晨星发表报告指，将护城河较窄的华润啤酒的公允价值估值下调3%至37.5港元，同时将2025-2029年的 盈利预测下调4-5%。该行仍认为该股估值被低估，2025年4.4%的股息率也支撑这一观点。该行将华润 啤酒的白酒业务五年销售的复合年增长率预测，从7%下调至3%，反映行业需求前景疲软。同时预计该 公司旗下公司"金沙酒业"品牌组合在高端白酒市场的表现将落后于其他品牌。此外，由于低端啤酒价格 承压，该行将2026年的价格增长预期下调2个百分点。喜力啤酒的渠道扩张仍是啤酒业务销量增长的主 要驱动力。 ...

- The report primarily focuses on tracking and analyzing the performance of broad-based indices in the A-share market, including metrics such as daily returns, turnover rates, risk premiums, PE-TTM, dividend yields, and net asset break rates[1][2][3] - **Risk Premium Analysis**: The risk premium is calculated using the yield of 10-year government bonds as the risk-free rate. The report highlights that indices like CSI 500 (52.54%) and CSI 2000 (48.73%) have relatively high 5-year percentile values, while indices like SSE 50 (30.87%) and ChiNext (19.05%) are lower. The risk premium for CSI 500 and CSI 2000 shows higher volatility compared to other indices[29][31][33] - **PE-TTM Analysis**: The PE-TTM values are used as a valuation reference. CSI 500 (97.6%) and CSI All Share (96.28%) have high 5-year percentile values, while SSE 50 (85.7%) and ChiNext (58.43%) are relatively lower. The report notes that the valuation levels of most indices have been on an upward trend since late 2024, with a turning point observed in September 2025[41][44][45] - **Dividend Yield Analysis**: Dividend yield is analyzed as a measure of cash return. ChiNext (61.57%) and CSI 1000 (35.79%) are at relatively high 5-year historical percentiles, while CSI 500 (15.62%) and CSI 2000 (12.81%) are lower. The report emphasizes the importance of high dividend yields during periods of market downturns and declining interest rates[50][55][57] - **Net Asset Break Rate**: The net asset break rate, which reflects the proportion of stocks trading below their net asset value, is used as a market valuation indicator. Current break rates are reported as SSE 50 (22.0%), CSI 500 (11.2%), CSI 1000 (8.1%), and CSI 2000 (3.55%), among others. A lower break rate may indicate market optimism about future growth[56][59][61]

麦格理发布研报称，美高梅中国(02282)新品牌授权协议将于2026年1月起，将从原来的每月综合收益净 额1.75%调高至3%，有效期最长可达20年。基于2026年预期EV/EBITDA倍数维持10倍不变，下调目标 价7%，由22.6港元降至21港元，维持"跑赢大市"评级。另外，美高梅中国于3月宣布将派息比率从原先 35%提高至不少于50%，以50%假设下，经股价调整后，2026年预期股息率可达5.4%，仍具吸引。 该行称，尽管授权费支出大幅增加，但这一长期协议将缓解美高梅中国未来20年内授权费进一步上调的 风险。该股股价已回落17%，现时为良好入场点。因授权费估计上调，该行削美高梅中国2026-2027年 EBITDA分别5.1%/4.8%。 ...

- The report primarily focuses on tracking and analyzing the performance of broad-based indices in the A-share market, including their daily returns, moving averages, turnover rates, and valuation metrics such as PE-TTM and dividend yield[1][2][4] - The turnover rate of the indices is calculated using the formula: $ \text{Turnover Rate} = \frac{\Sigma(\text{Component Stock Free Float Shares} \times \text{Component Stock Turnover Rate})}{\Sigma(\text{Component Stock Free Float Shares})} $ This metric reflects the liquidity and trading activity of the indices[19] - The risk premium of the indices is measured relative to the 10-year government bond yield, serving as a benchmark for risk-free rates. The report highlights the mean-reversion behavior of risk premiums and their volatility trends over time[29][30] - The PE-TTM (Price-to-Earnings Trailing Twelve Months) is used as a valuation metric to assess the investment value of indices. The report observes that the PE-TTM values of indices like CSI 500 and CSI All Share are at relatively high historical percentiles, while indices like SSE 50 and ChiNext are at lower percentiles[41][44][45] - Dividend yield is analyzed as a measure of cash return to investors. The report notes that indices such as ChiNext and CSI 300 have relatively high historical percentiles for dividend yield, while CSI 500 and CSI 2000 are at lower percentiles[50][52][56] - The report also tracks the net asset value (NAV) break rate, which indicates the proportion of stocks trading below their book value. A higher break rate suggests undervaluation, while a lower rate may indicate market optimism. Current break rates for indices like SSE 50 and CSI 300 are higher compared to others like CSI 2000 and CSI All Share[57][59]

- The report tracks the performance of various broad-based indices in the A-share market, noting that on December 24, 2025, all indices except the SSE 50 increased, with the CSI 2000 and CSI 1000 showing the largest gains of 1.55% and 1.54%, respectively[2] - The report compares the moving averages of the indices, highlighting that the CSI 1000 broke through the 60-day moving average, and all tracked indices are above the 5, 10, 20, and 60-day moving averages[13] - The report analyzes the trading volume and turnover rates, noting that on December 24, 2025, the CSI 2000 had the highest trading volume share at 24.78%, followed by the CSI 300 and CSI 1000, both at 21.96%[17] - The report examines the daily return distribution, indicating that the ChiNext Index has the largest negative skewness and kurtosis, while the CSI 2000 has the smallest negative skewness and kurtosis[23][25] - The report evaluates the risk premium of the indices relative to the 10-year government bond yield, noting that the CSI 1000 and CSI 500 have high 5-year percentile values of 89.44% and 88.1%, respectively, while the CSI 300 and SSE 50 have lower values of 64.21% and 47.46%[28][31] - The report assesses the PE-TTM ratios of the indices, highlighting that the CSI 500 and CSI 1000 have high 5-year percentile values of 96.94% and 94.63%, respectively, while the SSE 50 and ChiNext Index have lower values of 84.05% and 59.17%[42][43] - The report analyzes the dividend yield, noting that the ChiNext Index and CSI 1000 have high 5-year historical percentile values of 61.32% and 39.09%, respectively, while the CSI 500 and CSI 2000 have lower values of 17.77% and 16.36%[51][53] - The report examines the net asset value break rate, indicating that the current break rates for the indices are 22.0% for the SSE 50, 16.0% for the CSI 300, 10.8% for the CSI 500, 8.0% for the CSI 1000, 3.25% for the CSI 2000, and 6.14% for the CSI All Share Index[57]

Core Viewpoint - Under the backdrop of low interest rates and asset scarcity, the allocation value of high cash flow assets is increasingly prominent, with sustained demand expected due to medium to long-term capital inflows [1] Group 1: Cash Flow and Investment Opportunities - Empirical research indicates that companies with abundant cash flow typically exhibit a higher willingness to distribute dividends, with a significant positive correlation between free cash flow rate and dividend yield [1] - Investors are encouraged to pay attention to cash flow ETFs (159399), which have consistently outperformed the CSI Dividend Index and the CSI 300 Index over the past nine years from 2016 to 2024 [1] Group 2: ETF Performance and Characteristics - The underlying index of cash flow ETF (159399) focuses on large and mid-cap stocks, with a higher proportion of central state-owned enterprises compared to similar cash flow indices [1] - According to the fund announcement, the cash flow ETF has been able to assess dividends monthly and has distributed dividends for ten consecutive months since its listing, making it a potential area of interest for investors [1]

- The report primarily focuses on tracking and analyzing the performance of broad-based indices in the A-share market, including their daily investment dynamics, moving averages, turnover rates, risk premiums, PE-TTM, dividend yields, and net asset break rates[1][2][4] - The turnover rate of the indices is calculated as the sum of the free-float market capitalization of constituent stocks multiplied by their turnover rates, divided by the total free-float market capitalization of the constituent stocks[17] - The risk premium is measured relative to the yield of 10-year government bonds, serving as a reference for risk-free rates, to evaluate the relative investment value and deviation of the indices[27][29] - The PE-TTM (Price-to-Earnings Trailing Twelve Months) is used as a valuation reference to assess the investment value of the indices at the current point in time[37][41] - Dividend yield is tracked to reflect the cash dividend return rate, which is particularly significant during market downturns as high dividend yields often act as a safe haven[46][51] - The net asset break rate is defined as the proportion of stocks with a price-to-book ratio below 1, indicating undervaluation in the market[52][55]

中泰证券指出，富时中国A股自由现金流指数成份股集中分布在原材料、工业和可选消费行业，行业防 御属性相对较强。在震荡下跌市中，自由现金流指数跑赢全市场，展现出避险功能。从因子表现看，自 由现金流率与股息率呈显著正相关，现金流充裕的公司更倾向于稳定分红，规避了缺乏现金流支撑 的"价值陷阱"。 （文章来源：每日经济新闻） 投资者可关注现金流ETF（159399）。市场表现来看，标的指数富时现金流指数2016年至2024年连续9 年跑赢中证红利指数和沪深300指数。现金流ETF（159399）的标的指数聚焦大中市值，标的指数央国 企占比高于同类现金流指数，月月可评估分红，感兴趣的投资者或可持续关注。 ...

Group 1: Allocation Demand in Low-Interest Rate Environment - The demand for dividend-related assets is expected to continue increasing, driven by the need for stable cash returns in a low-interest rate and asset scarcity environment [4][9]. - As of December 17, 2025, the tracking scale of dividend index ETFs approached 200 billion, while cash flow-related products reached 24.8 billion since their issuance in February of the same year [9]. Group 2: Comparison of Dividend and Free Cash Flow Indices - The report outlines the selection rules for the CSI Dividend Index and the National Index Free Cash Flow, emphasizing liquidity and consistent dividend payments over the past three years [12]. - The performance comparison shows that both dividend and cash flow indices outperformed the overall market during periods of market downturns, indicating their defensive characteristics [15]. Group 3: Relationship Between Dividend Capability and Willingness - There is a significant positive correlation between dividend yield and free cash flow, indicating that companies with high cash flow are more willing to distribute dividends [51]. - The analysis shows that companies with a history of consistent dividends and strong cash flow tend to have more stable and superior long-term stock price performance [59]. Group 4: "High-Yield Cash Cow" Strategy Construction - The "High-Yield Cash Cow" strategy involves selecting stocks based on high free cash flow rates and consistent dividend payments, excluding financial and real estate sectors [59]. - The strategy has shown strong performance, with the "Cash Cow 50 High Yield 30" combination achieving an annualized return of 25.9% since 2014, outperforming the CSI Dividend Index by 13.5% [62].

Content: --------- <doc id='1'>证券研究报告·金融工程报告 2025 年 12 月 18 日 江海证券研究发展部 金融工程定期报告 金融工程研究组 A 股市场快照：宽基指数每日投资动态 2025.12.18 ◆市场表现：2025 年 12 月 17 日, 各宽基指数（表 1）全部上涨，其中创业板指（3.39%） 投资要点：</doc> <doc id='2'>分析师：梁俊炜 执业证书编号：S1410524090001 A 股市场快照：宽基指数每日投资动 和中证 500（1.95%）涨幅最大。当年涨跌情况，创业板指（48.3%）涨幅最大，其 次是中证 2000（30.48%）和中证 500（24.66%），中证 1000（22.34%）和中证全指 （21.17%）涨幅扩大，而上证 50（11.43%）涨幅最小。 ◆均线比较：除了中证 1000 和中证 2000，其余跟踪指数已突破 5 日及 20 日均线。 创业板指率先突破 60 日均线。各跟踪指数单日修复程度较大。 ◆资金占比与换手：2025 年 12 月 17 日, 沪深 300（25.34%）交易金额占比最高， 相关研究报告</doc> <doc id='3'>态 2025.12.17 A 股市场快照：宽基指数每日投资动 态 2025.12.16 A 股市场快照：宽基指数每日投资动 态 2025.12.15 其次是中证 2000（23.94%）和中证 1000（20.51%）。各宽基指数当前换手率分别 为中证 2000（3.88），创业板指（2.41），中证 1000（2.24），中证全指（1.63）， 中证 500（1.56），沪深 300（0.54）和上证 50（0.23）。 ◆日收益率分布：创业板指的峰度负偏离最大，中证 1000 的峰度负偏离最小。上 证 50 和创业板指的负偏态最大，中证 1000 和中证 2000 的负偏态最小。 ◆风险溢价：2025 年 12 月 17 日, 创业板指（97.14%）和中证 500（96.59%）风险 溢价近 5 年分位值较高，中证 1000（88.41%）和中证 2000（69.05%）较低。</doc> <doc id='4'>◆PE-TTM：中证 500（95.04%）和中证 1000（93.47%）分位值较高，而中证 2000 （79.17%）和创业板指（57.69%）分位值较低。 ◆股债性价比：没有指数高于其 80%分位，中证 500 低于其 20%分位。 ◆股息率：创业板指（63.22%）和中证 1000（51.65%）所处近 5 年历史分位值较 高，而中证 2000（31.32%）和中证 500（24.55%）较低。 ◆破净率：当前，各指数破净率为上证 50（22.0%），沪深 300（16.33%），中证 500（11.2%），中证 1000（8.3%），中证 2000（3.8%），创业板指（nan%）和中 证全指（6.51%）。 ◆风险提示：本报告可能存在数据缺失、数据错误、数据不及时、模型处理错误 等风险。本报告仅从金融工程角度，对重要指数的市场数据进行跟踪、统计、分 析，不构成对市场指数、行业或个股进行预测或推荐。</doc> <doc id='6'>| 市场衣乳… | | --- | | 1.1 指数表现 … | | 1.2 指数与均线的比较 | | 1.3 资全占比与换手率 … | | 2 日收益分布 | | 2.1 收益区间分布对比 | | 22 分布形态变化对比 | | 3 风险溢价 … | | 3.1 各宽基指数的风险溢价 | | 32 风险溢价历史分布 | | 4 PE-TTM. | | 4.1 各宽某指数 PE-TTM 和分位值 | | 4.2 PE-TTM 历史对比… | | 4.3 股债性价比历史对比… | | 5 吸血率… | | 5.1 近一年各宽某指数股息率变化情况, | | 5.2 股息率历史对比… | | 6 玻璃率 | | 7 风险提示 . |</doc> <doc id='8'>| 表 1、各宽基指数表现情况 | | --- | | 表 2、各宽基指数与均线、近250交易日高位和低位的比较 … | | 表 3 、各宽基指数分布形态变化 … | | 表 4、各宽基指数和十年期国债即期收益率的风险溢价 | | 表 5、各宽基指数 PE-TTM 分位值和历史值 | | 表 6、各宽基指数当前股息率和历史情况 | | 图 1、各宽基指数交易全额占比和换手率 | | 图 2、各宽基指数每日收益率分布情况 | | 图 3、各宽基指数相对十年国债即期收益率的风险溢价 | | 图 4、各宽基指数相对沪深 300 的风险溢价的近 5年分布 . | | 图 5 、各宽基指数 PE-TTM 及其分位值 | | 图 6、各宽基指数的股债性价比… | | 图 7、各宽基指数股息率 | | 图 8、各宽基指数破净个股数和占比………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 10 |</doc> <doc id='10'>1 市场表现 本报告将从指数涨跌幅、连阴连阳、上涨下跌分布等维度对各宽基指数进 行评价和跟踪。 1.1 指数表现 </doc> <doc id='11'>2025 年 12 月 17 日, 各宽基指数（表 1）全部上涨，其中创业板指（3.39%） 和中证 500（1.95%）涨幅最大。当周涨跌情况，各跟踪指数全部下跌，其中 中证 2000（-1.22%）和中证 1000（-1.12%）跌幅最大。当月涨跌情况，各跟踪 指数涨跌各现，其中创业板指（4.04%）和中证 500（1.51%）涨幅最大，而中 证 2000（-0.89%）和中证 1000（-0.62%）下跌。当季涨跌情况，各跟踪指数除 了上证 50（0.09%）外全部下跌，其中中证 1000（-3.78%）和中证 500（-3.7%） 跌幅最大。当年涨跌情况，创业板指（48.3%）涨幅最大，其次是中证 2000（30.48%） 和中证 500（24.66%），中证 1000（22.34%）和中证全指（21.17%）涨幅扩大， 而上证 50（11.43%）涨幅最小。 表 1、各宽基指数表现情况 指数名称 指数代码 当日涨幅% 当周涨幅% 当月涨幅% 当季涨幅% 当年涨幅% 日K </doc> <doc id='12'>| 指数名称 | 指数代码 | 当日涨幅% | 当周涨幅% | 当月涨幅% | 当季涨幅% | 当年涨幅% | 日K 连阴连阳 | 周K 连阴连阳 | 月K 连阴连阳 | 季K 连阴连阳 | 年K 连阴连阳 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 上证50 | 000016.SH | 1.25 | -0.10 | 0.74 | 0.09 | 11.43 | | | |