Core Viewpoint - The recent "explosion mountain" event organized by the brand Arc'teryx has sparked widespread public outrage due to its potential ecological damage in the fragile environment of the Himalayas, raising questions about the brand's commitment to environmental protection and cultural respect [2][8][16]. Group 1: Event Overview - The "Ascend Dragon" event involved igniting colorful fireworks from approximately 4,600 meters above sea level, reaching the summit at 5,050 meters, as part of Arc'teryx's "Towards Beauty" series [2][9]. - The event aimed to explore local culture through art, but the execution has been heavily criticized for lacking proper environmental assessments and potentially harming the ecosystem [2][5]. Group 2: Public Reaction - Social media backlash labeled the fireworks display as "earth's shingles" and "a colorful lump," indicating strong disapproval from the public [4]. - Critics highlighted the inadequacy of the brand's environmental measures, questioning the effectiveness of using biodegradable materials in such a harsh climate [5][6]. Group 3: Ecological Concerns - Experts pointed out that the high-altitude environment has a very slow decomposition rate, making the use of biodegradable materials questionable [5]. - The destruction of vegetation and soil due to the fireworks is seen as a significant and potentially irreversible ecological impact [5][9]. Group 4: Brand Strategy and Identity - Arc'teryx, under Anta's ownership, is attempting to shift its brand narrative to resonate with urban elites while maintaining its outdoor heritage [11][14]. - The brand's previous initiatives focused on environmental protection, contrasting sharply with the recent event, which has been perceived as a marketing misstep [9][16]. Group 5: Future Implications - The backlash from the event poses a serious challenge for Anta as it aims to position itself as a global brand, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach between marketing and ecological responsibility [16][19]. - The incident serves as a critical lesson for brands in understanding and respecting their consumer base, particularly those passionate about outdoor activities and environmental conservation [26][27].

Core Viewpoint - The recent fireworks event by the outdoor brand Arc'teryx in the Himalayas, in collaboration with artist Cai Guo-Qiang, has sparked significant public controversy regarding environmental concerns, leading to a notable decline in the stock price of its parent company, Anta Sports, which fell over 4% in early trading [1][2]. Group 1: Company Impact - Anta Sports' stock price dropped by more than 4% following the controversy surrounding the Arc'teryx fireworks event [1]. - The company's market capitalization is reported at 259.2 billion, with a price-to-earnings ratio of 16.11 and a price-to-book ratio of 3.71 [2]. Group 2: Environmental Concerns - The fireworks event on September 19 led to widespread criticism from netizens and outdoor enthusiasts regarding its environmental impact [2]. - In response to the backlash, Arc'teryx issued an apology and committed to cooperating with government oversight and third-party environmental assessments [3][6]. - Cai Guo-Qiang's studio also expressed a commitment to evaluate the ecological impact of the event and take remedial actions if necessary [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - The recent fireworks event by Arc'teryx in the Himalayas has sparked significant controversy regarding environmental impact and cultural insensitivity, challenging the brand's image as a nature-respecting outdoor company [6][7][8]. Summary by Sections Event Overview - Arc'teryx, a brand under Amer Sports, held its third annual "Towards Beauty" event in the Himalayas, collaborating with artist Cai Guoqiang for a fireworks art project called "Ascending Dragon" [4][5]. Public Reaction - The event faced backlash on social media, with many users criticizing the ecological implications of fireworks in a fragile high-altitude environment, despite claims of using biodegradable materials [6][7]. - The brand's long-standing image of "respecting nature" has been questioned, leading some consumers to express intentions to stop purchasing Arc'teryx products [8]. Brand Performance - Arc'teryx has been a popular outdoor brand in China, with its parent company, Amer Sports, reporting a 42% year-on-year revenue increase in the Greater China region for the first half of 2025, amounting to $856 million (approximately 6.094 billion RMB) [12]. - The outdoor functional apparel segment, which includes Arc'teryx, saw a revenue growth of 26% to about $1.173 billion in the first half of 2025, following a 36% growth in 2024 [12]. Industry Trends - Outdoor brands are shifting marketing strategies from high-end malls to natural settings, enhancing consumer engagement through outdoor experiences and cultural exchanges [13].

Core Points - The "Sustainable Theater - Zero Waste Planet: Clean Beach Action Public Exhibition" was launched in Beijing, co-hosted by the SEE Foundation and Ant Forest Foundation [1] - The exhibition features an installation inspired by the SEE Foundation's "Zero Waste Planet" project, symbolizing the interconnectedness of human and natural ecosystems [1] - The exhibition aims to encourage public participation and awareness of environmental issues through relatable daily life scenarios [1] Group 1 - The SEE Foundation and Ant Forest have initiated the "Clean Beach Public Action" since 2023, conducting nearly 500 activities across 61 beaches in 18 cities [1] - The exhibition showcases real stories of individuals becoming ecological "guardians," including students and volunteers participating in beach clean-ups [2] - Over 30 million people have supported the "Clean Beach Public Action" through the Ant Forest platform, converting low-carbon behaviors into green energy [2] Group 2 - On the opening day, partners from eight cities launched simultaneous clean-up actions, aligning with the global initiative of World Clean-Up Day [2] - The exhibition encourages visitors to transition from spectators to active participants in environmental protection [2]

Core Viewpoint - The collaboration between the brand Arc'teryx and artist Cai Guoqiang for the art project "Ascension Dragon" has led to a significant public relations crisis, as the event's fireworks display in a fragile ecological area has drawn widespread criticism from environmental organizations and consumers [1][3]. Group 1: Brand Crisis - The fireworks event has been perceived as a betrayal of the brand's core values of environmental respect, leading to a rapid decline in brand image [1][4]. - Following the backlash, both Arc'teryx and Cai Guoqiang issued apologies and committed to third-party ecological assessments, but these actions cannot quickly restore the damaged ecological environment or brand reputation [1][6]. - The incident is seen as a culmination of a strategic shift for Arc'teryx since its acquisition by Anta, moving from a focus on performance and environmental sustainability to chasing social media trends and exposure [3][19]. Group 2: Brand Identity and Values - Arc'teryx's previous reputation was built on its commitment to environmental sustainability and high-performance outdoor gear, which has now been undermined by the recent event [5][6]. - The brand's shift towards a "luxury sportswear" narrative has led to a disconnect with its original values, resulting in public perception of the brand as superficial and hypocritical [7][19]. - The contrasting responses from Arc'teryx's global and Chinese social media accounts highlight a lack of consistent brand identity and values post-acquisition [11][13]. Group 3: Market Position and Competition - The outdoor market is witnessing the rise of niche brands that focus on specific outdoor activities, which are gaining loyal customers through their commitment to quality and performance [21][23]. - Arc'teryx's strategy of positioning itself as a luxury brand through limited editions and high prices may lead to a loss of credibility and market share, especially as competitors like Patagonia and The North Face continue to emphasize sustainability and professional credibility [19][23]. - The recent crisis has exposed the fragility of Arc'teryx's "luxury sportswear" narrative, as the brand struggles to maintain its high-end positioning amidst growing consumer skepticism [23].

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the release of fireworks in the Himalayas by the brand Arc'teryx and artist Cai Guoqiang has sparked significant public backlash, raising questions about the brand's commitment to its environmental and outdoor ethos [1][3][5]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On September 19, Arc'teryx collaborated with Cai Guoqiang to launch a fireworks art project in the Himalayas, which was widely shared on social media [3]. - The fireworks, although claimed to be biodegradable, raised concerns due to the fragile ecological environment of the high-altitude region [3]. - The event led to a public outcry, with related topics trending and accumulating over 130 million views [3]. Group 2: Brand Response - Both Arc'teryx and Cai Guoqiang issued apologies and committed to cooperating with relevant authorities for environmental assessments and recovery actions [3][5]. - Arc'teryx expressed gratitude for public concern regarding the ecological impact and promised to expedite its environmental protection initiatives in Tibet [3][5]. Group 3: Brand Image and Market Position - Arc'teryx has been perceived as straying from its core values of outdoor professionalism and environmental sustainability, which could jeopardize its reputation as a high-end outdoor brand [5][9]. - The brand has increasingly associated itself with luxury and high fashion, which some consumers feel undermines its original outdoor ethos [7][9]. - The brand's recent performance has been strong, with a reported revenue of $2.7 billion in the first half of the year, marking a 23.46% increase, largely attributed to Arc'teryx's contributions [8]. Group 4: Consumer Reaction - Loyal customers expressed disappointment, emphasizing the importance of the "Leave No Trace" principle in outdoor activities [6]. - Some influencers and outdoor enthusiasts have chosen to sever ties with Arc'teryx, citing a betrayal of the outdoor community's values [6].

Core Viewpoint - The high-altitude fireworks display "Ascension Dragon" by the outdoor brand Arc'teryx and artist Cai Guoqiang has faced significant backlash for its environmental impact, leading to a public apology and an investigation by local authorities [1][4][5]. Group 1: Event Overview - The fireworks show took place on September 19 in the Himalayas, at an average altitude of over 4,600 meters, disrupting the natural tranquility of the region [5]. - Initial claims by the brand emphasized the event as a tribute to nature, but it quickly drew criticism regarding its ecological consequences [7]. Group 2: Public Reaction and Apology - The public raised concerns about the potential harm to local wildlife and the environment, questioning the brand's commitment to its "Leave No Trace" philosophy [7]. - Following intense criticism, both Arc'teryx and Cai Guoqiang issued apologies, acknowledging the backlash and the need for a more responsible approach to environmental stewardship [4][8]. Group 3: Brand Image and Financial Performance - Arc'teryx's parent company, Amer Sports, reported a 36% increase in annual revenue, surpassing $2 billion, positioning the brand as a leader in the high-end outdoor market [8]. - Despite commercial success, the incident highlighted a disconnect between the brand's environmental commitments and its actions, raising questions about corporate social responsibility [8].

9月21日，始祖鸟ARCTERYX在国内社媒平台发致歉信，承诺在政府监管下，配合团队复核项目生态影响，邀第三方评估并依结果补救，同时推进藏地环保计划与文化公益项目。海外版致歉信称对青藏高原烟花表演深感遗憾，此行为与品牌环保价值观及期望不符，郑重致歉。同时，还提到“正与相关艺术家和中国团队沟通，调整工作方式避免类似情况”。部分网友质疑，始祖鸟致歉“不够诚恳”“内外有别”“态度敷衍”，与中国团队沟通调整工作方式有“甩锅”嫌疑。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The collaboration between outdoor brand Arc'teryx and artist Cai Guoqiang to launch an art fireworks show in the Himalayas has sparked significant public controversy, leading both parties to issue apologies and emphasize their commitment to environmental values [2][4][16]. Group 1: Event Overview - On September 19, Arc'teryx and Cai Guoqiang launched the "Ascension" art project, featuring 145 fireworks that created a 3,000-meter-long colorful display in the Himalayas [4]. - The organizers claimed that the fireworks used biodegradable materials and met environmental standards, with a low-risk classification [4][6]. - Despite these claims, environmental experts criticized the potential ecological damage caused by the fireworks, highlighting the fragility of the high-altitude ecosystem [6][10]. Group 2: Brand and Environmental Commitment - Arc'teryx, acquired by Anta Group in 2019, has been positioned as a high-end outdoor brand, with a stated commitment to "coexistence with nature" [10][12]. - Industry insiders argue that the brand's environmental promises appear more as marketing strategies rather than genuine commitments, contrasting with companies like Patagonia that invest a percentage of sales in environmental causes [3][10]. - The incident has raised questions about the brand's alignment with its core values and the long-term vision articulated by Anta's founder, Ding Shizhong [10][18]. Group 3: Apology and Response - Following the backlash, both Arc'teryx and Cai Guoqiang issued apologies, acknowledging the need for greater consideration of environmental impacts in their artistic endeavors [14][16]. - Arc'teryx's apology included a commitment to cooperate with third-party assessments of the environmental effects of the project and to implement remedial actions based on the findings [16][18]. - The language used in the apologies shifted from "collaboration" to "sponsorship," which has been criticized as an attempt to evade responsibility [18].

Core Viewpoint - The outdoor brand Arc'teryx faced significant backlash after sponsoring an art fireworks display by artist Cai Guoqiang in the Himalayas, which contradicted its environmental values and led to public apologies from both parties [2][11]. Group 1: Event Overview - On September 19, Arc'teryx collaborated with Cai Guoqiang to launch fireworks in the Himalayas, specifically in the Jiangzi Helong area at an altitude of approximately 5,500 meters [3]. - The fireworks display, titled "Ascending Dragon," involved 145 fan-shaped fireworks creating a 3,000-meter long rainbow of colors [4]. Group 2: Environmental Concerns - Despite claims that the fireworks used biodegradable materials and met environmental standards, experts criticized the potential ecological damage to the fragile high-altitude ecosystem [6][8]. - Concerns were raised about the long-term impact of chemical residues from the fireworks on local soil, water sources, and wildlife [6][8]. Group 3: Corporate Response and Apologies - Following the backlash, Arc'teryx issued a public apology, acknowledging that the event contradicted its commitment to environmental stewardship and expressing a need for more professional evaluation of artistic expressions [11][15]. - The company committed to cooperating with third-party assessments to evaluate the environmental impact of the event and promised to take corrective actions based on the findings [13][15]. Group 4: Brand Image and Strategy - Arc'teryx, acquired by Anta Group in 2019, has been positioned as a high-end outdoor brand, but the fireworks event has been viewed as a misalignment with its core values of coexistence with nature [8]. - The incident has sparked discussions about the authenticity of Arc'teryx's environmental commitments, with comparisons made to Patagonia's genuine efforts in sustainability [8].