Workflow
食品安全
icon
Search documents
山东省烟台市食品安全抽检信息通告2025年第五期
Core Points - Yantai City Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection of 1,027 batches, revealing 19 non-compliant samples across seven categories of food products, including agricultural products, catering food, condiments, fruit products, nuts, pastries, and candies [2][3][4][5][6]. Group 1: Non-compliance Issues - The inspection identified issues such as pesticide residue exceeding standards, excessive use of food additives, microbial contamination, and failure to meet quality indicators [2][3][4][5][6]. - Specific examples of non-compliance include: - Mangoes sold by Longkou City New Jia Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Supermarket had thiamethoxam levels not meeting national food safety standards [2]. - Blackcurrant raisins from Qixia City Yongchuan Snack Shop contained non-compliant color additives [3]. - Ready-to-eat jellyfish from Fushan District Qingyang Hongzhi Dumpling Restaurant had aluminum residue exceeding standards [3]. Group 2: Microbial and Other Contamination - Microbial contamination was noted in products such as: - Ajiao dates from Penglai District Xiangnian Fruit and Vegetable Business Department, which had mold levels not compliant with national standards [4]. - Sesame candy from Zhaoyuan City Haihua Aquatic Products Store, which had total bacterial counts exceeding acceptable limits [4]. - Other contamination issues included: - Self-disinfecting utensils used in Qixia City Huihua Spicy Hot Pot Shop contained anionic synthetic detergents exceeding safety standards [4]. - Spicy fried peanuts from Yantai Development Zone Daji Family Hongfu Mall had peroxide values not compliant with national standards [4]. Group 3: Regulatory Actions - The local market supervision department has mandated producers and operators to trace the flow of non-compliant products, recall, and remove them from shelves, and implement corrective measures [6]. - Consumers are encouraged to report any non-compliant products they encounter by calling the designated hotline [6].
贵州省遵义市播州区市场监督管理局2025年食用农产品监督抽检合格信息公示(第一期)
Core Points - The Zunyi City Bozhou District Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection from April to May 2025, resulting in 222 batches of edible agricultural products passing the inspection [2][3]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 222 batches of edible agricultural products were found to be qualified during the inspection [2]. - The inspection covered various sales units including supermarkets, farmers' markets, and vegetable and fruit stores [2]. Group 2: Purpose and Objectives - The inspection aimed to effectively safeguard public health and life safety, identify food safety hazards, and maintain normal order in food production and operation [2]. - The activities were part of the 2025 Food Safety Supervision and Sampling Inspection Work Plan established by the Zunyi City Bozhou District Market Supervision Administration [2].
重庆市永川区市场监督管理局关于208批次食品安全抽检情况的通告(2025年第4号)
Core Viewpoint - The Chongqing Yongchuan District Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection of 208 batches of edible agricultural products, with 204 batches passing and 4 batches failing the safety standards [2]. Summary by Relevant Sections Inspection Results - A total of 208 samples were tested, with 204 samples meeting the food safety national standards, resulting in a compliance rate of approximately 98% [2]. - The 4 non-compliant samples were identified, and specific issues were noted, such as the presence of pesticide residues exceeding the allowable limits [2]. Actions Taken - The local market supervision authorities initiated legal actions against the non-compliant products as per the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China [2]. - Risk control measures were implemented, including tracing the product flow, recalling, and removing the non-compliant products from the market [2]. Non-Compliant Products - Specific details of the non-compliant products include: - Peas with a pesticide residue of 0.051 mg/kg, exceeding the standard of 0.02 mg/kg [2]. - Cowpeas with a pesticide residue of 1.02 mg/kg, exceeding the standard of 0.4 mg/kg [2]. - White radishes with a pesticide residue of 0.77 mg/kg, exceeding the standard of 0.3 mg/kg [2]. - Peas with a residue of 0.059 mg/kg, exceeding the standard of 0.02 mg/kg [2]. Compliance Information - The report also included information on compliant products, indicating a wide range of food items that passed the inspection, contributing to overall food safety in the region [2].
西安市阎良区关于2025年第五期食品安全“你点我检”—“春夏食安”专题抽检情况的通告(2025年第6号)
Core Viewpoint - The Xi'an Yanliang District Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection as part of the 2025 fifth phase of the "You Choose, I Test" initiative, resulting in 45 food samples tested, with 42 passing and 3 failing [1]. Summary by Category Food Safety Inspection Results - A total of 45 food samples were tested, including categories such as agricultural products, condiments, pastries, edible oils, and restaurant foods [1]. - Out of the 45 samples, 42 were found to be compliant with safety standards, while 3 samples were deemed non-compliant [1]. Actions Taken - The Yanliang District Market Supervision Administration has initiated disposal actions for the non-compliant products and is handling violations according to legal procedures [1]. Non-Compliant Products - Specific non-compliant products included: - A sample from "Le Tao Tao Fresh Department" contained dehydroacetic acid and sodium salt exceeding the permissible limit [2]. - A sample from "Fat Fruit Town" was found to have sodium saccharin, which is prohibited [2]. - Another sample from "Ya Han Fruit Store" also contained dehydroacetic acid exceeding the allowed limit [2]. Compliant Products - Several compliant products were identified, including: - Blueberry products from "Le Tao Tao Fresh Department" [3]. - Soy sauce from "Good Housewife Food Co." [3]. - Various pastries and agricultural products from local producers [3][4].
马明龙现场督导食品安全工作时强调 落实“四个最严”要求 守护“舌尖上的安全”
Zhen Jiang Ri Bao· 2025-06-17 23:03
Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of food safety as a critical issue, highlighting the need for strict adherence to regulations and comprehensive supervision throughout the food supply chain [1][2] - The local government is focusing on enhancing food safety management systems, training, and awareness among all stakeholders to improve overall food safety standards [1][2] - The responsibility for food safety is framed as a political obligation, necessitating a collaborative approach involving various stakeholders, including businesses, local authorities, and regulatory bodies [2] Group 2 - The government aims to implement a systematic approach to food safety, emphasizing the need for continuous improvement in regulatory practices and the establishment of new guidelines for emerging sectors such as online food sales and cross-border e-commerce [2] - There is a strong emphasis on enhancing the capacity for timely problem detection and resolution within the food safety framework, alongside improving the effectiveness of inspections and testing [2] - The initiative includes fostering a culture of food safety awareness among the public, encouraging community involvement and participation in food safety efforts [2]
从隔夜柠檬到菌群超标,投资者对蜜雪冰城的宽容还剩多少?
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges faced by the popular tea brand Mixue Ice City in the Hong Kong market, particularly focusing on food safety issues and the sustainability of its low-price strategy. Group 1: Market Entry and Challenges - Many mainland restaurant brands are attempting to enter the Hong Kong market, seeing it as a lucrative opportunity due to the spending power of Hong Kong residents [4][5]. - The year 2023 marked a peak for mainland restaurant brands entering Hong Kong, with at least 42 brands having established a presence by June [5][7]. - However, the Hong Kong market presents significant challenges, including higher rent and labor costs, as well as stricter regulatory scrutiny compared to mainland China [8]. Group 2: Food Safety Issues - Mixue Ice City was recently highlighted by Hong Kong authorities for food safety violations, specifically for exceeding bacterial limits in frozen dessert samples [9][22]. - The Hong Kong food safety system is known for its strict regulations, with a compliance rate of 99.9% for food safety [12]. - The specific violations included a 70% exceedance of the allowable limit for coliform bacteria and a 50% exceedance for total bacterial count in their products [26]. Group 3: Consumer and Market Response - Despite the food safety issues, consumers have shown a degree of tolerance towards Mixue Ice City, with its stock price remaining relatively stable after the incidents [36][37]. - The brand's low pricing strategy, such as offering lemon water for 4 HKD, has created a strong psychological barrier for consumers, making them more forgiving of the brand's missteps [40][38]. - Mixue Ice City's stock price has seen significant growth, with a cumulative increase of over 160% since its listing, reflecting strong market resilience [51]. Group 4: Financial Performance - For the fiscal year 2024, Mixue Group reported a revenue of 24.83 billion RMB, a year-on-year increase of 22.3%, and a net profit of 4.45 billion RMB, up 39.8% [52][53]. - The company's gross margin stood at 32.5%, indicating strong profitability compared to its peers [52]. Group 5: Future Outlook and Risks - Despite its current success, Mixue Ice City faces significant challenges, including the need to balance expansion with food safety management [69]. - The brand's overseas operations have encountered setbacks, with negative net openings in international markets and a 35% decline in same-store sales growth [64][66]. - Analysts have downgraded Mixue Ice City's rating due to concerns over high valuations and underperformance in overseas markets [60][61].
西安市莲湖区市场监督管理局关于126批次食品监督抽检情况的通告(2025年第9号)
Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint - The recent food safety inspection in Xi'an's Lianhu District revealed that out of 126 food samples tested, 122 were compliant with national food safety standards, while 4 samples failed due to pesticide residue exceeding permissible limits [3][4]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 19 categories of food were sampled, including biscuits, restaurant food, tea products, nuts, starch products, condiments, convenience foods, pastries, canned goods, alcoholic beverages, frozen drinks, grain products, dairy products, sugar, edible oils, root vegetables, puffed foods, fruit products, and beverages [3]. - The breakdown of the inspection results showed that 122 samples passed, while 4 samples were found non-compliant [3][4]. Group 2: Non-Compliant Products - The non-compliant products included: 1. Bananas from Guole Source Convenience Store, with pesticide residue (pyriproxyfen) at 0.080 mg/kg, exceeding the limit of 0.05 mg/kg [5][6]. 2. Yam from Guole Source Convenience Store, with pesticide residue (mefenoxam and mefenoxam manganese salt) at 6.84 mg/kg, exceeding the limit of 0.3 mg/kg [5][6]. 3. Green peppers from Shixiang Convenience Store, with pesticide residue (thiamethoxam) at 0.095 mg/kg, exceeding the limit of 0.05 mg/kg [5][6]. 4. Yellow bean sprouts from Shixiang Convenience Store, with pesticide residue (6-benzyladenine) at 30.9 μg/kg, which is not allowed [5][6]. Group 3: Compliance Overview - The majority of food categories tested were compliant, including biscuits, restaurant food, tea products, nuts, starch products, condiments, convenience foods, pastries, canned goods, alcoholic beverages, frozen drinks, grain products, dairy products, sugar, edible oils, and beverages [3][4]. - Specifically, 65 out of 69 edible agricultural products passed the inspection, with only 4 failing due to pesticide residue issues [3].
消费者买到“未来日期” 麻酱,海底捞回应
新华网财经· 2025-06-17 05:32
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a consumer complaint regarding a food safety issue with Haidilao's product, highlighting the regulatory response and the company's subsequent actions to address the situation [1][2][4]. Group 1: Consumer Complaint - A consumer in Taiyuan reported purchasing a Haidilao "Douhua Dry Mixed Spicy Hotpot Set" with a peanut sesame sauce labeled with a future production date of June 15, 2025, raising concerns about food safety [1]. - The consumer experienced symptoms of diarrhea after consuming the product, prompting her to report the issue to local authorities [1]. Group 2: Regulatory Response - The local market regulatory department indicated that the incident fell under a "no penalty" category due to the absence of severe consequences and the low monetary value of the product involved [1][2]. - According to the Food Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, penalties for false production dates can range from fines of 50,000 to 100,000 yuan, depending on the value of the goods and the severity of the violation [2]. Group 3: Company Response - Haidilao stated that the actual production date of the peanut sesame sauce was June 9, 2023, and the labeling error was due to a keyboard mishap by an employee, affecting seven orders [4]. - The company expressed regret for the confusion caused and has initiated a system upgrade to prevent similar errors in the future, enhancing operational efficiency [4].
浙江同康酒业米醋检出禁用添加剂甜蜜素,被罚没5.4万余元
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-06-17 02:21
近日,台州市市场监督管理局公布一则食品安全行政处罚决定,浙江同康酒业有限公司因生产超范围使用食品添加剂的食醋产品,被依法处以罚款并没收涉 案财物,罚没款合计54419.3元。 据台市监处罚〔2025〕15号行政处罚决定书披露,2024年10月23日,浙江同康酒业有限公司生产同康米醋(酿造食醋)510箱,每箱40袋(350ml/袋),共 20400袋。2024年11月18日至2025年1月25日期间,当事人将上述批次袋装米醋销售给××等客户392箱(40袋/箱,15680袋),销售单价12元/箱(0.3元/ 袋),销售总金额4704元。案发时,上述批次袋装米醋库存118箱(4720袋)。案发后,当事人从客户处召回上述批次袋装米醋949袋。 2025年1月7日,台州市监局委托浙江方圆检测集团股份有限公司对台州市黄岩某某超市有限公司经营的标示浙江同康酒业有限公司生产的上述批次袋装米醋 进行抽样。经浙江检验检疫科学技术研究院检验,检出甜蜜素(以环己基氨基磺酸计)0.0558g/kg,而标准规定不得使用,不符合GB 2760-2014《食品安全 国家标准 食品添加剂使用标准》要求,检验结论不合格。2月7日,当事人收到本 ...
广东省中山市市场监督管理局食品监督抽检信息通告(2025年第18期)
Summary of Key Points Core Viewpoint The Zhongshan Market Supervision Administration conducted a food safety inspection, revealing that out of 123 food samples tested, 118 were compliant while 5 were found to be non-compliant, highlighting ongoing efforts to ensure food safety in the region [2]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 123 food samples were tested in Zhongshan, with 118 passing and 5 failing the safety standards [2]. - The inspection covered five categories of food: catering food, condiments, meat products, edible agricultural products, and beverages [2]. - The testing was conducted according to the "Implementation Rules for Food Safety Supervision and Sampling Inspection in Guangdong Province" [2]. Group 2: Non-compliant Samples - The non-compliant samples included various food items, with specific details on the nature of the violations provided in the inspection report [3][4]. - For instance, one sample of fried food was found to have a polar component exceeding the acceptable limit of 27% [3]. - Another sample of cowpea contained pesticide residues (Thiamethoxam) at 0.43 mg/kg, surpassing the permissible level of 0.3 mg/kg [3]. Group 3: Consumer Engagement - The administration encourages consumers to participate actively in food safety supervision and report any harmful food products or illegal activities [2]. - A hotline (12345) is provided for consumers to report issues related to food safety [2].