区块链
Search documents
前高管指控涉数十亿财务造假,360回应称“完全背离事实”
2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao· 2025-12-16 15:08
Core Viewpoint - The former executive of 360, Yu Hong, publicly accused the company's founder Zhou Hongyi of large-scale financial fraud, claiming to have evidence of significant financial misconduct [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Responses - Yu Hong alleged that he helped Zhou Hongyi falsify accounts by at least several billion yuan and stated that 360 may have inflated its gaming revenue through false recharge methods [2]. - In response to the allegations, 360 issued a statement denying any wrongdoing, asserting that the company operates in compliance with laws and regulations, and that its financial status is transparent and healthy [4][5]. - 360 clarified Yu Hong's background, noting that he had never held a core management position within the company and had left for personal reasons after a brief tenure [5]. Group 2: Market Impact - Following the allegations, 360's stock price fell by 5.07%, closing at 10.86 yuan per share, resulting in a market capitalization decrease to 760.15 billion yuan [3]. - The company emphasized that its gaming business revenue recognition complies with accounting standards and that all financial data has been audited without reservations [5]. Group 3: Background of Yu Hong - Yu Hong was previously the founder of Gamewave, which was acquired by 360 over a decade ago, and he later joined 360, where he was involved in various projects [6]. - His reputation suffered after the XMax blockchain project faced allegations of fraud, leading to significant criticism from investors [7].
迷策略进一步购买2440个单位的Solana
Zhi Tong Cai Jing· 2025-12-16 14:24
迷策略(02440)发布公告,于2025年12月16日,本集团于公开市场加密货币交易平台进一步购买2440个 单位的Solana,总现金代价约为240万港元,由本集团现有的现金储备(不包括任何本公司供股剩余所得 款项)提供资金(进一步投资于Solana)。进一步投资于Solana后及于本公告日期,本集团已以总代价约 1490万港元收购合共12,290个单位的Solana。 归根结底,进一步投资于Solana是本集团将现有数据管理解决方案扩展至区块链的重要组成部分。因 此,董事会认为,进一步投资于Solana符合本集团向区块链解决方案扩张的计划,既是战略部署与合乎 逻辑的延伸,也是本集团现有核心数据管理业务顺势发展的关键一步。 进一步投资于Solana的代价以现金支付,该代价乃根据公开市场所报的Solana买入价及卖出价厘定。于 相关购买订单发出并于2025年12月16日完成后,立即对进一步投资于Solana进行结算。 ...
迷策略(02440)进一步购买2440个单位的Solana
智通财经网· 2025-12-16 14:22
智通财经APP讯,迷策略(02440)发布公告,于2025年12月16日,本集团于公开市场加密货币交易平台进 一步购买2440个单位的Solana,总现金代价约为240万港元,由本集团现有的现金储备(不包括任何本公 司供股剩余所得款项)提供资金(进一步投资于Solana)。进一步投资于Solana后及于本公告日期,本集团 已以总代价约1490万港元收购合共12,290个单位的Solana。 进一步投资于Solana的代价以现金支付,该代价乃根据公开市场所报的Solana买入价及卖出价厘定。于 相关购买订单发出并于2025年12月16日完成后,立即对进一步投资于Solana进行结算。 归根结底,进一步投资于Solana是本集团将现有数据管理解决方案扩展至区块链的重要组成部分。因 此,董事会认为,进一步投资于Solana符合本集团向区块链解决方案扩张的计划,既是战略部署与合乎 逻辑的延伸,也是本集团现有核心数据管理业务顺势发展的关键一步。 ...
迷策略(02440.HK)授予”SOtify“43.2万份受限制股份单位
Ge Long Hui· 2025-12-16 14:12
格隆汇12月16日丨迷策略(02440.HK)公告,43.2万份受限制股份单位已授予一名服务提供商参与者 SOtify Company Limited(「SOtify」),其为一名服务提供商顾问,专门提供人工智能及区块链之全球及 地区品牌及营销服务。 ...
Visa在美国推出USDC交割服务
Ge Long Hui· 2025-12-16 13:35
美股频道更多独家策划、专家专栏,免费查阅>> 责任编辑:山上 Visa宣布在美国推出USDC交割服务,标志着稳定币在主流金融服务中的整合取得重大进展。美国的发 卡机构和收单机构合作伙伴现在可以使用Circle的USDC与Visa进行交割。首批参与的银行包括Cross River Bank和Lead Bank,它们已经开始通过Solana区块链与Visa进行USDC交割,计划到2026年将扩大 可用范围。 ...
中国置业投资计划购买数字资产
Zhi Tong Cai Jing· 2025-12-16 13:32
中国置业投资(00736)发布公告,为推进公司资产配置多元化及把握数字经济发展机遇的战略,已决议 公司计划使用自有资金,在遵守相关法律法规及风险管控的前提下,于公开市场购买并持有 BNB(Binance Coin)及其他合适的数字资产,作为公司的战略储备资产。公司长期看好数字资产行业的 发展前景,并对BNB所依托的运营主体及其技术研发、生态布局与行业竞争力抱有充分信心,认可其 在区块链领域的长期发展潜力与价值成长空间。 董事会认为,将BNB及其他合适数字资产纳入公司战略储备资产组合具有以下战略意义:资产多元 化:数字资产作为新兴资产类别,与传统金融资产相关性较低,有助于优化公司资产结构,分散投资风 险,提升资产组合的整体抗风险能力。拥抱数字经济:本次投资是公司对区块链技术及数字经济生态的 前瞻性布局,旨在通过战略储备相关资产,把握数字经济发展红利,为公司在未来数字时代中创造新的 价值增长点。战略储备价值:董事会经审慎研究,认为数字资产行业正处于快速发展阶段,行业潜力巨 大;而BNB所依托的生态系统具备完备的技术架构、丰富的应用场景及强大的生态凝聚力,其他拟购买 的优质数字资产亦具备清晰的价值逻辑与长期发展潜力 ...
钱包跨链转账操作要点解析import
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-12-16 12:53
Core Insights - The rapid development of blockchain technology has made cross-chain transfers a crucial aspect of digital asset management, necessitating user caution to avoid asset loss or operational errors [1] Group 1: Key Considerations Before Cross-Chain Transfers - Users must verify the accuracy and compatibility of the recipient address, as different blockchain networks have varying wallet address formats, which can lead to permanent loss if assets are sent to incompatible addresses [1] - It is recommended to use copy-paste functions instead of manual input to reduce error probability, and some wallets offer address book features to save frequently used addresses for enhanced security [1] Group 2: Understanding Bridge Protocols and Transaction Costs - Cross-chain transfers typically rely on bridge protocols or intermediary exchanges, and users should understand their workings and potential risks, including smart contract vulnerabilities and centralization risks [3] - Users are advised to select reputable bridge services that have undergone audits and to avoid large transfers during network congestion to prevent transaction failures due to high gas fees or delays [3] - Gas fees and network congestion significantly impact transfer efficiency and costs, with different blockchain networks having distinct gas mechanisms; users can check network status via blockchain explorers to choose optimal times for transactions [3] Group 3: Security Measures for Cross-Chain Transfers - Security is paramount in cross-chain transfers; users should ensure a secure operating environment and avoid public networks or unverified devices [4] - Enabling multi-signature features or hardware wallet support is recommended to enhance account security, and users should be cautious of phishing sites and fake applications [4] - Conducting small test transfers before large transactions can help verify the process's correctness, and users should seek official support if any issues arise during the transfer [4] Group 4: Post-Transfer Actions - After a cross-chain transfer, users should check the transaction status via blockchain explorers to confirm successful asset arrival at the target address [5] - If a transaction remains unconfirmed for an extended period, users can contact technical support with the transaction hash, and regular wallet updates and mnemonic phrase backups are advised to mitigate potential risks [5] - While cross-chain transfers offer greater asset liquidity and flexibility, the associated technical details and risks require careful handling to ensure asset safety [5]
“前高管”手撕周鸿祎几十亿假账,周鸿祎回应:完全背离事实!
Feng Huang Wang Cai Jing· 2025-12-16 11:52
在商业社会,没有永远的朋友,只有永远的利益。 12月16日,互联网圈爆出惊天大瓜!原360高级副总裁、三点钟区块链社群创始人玉红在微信朋友圈及多个社群中情绪激烈地公开炮轰老东家,将矛头直 指360公司董事长兼CEO周鸿祎。 他指控"帮周鸿祎做假账就至少几十亿",并声称掌握相关证据,将择机全网公开,并表示认识周鸿祎是最后悔的选择,自己被坑了很多钱。此番言论迅速 在业内发酵,引发广泛关注。 值得注意的是,玉红的"炮火"并未仅限周鸿祎一人。在相关群聊及朋友圈中,他还同时点名币安创始人赵长鹏、币安联合创始人何一、奇安信集团董事长 齐向东等多位行业重量级人物,措辞犀利,情绪激昂。 对此,周鸿祎通过微博否认"财务造假"一事。"经核查,玉红曾担任Gamewave游戏公司负责人,该公司十多年前被原360美股上市主体Qihoo360收购。玉 红2014年入职360集团下属公司,一年后2015年因个人原因离职。其在职期间从未担任360集团核心管理层职务。"周鸿祎称,360集团将依法采取法律措施 追究其法律责任,坚决维护企业声誉与合法权益。 01 "传销币教父"发疯了? 玉红,江湖人称"红姐",前趣游网络创始人。他身上贴有"小镇青 ...
“前高管”手撕周鸿祎几十亿假账,周鸿祎回应:完全背离事实!
凤凰网财经· 2025-12-16 11:33
来源丨凤凰网财经《公司研究院》 在商业社会,没有永远的朋友,只有永远的利益。 12月16日,互联网圈爆出惊天大瓜!原360高级副总裁、三点钟区块链社群创始人玉红在微信朋友圈及多个社群中情绪激烈地公开炮轰老东家,将 矛头直指360公司董事长兼CEO周鸿祎。 他指控 "帮周鸿祎做假账就至少几十亿",并声称掌握相关证据,将择机全网公开 , 并 表示 认识周鸿祎是最后悔的选择,自己被坑了很多钱。此番 言论迅速在业内发酵,引发广泛关注。 值得注意的是,玉红的 "炮火"并未仅限周鸿祎一人。在相关群聊及朋友圈中,他还同时点名币安创始人赵长鹏、币安联合创始人何一、奇安信集团 董事长齐向东等多位行业重量级人物,措辞犀利,情绪激昂。 对此,周鸿祎通过微博否认 "财务造假" 一事。 "经核查,玉红曾担任Gamewave游戏公司负责人,该公司十多年前被原360美股上市主体 Qihoo360收购。玉红2014年入职360集团下属公司,一年后2015年因个人原因离职。其在职期间从未担任360集团核心管理层职务。"周鸿祎称, 360集团将依法采取法律措施追究其法律责任,坚决维护企业声誉与合法权益。 01 "传销币教父 " 发疯了? 玉红, ...
抖音:禁止发布为虚拟货币交易提供信息中介和定价服务相关的非法金融内容
Bei Jing Shang Bao· 2025-12-16 10:33
Core Points - Douyin has released the "Douyin Community Financial Industry Convention (Trial)" to regulate the dissemination of financial content [1] - The convention includes guidelines on account qualifications, content management, marketing behaviors, and mechanisms for handling violations [1] Content Management - The platform encourages financial creators to publish objective and neutral financial knowledge, prohibiting illegal financial content related to virtual currencies and blockchain [1] - Content related to virtual currency exchange and information intermediary services is specifically banned [1] Account Qualifications - Douyin advocates for financial authors to complete the platform's financial professional qualification certification [1] - Uncertified accounts are explicitly prohibited from publishing financial professional content or recommending related services [1] Marketing Behaviors - Financial institutions and professionals are restricted from conducting marketing activities beyond their business licenses [1] Violation Handling - The platform will impose a range of penalties based on the severity, frequency, and impact of violations, including warnings, traffic limitations, profit recovery, suspension of publishing, and permanent bans [1]