| | 中华人民共和国商务部 | Q 请输入关键字 | | --- | --- | --- | | | 首页 > 政务公开 > | 政策发布 | | | 来源:贸易救济局 类型:原创 | 2025-09-13 19:25 | | 首 页 | | 商务部公告2025年第27号 公布对原产于美国的进口 | | 机构设置 | 相关模拟芯片发起反倾销立案调查 | | | 新闻发布 | | | | 目 政务公开 | | | | 园 政务大厅 | 【发布单位】贸易救济局 | | | | 【发布文号】商务部公告2025年第27号 | | | ■ 互动交流 | 【发文日期】2025年09月13日 | | | ◇ 公共服务 | | | 商务部新闻发言人就对原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片发起反倾销调查答记者问时表示， 近期，美国政府泛化国家安全概念，滥用出口管制和"长臂管辖"，对中国芯片产品和人工智能产业进行 恶意封锁和打压，严重违反世贸组织规则，损害中国企业正当权益，中方对此坚决反对。 来源：商务部官网、新华社 今天，商务部连发两条公告，公布对原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片发起反倾销立案调查、就美国对华 集成电路领域相关措施发起反 ...

商务部获得初步证据和信息显示，美国对华集成电路领域相关措施（以下称被调查措施）符合《中 华人民共和国对外贸易法》第七条规定的"在贸易方面对中华人民共和国采取歧视性的禁止、限制或者 其他类似措施"的情形。 依据《中华人民共和国对外贸易法》第七条、第三十六条规定，任何国家或地区在贸易方面对中华 人民共和国采取歧视性的禁止、限制或者其他类似措施的，中华人民共和国可以根据实际情况对该国家 或者该地区采取相应的措施。商务部可自行或会同国务院其他有关部门发起相关调查。 （二）2022年以来，美国政府通过发布相关规则、发送通知函等方式，限制对中国出口集成电路相 关产品、制造设备等，限制"美国人"参与中国半导体项目。如2022年10月、2023年10月、2024年12月、 2025年1月等发布的规则。 （三）2022年以来，美国政府根据《芯片与科学法》及相关规则，限制相关企业和个人在中国相关 领域开展经贸与投资活动等。 （四）2025年5月，美国政府发布新闻和指南，限制使用包括华为昇腾芯片在内的中国先进计算集 成电路、限制美国人工智能芯片用于训练中国人工智能模型等。 此外，美国在集成电路领域，包括设计、制造、封装、测试、装备 ...

商务部：对原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片发起反倾销立案调查 中华人民共和国商务部（以下简称商务部）于2025年7月23日收到江苏省半导体行业协会（以下称申请人）代表国内相关模拟芯片产业正式提交的反倾销 调查申请，申请人请求对原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片进行反倾销调查。商务部依据《中华人民共和国反倾销条例》有关规定，对申请人资格、申请调 查产品有关情况、中国同类产品有关情况、申请调查产品对国内产业影响、申请调查国家有关情况等进行了审查。 根据申请人提供的证据和商务部初步审查，申请人相关模拟芯片的合计产量符合《中华人民共和国反倾销条例》关于申请人资格的规定。同时，申请书中 包含了《中华人民共和国反倾销条例》第十四条、第十五条规定的反倾销调查立案所要求内容及有关证据。 根据上述审查结果，依据《中华人民共和国反倾销条例》第十六条的规定，商务部决定自2025年9月13日起对原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片进行反倾销 立案调查。现将有关事项公告如下： 一、立案调查及调查期 自本公告发布之日起，商务部对原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片进行反倾销立案调查，本次调查确定的倾销调查期为2024年1月1日至2024年12月31日，产 业损害 ...

今天，商务部连发两条公告，公布对原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片发起反倾销立案调查、就美国对华 集成电路领域相关措施发起反歧视立案调查。 | | 年工利压的关部 请编入关键字 | | --- | --- | | | 首页 > 政务公开 > 政策发布 | | | 来源:贸易救济局 类型:原创 2025-09-13 19:25 | | 首 页 | 商务部公告2025年第27号 公布对原产于美国的进口 | | 机构设置 BR | 相关模拟芯片发起反倾销立案调查 | | 新闻发布 | | | ■ 政务公开 | | | E 政务大厅 | 【发布单位】贸易救济局 | | | 【发布文号】 裔务部公告2025年第27号 | | 互动交流 | 【发文日期】2025年09月13日 | | ◇ 公共服务 | | 商务部新闻发言人就对原产于美国的进口相关模拟芯片发起反倾销调查答记者问时表示， 近期，美国政府泛化国家安全概念，滥用出口管制和"长臂管辖"，对中国芯片产品和人工智能产业进行 恶意封锁和打压，严重违反世贸组织规则，损害中国企业正当权益，中方对此坚决反对。 此次反倾销调查是应中国国内产业申请发起，符合中国法律法规和世贸组织规则。 ...

Core Viewpoint - China has initiated an anti-discrimination investigation against the United States regarding measures taken in the integrated circuit sector, citing these actions as discriminatory and harmful to both China's development and the global semiconductor supply chain stability [1]. Group 1: Investigation Details - The investigation is a response to a series of prohibitive and restrictive measures imposed by the U.S. on China in the integrated circuit field, including Section 301 investigations and export controls [1]. - China asserts that these protectionist practices are aimed at suppressing the development of advanced computing chips and artificial intelligence in China [1]. - The investigation will be conducted based on principles of fairness, justice, and transparency, inviting participation from all stakeholders affected by U.S. measures, including domestic industries and enterprises in China [1]. Group 2: Legal Framework and Future Actions - The decision to launch the investigation is grounded in several provisions of the Foreign Trade Law of the People's Republic of China [1]. - China has indicated that it will take necessary measures to defend the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese enterprises in response to the U.S. actions [1].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around China's imposition of a 100% tariff on Canadian canola meal, which is seen as a retaliatory measure against Canada's recent tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and steel products [1][3][5] - Canada is the largest supplier of canola to China, with exports valued at CAD 4.9 billion in 2024, accounting for 67% of its canola exports, making this a critical economic issue for Canada [1][5] - The 100% tariff and a 75.8% temporary anti-dumping tax effectively block Canadian canola from the Chinese market, while China can source canola from other countries like Australia and Russia [1][7] Group 2 - Canada's actions are viewed as aligning with U.S. strategies, which has led to accusations of trade protectionism and discrimination from China, citing violations of WTO rules [3][5] - The political implications of the tariff are significant, as it exacerbates tensions between the Canadian federal government and its western provinces, which are heavily reliant on canola farming [7][9] - China's strong response is framed as a warning to other nations, particularly the U.S. and EU, indicating that those who engage in trade wars will face consequences [7][9]

Group 1 - Canada announced a 25% tariff on steel and related products from China to protect its domestic industry from an influx of foreign steel following U.S. tariffs [1][3] - The Canadian government is responding to U.S. trade policies, particularly those imposed by the Trump administration, which have included tariffs ranging from 35% to 50% on various Canadian products [3][5] - The decision to target China is seen as a strategic move to demonstrate a tough stance externally while attempting to appease domestic dissatisfaction and signal cooperation to the U.S. [5][7] Group 2 - China is the largest steel producer globally and a significant source of steel imports for Canada, accounting for over 10% of Canada's steel imports last year, which could lead to increased costs for Canadian industries [5][7] - China's potential retaliatory measures include imposing punitive tariffs on Canadian agricultural products, which could severely impact Canada's agricultural sector that relies heavily on the Chinese market [7][9] - The evolving trade dynamics indicate a broader trend of countries aligning against China, with Canada’s actions reflecting this shift in international trade relations [7][9]

Group 1: Conflict Trigger - The conflict was triggered by Canada's unilateral imposition of tariffs on Chinese goods, particularly a 100% tariff on electric vehicles and a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum, effective October 1, 2024 [2][4] - Canada's actions were framed as a response to similar measures by the US and EU, but lacked substantial evidence and appeared hasty compared to the thorough investigations conducted by the US and EU [4][6] Group 2: China's Response - In response to Canada's tariffs, China initiated an anti-discrimination investigation against Canada on September 26, 2024, marking a significant move in international trade disputes [8][10] - China also launched an anti-dumping investigation on Canadian canola on September 9, 2024, targeting a key export commodity worth over 3 billion Canadian dollars in 2023 [10][12] Group 3: Historical Context - Diplomatic relations between China and Canada began in 1970, with a mutually beneficial trade relationship that peaked in the 2010s, where bilateral trade reached hundreds of billions of Canadian dollars [14][16] - The relationship soured significantly after the 2018 Meng Wanzhou incident, leading to a series of retaliatory measures and a decline in trust between the two nations [16] Group 4: International Implications - The dispute has broader international implications, with China's anti-discrimination investigation potentially setting a precedent for future trade conflicts, while Canada faces criticism for its unfounded tariff measures [17][19] - Canada has expressed strong condemnation of China's actions and plans to support affected industries, but the scale of assistance is limited, and there are calls for government compromise from the agricultural community [20] Group 5: Conclusion - The trade war illustrates the complexities of global trade dynamics and the lack of true winners, as both countries face economic repercussions and strained relations [21]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the establishment of a dispute resolution panel by the WTO regarding Canada's imposition of additional tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles, steel, and aluminum products, which China claims violate GATT regulations [1][2][4]. Group 1: Dispute Background - On October 1, 2024, Canada officially implemented a 100% additional tariff on electric vehicles imported from China, followed by a 25% additional tariff on steel and aluminum products from China starting October 22, 2024 [3][5]. - China initiated a lawsuit at the WTO against Canada's unilateral and protectionist measures, asserting that these actions are inconsistent with WTO rules [3][6]. Group 2: Tariff Details - The dispute, numbered DS627, involves Canada's 100% additional tariff on all Chinese-made electric vehicles and a 25% tariff on steel and aluminum products [4][5]. - In 2023, the trade value affected by these measures was approximately $1.7 billion for electric vehicles, $950 million for steel products, and $720 million for aluminum products [10][11]. Group 3: Responses and Negotiations - China expressed willingness to engage in constructive dialogue with Canada despite the request for the establishment of an expert group [7][8]. - Canada maintains that its measures comply with GATT regulations and also expresses a desire for constructive dialogue with China [8]. Group 4: Countermeasures and Further Actions - In response to Canada's tariffs, China announced anti-discrimination measures, including a 100% tariff on certain Canadian imports such as canola oil and specific seafood products, effective March 20, 2025 [14][15]. - Canada argues that China's countermeasures exceed the commitments made under GATT and seeks expedited processing of the dispute due to the perishable nature of the goods involved [16][17]. Group 5: Future Implications - China's ambassador to Canada highlighted the potential for cooperation in the electric vehicle sector, emphasizing the benefits for both countries and the need for a fair trade environment [11]. - The article concludes with the assertion that the resolution of these disputes hinges on Canada's actions regarding the discriminatory tariffs imposed on Chinese products [19].

Core Viewpoint - China has announced the results of its first anti-discrimination investigation against Canada and will impose additional tariffs on Canadian goods [1] Group 1: Investigation Results - The results of the anti-discrimination investigation initiated by China have been released, marking a significant development in trade relations with Canada [1] - Six major trade associations in China, including the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Metals, Minerals & Chemicals, expressed strong support for the Ministry of Commerce's ruling on the investigation [1]