第一章 总则 第一条 为规范重庆秦安机电股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）和其他信息 披露义务人信息披露暂缓与豁免行为，保证公司依法合规履行信息披露义务，保 护投资者的合法权益，根据《上海证券交易所股票上市规则》《上市公司信息披 露管理办法》《上市公司信息披露暂缓与豁免管理规定》等法律法规、规范性文 件以及《重庆秦安机电股份有限公司公司章程》 《重庆 秦安机电股份有限公司信息披露管理办法》等规定，制定本制度。 重庆秦安机电股份有限公司 信息披露暂缓与豁免管理制度 目 录 （以下简称"公司章程"）、 第二条 公司和其他信息披露义务人暂缓、豁免披露临时报告，在定期报告、 临时报告中豁免披露中国证券监督管理委员会和上海证券交易所规定或者要求 披露的内容，适用本制度。 第二章 暂缓、豁免披露信息的范围 第三条 公司和其他信息披露义务人有确实充分的证据证明拟披露的信息涉 及国家秘密或者其他因披露可能导致违反国家保密规定、管理要求的事项（以下 统称"国家秘密"），依法豁免披露。 第四条 公司和其他信息披露义务人有保守国家秘密的义务，不得通过信息 披露、投资者互动问答、新闻发布、接受采访等任何形式泄露国家秘密，不得以 信息涉 ...

昨晚，腾讯控股公布Q2财报。当季，腾讯收入1845亿元人民币，同比增长15%。仅从游戏业务来看，季度收入达到592亿元，折合每天约赚6.5亿 元。 值得注意的是，《王者荣耀》第35次登上腾讯财报。另据第三方数据显示，今年上半年，《王者荣耀》每月收入近12亿元。 马化腾也提及了这颗"摇钱树"的优异表现。他表示：《王者荣耀》和《和平精英》等长青游戏向平台化进化并加大了AI的应用……使我们的游戏业 务在用户及收入侧均表现出色。 另一方面，《王者荣耀》近期引发的社会争议备受关注。就在财报发布前一天， "中国游戏算法诉讼第一案"开庭，青岛律师孙千和起诉要求公开王 者荣耀匹配机制，庭审达5个小时未宣判。 当事人孙千和向《BUG》栏目提到， "腾讯担心《王者荣耀》匹配算法公开会造成黑产滥用。 "她表示，应当找到一种方法保护玩家应有的知情权， 而对于这一点，双方仍然存在较大分歧。 "黑灰产"与"商业秘密"的分歧 谈及此次庭审，孙千和表示， "（腾讯）他们主要还是基于自己的证据，认为之前已经完成了算法公开的义务。另一个就是他们很反对公开技术细 节，因为他们认为这会侵犯他们合法的技术秘密，权益，可能造成不好的黑产和后果。 " 对 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a legal case involving the game "Honor of Kings," where a player, Sun Qianhe, is suing Tencent, claiming that the game's matchmaking system is flawed and manipulates player win rates to maintain engagement [2][18]. Group 1: Legal Case Overview - Sun Qianhe, a player and lawyer, has raised concerns about the matchmaking mechanism in "Honor of Kings," alleging that it intentionally arranges matches to control player win rates around 50% [2][9]. - The court case has attracted attention, with Tencent presenting over 1,000 pages of evidence to counter Sun's claims, arguing that the matchmaking system is not designed to manipulate win rates [11][16]. - The court has yet to deliver a verdict on the case, and legal experts suggest that Sun's claims may face significant challenges [18][30]. Group 2: Matchmaking Mechanism - Sun Qianhe's main argument is based on her personal experiences of inconsistent matchmaking, where she feels that winning streaks lead to poor teammates and losing streaks lead to easy opponents [4][9]. - Tencent has defended its matchmaking system, stating that it does not aim to control win rates and has provided evidence of various players achieving win rates significantly above 50% [16][17]. - The company emphasizes that revealing the specific details of the matchmaking algorithm could harm the game's integrity and lead to exploitation by malicious players [16][22]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Considerations - The case raises questions about the balance between players' right to know and the protection of commercial secrets, with legal experts debating the definition of "commercial secrets" in this context [20][22]. - Sun Qianhe's request for transparency in the matchmaking algorithm is seen as a challenge to the boundaries of commercial confidentiality, with some lawyers arguing that the algorithm qualifies as a protected secret [20][22]. - The article highlights the broader implications of the case for the gaming industry, particularly regarding how player engagement and fairness are managed within competitive gaming environments [27][28].

Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit filed by a player against Tencent seeks to make the matchmaking mechanism of "Honor of Kings" public, focusing on the factors influencing player matchups and their respective weights in different game modes, raising concerns about whether game outcomes are manipulated by the matchmaking system [1][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The court hearing has concluded, and the next steps await notification from the court [1]. - The main dispute centers on whether the matchmaking mechanism can determine game outcomes and whether it should be made public [3]. - Tencent argues that the claim of controlling player win rates to maintain a 50% win rate is unfounded, providing examples of player win rates that vary significantly from 50% [3]. Group 2: Consumer Rights and Transparency - Tencent's defense cites the Consumer Rights Protection Law, stating that the law does not require the disclosure of technical details behind services, and previous cases have established boundaries for consumer rights [4]. - The court was informed that Tencent has provided information about the matchmaking mechanism through official channels, but the plaintiff believes this is insufficient and more of a promise than true transparency [4][5]. Group 3: Comparison with Other Platforms - The plaintiff argues that other large apps like Douyin and Weibo disclose their algorithms without claiming commercial secrets, questioning why Tencent does not do the same for its matchmaking mechanism [7]. - Tencent maintains that the matchmaking mechanism is a commercial secret and that its disclosure could lead to exploitation of the system, harming the gaming experience [10][11]. Group 4: Technical Aspects of Matchmaking - The matchmaking mechanism is described as a complex system that balances speed, fairness, and game quality, with the Elo rating system being used to match players of similar skill levels [12][13]. - Tencent emphasizes that the matchmaking system is a proprietary technology developed to create fair competition and that its disclosure could undermine market fairness and innovation [13].

对于案件相关问题，新浪科技向腾讯进行求证，截至发稿官方暂未回应。（新浪科技） 【#起诉王者荣耀玩家回应开庭庭审#：腾讯担心算法公开可能导致黑产滥用，尽管分歧较大，双方均同 意尝试找到满足玩家平衡点】《王者荣耀》玩家、律师孙千和起诉腾讯要求公开王者荣耀匹配机制一案 在深圳市南山区人民法院开庭。当事人孙千和表示，庭审于今日下午2:30开始，持续至约下午7:30结 束。 她表示，案件庭审已经结束，由于对方在开庭前补充提交了部分证据，导致未能当庭完成质证，后续将 通过提交书面质证意见给法院，预计不再另行开庭。 关于案件，孙千和表示，腾讯认为《王者荣耀》的匹配算法属于技术秘密，不宜公开，并指出已在多个 公开渠道对匹配机制进行了说明。他们担心算法公开可能导致黑产滥用，如外挂等问题，进而损害玩家 利益。对此，孙千和认为腾讯能够在保护技术秘密与保障玩家知情权之间寻找平衡点，以实现双方利益 的最大化。 "我希望双方能找到一个合适的度，按照这个最低限度知情的原则，既保护了他们所说的技术秘密，又 保护了我们玩家的该有的知情权，如果能找到这样一个度那自然是最好的。"她表示。 孙千和向@新浪科技 等表示，本次庭审主要围绕匹配算法是否属 ...

浙江丰茂科技股份有限公司 信息披露暂缓与豁免事务管理制度 第一章 总则 第一条 为规范浙江丰茂科技股份有限公司（下称"公司"）信息披露暂缓与 豁免行为，督促公司及相关信息披露义务人（以下简称"信息披露义务人"）依 法合规地履行信息披露义务，根据《中华人民共和国证券法》（以下简称"《证 券法》"）、《上市公司信息披露暂缓与豁免管理规定》（以下简称"《管理规 定》"）、《深圳证券交易所创业板股票上市规则》（以下简称"《股票上市规 则》"）、《深圳证券交易所上市公司自律监管指引第 2 号——创业板上市公司 规范运作》（以下简称"《规范运作指引》"）等相关规定以及《浙江丰茂科技 股份有限公司章程》（以下简称"《公司章程》"）等公司制度，结合实际情况， 制定本制度。 第二条 信息披露义务人按照《股票上市规则》《规范运作指引》及深圳证 券交易所其他相关业务规则的规定，办理信息披露暂缓、豁免业务的，适用本制 度。 第三条 公司应自行审慎判断应当披露的信息是否存在《管理规定》《创业 板上市规则》及《规范运作指引》等规定的暂缓、豁免情形，并采取有效措施防 止暂缓或豁免披露的信息泄露，接受深交所对有关信息披露暂缓、豁免事项的事 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges faced by Haichen Energy Storage, particularly in light of legal issues and its upcoming IPO, which may impact its market position and financial stability [5][7][14]. Group 1: Legal Issues and IPO Impact - Haichen Energy Storage's president was detained for allegedly infringing on trade secrets, which has raised concerns about the company's IPO prospects [5][7]. - The company must demonstrate to regulators that ongoing litigation does not affect its operational capabilities, or it risks delays or termination of its IPO process [7][8]. - The legal troubles stem from competitive tensions with CATL, with Haichen asserting that the disputed technology is publicly known and not a trade secret [9][11]. Group 2: Company Background and Growth - Founded in 2019, Haichen Energy Storage has rapidly grown to become the third-largest energy storage battery manufacturer globally, focusing on lithium-ion storage solutions [16][14]. - The company has completed four rounds of financing, raising a total of 8 billion RMB, and has shown impressive revenue growth, with a compound annual growth rate of 89% from 2021 to 2024 [17][19]. - Despite its growth, the company faces financial risks, with accounts receivable surging from 22.3 million RMB in 2022 to 8.315 billion RMB in 2024, representing 69.5% of its revenue [19]. Group 3: International Expansion and Market Challenges - Haichen's international revenue share increased from 0% in 2022 to 28.6% in 2024, with significant contributions from the U.S. market [21][23]. - The company has faced challenges due to the recent bankruptcy of a major U.S. client, Powin, although it claims no direct financial impact from this event [23][24]. - The U.S. market's shrinking demand for energy storage solutions, exacerbated by recent legislative changes, poses a significant risk to Haichen's overseas operations and overall financial health [24][25].

Group 1 - Tencent is facing simultaneous lawsuits both domestically and internationally, with Sony accusing Tencent of copying its game "Horizon" in the game "Wild Origin" and filing a lawsuit in California federal court [2] - A player of "Honor of Kings" has sued Tencent over the game's matchmaking system, claiming it lacks transparency and demanding the disclosure of algorithm weight parameters, with the case set to be heard on August 12 in Shenzhen [2] - The player alleges that after winning streaks, the system intentionally matches them with "actor teammates" or higher-ranked opponents, resulting in a win rate that hovers around 50% [2] Group 2 - Tencent's official response denies manipulating win rates, stating that the goal is to achieve "evenly matched games," attributing winning and losing streaks to player skill fluctuations or opponent strategy adjustments, unrelated to the algorithm [2] - The lawsuit has garnered significant public attention due to the popularity of "Honor of Kings," with related topics on Douyin exceeding 1 billion views, sparking debates about whether game algorithms are "black boxes" and if core algorithms are considered trade secrets [2] - According to the Consumer Rights Protection Law, consumers have the right to know the true conditions of the products or services they purchase, which may impact the outcome of the lawsuits regarding algorithm transparency [3]

Group 1 - The president of Haicheng Energy, Feng Dengkai, has been reported for allegedly infringing on trade secrets and has been taken into custody by the police in Ningde, Fujian [1][3] - Haicheng Energy issued a statement claiming that the technology in question, "composite electrolyte technology," is publicly known and does not constitute a trade secret, asserting that the dispute will not adversely affect its operations [3][4] - The company clarified that it has not used the disputed technology in any products and is providing support to Feng Dengkai and his family during the ongoing investigation [3][4] Group 2 - The company addressed rumors regarding its chairman's spouse's age and the bankruptcy of its major U.S. customer, Powin, stating that these claims are false and that the bankruptcy will not impact its operations [3][4] - Haicheng Energy's 587Ah battery cell is claimed to be fully self-developed and not in violation of any competition laws, with no legal documents confirming any unfair competition claims against the company [4][5] - The company has been involved in ongoing disputes with Ningde Times, including a civil lawsuit filed by Ningde Times for unfair competition, with a court hearing scheduled for August 12 [4][5] Group 3 - Founded in 2019, Haicheng Energy focuses on providing energy storage battery solutions and has rapidly developed into the third-largest energy storage battery company globally by shipment volume [5][6] - The company is currently in the process of listing on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, with projected revenue of 12.917 billion yuan and an adjusted net profit of 318 million yuan for 2024 [5][6] - The chairman, Wu Zuyu, and several executives have backgrounds in Ningde Times, but this has not led to a positive relationship, as disputes have arisen over competition and employment agreements [6]

Group 1 - The recent arrest of Feng Dengke, a senior executive at Haicheng Energy, is linked to allegations of commercial secret infringement, initiated by CATL, a leading player in the energy storage industry [1] - The case involves suspicious patent transfers from Shenzhen Haihong New Energy Technology Co., which transferred multiple "collective fluid" related patents to Haicheng Energy in 2022 before being dissolved in 2023 [1] - Feng Dengke's previous roles include positions at Haicheng Energy and its subsidiary Haicheng Green Energy, where he was involved in business development rather than technical research [2] Group 2 - The timing of Feng Dengke's legal issues coincides with Haicheng Energy's efforts to pursue an IPO, raising concerns about potential impacts on the company's operations and IPO progress [2] - CATL has been increasingly vigilant regarding patent infringement and unfair competition, having previously sued several competitors, including Tafiel New Energy and Zhongchuang Xinhang [3] - The ongoing legal disputes between CATL and Haicheng Energy, including a lawsuit filed by CATL for unfair competition, highlight the intense rivalry and historical grievances between the two companies [3]