GB 大半夜苹果手机突然 自己给别人打电话, 打了47分钟,把我 吓醒了!困 苹果自动拨号了 大半夜苹果手 苹果手机半夜自动给别人打电 机突然自己给别人打电话, ... 话 凌晨四点被手机通话铃声 ... 01 7 赞 41 1 |大即 苹果手机iOS 26.2.1, 凌晨3:19自动拨打 未知 SIM卡: @ 主导 C 电话,充电量到80% (020) 8370 3 1 停住 网友在社交平台上发布类似的经历 "吓死了！我的iPhone凌晨两点自己打电话！"2月25日，一名网友发表了自己凌晨的一段恐怖经历。 "睡得正香，突然听到一阵电话的背景音乐和语音'您拨打的用户暂时无人接听'，被惊醒。起来一看，竟然是我的 手机自己在打电话，真的吓懵了。马上去社交平台上查，有这个问题的人还不少。有人给出解决方案：升级系 统。半夜里被吓醒，升级系统，谁懂啊？" 该网友表示，当时手机在窗口的书桌上充电，锁屏、关闭了网络，开启了睡眠模式，这个自动打出去的号码是她 白天拨打过的快递小哥的号码。"我的系统是iOS 26.1，没有其他任何操作，真的半夜被吓到，后背发凉！瞌睡都 醒了。" 此前报道 自动拨号或是误触 关于自动拨号的原因， ...

华为技术有限公司董事长梁华在2026广东省高质量发展大会上发表讲话时透露，搭载HarmonyOS 5和 HarmonyOS 6的终端设备数突破4000万。 华为技术有限公司董事长梁华在2026广东省高质量发展大会上发表讲话时透露，搭载HarmonyOS 5和 HarmonyOS 6的终端设备数突破4000万，可获取的原生应用和云服务超过7.5万个，在金融、电力、能 源、交通、通信等行业也得到广泛的应用。 据市场调研机构CounterPoint Research的数据显示，在中国移动操作系统中，鸿蒙拿下了18%的份额， 稳稳超过苹果iOS系统，占据中国市场份额第二。而随着鸿蒙终端设备的不断增加，将进一步夯实鸿蒙 系统的市场份额。 据市场调研机构CounterPoint Research的数据显示，在中国移动操作系统中，鸿蒙拿下了18%的份额， 稳稳超过苹果iOS系统，占据中国市场份额第二。而随着鸿蒙终端设备的不断增加，将进一步夯实鸿蒙 系统的市场份额。 HarmonyOS 5系统在2024年开始启用，该版本不提供Android生态支持，完全采用鸿蒙生态。截至2025 年7月30日，鸿蒙终端设备正式突破1000万 ...

来源：橙柿新闻 "吓死了！我的iPhone凌晨两点自己打电话！！" 今早，橙友"一一啊！"在橙友圈写下自己凌晨的一段经历。 "睡得正香，突然听到一阵电话的背景音乐和语音'您拨打的用户暂时无人接听'被惊醒。起来一看，竟 然是我的手机自己在打电话，真的吓懵了。马上去社交平台上查，有这个问题的人还不少，有人给出解 决方案：升级系统。半夜里被吓醒，升级系统，谁懂啊？" 该橙友表示，当时手机在窗口的书桌上充电，锁屏、关闭了网络，开启了睡眠模式，这个自动打出去的 号码是她白天拨打过的快递小哥的号码。"我的系统是iOS26.1，没有其他任何操作，真的半夜被吓到， 后背发凉！瞌睡都醒了。" 社交平台上，有类似经历的网友不少。 今早，橙友"一一啊！"咨询了苹果Apple专家，Apple专家表示，建议将系统升级到ios26.3，"最新的系 统是可以修复异常的"。橙友表示了自己对账户安全的担心，Apple专家表示跟账户没有关系。 有网友说："大半夜苹果手机突然自己给别人打电话，打了47分钟，把我吓醒了！开了睡眠模式，手机 放在床头柜上，都没有触碰到手机，拨打的是400开头的电话，是我中午一点半左右拨打过的，但是我 后续还拨打了几个 ...

Group 1 - Apple is the biggest winner in the global smartphone market in 2025, achieving a 20% market share and leading both the incremental and installed base competition [1][3][6] - The global smartphone market saw a 2% year-on-year increase in shipments, driven by strong demand in emerging markets and improved economic momentum [1][3] - Apple’s iPhone 17 series significantly contributed to its market share, with one in five new smartphones sold being an iPhone [1][3] Group 2 - In terms of active installed base, Apple holds a 25% share, making it the leader in the global active smartphone market, with over 1 billion active devices [3][10] - Apple and Samsung are the only two manufacturers with over 1 billion active devices, together accounting for 44% of the total active devices [3][10] - Apple's net increase in active devices in 2025 surpassed the total of its next seven competitors combined [5] Group 3 - The iPhone 17 series has been particularly successful in China, with over 10 million units activated for the Pro series and over 20 million for the entire series [9] - Apple's long-term software support and updates contribute to the longevity and value retention of its devices, enhancing user satisfaction and loyalty [10][12] - Apple's strategy of providing extensive software updates and support has created a positive cycle for its user base, encouraging repeat purchases and service revenue [13][15] Group 4 - Apple's service revenue reached $30.01 billion in Q4 2025, a 14% year-on-year increase, driven by its strong installed user base [15] - The smartphone market is entering a phase of slower growth, making the management of existing users increasingly important for manufacturers [16] - Other Chinese brands like Xiaomi, Vivo, OPPO, and Huawei also achieved significant milestones in active device installations, indicating a competitive landscape [16]

Core Insights - Apple's success transcends commercial and technological boundaries, capturing and shaping the ultimate imagination of technology products as extensions of identity, taste, and lifestyle [1] - Apple captures over 80% of the industry's profits with less than 20% of sales, demonstrating its ability to set rules rather than just compete [1] - The profit model of Apple has evolved from traditional revenue-cost-profit formulas to a new formula based on user value and ecosystem leverage, emphasizing long-term user relationships [1] Group 1: Profit Model and Market Position - Apple's profit model allows it to maintain high overall profit margins despite fluctuations in iPhone sales and hardware gross margins [1] - In contrast, Chinese smartphone companies like Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo are projected to have net profit margins below 10% by 2025, less than one-third of Apple's [1][2] - The disparity in profitability is attributed to differences in business models and industry positioning rather than technology or product quality [2] Group 2: Challenges and Opportunities for Chinese Companies - Chinese smartphone companies face challenges in establishing differentiated advantages amid hardware homogenization and brand recognition limitations [2] - The shift towards AI and interconnected devices presents an opportunity for Chinese companies to redefine competition and create unique ecosystems [2] - Companies like Huawei, Xiaomi, and OPPO are attempting to build open intelligent ecosystems that differ from Apple's, potentially generating greater industry value and social impact [2] Group 3: Long-term Strategy and Future Outlook - The essence of Apple's profit myth lies in the "war of definition," where it sets standards for high-end experiences and indispensable technology [2][3] - Chinese smartphone companies must adopt a long-term perspective, recognizing that building competitive advantages in areas like chip development and ecosystem construction requires significant time and investment [3] - The mobile industry is entering a phase of competition focused on profits, ecosystems, and future definitions, with the outcomes likely to shape the global technology landscape [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the competitive landscape in the AI industry, focusing on Meta's Mark Zuckerberg and his strategic shift towards an aggressive "scorched earth" approach to disrupt competitors like OpenAI and Google, particularly in the context of AI development and monetization. Group 1: Background and Context - Zuckerberg has historically felt constrained by Apple's dominance, as Meta's applications rely on Apple's iOS, making him vulnerable to changes in Apple's policies [10][11]. - The introduction of Apple's "App Tracking Transparency" in 2021 significantly impacted Meta's advertising revenue, leading to a loss of $10 billion in a single year [12][13]. - This experience instilled a desire in Zuckerberg to establish his own ecosystem, free from reliance on external platforms [15]. Group 2: Strategic Shift - In 2025, Zuckerberg identified AI as a potential disruptor to Apple's control, prompting him to adopt a "scorched earth" strategy against competitors [17][19]. - Meta's release of the Llama 4 model, with 400 billion parameters and an open-source, free commercial use model, aimed to undermine the business models of OpenAI and Google [30][31]. - This strategy effectively commoditized AI technology, leading to a collapse in the SaaS industry and forcing competitors to reassess their value propositions [35][36]. Group 3: Implementation and Impact - The launch of Llama 4 allowed developers to access advanced AI capabilities without the associated costs, significantly lowering the barriers to entry for new applications [32][34]. - Meta's integration of AI into platforms like Instagram and Facebook through features like "AI Studio" increased user engagement and transformed social interactions, ultimately driving advertising revenue [41][47]. - Zuckerberg's approach not only disrupted the software industry but also aimed to establish Meta as a dominant player in the AI landscape, positioning it for future growth [37][40].

Core Insights - Google has introduced a "Notification Organizer" feature for Pixel 9 and Pixel 10 series to address the issue of notification overload on Android devices [1][3] Group 1: Feature Overview - The "Notification Organizer" utilizes on-device AI to analyze the content of notifications rather than simply categorizing them by app, allowing for more nuanced organization [3][11] - This feature will help users prioritize notifications, distinguishing between important messages and less relevant advertisements [3][11] Group 2: Background and Context - Despite previous attempts to manage notifications in Android versions 8.0 through 11, users still face challenges with notification overload due to the increasing number of apps installed [4][6] - As of March 2024, the average Chinese internet user has installed 70 apps, contributing to the clutter in notification bars [4] Group 3: Industry Implications - The proliferation of apps and notifications is a deliberate strategy by internet companies to capture user attention, which has become a monetizable resource [9] - The competitive nature of the mobile internet market discourages developers from self-regulating notification practices, leading to a chaotic notification environment [11] Group 4: Technological Focus - The "Notification Organizer" represents a practical application of Google's focus on on-device AI capabilities, particularly with the Tensor G5 chip in the Pixel 10 series [13] - This feature aims to provide users with a tangible experience of AI's benefits in managing notifications, contrasting with other less practical AI features [13]

Core Insights - The Chinese smartphone industry is experiencing a silent "three-line war," characterized by fierce competition in the mid-range market, a duopoly in the high-end segment, and a push towards AI integration [1][2] Group 1: Market Dynamics - By 2025, the smartphone market is showing signs of a split narrative, with significant reshuffling among mainstream manufacturers in the mid-range segment while Apple and Huawei dominate the high-end market [2] - IDC data for Q3 2025 indicates that vivo leads the market with a 17.2% share, followed by Apple at 15.8%, Huawei at 15.2%, Xiaomi at 14.7%, and OPPO at 14.5% [3][4] - The total shipment volume for the top five manufacturers in Q3 2025 was 68.5 million units, a slight decline of 0.5% year-on-year [4] Group 2: Competitive Landscape - The mid-range market is marked by intense competition and strategic adjustments, with brands like Honor and Xiaomi struggling to maintain their positions [5][6] - Huawei faces challenges with its HarmonyOS ecosystem, particularly in app compatibility, which affects user experience [6] - The high-end market remains stable, with Apple and Huawei holding over 80% of the market share for devices priced above 6000 yuan [7][8] Group 3: AI Integration - The smartphone industry is transitioning to an AI 3.0 phase, where AI capabilities are becoming integral to the user experience rather than just additional features [10][11] - The introduction of advanced AI models is expected to redefine user interaction with smartphones, moving from hardware specifications to intelligent integration [12] - Companies are increasingly focusing on AI as a differentiator, with significant investments from major players like ByteDance in collaboration with hardware manufacturers [13] Group 4: New Entrants and Market Evolution - The entry of cross-industry players and the resurgence of previously overlooked brands are reshaping the competitive landscape [14][15] - The smartphone industry is evolving from hardware competition to ecosystem competition, emphasizing service differentiation [16] - The market is anticipated to undergo another round of reshuffling in 2026, with smaller manufacturers needing to leverage AI to avoid being sidelined [16]

Core Viewpoint - Apple has reached a settlement with Brazil's antitrust regulator CADE, allowing third-party app stores and payment methods in its iOS system to conclude a three-year antitrust investigation [2] Group 1: Settlement Details - The agreement permits third-party app stores to operate within Brazil's iOS ecosystem and allows in-app purchases to utilize third-party payment methods or link to external websites for transactions [2] - CADE's internal group approved the agreement by a majority vote, with the terms effective for three years and immediately binding on developers [2] - Apple must implement the necessary adjustments within 105 days, with a potential fine of up to 150 million Brazilian Reais (approximately 27 million USD) for non-compliance [2] Group 2: Background and Reactions - The case originated from a complaint by Latin American e-commerce platform MercadoLibre in 2022, which alleged that Apple restricted the distribution of digital goods and in-app payments [2] - MercadoLibre acknowledged CADE's efforts but stated that the agreement only partially improves the competitive environment [2] - Apple has indicated it will comply with regulatory requirements but warned that these changes may pose privacy and security risks [2]

Core Viewpoint - Apple has been fined significantly for abusing its market dominance, particularly due to its "App Tracking Transparency" (ATT) policy, which has been deemed to restrict competition and harm third-party developers [3][10][11]. Group 1: Fines and Legal Issues - The Italian Competition and Market Authority imposed a fine of €9.8635 million (approximately ¥817 million) on Apple for its ATT policy, which limits competition [3]. - Earlier in March, Apple received a €150 million (approximately ¥1.242 billion) fine from the French Competition Authority for similar reasons related to the ATT policy [11]. - Cumulatively, Apple has faced fines exceeding ¥20.7 billion this year across multiple European countries due to its market practices [10][11]. Group 2: ATT Policy and Its Implications - The ATT policy, launched in April 2021, requires third-party apps to obtain explicit user consent for data collection, but it has been criticized for being overly restrictive and not aligning with Italian privacy laws [5][6]. - Apple's approach to data collection shows a double standard, as its own apps require only a single user consent for data collection, while third-party apps face stricter requirements [7][9]. - The enforcement of the ATT policy has been seen as damaging to the interests of third-party developers and advertisers, leading to accusations of market dominance abuse [6][11]. Group 3: Global Market Impact - Apple has faced multiple fines globally, including a potential fine of $38 billion (approximately ¥2.671 trillion) in India for not allowing third-party payment solutions and charging a 30% commission [12]. - In the UK, Apple lost a significant lawsuit regarding app store commissions, resulting in a claim of £1.5 billion (approximately ¥14.226 billion) due to unfair practices [13]. - The company has adjusted its commission rates in various regions, lowering them below 30% in the US, Europe, and other markets, but maintains the highest rates in China [15][16].