华设施，成本远超同类项目。这顶帽子扣下来，足 以煽动起民众对"官僚浪费"的怒火。 共和党议员卢娜更是直接捅到了司法部，举报鲍威尔在国会听 ...

Group 1 - The core point of the article is the formal establishment of a regulatory framework for digital stablecoins in the U.S. through the signing of the "Genius Act" by President Trump, marking a significant legislative development in the cryptocurrency space [1][5] - The "Genius Act" requires stablecoins to be backed by liquid assets such as U.S. dollars or short-term U.S. Treasury securities, and mandates monthly disclosures of reserves by issuers [4][5] - The passage of the "Genius Act" and related legislation reflects a shift in the political landscape, with cryptocurrency evolving from a financial innovation topic to a matter of national interest involving U.S. dollar dominance and political stakes [1][2] Group 2 - Trump's previous skepticism towards cryptocurrencies has transformed into strong support, as he aims to position the U.S. as a leader in the digital currency space [2][6] - The legislative process faced significant hurdles, including an unprecedented 8-hour procedural vote in the House of Representatives, highlighting the contentious nature of cryptocurrency regulation [3][5] - The approval of the "Genius Act" is expected to pave the way for U.S. banks to issue digital assets, with major financial institutions eager to explore this new business opportunity [5] Group 3 - The legislation is seen as a means to maintain the dominance of the U.S. dollar in the global market, with stablecoins potentially reinforcing the dollar's influence beyond traditional monetary systems [7][10] - The demand for stablecoins is projected to create significant new demand for U.S. Treasury securities, potentially lowering interest costs for the U.S. government [7][8] - The push for private sector-issued stablecoins comes alongside efforts to limit the Federal Reserve's power regarding central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), indicating a strategic preference for market-driven solutions [8][10] Group 4 - The global response to the U.S. stablecoin legislation has been one of concern, with many countries accelerating their own CBDC initiatives to counter the potential risks posed by U.S. dollar stablecoins [10][11] - The dominance of U.S. dollar stablecoins, which account for 99% of the global market share, raises alarms about the erosion of monetary sovereignty for other nations [10][11] - Countries like Japan are implementing strict regulations to control the issuance of stablecoins, reflecting a defensive stance against the expansion of U.S. digital currency influence [11]

Core Viewpoint - The signing of the "Stablecoin Innovation Act" by President Trump establishes a regulatory framework for digital stablecoins in the U.S., aiming to anchor them to the U.S. dollar and create a federal strategy for digital assets [1][2]. Group 1: Legislative Developments - The U.S. House of Representatives passed the "Stablecoin Innovation Act" with a vote of 308 in favor and 122 against, which aims to regulate stablecoins pegged to the dollar [2]. - The act requires stablecoins to be backed by liquid assets such as U.S. dollars or short-term U.S. Treasury securities, and issuers must disclose reserve details monthly [5]. Group 2: Market Implications - Investment institutions believe that stablecoins can fill the void left by declining demand for U.S. Treasury securities, potentially becoming a strategic asset for the U.S. government in the next 5 to 10 years [5]. - The proportion of foreign creditors holding U.S. Treasury securities has sharply decreased over the past 15 years, indicating a growing reliance on stablecoins to support demand [5]. Group 3: Risks and Concerns - The Bank for International Settlements has warned that stablecoins have significant risks, including lack of central bank backing, insufficient measures against illegal use, and limited funding flexibility for loans [7]. - Concerns have been raised that stablecoins could undermine monetary sovereignty and lead to capital flight in emerging economies [8].

智通财经7月15日电，美国国债恢复下跌，收益率升至盘中高点。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Treasury bonds have declined for the fifth consecutive day, leading to a decrease in demand for long-term bonds as multiple bond auctions are scheduled this week [1] Group 1: Market Performance - U.S. Treasury bonds fell across the board on Tuesday, resulting in an increase in yields by 2 to 4 basis points [1] - The 30-year yield approached 5% for the first time since May, indicating a significant rise in long-term borrowing costs [1] Group 2: Economic Indicators - The rise in yields follows a robust non-farm payroll report, which revealed unexpected strength in the U.S. labor market [1] - Investors have adjusted their expectations regarding Federal Reserve interest rate cuts, reducing bets on potential rate decreases [1] Group 3: Future Expectations - Interest rate swaps indicate that traders anticipate two rate cuts of 25 basis points each by the end of the year, with the first cut expected in September [1]

Core Points - The recent passage of the "Big Beautiful Act" in the U.S. Congress reflects a significant shift towards austerity measures that disproportionately affect lower-income individuals and workers [4][10] - The act extends tax benefits for the wealthy while cutting food assistance and medical subsidies for the poor, indicating a regression to a more conservative societal structure reminiscent of the Cold War era [6][10][11] - The U.S. is facing a growing national debt, nearing $35 trillion, with interest payments exceeding $1 trillion annually, prompting the need for spending cuts [9] Summary by Sections Legislative Changes - The "Big Beautiful Act" passed with a narrow vote of 218 to 214, with no Democratic votes in favor and only two Republicans opposing [4] - Key provisions include the extension of tax benefits for the wealthy and cuts to food assistance and medical subsidies for the poor [4][10] Economic Context - Over the past decade, average wage growth in the U.S. was around 3% annually before the pandemic, but real purchasing power has stagnated despite nominal increases of over 5% in recent years [6] - The wealth of the top 10% of Americans increased by over 15% in the past year, driven by stock market and real estate gains, while lower-income households have seen their savings diminish [7] Social Implications - The cuts to welfare programs, including a 4% reduction in food assistance and over 1% in children's health insurance subsidies, suggest a return to a society where the working poor must work harder for less support [10][11] - The current economic environment is characterized by a strong dollar and high interest rates, which may lead to further cuts in education and housing subsidies if fiscal pressures continue [13] Consumer Sentiment - Despite rising stock markets, consumer confidence remains low, with many Americans expecting negative economic conditions in the near future [15] - The passage of the "Big Beautiful Act" indicates a prioritization of corporate interests and fiscal strength over the welfare of ordinary workers, raising concerns about the long-term societal impact [15][17]