应对挑战：多领域寻求共识 在新一轮科技革命与地缘政治变迁的激荡下，传统与非传统安全威胁交织叠加。全球发展失衡、地缘冲突风险、人工智能治理、气候变化应对等议题，前所 未有地呼唤全球合作与共同行动。 全球治理：增强稳定性与确定性 作为中国与世界深度交流的高端平台，"从都国际论坛"自2014年创办以来，共举办了九届，始终致力于促进对话、凝聚共识、推动交流合作。 世界领袖联盟主席、斯洛文尼亚前总统达尼洛·图尔克表示，这是一次意义非凡的盛会。"我们必须认真思考、全力以赴，构建一套完整全面的理念体系，既 要推动国际合作、共担责任，也要在这一过程中携手探索国际合作的新形式、新质效。" 在论坛上，与会嘉宾围绕"改革完善全球治理，增强稳定性和确定性"的议题，深入探讨了当前全球治理体系的不足与改革方向。第75届联合国大会主席沃尔 坎·博兹克尔表示，"当我们庆祝联合国80周年时，我认为我们正处于十字路口。联合国及相关机构大多是在第二次世界大战后创建的，如何解决21世纪的问 题，确实面临很多新的问题。没有其他组织能替代联合国，我们不能没有它，所以我们必须尽所能让它发挥作用。" 韩国前总理韩升洙指出，历次工业革命在造福人类的同时，也因 ...

卡内基梅隆揭秘美国AI产业链：谁能扼住AI的喉咙？ OpenAI和迪士尼如何捆绑，AMD、软银和英伟达究竟在下哪盘棋？ 卡内基梅隆大学刚刚抛出一颗「产业核弹」：首个系统刻画数据、算力、模型、资本乃至人才流向的AI供应链数据集。 谁控制上游瓶颈？谁掐住了全球AI产业的咽喉？ 这一次，资本、科技与权力的真实版「关系网」被摊在了阳光下。 | Allow Fuzzy Deduplication 0 Merge similar actor names (e.g., "OpenAl" and "OpenAl Inc.") to reduce duplicates | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 13694 | ప్లిక్ | 18547 | 191 | 3106 | III | 370 CE | = | | Unique Actors | | Unique Actor Pairs | | SEC Relationships | | News Relationships | | | Data Source Breakd ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that Guangdong Province aims to accelerate the construction of a national digital economy innovation development pilot zone, targeting that by 2027, the core industry value of the digital economy will account for over 16% of GDP, with an annual compound growth rate of over 15% for the data industry, and the scale of the artificial intelligence core industry exceeding 440 billion yuan [1] - The Thai Foreign Ministry's official highlighted that digital transformation extends beyond trade and investment to include cross-border e-commerce, digital payment systems, artificial intelligence, smart healthcare, online education, multimedia communication, and high-tech in digital agriculture and agricultural production [1][4] Group 2 - The rapid development of the digital economy presents significant opportunities for the growth of small and medium-sized enterprises, enhancing productivity and building a regional digital ecosystem [4] - There is an urgent need for governance in artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, prevention of cybercrime, and online risk control due to the rapid growth of the digital economy, suggesting close cooperation between ASEAN and China to establish legal frameworks and unified standards [4]

Core Insights - The forum focused on the theme of "Constructing Consensus on Good Governance of Artificial Intelligence," addressing common challenges in AI governance and methods for building effective legal frameworks [3] - The forum emphasized the importance of international cooperation in advancing AI governance and legal frameworks, advocating for deeper international consensus on good governance practices [4][7] Industry Growth - From January to September this year, the number of core AI enterprises in Zhejiang Province continued to grow, with revenue surpassing 490 billion yuan [4] - Major AI models like Tongyi Qianwen and DeepSeek have made significant iterative breakthroughs, leading to a collaborative development model involving leading enterprises, universities, and innovative companies [4] Legal Framework and Governance - The modernization of network security capabilities and governance systems in China is progressing, with a notable increase in network security protection capabilities [4] - The legal system is becoming more systematic and standardized, optimizing the business environment for the platform economy [4] Judicial Practices - AI-related cases primarily involve personality rights infringement, copyright infringement, and contract disputes, highlighting the need for clear legal frameworks in the AI sector [6] - The Beijing Internet Court has handled numerous AI-related cases, emphasizing the importance of identifying responsible parties behind AI actions [6] International Cooperation - The necessity for international collaboration in AI governance is underscored, as the borderless nature of AI technology requires global governance solutions [7] - Scholars advocate for policy coordination, standard recognition, information sharing, and cooperative governance to address the challenges posed by AI [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence governance, particularly focusing on the governance of general-purpose and frontier models in the US, EU, and China, highlighting their distinct approaches and regulatory frameworks [2][10]. Group 1: EU Governance Approach - The EU has established a complex risk governance framework categorizing AI systems into four risk levels: prohibited, high-risk, limited-risk, and minimal-risk, with stricter regulations for higher-risk categories [4]. - The EU's governance mechanism for general models distinguishes between those with and without "systemic risk," requiring all providers to disclose technical documentation and training summaries, while those with systemic risk must undergo model assessments and report significant incidents [5]. - The EU's framework is characterized by overlapping standards for models and applications, leading to a burdensome regulatory environment that may hinder innovation, prompting the EU Commission to push for simplification of related regulations [6]. Group 2: US Governance Approach - California has adopted a lighter regulatory approach with the signing of the "Frontier AI Transparency Act" (SB 53), focusing on self-regulation and limiting the scope of obligations for model developers [6]. - SB 53 targets "frontier developers" using models with over 10^26 FLOPs, with additional criteria for larger developers, thus narrowing the regulatory scope compared to the EU's broader approach [6]. - The obligations under SB 53 are minimal, primarily requiring basic transparency regarding website information and intended use, contrasting sharply with the EU's extensive documentation requirements [6]. Group 3: China's Governance Approach - China's governance strategy is application-driven, focusing on real-world issues and extending regulations from application services to model governance [7][8]. - The country has established a regulatory framework for algorithm governance, which has laid the groundwork for model governance, addressing risks associated with algorithmic recommendations and deep synthesis technologies [8]. - China's governance framework emphasizes practical measures for risk identification and management, categorizing risks into endogenous, application, and derivative risks, thus providing a clear delineation of responsibilities [9]. Group 4: Commonalities and Future Directions - Despite differing backgrounds and regulatory obligations, the US, EU, and China share a tendency towards "flexible governance" and industry-led initiatives, allowing for greater compliance autonomy [11]. - All three regions are exploring the establishment of assessment ecosystems to address uncertainties in model capabilities, with suggestions for community-driven evaluation mechanisms [11]. - Transparency has emerged as a core governance tool across the three regions, facilitating maximum control with minimal constraints, thereby fostering innovation while ensuring accountability [12].

Core Viewpoint - The rise of AI impersonation in live streaming poses significant challenges for platforms like Douyin, as they struggle to identify and combat unauthorized use of public figures' likenesses [2][5][9] Group 1: AI Impersonation Incidents - The recent drama "News Queen 2" features a storyline where a TV station uses the likeness of a deceased anchor for an AI virtual host, paralleling real-life incidents where actress Wen Zhengrong's image was used without consent in live streams [2][4] - Douyin has initiated a special governance action against impersonation, addressing over 11,000 accounts involved in infringement since October [5] Group 2: Technical Challenges - Douyin's Vice President Li Liang acknowledged that AI content infringement detection is a technical challenge, with malicious impersonation accounts continuously evolving [7] - Experts explain that while AI-generated images may appear flawless to the human eye, they can be detected through specific technical analyses that reveal anomalies in altered areas [3][8] Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Framework - Legal experts assert that using public figures' likenesses for AI impersonation constitutes a clear violation of portrait rights and potentially defamation [9][10] - The introduction of the "Artificial Intelligence Generated Synthetic Content Identification Measures" mandates platforms to label AI-generated content, ensuring transparency for consumers [10][11] Group 4: Future Implications - The emergence of entirely virtual personas, or "digital humans," presents a more severe challenge, as they can fabricate identities that mislead the public [11] - Experts emphasize the necessity for stringent identification measures for AI-generated content to protect consumers and uphold platform accountability [11]

人民网北京11月12日电 （记者崔译戈）近日，北京大学临湖智库国际讲坛"北京大学人工智能治理国际圆桌对话会"在北京大学斯坦福中心举行。多位 来自海内外的专家学者和业界人士围绕人工智能治理相关议题展开深度对话，为深化全球人工智能治理合作、平衡安全与创新提供了宝贵思考。 本次对话会由北京大学社会科学部、北京大学人工智能研究院和北京大学中外人文交流研究基地联合主办，北京大学国际合作部、北京大学人事部、北 京大学融媒体中心、北京大学出版社协办，启明创投支持。 北京大学国际关系学院长聘副教授、中外人文交流研究基地秘书长祁昊天主持开幕式。北京大学国际关系学院教授、社会科学部副部长兼智库中心管理 办公室主任、中外人文交流研究基地执行主任王栋，北京大学法学院党委副书记、人工智能研究院副院长杨晓雷，启明创投中国区首席运营官兼总法律顾问 张毅，全国政协常委、北京大学国际关系学院教授、中外人文交流研究基地主任贾庆国分别致开幕辞。 王栋在致辞中代表北京大学社会科学部对参会嘉宾表示欢迎。他表示，人工智能正以前所未有的速度重塑产业、社会与全球格局，亟需在安全底线和创 新活力之间找到关键平衡，而这离不开学术界、政策界和产业界的跨界、跨学科 ...

Core Viewpoint - China is playing a leading role in global artificial intelligence governance, establishing a governance framework that reflects the characteristics of developing countries and balances development, security, and privacy [1][2]. Group 1: AI Governance Framework - Three main AI governance systems have emerged globally: the US's center-periphery structure, the EU's emphasis on personal data privacy, and China's distinctive governance model [1]. - China's AI governance framework is characterized by a comprehensive approach that integrates development and security, involving government, enterprises, industry associations, and individual tech communities in a collaborative governance model [2][3]. Group 2: Network Sovereignty - The concept of a community of shared future in cyberspace is based on the principle of respecting network sovereignty, which includes four principles and five propositions that provide a Chinese perspective on global governance [3]. - Respecting network sovereignty is crucial as it allows sovereign states to maintain jurisdiction over data and infrastructure within their territories, promoting equality in international discussions on governance [3][4]. Group 3: International Consensus - The recent World Internet Conference highlighted the growing international consensus on promoting network sovereignty as a foundation for building a community of shared future in cyberspace [4].

Group 1 - The core message emphasizes China's commitment to promoting inclusive and equitable development of the internet in collaboration with the international community [1][2] - The 2025 World Internet Conference in Wuzhen successfully concluded, with over 1,600 participants from more than 130 countries discussing global internet governance [1] - The conference highlighted the importance of equal development rights in cyberspace for every country and individual, adhering to the principles of consultation, construction, and sharing [1][2] Group 2 - This year marks the tenth anniversary of President Xi Jinping's proposal to build a community of shared future in cyberspace, underscoring the urgency of governance in areas like artificial intelligence and internet space [2] - China has introduced initiatives such as the Global Governance Initiative and the Global Artificial Intelligence Governance Initiative to enhance international cooperation in internet governance [2] - The aim is to transform the "digital divide" into a "digital thoroughfare" and promote a more just and reasonable global internet governance system [2]

Core Points - China is committed to expanding high-level opening-up, leveraging its vast market to create positive spillover effects for global cooperation [1] - The country aims to enhance international cooperation through platforms like the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the Belt and Road Initiative, promoting infrastructure development in partner countries [2] - China is deepening South-South cooperation, establishing a $4 billion global development fund to support projects in over 60 countries, benefiting more than 30 million people [3] - The nation emphasizes the importance of maintaining the authority of the United Nations and its principles, actively participating in peacekeeping and international cooperation [5] - China is advocating for a new type of major power relations, promoting multilateralism and opposing unilateralism and hegemony [6][7] - The country is focused on enhancing global governance, particularly in trade and finance, committing to a fair and just international economic order [10] - China is taking a leading role in ecological governance, pledging to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 7%-10% from peak levels by 2035 [11] - The nation is actively participating in emerging field governance, including artificial intelligence and internet governance, promoting international cooperation [12][13] - China is promoting cultural exchange and mutual learning among civilizations, emphasizing the importance of respecting cultural diversity [14][15] - The country is committed to building a community with a shared future for mankind, aligning its development goals with global interests [19][20][21] - The Belt and Road Initiative has become a significant platform for international cooperation, with numerous infrastructure projects enhancing connectivity and economic development [22][23]