5000万桶石油，被美国强行控制之后，本该是一笔"稳赚不赔"的大买卖。 特朗普的设想很简单，只要油在美国手里，再往市场上一放，尤其是点名中国这个全球最大买家后，钱 自然就会流进来。 可现实却给了他当头一棒，因为中国的态度异常干脆，不谈价格，不搞博弈，直接拒绝，一桶都不买。 美国以军事手段扣押委内瑞拉油轮，试图把争议资源变成"美国商品"，特朗普这才意识到，市场并不一 定会听命于强权。 特朗普的"豪赌" 2026年1月10日，美国总统特朗普放话，说美国政府已经"控制了委内瑞拉多达5000万桶原油"，并宣布 要开始提炼并销售这些被扣押的石油。 他还直言不讳地欢迎中国、俄罗斯及所有国家购买这些原油，但问题是这一切看起来像是巨大的能源商 业交易，其背后却隐藏着激烈的国际对抗和政治博弈。 这些被"控制"的原油是怎么来的？ 美国军事力量与国土安全部联合，在加勒比海多次扣押试图运往世界各地的油轮，截至目前已有多次类 似行动，意在切断委内瑞拉原油出口。 油轮背后的故事同样惊心动魄，有美军直升机吊绳突袭登船的画面出现，也有像巨大货轮在无冲突情况 下被控制的情况，军方动态一次次被世界媒体捕捉并发布。 在传统贸易秩序中，这样的操作几 ...

美国能源信息局数据显示，委内瑞拉拥有约3000亿桶已探明原油储量，占全球储量的约17%，位居世界 第一。通过控制这片让美国垂涎欲滴的"黑色金矿"并调整其产能，美国可以获得更大的国际油价定价 权。 举起能源霸权的"狼牙棒"，美国"爆锤"委内瑞拉石油资源。一同被"爆锤"的，还有战后国际规则和国际 秩序。张开的大嘴，预示着美国不止企图鲸吞"黑色黄金"，更试图扼杀他国自主发展的根基。 这种赤裸裸的暴力干涉，将美国长期以强权逻辑践踏国际规则、肆意掠夺他国战略资源的嘴脸暴露于 世，让其无所遁形。 近日对委内瑞拉发动突袭后，美国表示，要让美大型石油公司进入委内瑞拉，并称委方将向美移交数千 万桶石油。 美国强力干预委内瑞拉局势，明目张胆抢石油，连装都懒得装了。就短期目的来说，美国是为了委内瑞 拉的重质原油，从长期图谋来看，美国则想借控制委石油资源，推动实现"能源霸权"。 ...

本文转自【央视新闻客户端】； 针对美国总统特朗普近期多次威胁要得到丹麦自治领地格陵兰岛的言论，欧盟及北约总部所在地布鲁塞 尔以及波兰的民众和学者纷纷表态，表示反对。 比利时民众：美"强权逻辑"不可接受 布鲁塞尔居民：任何人都无权声称要得到别人的领地。如果明天美国得到了格陵兰岛，那后天也许会轮 到别的地方，这可能带来严重后果。 布鲁塞尔居民：国际法与国家边界必须得到尊重，因此美国的做法完全不可接受。国际关系需要相互尊 重，对合作伙伴是如此，对其他国家也是如此，而美国现在恰恰没有做到这一点。 总台记者 刘婵娟：在布鲁塞尔，人们的担忧非常明显。当"强权逻辑"凌驾于规则之上，北约成员国之 间开始相互对立，所谓的"共同价值"和"安全伙伴关系"正面临前所未有的考验。有分析认为，格陵兰岛 问题已不再只是一次外交争议，它折射出美欧在国际规则、战略边界和相互尊重上的深层分歧。这道裂 痕是否会进一步扩大，欧洲正密切关注，美国对此也难以回避。 波兰民众：美言论令人担忧 有波兰学者以及该国民众也表示反对。他们指出，美方的言论令人担忧，国际法以及国际秩序应该得到 尊重。 波兰民众 卢卡什：这是一种干涉，事实上也是试图侵占并不属于自己的 ...

总台记者 李健南：新闻发布会上，巴加埃表示，针对美国和以色列通过心理战和操控媒体舆论向伊朗 施压的行为，伊朗必须警惕。他强调，伊朗已经做好充分准备，敏锐监测事态发展，以维护国家利益。 此外，伊朗武装部队将继续加强战备、保持警惕，捍卫伊朗领土安全。 伊朗外交部发言人 巴加埃：侵犯他国主权和领土完整，无论如何都不可辩解。美国的行为已与国际法 律法规背道而驰，该做法将对整个国际社会产生负面影响。《联合国宪章》和当代国际法是两次世界大 战后人类共同经验的结晶。因此，美国的这一行为应遭到国际社会谴责和反对，且采取该行动的各方须 为其行为承担全部责任。 本文转自【央视新闻客户端】； 当地时间1月5日，伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃在新闻发布会上表示，美国对委内瑞拉的袭击应引起国际社 会警惕，美国屡次侵犯他国主权、破坏国际规则，国际社会应予以强烈谴责。 巴加埃表示，一国总统遭到另一个国家强行控制是非法行为，委内瑞拉总统马杜罗必须获得释放。针对 美方对马杜罗的所谓"犯罪"指控，巴加埃强调，在任何情况下，一个国家的国内法律不能成为侵犯他国 的依据，这只是美国为其非法行为辩护的掩饰和虚假理由。 ...

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the intense discussions among the five permanent members of the UN Security Council regarding the situation in Venezuela, with the U.S. making multiple accusations against the Venezuelan government for corruption and misconduct [1][3] - The U.S. has taken military actions in the Caribbean, including deploying warships and intercepting Venezuelan oil tankers, which has escalated tensions in the region and drawn global attention [4][12] - Russia and China have strongly rebutted U.S. accusations, emphasizing the need to respect Venezuela's sovereignty and opposing unilateral actions [12][24] Group 2 - The U.S. claims that the Maduro government is involved in drug trafficking and supports extremist organizations, but these allegations lack substantial evidence and are viewed as a pretext for military intervention [10][11] - Russia has responded by enhancing Venezuela's defense capabilities, providing advanced military equipment and expertise, signaling a geopolitical counteraction to U.S. influence [18][20] - China has reiterated its commitment to international law and non-interference, supporting Venezuela through energy cooperation and trade to help stabilize its economy [23][26] Group 3 - France's cautious stance during the discussions marks a significant shift, as it seeks to avoid regional destabilization and emphasizes dialogue over unilateral military actions [19][21] - The U.K. continues to support the U.S. position, advocating for a government in Venezuela that reflects the will of the people, which indirectly undermines the legitimacy of the Maduro government [28][30] - The international community is divided on the Venezuela issue, with the U.S. pushing for a unilateral solution based on security concerns, while Russia, China, and many developing countries advocate for a multilateral approach [24][45]

Core Points - The recent controversy revolves around the "Hubei-Guangdong Railway Bonds," which were debts incurred by the Qing Dynasty under unfavorable conditions, raising questions about their legitimacy in modern financial relations [1][5][7] - Some U.S. politicians are using this historical debt as leverage, suggesting that if China does not acknowledge it, the U.S. may consider invalidating China's holdings of U.S. Treasury bonds [5][9][11] - China's government has firmly stated that it does not recognize these debts, citing international law and historical justice as the basis for its position [7][12][13] Legal Perspective - Previous legal challenges regarding these bonds have been dismissed by U.S. courts, which ruled that such debt disputes do not fall under their jurisdiction [3] Political Context - The current U.S. financial situation is precarious, with rising national debt and interest payments, prompting some politicians to deflect attention by framing China as a "debtor" [9][11] - This tactic of reviving old debts is seen as a political maneuver to distract from domestic financial issues [5][12] China's Response - China is strategically reducing its reliance on U.S. Treasury bonds while increasing its gold reserves and diversifying its foreign exchange assets [11][12] - The Chinese government maintains a rational and systematic approach, emphasizing legal principles and financial security in its response to U.S. provocations [11][13] Broader Implications - The situation highlights a deeper geopolitical struggle between the old order and the new dynamics in international relations, with the U.S. attempting to manipulate historical narratives for political gain [11][12] - The ongoing discourse serves as a reminder that international rules and creditworthiness are paramount, moving away from the era where historical grievances could dictate current financial relations [12][13]

Core Points - The European Union's seizure of Russian assets is viewed by Russia as blatant theft, with warnings that all involved parties will face consequences [1][3] - The EU's actions have led to internal discord, particularly regarding sanctions on Russian energy, with Hungary opposing gas embargoes due to domestic heating needs [3][4] - Russia's resilience against Western sanctions has been noted, with officials claiming that predictions of economic collapse have not materialized [3][4] Group 1 - The EU has provided €4 billion in aid to Ukraine, sourced from frozen Russian assets, which has intensified tensions between Russia and the EU [3] - The European Central Bank's president has cautioned that such asset seizures could undermine trust in the euro, raising concerns among EU member states [3] - The ongoing financial conflict is altering global dynamics, with emerging markets seeking alternatives to the dollar and euro to avoid similar asset freezes [4] Group 2 - Russia's warning specifically targets "involved families," suggesting that European politicians' overseas assets may be at risk [4] - The balance of power in this financial standoff resembles a high-stakes game, with both sides holding significant leverage over each other's investments [4] - The unprecedented nature of large-scale asset seizures raises questions about international law and the potential rewriting of rules governing state assets [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the erratic behavior of U.S. President Trump regarding tariffs on China, highlighting the inconsistency in his statements and actions, which reflects a broader issue of U.S. arrogance in international relations [1][3][5]. Group 1: U.S.-China Tariff Issues - Trump's fluctuating stance on tariffs has included proposals to reduce tariffs by over 50%, followed by a refusal to lower them unless China makes concessions [1][3]. - The U.S. economy is reportedly facing challenges, with a 0.3% contraction in GDP compared to the previous year, and economists warn of a potential 4% decline if the trade war continues [3][5]. - The imposition of tariffs has disrupted normal international trade, harming both U.S. and Chinese businesses and consumers, necessitating the unconditional removal of unreasonable tariffs [5][7]. Group 2: U.S. International Conduct - The U.S. has been accused of spreading false information in international matters, such as the "Nord Stream" gas pipeline incident, undermining global order and stability [3][5]. - There is a call for the U.S. to engage in fair and transparent investigations into international incidents rather than evading responsibility [5][7]. - The article emphasizes that the U.S. must abandon its hegemonic mindset and treat other countries equally to foster genuine cooperation and respect on the international stage [5][7].

Group 1 - The core message emphasizes the strengthening of Brazil-China relations, highlighting mutual trust and cooperation across various sectors, which serves as a model for South-South cooperation [1][2] - Brazil's President Lula expressed admiration for China's strong response to "reciprocal tariffs," indicating a shared commitment to resist unilateral actions by certain countries and promote multilateralism [1] - Both countries aim to enhance high-level exchanges and deepen economic ties, particularly in finance and energy sectors, while also pushing for the success of the BRICS mechanism [1][2] Group 2 - Wang Yi conveyed President Xi Jinping's greetings and underscored the strategic decision to deepen the comprehensive strategic partnership between China and Brazil, aligning with the long-term interests of the Brazilian people [2] - The Chinese side is committed to countering unilateral bullying actions, which not only protect its own rights but also uphold the common interests of developing countries and international justice [2] - During his visit, Wang Yi participated in the BRICS Foreign Ministers' meeting and held discussions with key Brazilian officials, reinforcing bilateral cooperation [2]